Reviews
[REVIEW] Is ‘Fatal Attraction’ (1987) A Horror Film?
Fatal Attraction follows New York attorney Dan Gallagher (Michael Douglas) who meets editor Alex Forrest (Glenn Close) at a book release party. When Dan’s wife Beth (Anne Archer) and young daughter Ellen (Ellen Hamilton Latzen) go out to the country for a weekend with Beth’s parents, Dan has a life-changing affair with Alex. Once Dan makes it clear that he doesn’t wish to continue their affair in secret, Alex attempts to end her life. That’s just the tip of the iceberg. Learning that Alex is pregnant (possibly) with Dan’s child, he fast-tracks his family’s exit from the city to a sprawling, isolated house in the woods. But if he thought moving would solve all his problems…he was dead wrong.

Not to be that guy but Merriam-Webster defines horror as, “painful and intense fear, dread, or dismay.” Defining something as horror is more than just checking a few boxes of descriptor words. What it really comes down to is the subjective experience of the viewer. Fatal Attraction is one of those films I’ve heard endlessly mentioned throughout the years, but I had never given it the time of day. So, after finally watching it, I’m left with the question: is it horror?
Yes. But not a good one.
Fatal Attraction follows New York attorney Dan Gallagher (Michael Douglas) who meets editor Alex Forrest (Glenn Close) at a book release party. When Dan’s wife Beth (Anne Archer) and young daughter Ellen (Ellen Hamilton Latzen) go out to the country for a weekend with Beth’s parents, Dan has a life-changing affair with Alex. Once Dan makes it clear that he doesn’t wish to continue their affair in secret, Alex attempts to end her life. That’s just the tip of the iceberg. Learning that Alex is pregnant (possibly) with Dan’s child, he fast-tracks his family’s exit from the city to a sprawling, isolated house in the woods. But if he thought moving would solve all his problems…he was dead wrong.
Where do we start with discussing Fatal Attraction? I’ll start by quelling your, and curator of all things Horror Press James-Michael, minds by saying when I refer to Fatal Attraction as not being a “good one” I don’t mean it’s a bad film. It’s not great by any means but it’s not terrible. Fatal Attraction has the trappings of a great horror film but fails to follow through with elements that would make it an excellent horror film. Part of this has to do with the scrapped ending.
The “good guy” in Fatal Attraction isn’t Dan or Alex, it’s Beth and Ellen. Dan and Alex are inherently both bad people. Where Dan is just morally corrupt, Alex has mental health issues that drive her to commit reprehensible acts. Beth and Ellen (and the rabbit) are the innocents stuck in the crossfire of Dan and Alex. By the time the credits rolled and Dan shook the Luitenant’s hand (Michael Arkin), I didn’t feel anything for him. I felt terrible that Ellen had to be put through this and watch her parents argue (and get kidnapped). I felt bad that Beth was unnecessarily forced to have a car accident and then kill Alex.
Now, if the film’s purpose was to feel bad for Beth and Ellen, I would have a different outlook. But writer James Dearden and director Adrian Lyne (based on Dearden’s short film Diversion ((which was based on Clint Eastwood’s Play Misty for Me))) fail to do anything with their script and direction, respectively, to make you feel for them. Beth and Ellen are constantly relegated to the background and only used when Dan needs to be hurt somehow.
The scrapped ending for this film has Alex slitting her throat and framing Dan for her murder. While this would have been a better all-around ending, it still paints Alex as the crazy woman who solely has it out to hurt men. Which, for a film in the ‘80s, isn’t too much of a stretch. Films like this and 1977’s Death Game (the film that Eli Roth remade Knock Knock from) are quick to point the finger at women. Death Game even ends with Agatha (Sondra Locke) and Donna (Colleen Camp) getting run over by a van–their just desserts. I can only imagine the rounds of applause that moment got in ’70s cinemas. To make a long story short, Dan is not the victim in Fatal Attraction. And it’s completely disingenuous for this film to paint him as such.
One of the highlights of Fatal Attraction is the acting. While we may not see any of Michael Douglas’ famed cancer-causing-cunnilingus, he does a stellar job as Dan (the way he is written). Glenn Close, brings a level of charisma to her character that could lead to an “alpha” man falling for her. But maybe the biggest plothole of the film is WHO THE HELL WOULD EVER CHEAT ON Anne Archer?!
