Editorials
‘Pet Sematary’ (2019) is Scarier Than You Remember
The Pet Sematary remake brought us something new within a story we knew well. It created a horror we hadn’t gotten from the previous renditions. I am positively bewildered whenever I hear someone say that the remake of Pet Sematary wasn’t scary. As a standalone film, this movie is terrifying, and I am here to remind you why.
Before we begin, I want to preface this by saying that I hold Pet Sematary near and dear to my heart. The novel was the first full-length Stephen King book I ever read and watching the 1989 Pet Sematary movie for the first time with my older sister is a beloved childhood memory that left me scarred in the best possible way. Little gore and scares that stick with you? Little me was invested.
As with all things beloved, when the attempt to remake Pet Sematary was announced, I was equally excited and apprehensive.
I know some people refuse to partake in any excitement about remakes. These same people unknowingly have favorites of their own that are remakes, but I digress. The lengths people will go to downplay a remake, simply because it’s a remake, immediately gives any movie an uphill climb to endeavor. It reminds me of what Mark Twain said: “There is no such thing as a new idea. It is impossible. We simply take a lot of old ideas and put them into a sort of mental kaleidoscope.”
The Pet Sematary remake brought us something new within a story we knew well. It created a horror we hadn’t gotten from the previous renditions. I am positively bewildered whenever I hear someone say that the remake of Pet Sematary wasn’t scary. As a standalone film, this movie is terrifying, and I am here to remind you why.
Everything Making Pet Sematary (2019) Worth the Watch
We Don’t Talk About Zelda
There’s something I need to make clear right away. The point of this piece is to advocate for the Pet Sematary remake’s scariness; this is not a comparison piece against the original. That being said, it’s undeniable that the original left large shoes to fill when presenting this nightmare on screen, much of which the movie amounted to successfully. However, Andrew Hubatsek, the actor who played Zelda in 1989’s Pet Sematary, is the only Cinderella who can fill these slippers. As hard as I try to view the film as a standalone piece, this is one point that I cannot remove my expectancy bias. Zelda was the scariest part of 1989’s Pet Sematary, and the remake could not surpass his spectacular performance. There is some beauty in this, though, as the scariest parts of the 2019 Pet Sematary, directed by Kevin Kolsch and Dennis Widmyer, instead all came from the star, as it should.
Why Gage Didn’t Die in Pet Sematary (2019)
One of the biggest gripes we’ve seen about the film is its divergence from King’s material; on that note, I have two points. First, there’s nothing wrong with a horror director bringing the idea of someone else’s horror to life their own way. Dare to be different, so long as the original work is still respected.
Second, these divergences gave us the scariest parts of the movie- scares that were brand new to Pet Sematary lore.
Third, the movie is King-approved. Surprise, I had three points. But back to that second one.
Spoilers from here on out. Both King’s novel and the 1989 film adaptation of Pet Sematary have two-year-old Gage Creed die by the semi-truck that killed seven-year-old Ellie instead in 2019’s Pet Sematary. This change made fans furious for the apparent unnecessary blasphemous change to the plot.
Again, this isn’t a comparison piece, but after Miko Hughes’ performance as Gage Creed in the 1989 film, it would have been hard to see anyone else play that part anyway. Especially given that child labor laws are not the same today as they were in the eighties, that role would be tremendously difficult to pull off today with an actual toddler. Fun fact: Jete Laurence was 12 when Pet Sematary was released, and the role of Gage Creed in this film was played by twins Hugo and Lucas Lavoie.
Through this crucial change to the plot, we can see the perspective of someone who’d been brought back, allowing us to glimpse the darkness brought forth by the Pet Sematary like never before. Gage could only say a few words, so we were given the whole painful perspective for the first time through seven-year-old Ellie.
The Scariest Moments in Pet Sematary (2019)
“It’s only a tangle.”
From the moment Ellie returns from her resting place in the Pet Sematary, the movie is filled with a sense of dread. We know that Judd Crandall means it when he says, “Sometimes dead is better,” and that people don’t come back from the Pet Sematary quite right. This film gives us the added horrific splendor in the fact that Ellie returns in a body that was 1) mangled in a car accident and 2) had already started the process of decomposition after autopsy. (I can’t believe I even need to continue my argument for this film.)
