Reviews
[REVIEW] Panic Fest 2024: ‘Ghost Game’ Is Peak Content Creator Horror
This review is a message for Mr. Wattley. If anything is clear from Ghost Game it’s two things.
Firstly, writer Adam Cesare is having one hell of a 2024 and is rightfully getting the chance he deserves. His penned film Last Night at Terrace Lanes was an excellent debut screenplay, and his third entry into his Clown in the Cornfield series drops later this year. Secondly, The Stylist writer/director Jill Gevargizian isn’t going anywhere anytime soon. And that’s a damn good thing for horror. Working together, Gevargizian and Cesare mesh their two styles perfectly to create one hell of an engaging film.
Real-Life Inspiration Meets Ghost Game
Ghost Game comes at a very coincidental point in my life in an odd turn of events, or what I can only describe as a cruel irony. I’ve recently become frustratingly entranced with an older YouTube channel called Ally Law. He was a young British guy who popularized overnight challenges for views. With a group of friends, Ally would enter businesses (typically gyms, trampoline parks, pools, or water parks) near the end of their business hours and then hide until employees left. From there, they would spend the nighttime hours having a grand old time, leaving at sunrise or running from the cops if they would show up. Or as the British call them, policeman officers. I’ve started outlining a horror script based on this…and then I saw Ghost Game! You beat me to the punch Adam, and I concede that you wrote a script ten times better than I would have.
Ghost Game follows content creators Laura (Kia Dorsey) and Adrian (Sam Lukowski) who, at the behest of Mr. Wattley (Aidan Hughes), do extended overnight challenges in occupied houses. They create forced paranormal experiences and basically gaslight homeowners into thinking supernatural happenings are going on. Through a turn of events, Laura’s new beau Vin (Zaen Haidar) discovers her ominous occupation and strongarms his way between Laura and Adrian’s professional relationship—Vin takes Adrian’s spot in Laura’s latest haunt. Only, it seems the house they are entering may offer more than anyone bargained for…even the tenants who just moved in.
Ghost Game’s Fresh Twist on Influencer Nightmares
Mr. Wattley, and by proxy Laura and Adrian, have some sort of internet clout. To label them as influencers would be difficult, but it’s clear they have enough of a following to live well enough. Screenlife films have become one of the most overdone sub-subgenres and it’s gotten pretty lazy. Ghost Game gives us the best of both worlds. It’s clear from the start that Laura isn’t necessarily a good person. She’s not evil by any means, but what she does for a living is truly antagonistic. It should be stated Ghost Game is a different take on screenlife and doesn’t exist as a found footage film. Instead, it takes the content creators and puts them through horrors, but presents it to the audience as a regular film. This works in favor of the film and the audience. Rather than getting an hour and a half of Joseph Winters putting on a gratingly awful performance, we get content creators forced to reconcile their actions without making them perform like content creators.
The performances are stellar for everyone involved. But it’s Kia Dorsey who truly takes the CAKE. Each performer found excellent ways to perform against each other in fascinating ways, but Kia Dorsey is going to be a goddamn horror icon. She understands the genre and completely embodies the role of Laura in a way horror hasn’t seen in a long time. As much as I’ve been crapping on screenlife found footage movies, if this were found footage from Laura’s perspective, I would have been a thousand percent okay with that. She’s that good.
Rushed Ending and Predictability
While this film was overall enjoyable, it did suffer in a couple of ways, though it didn’t take away from my overall enjoyment. The biggest pitfall Ghost Game faces is an incredibly rushed finale. It just…ends. This could be from Cesare being a relatively new screenwriter and trying to play it safe, or this could have been due to budgetary constraints. Ghost Game comes in at a lean hour and 25 minutes, and it definitely could have been 10 minutes longer without sacrificing the film’s pacing. The second issue I had with the film was its predictability. Again, it wasn’t enough to detract from the film, but it does feel incredibly on the nose.
A lesser filmmaker would have taken Ghost Game into the realm of found footage- but its charm lies in that it doesn’t exist as found footage. If you want a scarily exciting paranormal romp with a fresh outlook on the subgenre, then Ghost Game is the film for you.
Reviews
‘Frankenstein’ Review: Guillermo Del Toro Is Off to the Races
Those expecting Guillermo Del Toro’s Frankenstein to be similar to the book, or to any other adaptation, are in for something else. A longtime enjoyer of the creature’s story, Del Toro instead draws from many places: the novel, James Whale’s culturally defining 1931 film, the Kenneth Branagh version, there are even hints from Terence Fisher’s Curse of Frankenstein, and if the set design and costuming are to be believed, there are trace elements of the National Theatre production too.
