Reviews
Ay, Mis Ojos: A Spoiler-Free ‘Bird Box Barcelona’ Review
Despite 2018’s Bird Box (based on the Josh Malerman novel of the same name) becoming the most-watched movie in the history of Netflix at the time it premiered (according to Netflix, anyway), it took five years to even hear a peep of a potential franchise. Well, that egg has finally hatched and what has come out is the spinoff Bird Box Barcelona, which shares a premise, some producers, and exactly one stunt performer with the original Bird Box and nothing else.
The movie takes place in Spain (the home of the hit series Money Heist and Elite, so Netflix knows they can score some international crossover points; presumably, if Spain has said no, this movie would have been shot in South Korea and nowhere else). Just like the America of Bird Box, Spain has been ravaged by the arrival of unseen creatures who, when gazed upon, drive humans into a self-destructive fugue state. This time we’re following grief-stricken Barcelona local Sebastián (Mario Casas) as he meets up with a band of survivors including English psychiatrist Claire (Barbarian’s Georgina Campbell), immigrant physicist/pizza boy Octavio (Babylon’s Diego Calva), and a young German girl named Sofia (Naila Schuberth).
How Does Bird Box Barcelona Compare to the Original?
Right off the bat, we learn that Bird Box Barcelona has very different intentions than Bird Box. While the original movie was a Romero-esque “humans are the real monsters” post-apocalypse story with an “elevated” motherhood angle, Barcelona swaps out motherhood for grief and is mostly interested in being a Catholic crisis of faith picture. This is more fitting than it sounds, considering the way that the monsters occupy a liminal space that allows humans to apply their own understanding to them. So, if you’re a Spanish Catholic, then, well, there you go.
Unfortunately, the other main thing Bird Box Barcelona takes from the original is its out-of-order storytelling. This one relies on flashbacks rather than flashforwards, which get in the way of the tension of the main narrative less, but they get so far out of the way that they are finished delivering any sort of useful information about a third of the way through the movie.
Other than that, Barcelona is ever so slightly gorier (one death in particular is a doozy) and quite a bit less scary than Bird Box. In fact, genuine horror doesn’t even seem to be one of the major tones the movie is going for most of the time. There is also a very different tenor to the main character’s journey this time around that does add texture to the first two acts, even if at the end of the day it’s still pretty much taking the shape of the arc we already saw Sandra Bullock’s Malorie play out in Bird Box.
Should You Watch Bird Box Barcelona?
Because of its overall disinterest in horror, Bird Box Barcelona does veer dangerously close to not actually being interesting to watch whatsoever. It loses even more of its potency by conspicuously ditching most of the parallels to the COVID-19 pandemic that the original movie had in spades (entirely by accident, of course, but it worked because of its universal sense of apocalyptic dread). It only pays lip service to certain COVID-y aspects in very brief moments. It makes sense why Barcelona would want to avoid reminding viewers of the 2020 lockdowns, but in doing so it sands off almost every edge it could have had.
However, the movie does have its moments. A setpiece in a subway tunnel is superbly directed and one particular sequence in the third act climax will have you gnawing your fingernails down to the bone. The acting is all perfectly serviceable without any particular standouts. And there is at least a sense that somebodywanted the movie to be pleasant to look at, with recurring eyeball motifs, the introduction of cool-looking blacked-out goggles in addition to blindfolds, and a strong sense of when to highlight a space with strips of golden light or huge swaths of inky shadow.
Ultimately, Bird Box Barcelona is the platonic ideal of a Netflix movie. It’s never going to knock your socks off, but it delivers a story you can hang onto just enough that you won’t click back to your home page and waste 30 minutes trying to figure out what streaming service Jury Duty is on.
