Reviews
’28 Years Later’ Review: Boyle’s Bold Return Falls Just Short of Greatness

Sometimes, seeing a director after they’ve taken a break feels like seeing an old friend. It’s been six years roughly since we’ve seen Danny Boyle in the director’s chair, and about eight since his last truly compelling film (apologies to the Beatles centric rom-com Yesterday, but Battle of the Sexes was just more gripping). So, when the trailer for 28 Years Later came out, it really did feel like seeing an old friend. It didn’t hurt that it was backed by a very crackly and very effective recording of the ominous Rudyard Kipling poem “Boots”, a piece about a British soldier slowly going insane. The preview we got cemented the vibe of the film we were going to get: it’s decades later and the war hasn’t ended, its only changed.
28 Years Later does succeed in reuniting audiences with the filmmaker that they love, and in telling a story of war—though it’s a battle within we get for the most part, and there are some directorial caveats limiting how truly great the film can be.
A Moving Coming Of Age Through The Apocalypse
It was an easy out for 28 Years Later to become one of those embarrassing nostalgia trips riddling the theatrical landscape nowadays (threatening to play John Murphy’s classic “28 Theme” as fanfare while Cillian Murphy steps out of a bunker to remind you what film series you’re watching).
It thankfully avoids that pitfall. At least, it has so far—we still have two movies to go, which this film makes very clear in its final, and truly most insane scene.
28 Years also quietly sidesteps the failures of its very weak predecessor, 28 Weeks Later, a film that felt cartoonishly eager to capitalize on the original film’s success. Instead, this returns to its roots in actually making you feel something for its characters. The movie follows young son Spike (Alfie Williams) and grizzled father Jamie (Aaron Taylor-Johnson) going on a mission beyond the walls of their isolated village on Lindisfarne, also known as Holy Mission Island.
Lindisfarne: A Unique Setting in 28 Years Later
With Lindisfarne separated from a quarantined England by a narrow causeway that sinks at high tide, the duo crosses the landbridge to go hunting on the mainland of the United Kingdom. Though it should bring them closer together, their relationship is only strained by the return as Spike insists on going back into the wild to find someone who can help his sick mother Isla (Jodie Comer).
Writer turned director turned back to writer Alex Garland has also returned with Boyle. The writer for the original 28 Days Later, here he paints an empathetic picture of a real, human conflict between Jamie and Spike. 28 Years Laterbecomes just as much a fight between tradition and the desire to break away from it as it is a fight between family members. It’s a struggle against life and death itself, with the tools not only being limited to bows and arrows.
Though the physical conflict comes from mutated virus hosts, some turned into muscular and monstrous “Alpha” infected in the years following the initial outbreak, Garland’s story of a young boy coping with the dissolution of his family, growing up, and trying to find hope in a hopeless situation is simple while still being biting in how real it can get, with a sincere and bloody coming of age story through the apocalypse being the result.
Alfie Williams and Aaron-Taylor Johnson Steal the Show
The young Alfie Williams who plays Spike is incredibly compelling in his role, depicting a real sense of anger and confusion that makes you forget he isn’t a veteran actor at points. He plays his role, a child whose inexperience is wrestling with his own determination and anger, like an expert. Likewise, Taylor-Johnson’s time onscreen as Jamie makes you really appreciate how uncomfortably real his character can get, being frustrating and sympathetic in his deeply flawed nature.
Jodie Comer has some phenomenal moments as Spike’s mother Isla, with one standout scene where her sickness has fully taken a toll on her mind. Unfortunately, the film doesn’t explore her character nearly as much as it could have, and the same can be said for Ralph Fiennes’ character, who despite being so forward in the promotional materials is not on screen nearly long enough. Ultimately, the story is brought home in spite of these weaknesses, depicted beautifully in cinematography that is nothing like what we’ve gotten from Boyle previously.
A Glut of Odd Editing Choices Blur Boyle’s Vision
The astounding directing Boyle brings to the table to depict this conflict, however, is pockmarked with truly bizarre editing choices. The use of shuddering 360 camera shots to display the infected being pierced by arrows is a small symptom of this, and can be reasoned away as a narrative decision instead of a clumsy technical exhibition. But then, these choices become more and more frequent.
