Reviews
[REVIEW] ‘Cherry Falls’ (1999) Brittany Murphy Shines in This Cult Classic Slasher
The hype for this memorably progressive cult classic is truly earned and should be an addition to everyone’s watchlist post haste.
With the announcement of Cherry Falls hitting Shudder on February 7th, 2022 I was admittedly clueless about why people were so excited to see this particular Brittany Murphy movie hitting the shelves.
Now I see why.
Was Cherry Falls the Blueprint for Malignant?
My eyes first got put on to this film by many people on Twitter, drawing similarities between this and James Wan’s newest masterpiece Malignant, which was my favorite horror of 2021; I even saw one tweet saying this film was likely the main inspiration for our beloved backwards slasher Gabriel, which certainly piqued my interest. Mix that with the fact that it felt reminiscent of one of my teen horror favorites, Disturbing Behavior, and I had to see it. With this film hitting streaming soon, I thought I’d take the time to give it a fair shake and watch a forgotten slasher starring one of my favorite actresses, the late great Brittany Murphy.
Points were made when it came to the ties between this and Malignant. A killer in black with long hair and split personalities, an absurd slaughter-filled finale with a laughable climax? Yes, this film has it. But I have to say, even with that, Cherry Falls is as close to Malignant as any costumed killer movie with a Giallo slant since that subgenre clearly inspires both with their very grisly mystery angle. Tonally and visually, however, these two are very out of sync and better off for it.
Giallo Vibes and Turn-of-the-Millennium Aesthetics
Although this film doesn’t have quite the sense of style that most of the great Giallo have, cinematography-wise, it’s still very well shot for being one of only five films director Geoffrey Wright made. Looks-wise, Cherry Falls nails it when it comes to generating that turn-of-the-millennium, small-town America vibe both of its clear inspirations did, emulating the aesthetics of Scream and I Know What You Did Last Summer nicely. It’s by far one of the best-looking of the spiritual successors to those franchises. There’s still, sadly, plenty of bad editing choices and questionable slow-motion that staggers what you’re looking at. Audio-wise, there are some distractingly bad music choices at points (that techno-beat for the first encounter between Jody and the killer, YEESH, that was awful!). But part of me has to say; they’re enjoyably bad for the most part.
As for the story, it’s a film that is self-aware but doesn’t stumble face-first into the beartrap of being eye-rolling and self-aggrandizing, never stopping to pat itself on the back for how clever it is. It takes Randy Meek’s prime requisite of surviving a horror film and flips it on its head; virgins die, and all the lovers who get a home run at Make-Out Point survive. It’s a cute inversion of a typical horror trope! But more importantly, it brings up some surprisingly in-depth feminist themes about sexual agency and women’s autonomy when it comes to intimacy.
Sex-Positive Storytelling Done Right
It’s a sex-positive film that never becomes leery or weird; it’s appropriately awkward at points and intimate at others. Cindy’s debriefing for the girls on the bleachers is a biting commentary on the failures of sex ed in American school systems. Also, it’s such a delight to watch thanks to Kristen Miller channeling the same energy of a big-money business exec as she dresses down her peers on the realities and pratfalls of teenage hookups. It’s all heartfelt and earnest to its benefit. The film is also not afraid to get heavy with its themes, and this is especially apparent in the conversation between Jody and her mother about the origins of our killer.
There are aged lines and some stiff dialogue, especially between Jody and boyfriend Kenny because their onscreen chemistry is out to lunch whenever they’re together. But for the most part, many of the actors depicting our cast of teenagers are fun to watch, and it’s clear that they’re having fun themselves tackling the material they’re given. Murphy’s performance stands out as the kick-ass Jody Marken, and she gives off that pure natural knack for being a scream queen. It’s a bummer this role isn’t more well-known because she’s as great as she always is, filling the boots of the final girl nicely.
RATING: 8.5 (Virgin-Targeting Modular Knife Blade Swaps)/10. Besides the technical flaws this has, it was still an incredibly pleasant surprise and a very fun watch. It’s a wonder I haven’t heard of this movie before with how good it is. It may not be as Malignant as many say it is, but I’m glad; its strength isn’t in how similar they are; it’s in how fascinatingly fresh and original it is.
Reviews
‘Undertone’ Review: A24’s Scariest Since ‘Hereditary’
A24 never stopped pumping out banger horror movies. Let’s get that out of the way, straight away. Even its commercial and critical flops, like Opus or Y2K, still took a lot of really original swings, even if it hasn’t been a string of masterpieces like in their horror heyday of the late 2010s and early 2020s. Still, they may have made their scariest yet with Undertone, in a return to A24’s original MO of pure indie filmmaking.
A Single Location Horror Film Powered by Sound
Undertone is not a perfect movie, with an occasional off story beat, and the ending just missing the mark of perfection, but it is a tried-and-true testament to the power of storytelling. With essentially one active, on-screen actress and a single location, the film manages to create a sensory hellscape with immersive nightmare-inducing audio that has both story and scares derived entirely from a podcast. It is a sensory overload of pure terror, one that feels deeply sinister in its pitch-black story, one that demands to be seen in the darkest possible movie theater.
A24’s Undertone: A True Crime Podcast Turns Supernatural
The story is pretty straightforward…at least at first. It follows a true crime/horror podcast host (Nina Kiry), who lives by herself as she takes care of her dying, elderly, and borderline vegetative mother. Her co-host (Adam DiMarco, who is never fully seen) is sent a series of ten mysterious audio files from an unknown address, presumably sent for her to listen to on the show. As they begin to record their latest episode with live reactions to the files, reality slips further as she and her co-host fall into supernatural delirium. Strange noises, slipping time, and other haunted house trimmings all come out to play, each elevated by (as mentioned) horrific sound design and an even more horrific backstory.