As such, Ellie returns with a look that is evident in all that I previously mentioned. It’s a goreful tidbit I never realized was woefully absent from its predecessor and made every scene with Ellie that much more uncomfortable. There was no looking at her and denying what you were looking at.
Because of the added insight into what an exhumed body might look like, we’re treated to the horrific bathtub scene where Louis Creed brushes his freshly undead daughter’s hair. He hits a snag, prompting her to ask in her little, evil, woodsy voice, “What was that?”
“It’s only a tangle,” he says, as he reveals he’d snagged onto staples in the back of her head. (You know, from where they had to staple her head back together after she died? Yikes)
That’s far from the only horrific incident with Jete Laurence’s little she-demon, as Louis Creed lays in bed next to his daughter, who can’t sleep, and as she lay, quietly seething, she proclaims:
“I can hear the woods.”
A quick aside to mention that Jason Clarke’s role as the grief-stricken Louis Creed was so well done. He perfectly encapsulated this place between “I’m happy I brought my daughter back” and “Dear god, what have I done?”
These polarizing viewpoints on existence are thematic in the film, as we see Ellie go through her own crises, as she exists as a little girl, but something else entirely simultaneously. This junction is made clear by her dancing scene the morning after she comes back. Ellie’s changed back into the clothes she was buried in, twirling around like a ballerina, but with a vicious, malicious undertone growing in apparency until she smashes up the room. Ellie is the little girl she once was who loved to dance, but it’s all tainted with a growing darkness now.
Likewise, Rachel Creed is in her own existential crux, as she actively tries to avoid death due to her childhood trauma just to have it hit her right in her worst nightmare by losing her daughter (and subsequently being murdered by her).
Victor Pascal is also split between states of being. He exists in a limbo where his sole mission has been stopping Louis Creed from succumbing to the call of the Pet Sematary. Ironically, he more than likely perpetuates the spread of evil, as his messages alert Rachel to return to the house, securing her and Gage’s begotten fates. But I digress.
The dancing scene gets a lot of hate, but frankly, I’m obsessed with it because it hammers in these existential contrasts. These conflicts we see experienced by everyone on screen make these people all the more “real”, and the horrors they experience more palpable. Pet Sematary has always been a scary thought for parents in general, because at its heart, it investigates the wild recesses humans will explore when faced with every parent’s worst nightmare. The Pet Sematary remake leaned hard into this core issue, and as such, served us the same horror that made Stephen King’s story great in the first place.
An Unwarranted Hatred for a Legit Scary Movie
Overall, Pet Sematary (2019) is a remarkable scary movie and doesn’t deserve half the hate it gets. Undead Ellie was pure nightmare fuel through and through, and I’m bewildered how anyone else could say otherwise.
Is Pet Sematary (2019), in fact, trash? Is Undead Ellie not scary at all?
First, stop lying to yourself. Then, feel free to vent all your Pet Sematary-related frustrations to the Horror Press Instagram account. I won’t receive your messages, but I’m sure our Editor-In-Chief, Curator of All Things Horror Press, James-Michael Fleites, will happily pass them along to me if you remember to give us a follow while you’re there. Of course, you can always stop by to spread love, too, but do people go out of their way to do that?
Editorials
Why ‘The Changeling’ Is a Better Horror Movie Than Stephen King’s ‘The Shining’
I know The Shining is aesthetically pleasing and has a cast many of us would have killed to work with. I am also painfully aware that it holds a special place on Nostalgia Avenue in many fan’s hearts. However, I wish The Changeling got some of that attention and fanfare. I find it much more engaging, human, and chilling while utilizing some of the same thematic elements. I know I am sadly an outlier here. I will have to settle for this being one of the few times I agree with Stephen King about something. So, it is a wildly random party of two, but it is a party nonetheless.