A more prevalent example of these problems is the poor choice to splice in archival footage of England during wartime and medieval archers, haphazardly grafted onto pivotal moments early on in the film while our leads are out in the bloody and wide open unknown. This is also where the film decides to use that iconic audio of Rudyard Kipling’s “Boots” that made the trailer so effective, to eye-rolling results; it moves like a car breaking sharply and jerking to stop. It’s just not a narratively strong enough thread with the films weakly dispersed anti-war sentiments to justify bringing the movie to a halt so we can see these images.
An abrupt and awkwardly cut zombie attack in the final third of the film, scattered red tinted night vision shots from the infected point of view that are far and few between, and Fiennes absence makes me feel like quite a bit of material was cut from the film and reordered. And whether that material removed for time will see the light of day in a director’s cut or in a sequel means very little for the film we have at hand.
Why 28 Years Later Falls Just Short of Greatness
The fact is that 28 Years Later is a very compelling film at its core, but it is noticeably dragged down under the weight of its stylistic choices. Its potential is burdened by its editing, leaving you with a film that is thrilling and emotionally developed in the best of ways, sincere and even powerful at times, but just shy of being truly great.
Reviews
‘The Innkeepers’ (2011) Review: Ti West’s Horror Gem

A little over a year ago, I had the opportunity to catch a new film that reminded me of one of the films that sparked my interest in analyzing films in the first place. Sweet Relief was a fun and well-crafted modern mumblegore film that brought Ti West’s The Innkeepers back into my mind. I first watched The Innkeepers shortly before leaving for college, and I was stunned by how incredibly effective it was. To celebrate Dark Sky Select’s 4K steelbook release of The Innkeepers, I decided to give the film a well-deserved rewatch.
The Innkeepers: A Haunting Ghost Story
The Innkeepers follows Claire (Sara Paxton) and Luke (Pat Healy), the last two employees of The Yankee Pedlar Inn. Claire and Luke find themselves working during the hotel’s last week in operation. They also happen to be amateur ghost hunters. Due to the small number of guests, Claire and Luke have some time to put their ghost hunting tools to good use. As the hunting begins, the terror checks in. Is there more to this ghost story than meets the eye?
Before his flashy slasher trilogy, Ti West’s films had a darker, more personal feel to them. After wowing audiences with his satanic panic masterpiece The House of the Devil, Ti West tackled the true terrors of the supernatural. As much as I adore Ti West, this would be his last film that perfectly balances style and substance. Obviously, the goal of an artist is to grow and transform as a filmmaker, but this feels like West’s last intimate film.
Mumblegore Dialogue: Natural and Grounded
The Innkeepers keeps with the mumblegore-like dialogue West was so great at creating. There’s still that improvisational, but naturalistic, feel to their words. And while the situation becomes extraordinary, the dialogue still feels grounded in reality. Somehow, for a 2011 film, West finds a way to competently direct actors in saying the words “epic” and “failblog”. It’s the exposition of the film that truly sets it apart from others like it. While talking with a child in the lobby, Claire reveals the backstory of Madeline O’Malley and her untimely suicide in the hotel. It’s a small moment that could easily be a throwaway detail to provide the audience with the necessary backstory. But it’s Sara Paxton’s performance that sells the scene.
Speaking of, both Sara Paxton and indie darling Pat Healy absolutely tear it up on screen. Sara Paxton’s performance is reserved and lived in. She carries herself awkwardly, with little self-confidence, but still finds a way to be charming. Indie darling Pat Healy chews up the scenery with his Tintin-like faux hawk and a Red Bull-infused high energy. Not only do they steal their respective scenes alone, but they also play off each other like a fast-paced tennis volley.
Supernatural Horror Done Right
Ti West’s magnum opus handles the supernatural element in a much cleaner, fascinating way than most ghost films. The slow pace highlights the mundanity of working-class life that quickly becomes tense through the creeping terror of Madeline O’Malley and her growing cohorts of terror. There’s a certain unbalanced feel to the film’s three-act structure that lends an air of authenticity to it. Whereas most supernatural films feel the need to do more, The Innkeepers understands that it’s okay to do less. It’s how the scares are delivered that sets this film apart.
If you haven’t seen The Innkeepers, then you’re truly missing out on one of the subgenre’s greatest hits. That being said, I don’t think this film is for everyone. Ti West asks a lot from his audience, and I can understand that some people won’t want to go with him on this ride. It’s talky and demands full attention. But if you’re willing to sit with the film and let it work its magic, you won’t be disappointed.
