Connect with us

Reviews

[REVIEW] The End Is Extremely Nigh In ‘28 Days Later’ (2002)

28 Days Later starts with some animal activists breaking into a testing lab. They’re attacked by a monkey infected with a rage virus, and England’s apocalypse has officially begun. Cut to 28 days later. Jim (Cillian Murphy) wakes up in a hospital, unaware of the brewing hellstorm. Selena (Naomie Harris) and Mark (Noah Huntley) come to Jim’s aid as a group of zombies run him out of a church. As expected, things go awry. Over the next few days, Jim and Selena meet up with an interesting cast of characters as they try to make their way to a lesser-occupied area in hopes of some semblance of survival.

Published

on

Remember that trend a few years ago where everyone was bringing up their kindertrauma? Well it’s high time that resurfaces. There are a handful of traumatic moments from my childhood that still make me double-take when the lights are off, and my TV is shut off for the night. The first that comes to mind is the tooth fairy from Darkness Falls. The second is the opening scene from 28 Weeks Later, when Don (Robert Carlyle) sprints away while zombies overtake his wife and friends. Back then, I wasn’t as studied as I am now with horror and assumed 28 Weeks Later was its own entity. It wouldn’t be until I saw a copy of 28 Days Later for sale at Blockbuster when I was 17 that I realized I was wrong. Dead wrong.

28 Days Later starts with some animal activists breaking into a testing lab. They’re attacked by a monkey infected with a rage virus, and England’s apocalypse has officially begun. Cut to 28 days later. Jim (Cillian Murphy) wakes up in a hospital, unaware of the brewing hellstorm. Selena (Naomie Harris) and Mark (Noah Huntley) come to Jim’s aid as a group of zombies run him out of a church. As expected, things go awry. Over the next few days, Jim and Selena meet up with an interesting cast of characters as they try to make their way to a lesser-occupied area in hopes of some semblance of survival.

Why 28 Weeks Later Outshines 28 Days Later in Horror Intensity

It’s time for us to have a frank conversation; 28 Weeks Later is scarier than 28 Days Later. That doesn’t mean Days is a bad movie, but it’s a weaker, less focused film that takes too long to find its footing. At its core, Days is really three different movies hastily thrown together into one. Each third of the film feels too self-contained with a forced through line of Jim and Selena (and eventually Hannah (Megan Burns)). Whereas Weeks feels more focused and in touch with the story it needs to tell.

That’s not to say writer Alex Garland and director Danny Boyle didn’t strike gold with 28 Days Later because they did. Along with Resident Evil and, to a lesser extent, 2003’s Undead, Days kicked off the aughts resurgence of zombie films. Boyle brought Garland’s script to life in the most early-aughts way possible: heavy grain, low lights (but still somehow enough to see the action), buckets of blood with reckless abandon, and a hell of a cast filled with up-and-comers as well as actors in their prime. It’s hard for the 2025 mind to imagine a film with Cillian Murphy, Naomie Harris, Brendan Gleeson, Christopher Eccleston, and Ray Panthaki in the same film.

What is the Rage Virus: Are These Zombies or Something Else?

With Horror Press’ theme for April being zombies, it’s important to raise the question, “Does rage virus mean zombie?” When we think of zombies, we usually think, “When hell is full, the dead will walk the earth,” or something like that. For a film that took heavy inspiration from Romero, Garland’s rage virus plays heavily on the idea of what a zombie can be. Like Primal Rage, Pontypool, Rabid, and Night of the Creeps, the question of infection, possible cures, and how the virus infects the inhabitants varies. There’s no question that the rage virus zombies in 28 Days Later are violent, fast, utterly terrifying creatures of death. However, it should be noted that Days is often credited as the film that created the “fast zombie” but that crown really goes to 1980s Nightmare City. With all that said, I say yes, rage virus does equal zombie. Zombie means to you what it means to you and if you think rage viruses turn people into zombies then there’s no problem with that. Even if I can understand the argument against it.

Advertisement

Pacing issues aside (too slow at points, unnecessarily fast at others), without 28 Days Later, it’s safe to say the zombie subgenre might not be what it is today. Granted, 9/11 would be a driving force to a lot of the anger and xenophobia behind how the subgenre was perceived in the aughts, Days catapulted zombies back into the spotlight. Weeks is my favorite but I’ll be curious to see how 28 Years Later handles the previous two films and incorporates them into their canon. When this piece releases, we’ll have just a couple of months to wait until we get to see the shot-on-iPhone zombie epic grace the silver screen.

