Connect with us

Editorials

All My Homies Love Cronenberg

Why do Transgender people love Cronenberg?

Published

on

It starts on a Friday night with pizza, wine, and some cookies I pick up from the bodega. We all talk for a while, then, after accidentally clicking the awful movie of the same name from 2004, we begin Crash by David Cronenberg. Everyone else in the room is either transmasc or a trans woman. We’re all in our mid-late twenties. Someone should make a sitcom about us. 

Crash! 

I’m worried at first; we’re here because of me, and if someone doesn’t like the movie, it’s my stupid fault. During one of the early post-crash scenes, Charlotte tosses off a quick “that’s what my bottom surgery looked like” over a shot of Ballard’s (the film’s protagonist) scar. And we’re off. We cheer on the sex scenes. Oggle the car crashes. We cast the movie among the seven of us. Em is Vaughan. Dev is Ballard. Charlotte’s seen the movie before. She waits for the scene where Seagrave and Vaughan plan their recreation of the Jayne Mansfield car crash, and when Seagrave says, “I want tits out to here,” she pulls out the sniper: “Christian, that’s you!!” 

After it’s over, we all go outside. They smoke cigarettes. We talk about our favorite scenes. The one where Vaughan and Ballard have sex and then crash cars into each other stands out. Then we go inside and listen to Charlie XCX until it’s time for everyone to go home. 

To the trans folks I know, Cronenberg is cool.

Why Do Trans People Love Cronenberg?

This isn’t an isolated incident — a lot of trans people like Cronenberg. I’m far from the first person to make this observation. Cronenberg focuses, with monk-like dedication, on bodily transformations. His films are about humans evolving, often through some kind of new technology, into something else. Characters revel in the transformation. They’re sympathetic; bodily change makes them happy. Some characters object, but they’re usually the antagonists. Without fail, Cronenberg makes these changes sticky, gory, perverted, cold, unflattering—there’s a reason why it’s called body horror, not body romance. The transformation often ends in death, so if what we see is so horrible, why do the characters not perceive it that way? They must be seeing and experiencing something different than us. We, as trans people, are always on the outside of someone else’s joy. The trans connection is obvious, and the filmmaker, while not doing it on purpose, is aware of it.

Advertisement

“Body is reality. I want to change my reality. That means I have to change my body.”- David Cronenberg

We can talk about subtext all day, but I want evidence. I want it in the flesh. I want to watch a bunch of Cronenberg films and talk about them with my trans friends.

The Quiet Part Out Loud

After our late night watching Crash, I slept late and met up with my buddy Day for coffee. The conversation naturally shifts to ExistenZ. She hits me with a “he’s great, but I don’t know why all his movies have plots. If you want to film hot TV actors fingering each other’s VR holes, you can just do that.” 

The next night, my cis friend Archer comes over. We make giant cookies and eat them while watching Scanners. I take a picture of Michael Ironside in the scene where he has an eye drawing taped over the hole he drilled in his head and send it to Emerson. “Who ain’t drilled a hole or two these days?” she replies. 

But it’s Monday that I’m really excited about. Meg and I are going to talk about Crimes of the Future. Meg was there for the Crash viewing but was quiet. Our schedules don’t line up, so we watch the movie on our own and meet at a bar. We grab a table in the corner and nerd out.

Crimes has the most trans subtext we’ve seen in a Cronenberg film. It features a subculture of people who modify their organs so they can eat plastic to survive in a world falling apart. A child is born naturally with these organs, and it horrifies the mother so much that she kills her kid. Meg introduces me to the concept of bioessentialism, the belief that the way things were biologically created is the way they should always be. She points out that the antagonists in the movie hold on to an old-fashioned vision of humanity that reflects some abstract view of “nature,” not lived-in experience. 

Advertisement

Bioessentialism leads to acts of terror in Crimes of the Future, and ours as well. “Nature” is a big stumbling block for conservatives and many status-quo liberals. They can comfort themselves that cis gay people were “born this way,” but looking hard at trans people forces them to confront what it means to step against nature to create yourself.

Meg also points out that when you combine the oft-quoted slogan in Videodrome (“long live the new flesh”) with the motto in Crimes  (“surgery is the new sex”), you get “long live the new sex.”

Do with that what you will. 

The New Flesh

It ends with Charlotte. She comes over Tuesday night and steals some makeup for me. We watch Videodrome, the movie that sparked my love of Cronenberg. She hasn’t seen this one before, and it’s a true joy to watch her experience some of the insane visual effects for the first time. She laughs and writhes. 

At Day’s suggestion, I drop all thoughts about the plot. I study the VR holes. I watch how Max Renn is transformed by his new world, how he gazes at the abyss of his TV, and how excited he is when his body opens up for the first time. Charlotte points out that so many of Cronenberg’s movies are about a person who thinks they’re extreme but eventually find someone much more hardcore than themselves. They follow down this path of extremity to death or transcendence. Sometimes they act out of joy, sometimes out of fear, but most of the time, they’re driven forward by a stoic resolve: things have to change; they don’t know or care why. They’ll have time later on to figure that out.

Advertisement

We get to the end of the film. 

