Reviews
HORSES, HAVOC, AND HEART RACING SUSPENSE: ‘Nope’ (2022) Review
Jordan Peele’s third horror film puts the audience in the hot seat with its heavy themes and expert composition.
My three-word review for Jordan Peele’s Nope: See this movie.
My six-word review: SEE THIS MOVIE RIGHT F**KING NOW.
I will be upfront and say I really disliked Us. I thought it was a very well-shot film that showed its hand way too early and far too often for my taste. While I loved the concept up until the third act, I thought that it didn’t recapture the spark of Get Out and how that film reveled in the suspense and the mystery of it all.
But Nope does dwell on the atmosphere of the unknown, it has the mystery pumping through the film’s veins and giving it the lifeblood to hook you and keep you glued to your seat. So, when I say Nope is by and large the best of the three films, trust me on this one. On all fronts, it is a masterpiece, and it left me wanting more as I sat stunned in the theatre over the course of the credits.
Nope follows the Haywood siblings: the pragmatic, skilled & softspoken Otis Jr., or “OJ”, (played by Daniel Kaluuya), and the jack of all trades charmer Emerald (Keke Palmer). Disillusioned by Hollywood and the horse training business inherited from their father, the brother and sister become aware of the unidentified flying object skulking around the isolated mountain range their ranch is in, and the duo endeavor to be the first people to record it.
That’s about as much of the plot I can tell you without ruining the film, so let’s talk about our leads. I’m sure Keke Palmer’s going to be getting a lot of love given she is the film’s main source of levity, delivering an incredibly funny performance. But who I really enjoyed was Daniel Kaluuya. He plays the demure and tired OJ with a strong, silent delivery that is carried through his eyes. He’s got this one-of-a-kind on-screen presence, playing a character whose youth belies the amount of struggle and misery he’s had to go through. His onscreen chemistry with Palmer brings us a stellar portrayal of siblings who, despite all their differences and disagreements, have an undoubted and powerful love for each other.
Steven Yeun is incredibly charismatic as former child star Ricky “Jupe” Park, as is Brandon Perea’s techie Angel Torres who both make up the small supporting cast. Michael Wincott’s cinematographer Holst is the dark horse of the production who delivers a gravelly and memorable performance despite his short time on screen.
Besides Kaluuya’s stellar performance, his time on screen encapsulates how good Peele’s direction and framing of his actors is. Thanks to Hoyte Van Hoytema (regular cinematographer to directorial darling Christopher Nolan), we get plenty of dynamic movement with an unearthly smoothness. There are many strong, deft camera pans that follow the movement of characters and give you borderline point-of-view shots that are wholly unique to this film. Shots in this film pull from a gamut of references to the cinematic canon, ranging from more conventional science fiction and horror like Close Encounters, Fire in the Sky, andCloverfield to even one peculiar but fun reference to the anime film Akira (no, seriously!).
Peele doesn’t have just a masterful control of the camera, but the lighting and coloring as well. Palette-wise, lush black and rich dark blues make up most of the film’s nighttime shots, so try to see this in a Dolby Cinema or IMAX theatre because the film will benefit from that. Pair all of this with a triumphant and masterfully crafted soundtrack, and I genuinely can’t find a thing about this movie I dislike.
Truly, everything in Nope is deliberate and meticulously orchestrated. Everything down to the smallest one-off sight gag from early on being reincorporated in the finale is ingeniously planned down to the second, a hallmark of how he is a sniper with his films: only precision shots that leave you floored.
Fair warning, I will be discussing the film’s themes here, so skip to the Bottom Line if you want to go in blind. Reader discretion is advised.
Beyond its perfectly set-up story, Nope masterfully explores the grotesqueries of cinematic exploitation. The whole film makes you really ponder about who suffers to bolster our demanding and insatiable film industry, mainly through the use of screen animals.
When I say the “Gordy” segment of the film had me clutching the arms of my seat in the cinema, I don’t say that with an ounce of exaggeration. I cannot overstate how powerfully this film delves into the notions of spectacle coming at the cost of not only our animal companions, but our humanity as well, and the fact that the film’s villain is so expertly tangled into this strain of thought is what astounds me the most.
Theme talk ends here.
Bottom Line: A film whose runtime is put to perfect use, capped off with a finale that will leave you breathless and astounded by how Peele composes a story about family, our egos, and the creation of movies themselves. If it isn’t the best horror film of the year, Jordan Peele’s Nope definitely has some of the most gut-wrenchingly terrifying scenes in horror this year. Run to the theatre and watch this expeditiously– you won’t be disappointed.
Reviews
‘Undertone’ Review: A24’s Scariest Since ‘Hereditary’
A24 never stopped pumping out banger horror movies. Let’s get that out of the way, straight away. Even its commercial and critical flops, like Opus or Y2K, still took a lot of really original swings, even if it hasn’t been a string of masterpieces like in their horror heyday of the late 2010s and early 2020s. Still, they may have made their scariest yet with Undertone, in a return to A24’s original MO of pure indie filmmaking.
A Single Location Horror Film Powered by Sound
Undertone is not a perfect movie, with an occasional off story beat, and the ending just missing the mark of perfection, but it is a tried-and-true testament to the power of storytelling. With essentially one active, on-screen actress and a single location, the film manages to create a sensory hellscape with immersive nightmare-inducing audio that has both story and scares derived entirely from a podcast. It is a sensory overload of pure terror, one that feels deeply sinister in its pitch-black story, one that demands to be seen in the darkest possible movie theater.
