Connect with us

Reviews

[REVIEW] ‘Epidemic’ (1987) A Stunning Meta-Horror Masterpiece

Epidemic follows Lars von Trier and Niels Vørsel, who play fictionalized (though not by much) versions of themselves. They find themselves in trouble when the script in the film gets corrupted on a floppy disk. Von Trier and Vørsel spend the next few days isolated as they attempt to quickly complete a new script before their producer, Claes Kastholm Hansen, shows up in five days. Their new plague-based script is risky but becomes more dangerous when the events they are writing seemingly become a reality.

Published

on

The category for May over here at Horror Press was more of a free-for-all. When thinking of films to discuss, my first thought was underappreciated films from well-known filmmakers. What started as that list slowly morphed into half Wes Craven appreciation and half Udo Kier appreciation. And if you ask me, those two categories aren’t too shabby. Before we dig into one of Lars von Trier’s earlier works, we must accept that von Trier is inherently not a good person. The reason I picked this film is to highlight one of the most stylistically beautiful, this-shouldn’t-work-but-somehow-does films from the tail end of the 1980s.

Lars von Trier’s Epidemic: A Stylistic Marvel of the Late 1980s

Epidemic follows Lars von Trier and Niels Vørsel, who play fictionalized (though not by much) versions of themselves. They find themselves in trouble when the script in the film gets corrupted on a floppy disk. Von Trier and Vørsel spend the next few days isolated as they attempt to quickly complete a new script before their producer, Claes Kastholm Hansen, shows up in five days. Their new plague-based script is risky but becomes more dangerous when the events they are writing seemingly become a reality.

Written by Lars von Trier and Niels Vørsel and directed by von Trier, Epidemic is an interesting practice in self-reflection from two artists who are afraid to truly reflect. Epidemic is a dystopian past where von Tier and Vørsel lost the script for The Elements of Crime and inadvertently created a boil-filled pandemic. To have the penultimate film in your planned [debut] trilogy (which ended with the mildly infuriating Europa) be a meta-commentary on what you perceive yourself as is brave. It’s also where the film fails.

Udo Kier Shines Amidst Von Trier and Vørsel’s Uneven Performances

As the writers and stars of Epidemic, von Trier and Vørsel chuckle-act their way through what feels like B-level improvisation (at times). Their performances flip-flop between first-time improvers and two creatives who should solely stay behind the camera. One genuine performance graces the screen, and that’s from Udo Kier. Kier regales us with the real-life story of his birth and how, moments after he was born, a bomb was dropped on the hospital during WWII, and his mother had to be dug out from the rubble. It’s a truly harrowing tale that fuels the authenticity behind the short-lived scene.

What works in favor of Epidemic is how visually interesting von Trier turns nothingness. It’s a more active, less cerebral Danish response to My Dinner With Andre. A majority of Epidemic is two men in a room talking with one another, and von Trier somehow finds a way to make it compelling. The film jumps back and forth between real life and the film they’re writing without losing a beat. Its deliberate pacing might be a turnoff to fans of later von Trier, but this pre-Dogme 95 film sets the groundwork for what the auteur was working towards.

One thing I’ve always appreciated about his films is how he selectively utilizes lighting. Using black and white film at the tail end of the ’80s is a bold choice that works in the film’s favor. Different film stocks accompany different emotions in Epidemic, which lends to the film’s lighting being harsher, resulting in a more visually emotional film. Intense and deliberate lighting helps von Trier frame both the action and the characters in a way I wish he would attempt again. Gone are the mentally laborious stock videos that try to imply a deeper meaning than presented; Epidemic feels like a true work of art.

Advertisement

Is Epidemic the Right Starting Point for Lars von Trier Fans?

If you’ve never seen a Lars von Trier film before, I could not recommend Epidemic any less. But if you’re a seasoned von Trier fan and haven’t seen Epidemic, then it’s time. Epidemic is a bumpy ride that plays out in the least von Trier way possible. When it comes to film, the filmmaker has to trust their audience and vice versa. This film feels like von Trier is attempting to earn the trust of his soon-to-be audience. Whether you go along for the trip or not, well, that’s your call.

Brendan is an award-winning author and screenwriter rotting away in New Jersey. His hobbies include rain, slugs, and the endless search for The Mothman.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Reviews

TIFF 2025: ‘Fuck My Son!’ Review

Published

on

A couple of assumptions can be made when a movie has a title like Fuck My Son! The most obvious one is that the title also serves as the film’s entire premise. The second is that it’s probably going to be a raunchy, tasteless, and chaotic affair. Writer-director Todd Rohal’s (The Catechism Cataclysm, Uncle Kent 2) adaptation of Johnny Ryan’s comic of the same name meets both of those expectations. However, it starts out with an unexpected amount of promise before hitting the slippery slope that leads to an unforgettable but underwhelming experience for the audience. 

WTF?!

Fuck My Son! starts off with a scuzzy charm that makes you think it might just surprise you. It gives the audience a cute intro (although it looks like AI was heavily utilized) and explains how to use the Perv-O-Vision and Nude Blok glasses that the audience was given on the way in. This is obviously a ploy to throw some naked people on screen and rip the X-rated band-aid off early. While this bit lasted too long, I appreciated having peen on a big screen. As someone who yells into a podcast microphone a few times a year,I want to see a pair of testies for every pair of breasties,I appreciated a filmmaker having the balls to have balls on screen. 