Brendan is an award-winning author and screenwriter rotting away in New Jersey. His hobbies include rain, slugs, and the endless search for The Mothman.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Reviews

[REVIEW] ‘Fear Street: Prom Queen’ It’s Not Great…

Published

on

I was obsessed with Fear Street as a kid. I still have my collection of the popular YA horror detailing the murder and mayhem in Shadyside. These books have moved around the country with me. I even secretly hope to adapt a few of them for the screen someday. So, I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but I have to tell you that Fear Street: Prom Queen is a strong contender for the worst movie to hit streaming (so far) this year. Here is our review of Fear Street: Prom Queen.

I felt Netflix’s 2021 Fear Street trilogy, helmed by Leigh Janiak, was okay. We had some great kills, it added intersectional lead characters as canon, and the soundtrack was a banger. Did it feel more like a project that was moved to Fear Street rather than an adaptation of any of my beloved books? Yes. Was it the worst thing that could have happened to the beloved series? No.

However, I could not help getting more excited for this fourth installment. Mainly because the title Fear Street: Prom Queen is so close to Fear Street: The Prom Queen. It gave my nerd heart hope that we would finally see one of the actual books on screen. However, we rarely get what we want in life.

A Disappointing 1988 Vibe

Fear Street: Prom Queen does take place during prom season. It does have a group of high school girls who want the crown for various reasons. We even eventually get around to some underwhelming murders. However, this 1988 moment left a lot to be desired. When it opens with the synth music and the 1980s high school, giving us Stranger Things vibes, I knew it would be different than anything that came before.

I quickly made peace with that and gave the first act grace, even when it started to experience turbulence. Not only is this installment bad, but it also undoes all of the goodwill the first three movies built with the audience. The characters feel one note, the pacing never finds the gas pedal, and by the time it got to the revealsI wanted to take a nap. 

Advertisement

Fear Street: Prom Queen and its One Dimensional Cast

We follow Lori (India Fowler), an outcast at her school who has been nominated for Prom Queen. As our narrator, she gives us the one-dimensional descriptions of everyone else. This includes her best friend Megan (Suzanna Son), who Lori tells us is a stoner and horror nerd.

We quickly realize Megan is also a Queer sidekick as this movie will not be following in the predecessor’s footsteps. There will be no queer Black characters at the front this time. Anyway, part of Lori’s deal is the town hates her mother because of mysterious events that transpired at her prom while she was pregnant with Lori.

This wild speculation and gossip has become the gospel that haunts Lori. It is also ammunition for her bully and prom queen competition, Tiffany (Fina Strazza).

Tiffany is one of the many characters that could be more interesting. However, the writing and direction will not let her be great. Each time she corners Lori to torment her with an exposition-filled monologue in whispered tones, I wondered if this was really the best option.

The way Tiffany runs her squad and twists the verbal knife into her bestie’s heart gives glimmers of a more interesting villain. Sadly, Fear Street: Prom Queen forces her also to be one-dimensional.

Advertisement

The project also wastes Lili Taylor as Vice Principal Dolores Brekenridge. A woman who demands law and order in her school but is just a stock character. However, at least it allows the actor to stop the whole affair from being a complete flatline.

My fellow millennials will also get a kick out of seeing Chris Klein as Dan Falconer. Dan is a teacher at the high school who happens to also be Tiffany’s dad. He might also have the silliest character arc of anyone in this situation. 

The Killer in Fear Street: Prom Queen

Lackluster Kills with No Tension

One of the things Fear Street (the books and the first three films) has going for them is the kills. Not only do teens die, but also the rest of the teens have to carry on as their classmates get turned into charcuterie.

Fear Street: Prom Queen opted out of all of that. The first kill is an uninspired axe to the shoulder. There was no fight, no struggle or chase. Just a whimper of a weapon going into someone’s back while they look off into the night. That aspiring prom queen is a drug dealer, so a few people ask about her, but no one really looks for her. Any hope that Christy’s (Ariana Greenblatt) whimper of a death scene would not set the tone is dashed at the prom.

Matt Palmer’s direction never allows for any tension building. This would not necessarily be a bad thing if Fear Street: Prom Queen ever found a rhythm. Or at least picked up the pace during the kills. However, they are all as slow and uninspired as the rest of the movie. Co-writers Palmer and Donald Mcleary never gave any of the characters a chance to have texture.

Advertisement

So, none of the deaths have weight on top of the killer just appearing next to the victims as if by magic. They also never got out of their way long enough to let the story do anything interesting or avoid being so formulaic. So, the few times they think they are surprising the audience falls flat.

Formulaic Storytelling and Flat Reveals

Each killer reveal was somehow equally ridiculous, expected, and underwhelming. This makes Lori’s fight for survival too tepid for us to root for her when she gets her final girl moment. 

I tried to gaslight myself into saying the movie was going for camp. After all, Tiffany and Lori have a weird dance-off to Gloria (a 1982 anthem) during the prom when things get too heated. However, as the entire runtime felt like a rehearsal instead of a performance, I might never know what the tone was supposed to be.