Score: 6/10
Reviews
[REVIEW] The People Vs. ‘The Exorcism of Emily Rose’
The Exorcism of Emily Rose is a unique take on exorcism films. The film follows Erin Brunner (Laura Linney), a high-profile defense lawyer. Brunner is fresh off a murder case where her client was cleared of all charges–only for that client to turn around and commit another set of murders. In the hopes of becoming a partner at her law firm, Brunner is talked into taking the defense for Father Richard Moore (Tom Wilkinson). Father Moore finds himself in the hot seat after a series of exorcisms resulted in the death of Emma Rose (Jennifer Carpenter). The twist? Erin Brunner is agnostic! OooOOoooOh.
The second film I wanted to cover, that’s “based on a true story”, is one that utterly fascinates me…and not for the right reasons. After Henry: Portrait of a Serial Killer, I felt let down. I am by no means a Henry Lee Lucas expert, but even with someone having the bare knowledge of the case, I couldn’t believe they dared to refer to it as having anything to do with the Confession Killer. Could The Exorcism of Emily Rose pull me out of this pit of despair? Can it get some basic information right? Ugh.
The Exorcism of Emily Rose is a unique take on exorcism films. The film follows Erin Brunner (Laura Linney), a high-profile defense lawyer. Brunner is fresh off a murder case where her client was cleared of all charges–only for that client to turn around and commit another set of murders. In the hopes of becoming a partner at her law firm, Brunner is talked into taking the defense for Father Richard Moore (Tom Wilkinson). Father Moore finds himself in the hot seat after a series of exorcisms resulted in the death of Emma Rose (Jennifer Carpenter). The twist? Erin Brunner is agnostic! OooOOoooOh.
This film brings us the dramatized events of Emily’s tragic final days through the setting of a courtroom drama. There’s something fun about this idea. It’s surprising this idea hasn’t been reused. Laura Linney and Tom Wilkinson are an excellent duo, they play off each other very well. If only the real-life lawyers were as likable as Erin Brunner (we’ll get there later). The real star of the show is Jennifer Carpenter. Tasked with doing justice to the real Emily Rose (Anneliese Michel), Carpenter handles her performance with class.
The story jumps back and forth between the courtroom and Emily’s experiences. There is great information for the film to base its script on, and it doesn’t do it interestingly. One of the most notorious pieces of evidence in this case is the leaked audio of the 67 exorcisms performed on Michel. The Catholic church did not release this audio until around 2011, but Carpenter does a great job of channeling the pain you can hear in the audio.
An interesting angle of the real Anneliese Michel story is how the lawyers were really trying to put the devil on trial. Unlike the film, Michel’s parents were also put on trial, as well as the two priests who initiated the exorcisms. Rather than the film’s dramatic guilty plea with time served as a sentence, the German justice department thought the parents had suffered enough and that the priests should just get fined. In reality, both the parents and the priests deserved to go to jail. The complete neglect of Anneliese’s ailments was thought nothing more than the dirty hands of the devil. Anneliese’s parents and the priests were the cause of her death. Their extreme beliefs in a bearded man in the sky trumped the reality of what was actually happening with their extremely sick daughter.
The film plays off Brunner as someone who needs to see the light. Brunner is put on this case to help rectify her previous case (the one where she got the murderer off without charges). God put her in Father Moore’s hands. So, by this logic, co-writer/director Scott Derrickson thinks that for one person to receive redemption, another must die. The Exorcism of Emily Rose is nothing more than religious propaganda. “What if god is real,” Erin Brunner asks the jury. Even if god is real, a young woman is dead! God isn’t on the chopping block, Father Moore is. This latter half of this film plays strictly to the Bible Belt.
Also, Erin Brunner is written as someone who can be redeemed and will be redeemed, a tragic character who has accepted greed over truth. Do you want to know who defended the Michels in real life? Lawyers who defended Nazis in the Nurenberg trials. Scott Derrickson can fuck right off.
Everything about this film feels like nothing more than Catholic-funded propaganda. Rather than owning up to their mistakes and accepting the punishment they deserved, the Michels and priests never had to answer for their true crimes. They left a young woman to die a truly horrible death and all got off with a slap on the wrist.