We soon meet Sandi (Tipper Newton) and her kid, Bernice (Kynzie Colmery), as they are shopping. They have a run-in with a nameless pervert that feels like Rohal might be going for a John Waters kind of sleaze. While having a heart-to-heart about good people versus bad people, they notice an older woman, Vermina (Robert Longstreet), needing assistance. They do not know that this old lady dressed like Mama from Mama’s Family has set a trap for the woman. This soon leads them to a home where Vermina explains that Sandi will have to fuck her son if she doesn’t want anything bad to happen to her or her daughter. To make this situation more twisted, her son, Fabian (Steve Little), is a mutant with a mutant dick (once it’s finally found).

We Also Feel A Little Trapped

What comes next is a lot of gross-out humor, repetitive jokes, and the fairly predictable escape to only be brought right back to their tormentors. Fuck My Son! loses all of the goodwill (and steam) we had as it stretches this premise well past the breaking point. There are a few more jokes that land as Sandi and Vermina square off, but not enough to stop the movie from overstaying its welcome. That being said, Tipper Newton understood the assignment and had a standout performance worth noting. She is still compelling enough around the forty-minute stretch when it becomes clear this movie didn’t need to be a feature film.

Fuck My Son! Tries to stitch a lot of things together that never really add up. For example, Bernice’s meat friends (the animated meat also gives AI), who visit her in times of distress. The movie also never addresses whether Vermina is being played by a male actor for an actual reason. No one is going to see Fuck My Son! for social commentary, and Longstreet does earn a couple of chuckles. However, it feels like another attempt at what passed for humor decades ago rather than putting drag on the big screen with a purpose. This could also be something that I just overthought once the movie lost its way. Much like I wondered why this old lady would have pads on hand when she is well past the point of having a period.

Advertisement

We Used to Be A Society

Some of these gripes could be partly explained by Fuck My Son! wanting to stay closer to the source material than it should for modern audiences. However, the issue of running a joke into the ground is pervasive throughout the movie. Even before it starts reaching for anything that could be even slightly offensive and makes its way to rape jokes and multiple endings. It makes for an overall frustrating experience because we want filmmakers to do something unique and take chances. Just not like this.

Many of us also have a soft spot for sleazy movies from the 1970s and 1980s. I was one of the last people to discover the charming chaos of Frank Henenlotter’s Basket Case and Frankenhooker. So, I know scuzzy cinema can work, and it can be fun. However, Fuck My Son! is a one-and-done instead of a title that will stand the test of time. It’s a movie you can toss on to laugh at with friends before it becomes background noise. It’s not one that most of us are going to demand a physical release of. Or want to revisit again. 

Continue Reading

Reviews

TIFF 2025: ‘Dead Lover’ Review

Dead Lover introduces us to a lonely and smelly gravedigger who dreams of being loved. One night, her wish comes true as she saves a man who seems intoxicated by her pungent scent. However, like all gothic romances, theirs is doomed. Her lover dies at sea, leaving the gravedigger upset and alone again, as all that’s left of the man she loved is his finger. This propels her to turn to science to see if she can bring her lover back from the dead using his sole digit. This obviously causes chaos because, as all horror fans know, sometimes things are better left dead.

Published

on

As a recovering theater kid who supports women’s rights and wrongs, I think Dead Lover is an interesting experiment. It feels like a sketch group has taken over a Black Box theater, and during the Q&A at TIFF, it was confirmed that that was the case. This leads to quite a bit of laughter and a few cheers as you invest in the ridiculousness of this world. Which is great for a movie premiering its Stink-O-Vision at a prestigious festival. However, what stands out the most for me are the themes of longing and basic human desire.

A Smell To Remember

Dead Lover introduces us to a lonely and smelly gravedigger who dreams of being loved. One night, her wish comes true as she saves a man who seems intoxicated by her pungent scent. However, like all gothic romances, theirs is doomed. Her lover dies at sea, leaving the gravedigger upset and alone again, as all that’s left of the man she loved is his finger. This propels her to turn to science to see if she can bring her lover back from the dead using his sole digit. This obviously causes chaos because, as all horror fans know, sometimes things are better left dead.

Director, co-writer, and our leading smelly gravedigger lady, Grace Glowicki, puts forth a world that allows women to be gross. However, unlike most cinema, Dead Lover knows the nauseating and uncouth lead still deserves love. There is no She’s All That makeover or a montage of her learning how to be a lady. This movie gets that people are people, women can be many things, and our dreams should not hinge on how society perceives us. Between the jokes, this film touches on yearning for the life you deserve. While Glowicki’s character yearning leads her to love, the sentiment can be applied to anything. She just happens to think her place in the world is beside the dead love of her short life. 

It’s The Ensemble for Me

In addition to Glowicki, Leah Doz, Lowen Morrow, and Ben Petrie (who also co-wrote the script) take turns playing an array of zany characters. This allows the world to feel fuller, even if it’s the same two stages reused with the same four actors. It also guarantees the team a dedicated playground to make an impression. Everyone gets at least one character so bizarre that they feel like the MVP of the film. At least until the next one is introduced.

The small ensemble of four performers tackling all the roles is committed to their bits and having fun. This allows Dead Lover to reach for some silly highs and some ridiculous lows as they move through these characters at a fairly rapid speed. This results in more of a Mel Brooks and Gene Wilder energy (with modern sensibilities). Which isn’t something most of us would expect from a body horror comedy.

Advertisement

If you are in the mood for a likable sketch troupe exploring gothic expressionism, then this is your movie. You might even find yourself charmed by the style choices and improv vibes if you’re a theater person.

Continue Reading

Horror Press Mailing List

Fangoria
Advertisement
Advertisement