Reviews
[REVIEW] ‘Final Destination: Bloodlines’ Death Makes a Return
In 2011, Final Destination 5 premiered, marking what was seemingly the end to a beloved franchise known for its campy dialogue, boneheaded teenage characters, and gleefully demented kill sequences. Each film starts with a random disaster, narrowly avoided thanks to a young protagonist’s premonition.
The rest usually follows the main character and their friends on the run against a vengeful Grim Reaper, taking revenge on them for cheating death. The series has worked its way into the hearts of horror fans, and in 2000, crafted the first truly innovative and iconic slasher since A Nightmare on Elm Street.
However, after a handful of entries with a fairly mechanical formula with little lore, five seemed like a good place to leave the series, escaping the fate of many other slashers that jumped the shark ten films in.
Why Revisit Final Destination in 2025?
So, after all these years, why turn back to a distinctly 2000s-era horror story, one that had a definitive ending with part 5’s cyclical finale? The answer is Bloodlines.
Easily the funniest, bloodiest, and most surprisingly heartfelt of the series, Final Destination: Bloodlines is a necessary return to the Summer horror blockbuster, revitalizing the genre with new blood while staying true to the series’ roots.
A Fresh Twist on the Franchise’s Premise
This is not your Dad’s Final Destination movie. Okay, well, it kind of is, but simultaneously, it breaks bloody new ground. The movie opens with an elongated, heart-wrenching opening disaster sequence as per tradition, this time set at a collapsing, rotating restaurant in the sixties.
However, instead of just cutting to the character the audience has been following, assuming that what we have seen is a premonition, we cut to present-day college student Stefani Reyes (Kaitlyn Santa Juana). As it turns out, Stefani is having visions of something that almost happened to her family’s estranged matriarch, her grandmother. But why?
A New Layer of Mystery and Family Dynamics
This sudden switch from the standard conventions of a Final Destination movie is reason enough to warrant this sequel. It adds a whole new layer of mystery and rule changes that lead to the film’s most interesting set-up: it is not the near-dead survivors of a crash, but instead the family of the disaster’s survivor.
The family itself is such a great cast, and a welcome change from the usual group of doofy high schoolers. Stefani is a compelling final girl, her family-centric arc adding a deeper, more emotional layer to what could have been a cheap, straight-to-streaming requel.
The characters give this story more important meanings and metaphors of generational trauma, Stefani’s grandmother’s supernatural PTSD from her near-death experience corrupting her daughter (Rya Kihlstedt), son (Alex Zahara), and eventually the rest of the family.
Emotional Depth in a Slasher Flick
The emotional thread allows the film to explore some more complicated character dynamics. It makes it genuinely more painful when some characters get offed, something that these kinds of slashers can often forget.
Additionally, the comedy in this movie is top-notch. Some previous entries can take themselves too seriously, both stylistically and narratively. Still, this film finds a logging truck full of laughs, either in its ludicrous kills or goofy family banter.
Richard Harmon is especially a standout in the film as alternative tattoo designer Erik Campbell, a hilarious side character whose costuming aesthetics totally call back to the 2000s emo vibes and Ian of Final Destination 3.
Tony Todd’s Final Bow as Bludworth
The film also features the return of Tony Todd’s familiar character Bludworth, making it his final film. It is a loving goodbye to an iconic role and a legendary actor. Arguments can definitely be made that the backstory given to his character in this movie could have been a little more…unexpected, to say the least, but his performance more than makes up for it.
The Franchise’s Most Original Death Sequences
It is refreshing to see a Final Destination flick with such an emotional thread, more complicated mystery, and some effective comedy, but let’s be real—we’re all in this for the kills, right? After all, who doesn’t love some of the nastiest movie death scenes, pushing the boundaries of how complicated a way can pulverize a character?