The formulation to breathe life into this amalgam is a sort of storm cloud of cultural memory and personal desire for Del Toro. This is about crafting his Frankenstein: the one he wanted to see since he was young, the vision he wanted to stitch together. What results is an experience that is more colorful and kinetic and well-loved by its creator than any Frankenstein we’ve had yet, but what it leaves behind is much of its gothic heart. Quiet darkness, looming dread, poetry, and romance are set aside as what has been sold as “the definitive retelling” goes off to the races. It’s a fast-paced ride through a world of mad science, and you’re on it.
Victor Frankenstein’s Ambition and Tragedy
A tale as old as time, with some changes: the morbid talents and untamed hubris of Victor Frankenstein (Oscar Isaac) guide him to challenge death itself. Spurred by a wealthy investor named Henrich Harlander, and a desire for Harlander’s niece Elizabeth (Mia Goth), Victor uses dead flesh and voltaic vigor to bring a creature to life. His attempts to rear it, however, go horribly wrong, setting the two on a bloody collision course as the definitions of man and monster become blurred.
Guillermo Del Toro’s Frankenstein is more Hellboy in its presentation than it is Crimson Peak; it’s honestly more similar to Coppola’s Dracula than either of them. The film is barely done with its opening when it starts with a loud sequence of the monster attacking Walton’s ship on the ice. Flinging crew members about and walking against volleys of gunfire, he is a monstrosity by no other name. The Creature (Jacob Elordi) cries out in guttural screams, part animal and part man, as it calls for its creator to be returned to him. While visually impressive (and it remains visually impressive throughout, believe me), this appropriately bombastic hook foreshadows a problem with tone and tempo.
A Monster That Moves Too Fast
The pace overall is far too fast for its first half, even with its heavy two-and-a-half-hour runtime. It’s also a far cry from the brooding nature the story usually takes. A scene where Victor demonstrates rudimentary reanimation to his peers and a council of judges is rapid, where it should be agonizingly slow. There’s horror and an instability in Victor to be emphasized in that moment, but the grotesque sight is an oddly triumphant one instead. Most do not revile his experiments; in fact he’s taken quite seriously.
Many scenes like this create a tonal problem that makes Victor’s tale lean more toward melodrama than toward philosophical or emotional aspects; he is blatantly wild and free, in a way that is respected rather than pitied. There are opportunities to stop, breathe in the Victorian roses and the smell of death, to get really dour, but it’s neglected until the film’s second half.
Isaac’s and Goth’s performances are overwrought at points, feeling more like pantomimes of Byronic characters. I’m not entirely convinced it has more to do with them than with the script they’re given. Like Victor working with the parts of inmates and dead soldiers, even the best of actors with the best of on-screen chemistry are forced to make do. The dialogue has incredibly high highs (especially in its final moments), but when it has lows, how low they are; a character outright stating that “Victor is the real monster” adage to his face was an ocean floor piece of writing if there ever was one.
Isaac, Goth, and Elordi Bring Life to the Dead
Jacob Elordi’s work here, however, is blameless. Though Elordi’s physical performance as the creature will surely win praise, his time speaking is the true highlight. It’s almost certainly a definitive portrayal of the character; his voice for Victor’s creation is haunted with scorn and solitude, the same way his flesh is haunted by the marks of his creator’s handiwork. It agonizes me to see so little of the books’ most iconic lines used wholesale here, because they would be absolutely perfect coming from Elordi. Still, he has incredible chemistry with both Isaac and Goth, and for as brief as their time together is, he radiates pure force.
Frankenstein Is a Masterclass in Mise-En-Scène
Despite its pacing and tone issues, one can’t help but appreciate the truly masterful craftsmanship Del Toro has managed to pack into the screen. Every millimeter of the sets is carved to specification, filled with personality through to the shadows. Every piece of brick, hint of frost, stain of blood, and curve of the vine is painstakingly and surgically placed to create one of the most wonderful and spellbinding sets you’ve seen—and then it keeps presenting you with new environments like that, over, and over.
At the very least, Del Toro’s Frankenstein is a masterpiece of mise-en-scène down to the minutest of details, and that makes it endlessly rewatchable for aesthetic purposes. This isn’t even getting into the effervescent lighting, or how returning collaborator Kate Hawley has outdone herself again with the costuming. Guillermo Del Toro tackling the king of gothic horror stories, a story written by the mother of all science fiction, inevitably set a high bar for him to clear. And while it’s not a pitch perfect rendering of Mary Shelley’s slow moving and Shakespearean epistolary, it is still one of the best-looking movies you will see all year.