The casting for Fatal Attraction works for what this film is, but it’s important to look at what could have been. Almost 100 actresses were looked at for Alex with people including Rosanna Arquette, Jessica Lange, Demi Moore, Sharon Stone, Mia Farrow, Beverly D’Angelo, Julia Louis-Dreyfus, Olivia Newton-John, Heather Locklear, and Isabelle Adjani. ISABELLE ADJANI. Come on! Conversely, some of the men looked at to play Dan were less interesting and attractive like Dan Aykroyd, John Voight, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Rick Moranis, Jim Belushi, Sylvester Stallone, and O.J. Simpson. That would have been hysterical[ly bad].
Fatal Attraction is a competently directed film for the story it’s trying to tell but fails to be anything more than thinly veiled semi-erotic fodder. Some solid performances are bogged down by a one-note story that’s afraid to push itself to the far reaches of human emotion. The first half is fun and exciting but slows down in the back half, which kills the pacing. I wish they would have stuck with the original ending and not curtailed itself to idiotic test audiences. It’s fine for what it is, but it could have been so much more with a better casting director.
Reviews
‘The Innkeepers’ (2011) Review: Ti West’s Horror Gem

A little over a year ago, I had the opportunity to catch a new film that reminded me of one of the films that sparked my interest in analyzing films in the first place. Sweet Relief was a fun and well-crafted modern mumblegore film that brought Ti West’s The Innkeepers back into my mind. I first watched The Innkeepers shortly before leaving for college, and I was stunned by how incredibly effective it was. To celebrate Dark Sky Select’s 4K steelbook release of The Innkeepers, I decided to give the film a well-deserved rewatch.
The Innkeepers: A Haunting Ghost Story
The Innkeepers follows Claire (Sara Paxton) and Luke (Pat Healy), the last two employees of The Yankee Pedlar Inn. Claire and Luke find themselves working during the hotel’s last week in operation. They also happen to be amateur ghost hunters. Due to the small number of guests, Claire and Luke have some time to put their ghost hunting tools to good use. As the hunting begins, the terror checks in. Is there more to this ghost story than meets the eye?
Before his flashy slasher trilogy, Ti West’s films had a darker, more personal feel to them. After wowing audiences with his satanic panic masterpiece The House of the Devil, Ti West tackled the true terrors of the supernatural. As much as I adore Ti West, this would be his last film that perfectly balances style and substance. Obviously, the goal of an artist is to grow and transform as a filmmaker, but this feels like West’s last intimate film.
Mumblegore Dialogue: Natural and Grounded
The Innkeepers keeps with the mumblegore-like dialogue West was so great at creating. There’s still that improvisational, but naturalistic, feel to their words. And while the situation becomes extraordinary, the dialogue still feels grounded in reality. Somehow, for a 2011 film, West finds a way to competently direct actors in saying the words “epic” and “failblog”. It’s the exposition of the film that truly sets it apart from others like it. While talking with a child in the lobby, Claire reveals the backstory of Madeline O’Malley and her untimely suicide in the hotel. It’s a small moment that could easily be a throwaway detail to provide the audience with the necessary backstory. But it’s Sara Paxton’s performance that sells the scene.
Speaking of, both Sara Paxton and indie darling Pat Healy absolutely tear it up on screen. Sara Paxton’s performance is reserved and lived in. She carries herself awkwardly, with little self-confidence, but still finds a way to be charming. Indie darling Pat Healy chews up the scenery with his Tintin-like faux hawk and a Red Bull-infused high energy. Not only do they steal their respective scenes alone, but they also play off each other like a fast-paced tennis volley.
Supernatural Horror Done Right
Ti West’s magnum opus handles the supernatural element in a much cleaner, fascinating way than most ghost films. The slow pace highlights the mundanity of working-class life that quickly becomes tense through the creeping terror of Madeline O’Malley and her growing cohorts of terror. There’s a certain unbalanced feel to the film’s three-act structure that lends an air of authenticity to it. Whereas most supernatural films feel the need to do more, The Innkeepers understands that it’s okay to do less. It’s how the scares are delivered that sets this film apart.
If you haven’t seen The Innkeepers, then you’re truly missing out on one of the subgenre’s greatest hits. That being said, I don’t think this film is for everyone. Ti West asks a lot from his audience, and I can understand that some people won’t want to go with him on this ride. It’s talky and demands full attention. But if you’re willing to sit with the film and let it work its magic, you won’t be disappointed.