As a kid who loved horror movies, one of the things I learned fast is that some movies are sacred. As an adult who gets paid for being a nerd, I have learned that there are usually movies in the same wheelhouse of sacred films that will land better with certain individuals. This is why I am here in what I hope is a safe space to discuss what I have discovered is a hot take.
I stand before you, ready to explain why I like The Changeling more than The Shining. Allow me to elaborate on my opinion that has probably caused a few people to scream into the empty abyss.
Please also allow me to remind you that your experience with these films is still your experience. I do not know you well enough, nor do I care enough to fight with you as if opinions are facts. That being said, let us unpack why I prefer The Changeling!
My History With Both Movies
The Shining is an iconic part of many horror fan’s journeys. Whether we like it, hate it, or are indifferent, many of us have childhood stories about it. We also cannot deny it has an aesthetic appeal on top of being blessed to have Jack Nicholson, Shelley Duvall, and Scatman Crothers in the cast. This title is so woven into required scary movie viewing that it was one of the few Stephen King adaptations I saw before reading the novel as a kid. When I saw King’s name on something I did not like, I figured I was broken and rewatched it a few times. So, I felt very vindicated later in life when I found out the author himself had issues with this adaptation. Not only can he be found on record explaining his feelings about it (in quite a few places, but the YouTube interviews are some of my favorites), but he also wrote a miniseries adaptation to get something closer to his novel. When I finally read the book, I felt like all of the missing pieces to the puzzle had been found and wished more of them had made it onscreen. His book is actually the best of all three versions of this story, and it gives the character of Jack Torrance so much more depth than what was afforded him in Kubrick’s version.
Speaking of depth, I discovered The Changeling about four years ago after a friend recommended it. I had no idea what it was about, nor that my weird little brain would draw comparisons between it and The Shining. While watching John Russell (George C. Scott) wander around a big haunted house as he grieved his family, lightbulbs kept going off in my head. At this point, I had read The Shining and saw the more nuanced version of Jack that had layers. So, watching this and seeing a version of a dad going through a difficult time in a haunted house was just the beginning of the parallels. I get that grief and alcoholism are very different kinds of isolating journeys. I also understand that both movies are bigger conversations than sad dads who are haunted. However, it is hard to ignore the similarities when you know both movies came out months apart and do stumble into some of the same thematic elements.
Jack and John Go Up A Hill
Off the bat, the Torrances are reactionary instead of proactive. Things happen, and then they eventually do something about it. Even Jack’s willing collaboration with the evil spirits took forever. Although he was on board and seemingly waiting for a reason to kill his family. This script issue is part of why The Shining sometimes feels like a slog. It is always more exciting to give actors things to do. It also allows their characters to move through a story with a purpose.
Meanwhile, The Changeling gives us John, a man whose wallowing is interrupted by a mystery that gives him a reason to get out of bed. He is not passive as he investigates this ghost and tries to get to the bottom of its story. When he finds out a kid was murdered, he channels his sadness into trying to get justice for this boy who died decades ago. This is more interesting to watch as an audience member and gives the actor something to sink his teeth into. While you will never catch me slandering the acting abilities of Shelley Duvall or Jack Nicholson, the script did not help them. I would argue they succeeded despite the lack of characterization. George C. Scott was given a role that allowed him to show a range of emotions. He played a man who did things instead of waiting for things to happen to him. Comparatively speaking, it is the difference between having one crayon and having the deluxe box with the built-in crayon sharpener. Maybe Wendy and Jack were written that way to further paint a bleak and cold portrait. However, whenever I revisit The Shining, I wish both of them had been given more because we know they could play more than one thing for almost three hours.
I sincerely believe the cast of The Shining did everything they could with what they were given. Their performances are one of the things I will always defend about this movie, but Jack was a very one-dimensional character. As a kid, I had to cut off contact with my alcoholic grandmother and then had to do the same to the closest thing to a friend I thought had who turned out to be an addict. I also have a huge distrust of dads because my dad was an asshole. However, even as a child, with all of that going on, I knew Jack and his recovery journey deserved better. He is written and directed to be menacing from the second we meet him. There is no struggle with the big evil so much as an almost instant partnership. This is an uninteresting avenue to take that makes the actor work harder. I am fine disliking a character, and I usually prefer it. However, when written as a flatline, it makes it hard to understand their purpose. By Jack being annoyed and pissed at his family for the whole film, it cuts off any humanity and leaves us wondering why we care. After all, he has nothing to lose if we never see him give a shit about them.