All of this went down around the same time as Vatican 2. The Catholics who were against Vatican 2 were hoping that they could find a way to prove that Anneliese was possessed because god wasn’t happy with the Vatican II overhaul. If they could prove god’s anger, they could use that as fuel to ensure Vatican II didn’t happen. Anneliese’s mother gaslit her into refusing the idea that her neurological issues could be the cause of all this. See, Anneliese wanted to be a teacher, but her mother forced her to believe that no one would hire her as a teacher if she had all of these issues. People won’t hire a crazy teacher.
Failed by those around her, Anneliese was posthumously deprived of any justice. If there is a god, I can only hope the Michels and the two priests do not meet him. Instead of breaking down all of these fascinating aspects of the case of Anneliese Michel, Scott Derrickson crafted a shell of a film. His lack of care for the source material is beyond disrespectful to Anneliese’s pain in her short time on earth. Scott Derrickson’s classless and [seemingly] Catholic-funded sophomore feature film is nothing more than a film that has a few solid scares that rely on you taking him at his word. For a film that starts with the title card “based on a true story,” there is not a lick of truth in this nearly two-hour film.
Reviews
[REVIEW] ‘Dreadstone: The Beginning’ Is a Gold Rush of Terror
We continue to start our year by looking at short films that either ran their festival circuit in 2024 or will soon be running the festival circuit. Western horror is a subgenre that’s often overlooked, usually because it offensively centers around Native Americans attacking groups of white people who have taken over their land. Bone Tomahawk and The Burrowers are unfortunate examples of painting Natives in a negative light for the plight of the whites. Who knew all it would take for a well-done Western horror is an Italian director at the helm?
Dreadstone: The Beginning follows Jeb (Grid Margraf), a tired and weathered man who is left in charge of his non-verbal autistic daughter Adeline (Alexandra Boulas). Jeb finds himself in possession of a purple-glowing gem that may be more nefarious than meets the eye. The two traverse across harsh lands in search of the source of the gem. But things turn south when they find out what they were looking for may have answers to questions they never intended on asking.
Written by Avery Peck and Riccardo Suriano, and directed by Riccardo Suriano, Dreadstone: The Beginning is a fascinating start to a tale as old as time. Peck’s cinematography beautifully brings their words to life and effortlessly blends cosmic horror with the overwhelming fruitless nature of greed and the human condition. Cosmic and Western horror aren’t typically put together, but they work incredibly well with the ideas behind Dreadstone and its themes. Jeb’s gem is a practical MacGuffin and is a great stand-in for the concept of greed; this opulent-looking rock in a no-tech world. It’s a simple object that’s incredibly effective.
The frontier setting of Dreadstone works to create an isolating setting. This large setting singularly frames these two characters and makes them feel like the only people in the world. It isn’t until the film’s final shot that we realize they are definitely not the only people around. Dreadstone: The Beginning is a drastic change from Suriano’s previous film, Along Came Ruby. Besides the obvious time difference between these two films, Ruby sets itself as a Last of Us-like post-apocalyptic film, whereas Dreadstone: The Beginning sets itself to possibly be a pre-apocalyptic film. These two films also differ in tone, but both films prove that Suriano is confident with his overall voice and vision.
Alexandra Boulas stars in both Along Came Ruby and Dreadstone: The Beginning. Boulas excels in both films but gives a more reserved and confident performance in Dreadstone. With the exception of a few moments, Boulas’ performance is silent…but commanding. Watching Ruby shows that Boulas can easily deliver lines, while Dreadstone proves there’s more to her acting than line delivery. Fingers crossed we see her in more films in the near future, I think she has a promising career ahead of her.
Dreadstone: The Beginning is a unique take on Western horror that forgoes the [racist] Native Americans against white people trope that the subgenre is fraught with. A touch of cosmic horror, a hint of coming-of-age, and a heaping spoonful of good ole greed make Dreadstone: The Beginning a short film that will stick with you long after the credits roll. I’ll tell you what…this made me look forward to Dreadstone: The Aftermath!