Sadly, I stopped trying to understand the mess and endured because that is my job. I finish things and tell people what I saw, and if I think it is worth watching. With great displeasure, I must tell you that Fear Street: Prom Queen feels like CW and Tubi had a baby behind a Radio Shack in hell. Not in a fun and chaotic way. More like the people didn’t understand the assignment and assumed their audience does not have standards.

A Letdown for Fear Street and Slasher Fans

I did not have a good time with Fear Street: Prom Queen and would like my time back. I love slashers and the books the movie is allegedly inspired by. So, I hate that it fails in both lanes.  It especially hurts because the Fear Street books are right there in all their fun glory.

Advertisement

While this did not capture any of the thrills of my favorite parts of the series, it did force me to find even more ways to appreciate the 2021 Netflix trilogy. It was not the Fear Street of our youth, but it got a few things right. Also, it at least gave horror fans something to talk about.

So, it really sucks to see this one campaigning for a spot at the bottom of the discount bin. 

Fear Street: Prom Queen is now available on Netflix.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Reviews

[Review] ‘Bring Her Back’ A Gut-Wrenching Horror Masterpiece

Published

on

Let’s just say the Philippou brothers are about to commit highway robbery on A24’s budgeting department for the foreseeable future. The sophomore feature film of the former YouTube celebs, Bring Her Back, lands the guys a heavy two-for-two after their directorial debut. 

Bring Her Back: A Triumphant Follow-Up From Philippou Brothers

As cute and carefree as these guys are in conversation, we’d never believe the trauma Danny and Michael Philippou were about to drum up with their grief-soaked house party, Talk To Me. Representing the new generation of horror, much of the film’s praise circled around their ability to add an accurate adolescence to the low vibrational theme of loss.

Their playfulness as a duo hasn’t budged, but the twins’ newest project swaps out any source of teenage nostalgia for an extra helping of domestic dread.

It’s “feel bad “o’clock”, alright. Bring Her Back sits at the stoop of the disturbing side of extreme cinema, similar to Red Rooms or Speak No Evil (2022)– just add a gallon of the bloody stuff.

Sora Wong and Billy Barratt Shine as Siblings in Bring Her Back

The film follows Andy and Piper, siblings who are quickly placed into nightmare foster care after the sudden death of their only parent. It’s felt instantly that the innocence of these characters is about to be challenged in ways the viewer might not be ready for. The bond between Sora Wong as Piper, and Billy Barratt as her brother, Andy, is tangible. The audience will feel how the series of events stretches and disrupts their chemistry from its origin, through its conflict, to the lasting impact of its third act.

Advertisement

Piper is the younger sister. She’s visually impaired, and a victim of bullying at school. Billy is almost 18, and after years of abuse, prioritizes protecting his step-sister from the household horrors that come with adolescence. The desolation is boosted with Sally Hawkins in the role of Laura; the kids’ new foster parent. Personally, I’m thankful Hawkins retired from her career of serving comfort charisma in the Paddington series for something complex and dangerous.

Her newest role is a little relatable… and likable for a little? All around it’s demented. Laura’s fallen into immense emptiness after losing her daughter, but found a seemingly reasonable solution in providing care for kids in need, like her current foster child, Oliver. At least that’s what her alibi tells us.

Weaponizing Empathy in a Horror Movie

The amount of humanity all over this is disturbing. Care is a theme, but it’s really a gag that anyone with an ounce of empathy is subject to trip over. The facade of a safe space lets in the manipulation. The only “what if?” comes from the ability to accept a stranger’s care in a time of struggle. The Philippou’s are wicked to use our human empathy against us.

Sora Wong’s debut performance carries a lot of hope to Piper, which is basically the viewer’s lifeline. Her visual impairment makes little impact on the situation, especially because she has all of the characteristics of a role that horror fans typically hold on to, especially with the weight of this context. Hopefully the young actor finds a taste for horror in her career moving forward.

Practical Effects and Body Horror Steal the Show

The physical horrors I witnessed are some of the worst things you can do to an audience. I honestly wish y’all luck getting this stuff out of your head (complimentary). The first foster child, Oliver, puts all the current creepy children in horror to bed. As strange as Laura gets, he is the conduit of the supernatural element. Jonah Wren Phillips nailing the classic “creepy kid” thing makes him the perfect subject for Philippou’s display of practical effects. The body horror sequences are traumatizing; they last forever, and you’ll hear twice as much as you see, but they’re worth every cent spent in production. These moments make for excellent theater experiences, but I also understand if you’d rather watch at home and sob a little too.

Advertisement

Simply put, Bring Her Back weighs a thousand tons. Somehow, it’s able to complement massive amounts of grief with the kind of practical and emotional depravity you rarely see in a wide release. We are so far from the gateway, folks, so take your trigger warnings seriously.

Continue Reading

Horror Press Mailing List

Fangoria
Advertisement
Advertisement