Meanwhile, John is a man who genuinely loved his tiny family. In the mere seconds we saw them together, we could tell they were his whole reason for being. Seeing him attempt to fight his way out of the phone booth, knowing it is already too late, tells us this is a different kind of father than Jack. This is further highlighted as we spend the entirety of The Changeling with him mourning his wife and daughter. We see him riding the rollercoaster of grief, which makes him want to help the ghost kid, Joseph, who lives in his home. Where previous people failed, he is practically running to save this young spirit and to maybe ease his survivor’s guilt as he could not save his daughter. I think this is also fascinating because so much media depicts fathers as absent, assholes, and angry. Again, while I have my own father issues, it is nice to see something different every once in a while. It also gives Scott so much more to play with as an actor and also underscores the thematic elements of the film. This is probably one of the reasons my brain keeps comparing The Changeling to The Shining.
Found Places And Haunted Spaces
One of the things I do like about The Shining is the aesthetic. I am obsessed with Wendy’s wardrobe. However, it is the retro patterns found in the hotel decor that always catch my eye. The Overlook carpet has become so iconic that it is still used for merch today. This large empty evil hotel is a sight to behold but comes across as cold and sterile. We also see cool shots like the camera following Danny (Danny Lloyd) and his tricycle through the large hallways. Sadly, these shots lose their luster as they get repeated a few too many times. I think it is to convey how huge the space was and how isolated the family was while giving a sense of danger. I know that works for most people, but the repetitive nature is one of the things that makes me squirm in my seat. The same goes for the empty space where Jack sets up his office. While it is nice to show the physical and mental distance Wendy has to travel to him in these moments, it is also cold, and we live in these moments for way too long each time.
That is not the case in John’s new haunted house. Do not get me wrong, this space is bigger than it needs to be for one sad man to roam around. However, it is used to show how isolated and alone he is through no fault of his own. Where Jack was a menace even before the spirits gave him an axe to grind, John lost his wife and daughter through a series of unfortunate events. Their deaths were sudden and left him to navigate the world with drastically different circumstances than he anticipated. So, the echo of the red ball bouncing down the stairs is haunting for many reasons. The mysterious banging of the pipes underscoring his gentle crying lands so hard because he is truly alone in the world. Where there should be the noise of his daughter and his wife, there is the heavy weight of their absence. The palpable silence is filled only by Joseph trying to reach this new stranger. John is not hiding away in a room with two other people on the property to annoy him with their love. John’s house feels cold, but not for the same reasons as The Overlook. It is that way because he is still struggling to find his path back to becoming a person. He is also sharing the space with a ghost whose father murdered him and moved on.
It is interesting that while Jack attempts to kill his family in The Shining, John moves into a house where a father drowned his helpless son. Unlike Jack, this man did it out of greed. That is especially interesting because John misses his daughter so much he struggles to be in the world without her. He is nothing like the man who used to live in his home or Jack, who seems upset he has a family. He is a third kind of dad who would trade so much for what the other two took for granted. Again, the weird connective tissue between these movies is so fascinating that it is now hard to think of one without the other. Much like the ghosts that haunt our protagonists, they haunt each other once you spend time with both films.