Reviews
[REVIEW] Fantastic Fest 2025: ‘Primate’ Is the Animal-Attack-Meets-Slasher Movie You Didn’t Know You Needed

If that one scene in Nope (you know the one) wasn’t enough to convince you that owning a chimpanzee is a bad idea, Primate is here to remind you that these animals can literally rip you limb from limb. Directed by Johannes Roberts, who also co-wrote the script with Ernest Riera, the film is scheduled to release in January—and if it wasn’t on your radar before, allow me to firmly add it.
PSA: Primate Proves That Chimps Are Not Pets (But They Are Great Slasher Killers)
Primate begins with a pre-credits scene introducing us to the danger: a vet has been called to check in on a chimp named Ben that isn’t feeling so hot, only to discover the hard way that the super-strong animal has gone rabid. It’s an evocative opening, though it does create a little timeline confusion when we jump back in time a few days to follow Lucy (Johnny Sequoyah) as she returns home to Hawaii to see her family and their unusual pet.
Her late mother, we learn, worked with Ben for years before her death, and he remains a beloved member of the family, able to communicate most basic needs via the use of sign language and a special tablet. Ben is acting a little off, though, so Lucy’s father (Academy Award-winner Troy Kotsur, in a stand-out role) calls in the vet we’ve already seen die before heading out for the night.
Of course, we know that Ben has rabies, so it’s only a matter of time before he goes bananas. In the meantime, Lucy, her sister, and their friends get to living it up while they have the place to themselves. The family owns a gorgeous secluded mansion complete with a cliffside infinity pool, and if you’ve seen The Strangers: Prey at Night, you’ll know Roberts loves a pool. He quickly finds a reason to drive the young people into it and trap them there—but just because chimps can’t swim, that doesn’t mean they’re safe.
Blending Animal Attack Horror with Slasher Thrills in Primate
One of the biggest things going for Primate is its ability to blend classic animal attack horror with slasher elements. The film draws clear inspiration from Cujo, but where the Trentons were largely safe from the beast’s foaming maw (if not the sun) so long as they stayed inside their vehicle, Lucy and friends aren’t so lucky. As the tagline for Primate warns, Ben is “dangerously close to human,” which means he understands how to use tools and constantly finds creative ways to take a swipe at his prey whenever they and the audience let their guard down. The sicker the chimp gets, the more he seems to radiate a savage, all-too-human glee.
At the same time, Roberts and Riera’s script leverages the communication gap between Ben and the family to devastating effect. Ben is so close to being able to tell them what’s wrong before his rabies progresses to the point of no return, but he doesn’t quite have the language. The fact that Lucy’s father is deaf adds an additional layer to the tragedy: we see how expressive the family is able to be through non-verbal communication, yet Ben is still isolated in his misery.
Toward the climax, however, even this form of communication starts to break down as the girls’ screams go unheard. While it feels like there’s more material that could have been wrung from this theme, it’s notable that Ben goes for the mouth more than once during his rampage, including in the film’s most memorable kill. In the end, maybe all communication is meaningless when nature decides to play a cruel prank.
Miguel Torres Umba’s Incredible Performance as Rabid Chimp Ben
This tragic aspect of the story doesn’t dampen the scares or thrills. Movement specialist Miguel Torres Umba, who portrays Ben, initially imbues the chimp with lovable warmth that makes his feverish, trembling intensity all the more frightening as the sickness takes hold. It’s a remarkable performance, one that lulls the audience into a similar state of wishful thinking to Lucy as she repeatedly reaches out to Ben in the hope that some part of the pet she loved is still in there. Primate rewards that desperate desire with brutal bites, bludgeonings, and beyond.
Primate Is a Lean, Mean, Face-Ripping Machine
Animal attack horror movies have trended hard toward sharks in the last decade (a world Roberts is no stranger to, having helmed 47 Meters Down and its sequel). It’s exciting to see a new addition to this subgenre focusing on a lesser-seen aggressor, especially one that doesn’t frame its killer creature as inherently evil, but rather a victim of both a natural blight and human foolishness. Ben should never have been put in the position he’s in—but now he’s here, it’s pulse-poundingly fun to see the damage that 100+ pounds of pure muscle can do when its brain is on fire.
Primate attacks theaters on January 9.