Connect with us

Reviews

[REVIEW] The 5 Forms of Terror: ‘Shin Godzilla’ (2016)

What makes this version different, and in my opinion, keen on horror fans, is what I call “Shin Godzilla’s 5 forms of terror,” with the last being slightly controversial. In an unexpected twist, he evolves. The monster Japan is met with is miles away from the monster we see at the end of the film. Through my American horror-obsessed eyes, I see monster perfection fueled by body horror and Lovecraftian influences told in true agony.

Published

on

Let’s face it. One of the world’s most loved monsters has experienced a softening. From decades of kid-friendly adaptations, and a handful of eye-roll inducing American remakes, Godzilla has grown into different forms that stray from the original echo of 1954 that Ishiro Honda used as a coping mechanism to illustrate the historical tragedy of the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in a way that audiences could digest.

A Return to Form for Godzilla

Six decades after Godzilla first began his reign of terror, directors Hideaki Anno and Shinji Higuchi brought the original mission back with 2016’s Shin Godzilla– my personal favorite. The film was intended to echo Godzilla’s original conception, using the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant disaster and the Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami from 2011 as direct references. The film performed decently with Japanese audiences, but received mixed reviews from western audiences, as it never stuck. From my own personal findings, many of the positive reviews of Shin Godzilla in the United States come from heavy horror fans. That’s not a coincidence- this rendition of the classic Godzilla story is bleaker than it has ever been before.

The story we follow is the basic kaiju monster blueprint. The Japanese coast guard investigates strange happenings off of Tokyo Bay. Authorities must come to terms with the fact that the danger is caused by a living creature after civilians capture viral footage of the entity to share online. From then, the authorities work to research the creature, and scramble to find a way to adapt.

Shin Godzilla’s 5 Forms of Terror

What makes this version different, and in my opinion, keen on horror fans, is what I call “Shin Godzilla’s 5 forms of terror,” with the last being slightly controversial. In an unexpected twist, he evolves. The monster Japan is met with is miles away from the monster we see at the end of the film. Through my American horror-obsessed eyes, I see monster perfection fueled by body horror and Lovecraftian influences told in true agony.

The Haunting Eyes of Shin Godzilla

Something I have to call attention to is the eyes. Godzilla, throughout his many metamorphoses, has eyes that lack any sense of consciousness- let alone humanity. They are the only features that remain unchanged throughout its multiple evolutions. Through the eyes viewers can feel how unfortunate this catastrophe is for all parties involved, maybe even for the monster himself. The changes this creature goes through seem so painful that the audience can imagine the collateral damage that it must cause in order to cope, seconds before we’re visually exposed to it. Imagine if a tarantula were unable to molt out of its skin- I’m no expert, but I imagine being trapped in a vessel you are quickly outgrowing would be extremely uncomfortable, suffocating, and life-threatening.

Advertisement

Godzilla’s Second Form: A Struggling Aquatic Monster

In the exposition of this film, we first see the monster in his official second form. It can be described as a relatively small aquatic tadpole-type creature. It wriggles on its stomach, has no arms, and is pale in color. It looks to have raw gills that can be seen secreting blood or pus. It’s clear through the design and motion that this form of Godzilla struggles to survive during the transfer from sea to land.

Godzilla’s Third Form: Adapting to Land

The third form becomes much more familiar to the traditional designs of the monster. Godzilla becomes bipedal, and his elongated neck shows that his gills have closed up. His skin darkens from a pale yellow to a soft reddish-pink like a scab to combat the loss of fluid from the previous form. Although the monster is clearly beginning to adjust to land, its rapid weight gain causes it to struggle to walk and overheat.

Godzilla’s Fourth Form: A Nuclear Powerhouse

The fourth evolution is absolutely solid. The skin emulates the texture of slightly cooled lava; a very hard crust that limits mobility, with spots of red leaking through the joints that are still able to move. The monster can now self regulate its temperature, the tail has grown exponentially, and the dorsal spikes are now fully equipped to harness the famous nuclear blast. The eyes are at their most terrifying, providing no expression- only instinct.

This is the evolution that is seemingly defeated by humanity. After discovering that the kaiju’s blood acts as a coolant, Godzilla is conquered with a coagulating agent in order to freeze his mobility, and hopefully his evolutions too. The mission is successful, and luckily the half-life of the attack is a short one, so Japan is able to begin the healing and rebuilding process.

A Final Evolution That Serves Horror

Fortunately for the fans, right before the credits roll, we are given a taste of one last evolution while the monster lays dormant. A slow pan to the tip of Godzilla’s tail reveals humanoid creatures spawning from the appendage and reaching out in agony in true Lovecraftian fashion. The fandom has named them “manzillas”, and seem to be Godzilla’s direct response to humans posing the ultimate threat to his safety. Could humanoid kaiju monsters be the defense that puts humanity six feet under?