I Will Let Stephen King Have The Last Word
I mentioned at the top of this article that I agree with Stephen King’s original assessment of Kubrick’s version of The Shining. However, I discovered last year that he and I share a love of The Changeling. In 2017, The British Film Institute celebrated the author with King On Screen. As part of the festivities, King was asked to choose movies he loved to screen as part of the tribute. One of the movies Uncle Stephen chose was The Changeling, and he explained:
“For supernatural horror, I like Peter Medak’s film The Changeling, starring George C. Scott in perhaps his last great screen role. There are no monsters bursting from chests; just a child’s ball bouncing down a flight of stairs was enough to scare the daylights out of me.” –The British Film Institute
King has seemingly thawed toward Kubrick’s version of The Shining over the decades. However, I find it interesting he chose Medak’s haunting film, which came out in the same year. I also noted that King On Screen was ten years after the miniseries he wrote, stylized as Stephen King’s The Shining aired. This could all totally be a huge coincidence. After all, The Changeling is a great film that just happened to also come out in 1980. I have also seen enough of Uncle Stephen’s recommendations to know this movie is right up his alley. However, even if that is the case, I feel this might also be a new level of professional pettiness to which I aspire.
I know The Shining is aesthetically pleasing and has a cast many of us would have killed to work with. I am also painfully aware that it holds a special place on Nostalgia Avenue in many fan’s hearts. However, I wish The Changeling got some of that attention and fanfare. I find it much more engaging, human, and chilling while utilizing some of the same thematic elements. I know I am sadly an outlier here. I will have to settle for this being one of the few times I agree with Stephen King about something. So, it is a wildly random party of two, but it is a party nonetheless.
For more information on the lore behind The Shining, check out our Horror 101 article here!
Editorials
Gatekeeping in Gateway Horror: Why We Need to Reevaluate What the Subgenre Means
Gateway horror holds a nostalgic space in the horror enthusiast’s heart. Many of us fixated on the genre as children, irrespective of whether the films we viewed scarred us for life. The subgenre of gateway horror (or children’s horror) is recognized as films targeted at younger audiences with frightening elements that do not cross the boundaries of suitability. Films that usually represent this subgenre include Hocus Pocus (1993), Gremlins (1984), Frankenweenie (2012), and others.
Unfortunately, most of these narratives focus primarily on white male children from middle-class neighborhoods (Lester, 2022). In ReFocus: The Films of Wes Craven, children’s horror scholar Catherine Lester highlights how children of different ethnic backgrounds are often featured as secondary characters and suggests adult-rated horror films such as The People Under the Stairs (1991) or Eve’s Bayou (1997) are more inclusive for Black children who love horror, through being represented on-screen.
I will further expand on this concept, i.e., gateway horror should not be defined by age ratings. We should look at the type of horror children create; what films resonate within their circles and listen to their opinions on what kinds of creepy stories they crave.
Gateway horror holds a nostalgic space in the horror enthusiast’s heart. Many of us fixated on the genre as children, irrespective of whether the films we viewed scarred us for life. The subgenre of gateway horror (or children’s horror) is recognized as films targeted at younger audiences with frightening elements that do not cross the boundaries of suitability. Films that usually represent this subgenre include Hocus Pocus (1993), Gremlins (1984), Frankenweenie (2012), and others.
Unfortunately, most of these narratives focus primarily on white male children from middle-class neighborhoods (Lester, 2022). In ReFocus: The Films of Wes Craven, children’s horror scholar Catherine Lester highlights how children of different ethnic backgrounds are often featured as secondary characters and suggests adult-rated horror films such as The People Under the Stairs (1991) or Eve’s Bayou (1997) are more inclusive for Black children who love horror, through being represented on-screen.
I will further expand on this concept, i.e., gateway horror should not be defined by age ratings. We should look at the type of horror children create; what films resonate within their circles and listen to their opinions on what kinds of creepy stories they crave.
Horror by Children, For Children
Thanks to TikTok and YouTube, the visibility of child filmmakers creating their own horror shorts has grown. Some even pursue it professionally, beyond the confines of their homes.
A young director making waves in the industry is transgender filmmaker Alice Maio Mackay, who has been called “The self-aware Gen Z Ed Wood we deserve” by critic Juan Barquin. She conceived her first feature, So Vam (2021), at age 15 but already cut her teeth directing shorts since age 11. While Mackay does not position herself as a “horror filmmaker for children”, her work in directing as a child makes her work a groundbreaking contribution to gateway horror. Queerness in the subgenre is scarce, though ParaNorman (2012) has been praised for featuring Mitch as the first openly gay character in an animated film.