Reviews
[REVIEW] Fantastic Fest 2025: ‘Primate’ Is the Animal-Attack-Meets-Slasher Movie You Didn’t Know You Needed

If that one scene in Nope (you know the one) wasn’t enough to convince you that owning a chimpanzee is a bad idea, Primate is here to remind you that these animals can literally rip you limb from limb. Directed by Johannes Roberts, who also co-wrote the script with Ernest Riera, the film is scheduled to release in January—and if it wasn’t on your radar before, allow me to firmly add it.
PSA: Primate Proves That Chimps Are Not Pets (But They Are Great Slasher Killers)
Primate begins with a pre-credits scene introducing us to the danger: a vet has been called to check in on a chimp named Ben that isn’t feeling so hot, only to discover the hard way that the super-strong animal has gone rabid. It’s an evocative opening, though it does create a little timeline confusion when we jump back in time a few days to follow Lucy (Johnny Sequoyah) as she returns home to Hawaii to see her family and their unusual pet.
Her late mother, we learn, worked with Ben for years before her death, and he remains a beloved member of the family, able to communicate most basic needs via the use of sign language and a special tablet. Ben is acting a little off, though, so Lucy’s father (Academy Award-winner Troy Kotsur, in a stand-out role) calls in the vet we’ve already seen die before heading out for the night.
Of course, we know that Ben has rabies, so it’s only a matter of time before he goes bananas. In the meantime, Lucy, her sister, and their friends get to living it up while they have the place to themselves. The family owns a gorgeous secluded mansion complete with a cliffside infinity pool, and if you’ve seen The Strangers: Prey at Night, you’ll know Roberts loves a pool. He quickly finds a reason to drive the young people into it and trap them there—but just because chimps can’t swim, that doesn’t mean they’re safe.
Blending Animal Attack Horror with Slasher Thrills in Primate
One of the biggest things going for Primate is its ability to blend classic animal attack horror with slasher elements. The film draws clear inspiration from Cujo, but where the Trentons were largely safe from the beast’s foaming maw (if not the sun) so long as they stayed inside their vehicle, Lucy and friends aren’t so lucky. As the tagline for Primate warns, Ben is “dangerously close to human,” which means he understands how to use tools and constantly finds creative ways to take a swipe at his prey whenever they and the audience let their guard down. The sicker the chimp gets, the more he seems to radiate a savage, all-too-human glee.
At the same time, Roberts and Riera’s script leverages the communication gap between Ben and the family to devastating effect. Ben is so close to being able to tell them what’s wrong before his rabies progresses to the point of no return, but he doesn’t quite have the language. The fact that Lucy’s father is deaf adds an additional layer to the tragedy: we see how expressive the family is able to be through non-verbal communication, yet Ben is still isolated in his misery.
Toward the climax, however, even this form of communication starts to break down as the girls’ screams go unheard. While it feels like there’s more material that could have been wrung from this theme, it’s notable that Ben goes for the mouth more than once during his rampage, including in the film’s most memorable kill. In the end, maybe all communication is meaningless when nature decides to play a cruel prank.
Miguel Torres Umba’s Incredible Performance as Rabid Chimp Ben
This tragic aspect of the story doesn’t dampen the scares or thrills. Movement specialist Miguel Torres Umba, who portrays Ben, initially imbues the chimp with lovable warmth that makes his feverish, trembling intensity all the more frightening as the sickness takes hold. It’s a remarkable performance, one that lulls the audience into a similar state of wishful thinking to Lucy as she repeatedly reaches out to Ben in the hope that some part of the pet she loved is still in there. Primate rewards that desperate desire with brutal bites, bludgeonings, and beyond.
Primate Is a Lean, Mean, Face-Ripping Machine
Animal attack horror movies have trended hard toward sharks in the last decade (a world Roberts is no stranger to, having helmed 47 Meters Down and its sequel). It’s exciting to see a new addition to this subgenre focusing on a lesser-seen aggressor, especially one that doesn’t frame its killer creature as inherently evil, but rather a victim of both a natural blight and human foolishness. Ben should never have been put in the position he’s in—but now he’s here, it’s pulse-poundingly fun to see the damage that 100+ pounds of pure muscle can do when its brain is on fire.
Primate attacks theaters on January 9.