Advertisement

The purists in the fandom rejected the Lovecraftian influences of the 5th form, stating that it is “not very Godzilla-like” and proposed concerns that these humanoid kaiju would replace Godzilla in the fight for survival moving forward. It’s an argument not worth digging into, as Toho has confirmed Shin Godzilla will not be granted a continuation, but the horror fans will remember…

I’m just a horror girl who loves monsters, but I have to credit the dedicated fans who live in the Godzilla fandom. There are tons of essays, videos, and theories out there on the internet to explain any fandom phenomenon in full detail. 

Check out this fan animation of Shin Godzilla’s size comparisons.

Xero Gravity is a media personality and genre journalist with a focus on diversity and inclusion in horror, sci-fi and dark fantasy. She curates and hosts nerdy fundraisers, events, screenings and dance parties as "THEE Black Elvira". When she’s not on her feet or behind the mic, you can find her online for killer movie reviews, podcasts, livestreams and commentary.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Reviews

‘Frankenstein’ Review: Guillermo Del Toro Is Off to the Races

Published

on

Those expecting Guillermo Del Toro’s Frankenstein to be similar to the book, or to any other adaptation, are in for something else. A longtime enjoyer of the creature’s story, Del Toro instead draws from many places: the novel, James Whale’s culturally defining 1931 film, the Kenneth Branagh version, there are even hints from Terence Fisher’s Curse of Frankenstein, and if the set design and costuming are to be believed, there are trace elements of the National Theatre production too.

The formulation to breathe life into this amalgam is a sort of storm cloud of cultural memory and personal desire for Del Toro. This is about crafting his Frankenstein: the one he wanted to see since he was young, the vision he wanted to stitch together. What results is an experience that is more colorful and kinetic and well-loved by its creator than any Frankenstein we’ve had yet, but what it leaves behind is much of its gothic heart. Quiet darkness, looming dread, poetry, and romance are set aside as what has been sold as “the definitive retelling” goes off to the races. It’s a fast-paced ride through a world of mad science, and you’re on it.

Victor Frankenstein’s Ambition and Tragedy

A tale as old as time, with some changes: the morbid talents and untamed hubris of Victor Frankenstein (Oscar Isaac) guide him to challenge death itself. Spurred by a wealthy investor named Henrich Harlander, and a desire for Harlander’s niece Elizabeth (Mia Goth), Victor uses dead flesh and voltaic vigor to bring a creature to life. His attempts to rear it, however, go horribly wrong, setting the two on a bloody collision course as the definitions of man and monster become blurred.

Guillermo Del Toro’s Frankenstein is more Hellboy in its presentation than it is Crimson Peak; it’s honestly more similar to Coppola’s Dracula than either of them. The film is barely done with its opening when it starts with a loud sequence of the monster attacking Walton’s ship on the ice. Flinging crew members about and walking against volleys of gunfire, he is a monstrosity by no other name. The Creature (Jacob Elordi) cries out in guttural screams, part animal and part man, as it calls for its creator to be returned to him. While visually impressive (and it remains visually impressive throughout, believe me), this appropriately bombastic hook foreshadows a problem with tone and tempo.

A Monster That Moves Too Fast

The pace overall is far too fast for its first half, even with its heavy two-and-a-half-hour runtime. It’s also a far cry from the brooding nature the story usually takes. A scene where Victor demonstrates rudimentary reanimation to his peers and a council of judges is rapid, where it should be agonizingly slow. There’s horror and an instability in Victor to be emphasized in that moment, but the grotesque sight is an oddly triumphant one instead. Most do not revile his experiments; in fact he’s taken quite seriously.

Advertisement

Many scenes like this create a tonal problem that makes Victor’s tale lean more toward melodrama than toward philosophical or emotional aspects; he is blatantly wild and free, in a way that is respected rather than pitied. There are opportunities to stop, breathe in the Victorian roses and the smell of death, to get really dour, but it’s neglected until the film’s second half.

Isaac’s and Goth’s performances are overwrought at points, feeling more like pantomimes of Byronic characters. I’m not entirely convinced it has more to do with them than with the script they’re given. Like Victor working with the parts of inmates and dead soldiers, even the best of actors with the best of on-screen chemistry are forced to make do. The dialogue has incredibly high highs (especially in its final moments), but when it has lows, how low they are; a character outright stating that “Victor is the real monster” adage to his face was an ocean floor piece of writing if there ever was one.

Isaac, Goth, and Elordi Bring Life to the Dead

Jacob Elordi’s work here, however, is blameless. Though Elordi’s physical performance as the creature will surely win praise, his time speaking is the true highlight. It’s almost certainly a definitive portrayal of the character; his voice for Victor’s creation is haunted with scorn and solitude, the same way his flesh is haunted by the marks of his creator’s handiwork. It agonizes me to see so little of the books’ most iconic lines used wholesale here, because they would be absolutely perfect coming from Elordi. Still, he has incredible chemistry with both Isaac and Goth, and for as brief as their time together is, he radiates pure force.

Frankenstein Is a Masterclass in Mise-En-Scène

Despite its pacing and tone issues, one can’t help but appreciate the truly masterful craftsmanship Del Toro has managed to pack into the screen. Every millimeter of the sets is carved to specification, filled with personality through to the shadows. Every piece of brick, hint of frost, stain of blood, and curve of the vine is painstakingly and surgically placed to create one of the most wonderful and spellbinding sets you’ve seen—and then it keeps presenting you with new environments like that, over, and over.