Well, it is a pleasure to say Bloodlines does not disappoint in the slightest. Without giving too much away, this has some of the franchise’s nastiest, most original, and most clever kills. The gore and suspense will have seasoned horror fans gagging on popcorn and squinting. While not necessarily more brutal than other entries, the cleverness of the set-ups are original.
Final Destination: Bloodlines Is Full Of Horror That Will Keep You On The Edge Of Your Seat
Small little details and a plethora of fakeouts, with small props coming back in unexpected ways make this movie the most effective of the entire series in how it handles its Rube Goldberg-esque nature. A more in-depth production design and varied settings, such as a sick tattoo parlor and a creepy isolated cabin, help provide the backdrop for some of the most gleeful deaths.
Overall, Final Destination: Bloodlines seems to mark the beginning of Summer. It is a huge, epic blockbuster of an entry, that demands to be seen with the biggest audience possible, on the biggest screen possible.
Everyone loves a bleak, moody folk horror, but this film will take excited audiences back to pure 2000s fun and expand into a genuinely meaningful story.
Reviews
‘Undertone’ Review: A24’s Scariest Since ‘Hereditary’
A24 never stopped pumping out banger horror movies. Let’s get that out of the way, straight away. Even its commercial and critical flops, like Opus or Y2K, still took a lot of really original swings, even if it hasn’t been a string of masterpieces like in their horror heyday of the late 2010s and early 2020s. Still, they may have made their scariest yet with Undertone, in a return to A24’s original MO of pure indie filmmaking.
A Single Location Horror Film Powered by Sound
Undertone is not a perfect movie, with an occasional off story beat, and the ending just missing the mark of perfection, but it is a tried-and-true testament to the power of storytelling. With essentially one active, on-screen actress and a single location, the film manages to create a sensory hellscape with immersive nightmare-inducing audio that has both story and scares derived entirely from a podcast. It is a sensory overload of pure terror, one that feels deeply sinister in its pitch-black story, one that demands to be seen in the darkest possible movie theater.
A24’s Undertone: A True Crime Podcast Turns Supernatural
The story is pretty straightforward…at least at first. It follows a true crime/horror podcast host (Nina Kiry), who lives by herself as she takes care of her dying, elderly, and borderline vegetative mother. Her co-host (Adam DiMarco, who is never fully seen) is sent a series of ten mysterious audio files from an unknown address, presumably sent for her to listen to on the show. As they begin to record their latest episode with live reactions to the files, reality slips further as she and her co-host fall into supernatural delirium. Strange noises, slipping time, and other haunted house trimmings all come out to play, each elevated by (as mentioned) horrific sound design and an even more horrific backstory.
Nursery Rhyme Origins and Deeply Disturbing Mythology
The story is about 95% airtight. Without getting too deep into spoilers, the origins of these files and their meaning are deeply fascinating, with some elements and angles involving the origins of nursery rhymes that are very, genuinely disturbing. There is one twist in particular that explores what one of the sounds truly means, which is highly upsetting once pieced together.
That being said, Undertone has some familiar tropes, and while the movie mostly touches upon certain unexplored mythology, certain scenes can feel a little too familiar to other recent demon movies like Shelby Oaks. The true meanings are a lot more creative, but it could have played around with its mythos to create a truly original villain.
Undertone’s Ambiguous Ending Demands a Rewatch
Similarly, the ending is almost perfect. There is a final twist about something the protagonist might have done that is a little confusing, and reframes the context of the film. It is highly interesting, however, and opens up several cans of worms of what this movie has to say about children, motherhood, and parenthood as a whole, as well as posing questions about the movie’s setting and timeline. It is always better to remain vague in horror, which this movie definitely does, but just a slight retweak of its final act could give the audience just the tiniest more understanding, without it going into full, mainstream territory. The film definitely requires a second watch, and in the best way possible.
A Groundbreaking Podcast Horror Experience
In a nutshell, the film’s methods of storytelling are groundbreaking. This movie is not a podcast, but all of its scares and stories are delivered to us like it is one. It feels like the birth of a new medium or style of movie, a perfect blend of audio and visual, with emphasis on the audio.