A24’s Undertone: A True Crime Podcast Turns Supernatural
The story is pretty straightforward…at least at first. It follows a true crime/horror podcast host (Nina Kiry), who lives by herself as she takes care of her dying, elderly, and borderline vegetative mother. Her co-host (Adam DiMarco, who is never fully seen) is sent a series of ten mysterious audio files from an unknown address, presumably sent for her to listen to on the show. As they begin to record their latest episode with live reactions to the files, reality slips further as she and her co-host fall into supernatural delirium. Strange noises, slipping time, and other haunted house trimmings all come out to play, each elevated by (as mentioned) horrific sound design and an even more horrific backstory.
Nursery Rhyme Origins and Deeply Disturbing Mythology
The story is about 95% airtight. Without getting too deep into spoilers, the origins of these files and their meaning are deeply fascinating, with some elements and angles involving the origins of nursery rhymes that are very, genuinely disturbing. There is one twist in particular that explores what one of the sounds truly means, which is highly upsetting once pieced together.
That being said, Undertone has some familiar tropes, and while the movie mostly touches upon certain unexplored mythology, certain scenes can feel a little too familiar to other recent demon movies like Shelby Oaks. The true meanings are a lot more creative, but it could have played around with its mythos to create a truly original villain.
Undertone’s Ambiguous Ending Demands a Rewatch
Similarly, the ending is almost perfect. There is a final twist about something the protagonist might have done that is a little confusing, and reframes the context of the film. It is highly interesting, however, and opens up several cans of worms of what this movie has to say about children, motherhood, and parenthood as a whole, as well as posing questions about the movie’s setting and timeline. It is always better to remain vague in horror, which this movie definitely does, but just a slight retweak of its final act could give the audience just the tiniest more understanding, without it going into full, mainstream territory. The film definitely requires a second watch, and in the best way possible.
A Groundbreaking Podcast Horror Experience
In a nutshell, the film’s methods of storytelling are groundbreaking. This movie is not a podcast, but all of its scares and stories are delivered to us like it is one. It feels like the birth of a new medium or style of movie, a perfect blend of audio and visual, with emphasis on the audio.
Additionally, with the story being literally told to us as if we’re listening to the characters’ podcast itself, it is a nightmare rabbit hole.
Reviews
‘Silent Warnings’ (2003) Review: An Unknown UFO Gem
Like many people born in the mid-90s, the Sci-Fi Channel was one of my first introductions to horror. Whether it was random films playing or Sci-Fi’s 31 Days of Halloween, this channel was one of the main channels in my household. For the month of March, we’re going to take a look at Sci-Fi Originals (and maybe I cheated a bit and picked films that had their premiere on Sci-Fi). Picking films for this month was no easy task. Did I want to cover one of the plethora of amalgamated mega-animals fighting each other? Or what about shark tornadoes? One of the films I picked, after finding it too difficult to find Children of the Corn (2009) on streaming services, was an odd alien film I had never even heard of. That film is Silent Warnings.
What is Silent Warnings About?
Layne Vossimer (A.J. Buckley), his girlfriend Macy (Callie De Fabry), and a group of their friends head to Layne’s cousin’s house, Joe (Stephen Baldwin), after his mysterious death. Once there, they find the house in disgusting disarray. The friends decide to help Layne clean it up in order to put it on the market. But things quickly go south when they find a series of VHS tapes Joe left behind in the attic. What’s revealed in those tapes shows something that’s out of this world. Can Layne, his friends, and Sheriff Bill Willingham (Billy Zane) fend off these otherworldly invaders before it’s too late?
Conspiracy Theories, Mental Health, and Paranoia in Silent Warnings
As stated, this film was a late pick as I could not find 2009’s Children of the Corn streaming anywhere. Boy, am I glad I picked this. Silent Warnings has its fair share of issues. But it makes up for them in so many ways. This film is a very sober look into conspiracy theories, mental health, and the lengths that people go to when it comes to perceived threats. We get very little Stephen Baldwin, but what we do get is more than enough. He’s a recluse who lives on his 40-ish-acre property that’s been alien-proofed. His best friend (cousin?) is a scarecrow that has an AK-47. And he constantly records incoherent ramblings with his camcorder. Baldwin absolutely kills in his limited screentime. It’s like Stanislavski said, there are no small parts, only small actors.
Small-Town Horror and UFO Lore in Porterville
The quaint town of Porterville acts as the perfect backdrop for a story like this: a sleepy, nowhere town, where most people know each other. A town where the big call of the day for the Sheriff is about a missing dog. It’s the perfect setup for a story like this. It even mirrors many of the towns mentioned in Silent Invasion: The Pennsylvania UFO-Bigfoot Casebook. Much of this film’s atmosphere, the crop circles, acres of corn, and the disintegrating house, create a condensed world that adds so much claustrophobia to the film’s soul.
Acting, Dialogue, and the Problem with Early 2000s CGI Aliens
That being said, there are quite a few issues. Mainly, the acting. Besides Kim Onasch, Michelle Borth, Billy Zane, and A.J. Buckley (mostly), much of this film’s acting feels very Sci-Fi Original. It doesn’t help that the film’s dialogue, from writers Bill Lundy, Christian McIntire, and Kevin Gendreau, is just plain boring. And that’s not even mentioning how awful the CGI aliens look. A 2003 film about aliens, when only two or three are shown on screen, should be fully practical. And the fact that they use digital aliens takes away much of the film’s punch.
Why Silent Warnings Is an Underrated Sci-Fi Original
Silent Warnings doesn’t break much ground when it comes to the topic of aliens/Ufology, but it’s damn entertaining. But that’s the thing. Films don’t necessarily need to break new ground. I appreciate the swings this film takes, whether they hit or miss. There’s a wonderful setup with Stephen Baldwin, and the slow build to an exciting finale makes it all worth the wait. For a Sci-Fi Original, Silent Warnings has worked its way into my heart.