At the very least, Del Toro’s Frankenstein is a masterpiece of mise-en-scène down to the minutest of details, and that makes it endlessly rewatchable for aesthetic purposes. This isn’t even getting into the effervescent lighting, or how returning collaborator Kate Hawley has outdone herself again with the costuming. Guillermo Del Toro tackling the king of gothic horror stories, a story written by the mother of all science fiction, inevitably set a high bar for him to clear. And while it’s not a pitch perfect rendering of Mary Shelley’s slow moving and Shakespearean epistolary, it is still one of the best-looking movies you will see all year.

Advertisement

Perhaps for us, it’s at the cost of adapting the straightforward, dark story we know into something more operatic. It sings the tale like a soprano rather than reciting it like humble prose, and it doesn’t always sing well. But for Del Toro, the epic scale and voice of this adaptation is the wage expected for making the movie he’s always dreamed of. Even with its problems, it’s well worth it to see a visionary director at work on a story they love.

Continue Reading

Reviews

‘The Siege of Ape Canyon’ Review: Bigfoot Comes Home

Published

on

In my home, films like Night of the Demon and Abominable are played on repeat; Stan Gordon is king. One of my favorite stories surrounding Bigfoot and Ufology is the Bigfoot/UFO double flap of 1973, which Stan Gordon has an incredible in-depth book on. The Patterson–Gimlin film couldn’t hold a flame to Stan Gordon’s dive into one of my home state’s most chronicled supernatural time periods. But as much as I love the Bigfoot topic, I’m not ashamed to say I don’t know half of the stories surrounding that big hairy beast. And one topic that I’m not ashamed to say I haven’t heard of is The Siege of Ape Canyon.

The Harrowing Events of Ape Canyon

Washington State, 1924. A group of miners (originally consisting of Marion Smith, Leroy P. Smith, Fred Beck, John Peterson, August Johannson, and Mac Rhodes) was on a quest to claim a potential gold mine. Literally. The miners would eventually set up camp on the east slope of Mount Saint Helens. Little did they know their temporary shelter would be the start of a multi-day barrage of attacks from what they and researchers believed to be Bigfoot. What transpired in those days would turn out to be one of the most highly criticized pieces of American lore, nearly lost to time and history…nearly.

I need to set the record straight on a few things before we get started. One, I don’t typically like watching documentaries. Two, I believe in Bigfoot. Three, this documentary made me cry.

Image courtesy of Justin Cook Public Relations.

Reviving a Forgotten Bigfoot Legend in The Siege of Ape Canyon

Documentarian Eli Watson sets out to tell one of the most prolific Bigfoot stories of all time (for those who are deep in Bigfoot mythology). It’s noted fairly early in the film that this story is told often and is well known in the Washington area. So then, how do people outside of the incident location know so little about it? I’ve read at least 15 books on and about Bigfoot, and I’ve never once heard this story. This isn’t a Stan-Gordon-reported story about someone sitting on the john and seeing a pair of red eyes outside of their bathroom window. The story around Ape Canyon has a deeper spiritual meaning that goes beyond a few sightings here and there.

Watson’s documentary, though, isn’t just about Bigfoot or unearthing the story of Ape Canyon. Ape Canyon nearly became nothing more than a tall tale that elders would share around a campfire to keep the younglings out of the woods at 2 AM. If it weren’t for Mark Myrsell, that’s exactly what would have happened. The Siege of Ape Canyon spends half its time unpacking the story of Fred Beck and his prospecting crew, and the other half tells a truly inspiring tale of unbridled passion, friendship, and love.

Mark Myrsell’s Relentless Pursuit: Friendship, Truth, and Tears

Mark Myrsell’s undying passion for everything outdoors inevitably led to bringing one of Bigfoot’s craziest stories to light. His devotion to the truth vindicated many people who were (probably) labeled kooks and crazies. Throughout Myrsell’s endless search for the truth, he made lifelong friends along the way. What brought me to tears throughout The Siege of Ape Canyon is Watson’s insistence on showing the human side of Myrsell and his friends. They’re not in this to make millions or bag a Bigfoot corpse; they just want to know the truth. And that’s what they find.

Advertisement

The Siege of Ape Canyon is a documentary that will open your eyes to a wildly mystical story you may not have heard of. And it does it pretty damn well. Whereas many documentaries feel the need to talk down to the viewer just to educate them, Watson’s documentary takes you along for the ride. It doesn’t ask you to believe or not believe in Bigfoot. It allows you to make your own decisions and provides the evidence it needs to. If you’ve ever had a passing interest in the topic of Bigfoot, or if you think you’re the next Stan Gordon, I highly recommend watching The Siege of Ape Canyon.

The Siege of Ape Canyon stomps its way onto digital platforms on November 11. Give yourself a little post-Halloween treat and check it out!

Continue Reading

Horror Press Mailing List

Fangoria
Advertisement
Advertisement