Perhaps for us, it’s at the cost of adapting the straightforward, dark story we know into something more operatic. It sings the tale like a soprano rather than reciting it like humble prose, and it doesn’t always sing well. But for Del Toro, the epic scale and voice of this adaptation is the wage expected for making the movie he’s always dreamed of. Even with its problems, it’s well worth it to see a visionary director at work on a story they love.
Reviews
‘The Siege of Ape Canyon’ Review: Bigfoot Comes Home
In my home, films like Night of the Demon and Abominable are played on repeat; Stan Gordon is king. One of my favorite stories surrounding Bigfoot and Ufology is the Bigfoot/UFO double flap of 1973, which Stan Gordon has an incredible in-depth book on. The Patterson–Gimlin film couldn’t hold a flame to Stan Gordon’s dive into one of my home state’s most chronicled supernatural time periods. But as much as I love the Bigfoot topic, I’m not ashamed to say I don’t know half of the stories surrounding that big hairy beast. And one topic that I’m not ashamed to say I haven’t heard of is The Siege of Ape Canyon.
The Harrowing Events of Ape Canyon
Washington State, 1924. A group of miners (originally consisting of Marion Smith, Leroy P. Smith, Fred Beck, John Peterson, August Johannson, and Mac Rhodes) was on a quest to claim a potential gold mine. Literally. The miners would eventually set up camp on the east slope of Mount Saint Helens. Little did they know their temporary shelter would be the start of a multi-day barrage of attacks from what they and researchers believed to be Bigfoot. What transpired in those days would turn out to be one of the most highly criticized pieces of American lore, nearly lost to time and history…nearly.
I need to set the record straight on a few things before we get started. One, I don’t typically like watching documentaries. Two, I believe in Bigfoot. Three, this documentary made me cry.

Image courtesy of Justin Cook Public Relations.
Reviving a Forgotten Bigfoot Legend in The Siege of Ape Canyon
Documentarian Eli Watson sets out to tell one of the most prolific Bigfoot stories of all time (for those who are deep in Bigfoot mythology). It’s noted fairly early in the film that this story is told often and is well known in the Washington area. So then, how do people outside of the incident location know so little about it? I’ve read at least 15 books on and about Bigfoot, and I’ve never once heard this story. This isn’t a Stan-Gordon-reported story about someone sitting on the john and seeing a pair of red eyes outside of their bathroom window. The story around Ape Canyon has a deeper spiritual meaning that goes beyond a few sightings here and there.
Watson’s documentary, though, isn’t just about Bigfoot or unearthing the story of Ape Canyon. Ape Canyon nearly became nothing more than a tall tale that elders would share around a campfire to keep the younglings out of the woods at 2 AM. If it weren’t for Mark Myrsell, that’s exactly what would have happened. The Siege of Ape Canyon spends half its time unpacking the story of Fred Beck and his prospecting crew, and the other half tells a truly inspiring tale of unbridled passion, friendship, and love.
Mark Myrsell’s Relentless Pursuit: Friendship, Truth, and Tears
Mark Myrsell’s undying passion for everything outdoors inevitably led to bringing one of Bigfoot’s craziest stories to light. His devotion to the truth vindicated many people who were (probably) labeled kooks and crazies. Throughout Myrsell’s endless search for the truth, he made lifelong friends along the way. What brought me to tears throughout The Siege of Ape Canyon is Watson’s insistence on showing the human side of Myrsell and his friends. They’re not in this to make millions or bag a Bigfoot corpse; they just want to know the truth. And that’s what they find.
The Siege of Ape Canyon is a documentary that will open your eyes to a wildly mystical story you may not have heard of. And it does it pretty damn well. Whereas many documentaries feel the need to talk down to the viewer just to educate them, Watson’s documentary takes you along for the ride. It doesn’t ask you to believe or not believe in Bigfoot. It allows you to make your own decisions and provides the evidence it needs to. If you’ve ever had a passing interest in the topic of Bigfoot, or if you think you’re the next Stan Gordon, I highly recommend watching The Siege of Ape Canyon.
The Siege of Ape Canyon stomps its way onto digital platforms on November 11. Give yourself a little post-Halloween treat and check it out!