Another filmmaker is Emily Hagins, who directed the zombie film Pathogen (2006) at 12 years old, going on to receive a Vinegar Syndrome release in 2022. In Zombie Girl: The Movie (2009), the behind-the-scenes process of Pathogen is captured as we see how she led a team of adults and children to bring her first feature to life. The documentary shows how self-aware she is as a filmmaker, noting she chose the zombie genre due to the conventions it must follow.
There are other child horror filmmakers whose films can be seen in festivals or competitions, creating opportunities for young people to express themselves. Renegade Film Festival has a “Best Gen Z Film” category, and Killer Shorts has opened submissions for horror writers under 18. We can look to the horror child creator as a guide, as well as seek out their opinions on horror as audience members.
Beyond the PG-13 Rating
When my niece was 12 years old, we recorded an episode of the Kindergeist Podcast, which discussed whether horror was appropriate for children. She expressed that Bird Box (2018) should be PG-13. When I mentioned death by suicide may be too intense for young viewers, she added:
“My generation, which is Gen Z obviously, we get introduced to social media and things at a very young age. So I learned about suicide when I was in fourth grade, okay? Which is a very young age to process. So that’s why I feel like it shouldn’t be rated-R probably, because I’m so used to seeing suicide everywhere.”
Salem Horror Fest founder Kay Lynch’s list of “queer friendly horror for children” on Letterboxd reveals how she sees the value in including R-rated films, because most embraced gateway horror films can be restrictive to the diversity of childhood experiences. Similarly, 14 year old CommonSense reviewer named GlytchedWatchesMovies wrote that I Saw The TV Glow (2024) should be accessible to 11 year olds and above, but the film has been rated 15 in the UK and PG-13 in the US.
The contrast between children’s and adults’ opinions surrounding film ratings is fascinating. In the US, the Classification and Ratings Administration (CARA) board is made up of a group of parents (with children aged 5-17) who help families decide what they can view together. However, at times it may feel adults claim that their restrictions “keep the children in mind” when in many cases, there is a desire to “control what the children have in mind.”
Children, Speak Now
Osgood Perkins is a director who is challenging the standard of gateway horror. In his retelling of the Grimm fairy tale Gretel & Hansel (2020), he approached the film’s intensity with the understanding that gateway horror tends to undermine the intelligence of young people. In an interview with Bloody Disgusting, he unpacks pushing against the norm:
“Where’s Gremlins today? Where’s the thing for kids that’s just slightly too freaky that just sort of trusts kids to be able to take care of themselves and to be able to emerge out from the other side and there’s just not a lot of those. So yes, the idea was always to honor the younger audience.”
Rated PG-13, Gretel & Hansel is an excellent example of a gateway horror film that does not shy away from crafting a dark and sophisticated storyline. Others include Jordan Peele’s Monkeypaw Productions, with their release of Henry Selick’s stop-motion Wendell & Wild (2022), which centers around a Black girl grieving the loss of her parents, and features a cast of Asian, Brown and transgender characters. In portrayals of neurodivergence, Come Play (2020) has been praised as a “horror movie that gets autism right”, showing a nonverbal 8-year-old on the autism spectrum.
While gateway horror is cherished, it is still an underserviced niche that is very cisgender, white, and heavily influenced by the perspectives of adults. There is still a lot of work to be done in creating a more inclusive and realistically diverse portrayal of childhood in gateway horror, but one thing is for sure – without the children’s involvement, we will not be getting anywhere.
References
Ponce, Z. and Pajarillo, X. (2021) 1: Is Horror Appropriate for Kids? Kindergeist [Podcast]. 24 September. Available at: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/kindergeist-podcast/episodes/1-Is-Horror-Appropriate-for-Kids-e17rmst
Thurman, T. ” Osgood Perkins on Making ‘Gretel & Hansel’ a Horror Movie for a Younger Audience.” Bloody Disgusting, 31 Jan. 2020, https://bloody-disgusting.com/interviews/3602756/interview-oz-perkins-gretel-hansel/
Waddell, Calum. ReFocus: The Films of Wes Craven, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781399507028