Nursery Rhyme Origins and Deeply Disturbing Mythology
The story is about 95% airtight. Without getting too deep into spoilers, the origins of these files and their meaning are deeply fascinating, with some elements and angles involving the origins of nursery rhymes that are very, genuinely disturbing. There is one twist in particular that explores what one of the sounds truly means, which is highly upsetting once pieced together.
That being said, Undertone has some familiar tropes, and while the movie mostly touches upon certain unexplored mythology, certain scenes can feel a little too familiar to other recent demon movies like Shelby Oaks. The true meanings are a lot more creative, but it could have played around with its mythos to create a truly original villain.
Undertone’s Ambiguous Ending Demands a Rewatch
Similarly, the ending is almost perfect. There is a final twist about something the protagonist might have done that is a little confusing, and reframes the context of the film. It is highly interesting, however, and opens up several cans of worms of what this movie has to say about children, motherhood, and parenthood as a whole, as well as posing questions about the movie’s setting and timeline. It is always better to remain vague in horror, which this movie definitely does, but just a slight retweak of its final act could give the audience just the tiniest more understanding, without it going into full, mainstream territory. The film definitely requires a second watch, and in the best way possible.
A Groundbreaking Podcast Horror Experience
In a nutshell, the film’s methods of storytelling are groundbreaking. This movie is not a podcast, but all of its scares and stories are delivered to us like it is one. It feels like the birth of a new medium or style of movie, a perfect blend of audio and visual, with emphasis on the audio.
Additionally, with the story being literally told to us as if we’re listening to the characters’ podcast itself, it is a nightmare rabbit hole.
Reviews
‘Silent Warnings’ (2003) Review: An Unknown UFO Gem
Like many people born in the mid-90s, the Sci-Fi Channel was one of my first introductions to horror. Whether it was random films playing or Sci-Fi’s 31 Days of Halloween, this channel was one of the main channels in my household. For the month of March, we’re going to take a look at Sci-Fi Originals (and maybe I cheated a bit and picked films that had their premiere on Sci-Fi). Picking films for this month was no easy task. Did I want to cover one of the plethora of amalgamated mega-animals fighting each other? Or what about shark tornadoes? One of the films I picked, after finding it too difficult to find Children of the Corn (2009) on streaming services, was an odd alien film I had never even heard of. That film is Silent Warnings.
What is Silent Warnings About?
Layne Vossimer (A.J. Buckley), his girlfriend Macy (Callie De Fabry), and a group of their friends head to Layne’s cousin’s house, Joe (Stephen Baldwin), after his mysterious death. Once there, they find the house in disgusting disarray. The friends decide to help Layne clean it up in order to put it on the market. But things quickly go south when they find a series of VHS tapes Joe left behind in the attic. What’s revealed in those tapes shows something that’s out of this world. Can Layne, his friends, and Sheriff Bill Willingham (Billy Zane) fend off these otherworldly invaders before it’s too late?
Conspiracy Theories, Mental Health, and Paranoia in Silent Warnings
As stated, this film was a late pick as I could not find 2009’s Children of the Corn streaming anywhere. Boy, am I glad I picked this. Silent Warnings has its fair share of issues. But it makes up for them in so many ways. This film is a very sober look into conspiracy theories, mental health, and the lengths that people go to when it comes to perceived threats. We get very little Stephen Baldwin, but what we do get is more than enough. He’s a recluse who lives on his 40-ish-acre property that’s been alien-proofed. His best friend (cousin?) is a scarecrow that has an AK-47. And he constantly records incoherent ramblings with his camcorder. Baldwin absolutely kills in his limited screentime. It’s like Stanislavski said, there are no small parts, only small actors.
Small-Town Horror and UFO Lore in Porterville
The quaint town of Porterville acts as the perfect backdrop for a story like this: a sleepy, nowhere town, where most people know each other. A town where the big call of the day for the Sheriff is about a missing dog. It’s the perfect setup for a story like this. It even mirrors many of the towns mentioned in Silent Invasion: The Pennsylvania UFO-Bigfoot Casebook. Much of this film’s atmosphere, the crop circles, acres of corn, and the disintegrating house, create a condensed world that adds so much claustrophobia to the film’s soul.
Acting, Dialogue, and the Problem with Early 2000s CGI Aliens
That being said, there are quite a few issues. Mainly, the acting. Besides Kim Onasch, Michelle Borth, Billy Zane, and A.J. Buckley (mostly), much of this film’s acting feels very Sci-Fi Original. It doesn’t help that the film’s dialogue, from writers Bill Lundy, Christian McIntire, and Kevin Gendreau, is just plain boring. And that’s not even mentioning how awful the CGI aliens look. A 2003 film about aliens, when only two or three are shown on screen, should be fully practical. And the fact that they use digital aliens takes away much of the film’s punch.
Why Silent Warnings Is an Underrated Sci-Fi Original
Silent Warnings doesn’t break much ground when it comes to the topic of aliens/Ufology, but it’s damn entertaining. But that’s the thing. Films don’t necessarily need to break new ground. I appreciate the swings this film takes, whether they hit or miss. There’s a wonderful setup with Stephen Baldwin, and the slow build to an exciting finale makes it all worth the wait. For a Sci-Fi Original, Silent Warnings has worked its way into my heart.