Additionally, with the story being literally told to us as if we’re listening to the characters’ podcast itself, it is a nightmare rabbit hole.
Reviews
‘Silent Warnings’ (2003) Review: An Unknown UFO Gem
Like many people born in the mid-90s, the Sci-Fi Channel was one of my first introductions to horror. Whether it was random films playing or Sci-Fi’s 31 Days of Halloween, this channel was one of the main channels in my household. For the month of March, we’re going to take a look at Sci-Fi Originals (and maybe I cheated a bit and picked films that had their premiere on Sci-Fi). Picking films for this month was no easy task. Did I want to cover one of the plethora of amalgamated mega-animals fighting each other? Or what about shark tornadoes? One of the films I picked, after finding it too difficult to find Children of the Corn (2009) on streaming services, was an odd alien film I had never even heard of. That film is Silent Warnings.
What is Silent Warnings About?
Layne Vossimer (A.J. Buckley), his girlfriend Macy (Callie De Fabry), and a group of their friends head to Layne’s cousin’s house, Joe (Stephen Baldwin), after his mysterious death. Once there, they find the house in disgusting disarray. The friends decide to help Layne clean it up in order to put it on the market. But things quickly go south when they find a series of VHS tapes Joe left behind in the attic. What’s revealed in those tapes shows something that’s out of this world. Can Layne, his friends, and Sheriff Bill Willingham (Billy Zane) fend off these otherworldly invaders before it’s too late?
Conspiracy Theories, Mental Health, and Paranoia in Silent Warnings
As stated, this film was a late pick as I could not find 2009’s Children of the Corn streaming anywhere. Boy, am I glad I picked this. Silent Warnings has its fair share of issues. But it makes up for them in so many ways. This film is a very sober look into conspiracy theories, mental health, and the lengths that people go to when it comes to perceived threats. We get very little Stephen Baldwin, but what we do get is more than enough. He’s a recluse who lives on his 40-ish-acre property that’s been alien-proofed. His best friend (cousin?) is a scarecrow that has an AK-47. And he constantly records incoherent ramblings with his camcorder. Baldwin absolutely kills in his limited screentime. It’s like Stanislavski said, there are no small parts, only small actors.
Small-Town Horror and UFO Lore in Porterville
The quaint town of Porterville acts as the perfect backdrop for a story like this: a sleepy, nowhere town, where most people know each other. A town where the big call of the day for the Sheriff is about a missing dog. It’s the perfect setup for a story like this. It even mirrors many of the towns mentioned in Silent Invasion: The Pennsylvania UFO-Bigfoot Casebook. Much of this film’s atmosphere, the crop circles, acres of corn, and the disintegrating house, create a condensed world that adds so much claustrophobia to the film’s soul.
Acting, Dialogue, and the Problem with Early 2000s CGI Aliens
That being said, there are quite a few issues. Mainly, the acting. Besides Kim Onasch, Michelle Borth, Billy Zane, and A.J. Buckley (mostly), much of this film’s acting feels very Sci-Fi Original. It doesn’t help that the film’s dialogue, from writers Bill Lundy, Christian McIntire, and Kevin Gendreau, is just plain boring. And that’s not even mentioning how awful the CGI aliens look. A 2003 film about aliens, when only two or three are shown on screen, should be fully practical. And the fact that they use digital aliens takes away much of the film’s punch.
Why Silent Warnings Is an Underrated Sci-Fi Original
Silent Warnings doesn’t break much ground when it comes to the topic of aliens/Ufology, but it’s damn entertaining. But that’s the thing. Films don’t necessarily need to break new ground. I appreciate the swings this film takes, whether they hit or miss. There’s a wonderful setup with Stephen Baldwin, and the slow build to an exciting finale makes it all worth the wait. For a Sci-Fi Original, Silent Warnings has worked its way into my heart.