After eliminating the executives responsible for the titular Videodrome, Max is informed he has to take one last step. Nicki Brand, played by Debbie Harry, appears on TV and says, “You’ve gone as far as you can with the way things are now.” And I feel a tug. As he’s learned to embrace the transmogrification of the body, Max’s body has shifted and grown, but now he has to completely leave it behind. 

“In order for the new flesh to live, the old flesh must die.”

Renn puts the gun — that is now his hand — to his head. “Long live the new flesh.” Gunshot. Credits. 

I tell Charlotte about the time my ex and I watched Videodrome together. How we had a weird conversation because though we both loved it, she found it disturbing — a cautionary tale. I found it gross but gorgeous. 

Advertisement

Later that night, Charlotte shows me how to do my makeup. I cry in her arms. 

All My Homies Love Cronenberg 

That was Tuesday. Today is Wednesday. I’m thankful for my trans friends during this deeply confusing and changing time of my life. I’m thankful we have a filmmaker that understands transformation so well. He’s working on an upcoming film called The Shrouds. I hope we can all see it together. 

What I’ve learned this week — from Meg, Emerson, Charlotte, Day, the hivemind that watched Crash, and from the man himself — is that the trans experience is a deeply human one. We reject nature, all of us. Sure, taking hormones isn’t natural, but watching a film isn’t natural, living in a concrete city isn’t natural, and kneeling at an altar, least of all. The biblical Ten Commandments are a defiance of nature, an attempt to quell our natural impulses. So is the government. We live in constructed domiciles under constructed skies. And look at all the beauty we are! 

When you look around, do you look at what nature created, or at what you created yourself? To be trans is to understand deeply, as Cronenberg does, that our bodies aren’t just houses for the soul; they are the houses that are the souls themself. This is why, I think, we love him. Though he sometimes scares us, he is not scared of the body’s evolution. Cronenberg is terrified, celebratory, and extremely conscious of the fact that every last one of us has a body. 

And what is more trans than knowing that, for every second of your life, for better or worse, you will always have, until you leave this earth, a body?

Advertisement

Christian Flynn (they) is a mixed Puerto Rican writer in NYC. Their play, Everyone in New York is Beautiful, was a 2024 Semi-Finalist for O'Neill Center's National Playwright's Conference. Their work is being performed across New York City this summer.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Editorials

‘I Know What You Did Last Summer’: And the Impact of Slasher Sequel Trends

Published

on

Legacy sequels are not a new invention in the horror genre. The 2020s have seen several horror legacy sequels keeping the same name as their predecessors and retconning the canon to revitalize the franchise for a new generation of movie-goers. We have seen this with the Halloween, Scream, Candyman, and Texas Chainsaw Massacre franchises. All of which kept the movie title of the original installment (minus the 2022 TCM movie, which dropped “The” and made “chainsaw” one word again) and removed nearly all installments after the first from the canon (minus Scream 2022, which is a continuation of Scream 4). 

Slasher fanatics are getting a new legacy sequel with the fourth installment of I Know What You Did Last Summer (IKWYDLS) hitting theaters this July. So far, we know that there will be legacy cast members returning, and it is expected to be a direct sequel to I Still Know What You Did Last Summer, according to Variety. Based on its horror franchise cohorts, here are my predictions for the new IKWYDLS movie. 

Spoilers ahead for Halloween (2018), Candyman (2021), Scream (2022), and Texas Chainsaw Massacre (2022).

Legacy Cast Turned Harbingers

Legacy cast members are not being hunted down yet again, but they now offer knowledge and a warning to the new class of fresh meat. The previous survivors and final girls now evolve to a different horror movie trope: the harbingers. 

We see this in a few movies. Laurie Strode warns her family in Halloween 2018. Dewey accurately predicts the killer to be Amber and Richie in Scream 2022. Anne-Marie discourages her son, Anthony, from uttering the word “Candyman” and reveals that the hooked-handed legend is the real danger in Nia DaCosta’s Candyman (2021). 

Advertisement

The first trailer for the new IKWYDLS shows Ray urging officials in a town hall to take the events seriously. In the second trailer, Julie shares her final girl advice not to be a passive victim and identify possible motives to narrow down who the new deadly fisherman is. I am looking forward to seeing a seasoned Freddie Prinze Jr and Jennifer Love Hewitt reprise their roles and hopefully be engaging harbingers.  

Previous Final Girl Becomes The Real Danger

In their role as a harbinger, the legacy final girl is back for blood. This is extensively shown in Halloween 2018 as Laurie Strode is now a firearms specialist and has designed her home to be a trap for Michael Myers. The sequence of her hunting for Michael in her house in the third act is unforgettable and bad ass. Sidney Prescott (and Gale Weathers) spoil Ghostface’s plan in Scream 2022 simply by showing up to the murder party.

Yes, Ghostface did want Sidney there, but they were very unprepared for how tactical she would be and not take the bait on tricks that a new slasher survivor would. Sidney was fine with shooting first and asking questions later!

Sally Hardesty (played by Owlen Fouere) makes her first return to the TCM franchise in the Netflix 2022 Texas Chainsaw Massacre legacy sequel. She has been trying to track down Leatherface and his family for decades, and finally gets her chance for revenge. An interesting take on what she has been up to for the past nearly 50 years. 

Julie and Ray could be the power couple that the new survivors need. After all, they did evade and clumsily defeat Ben Willis in the 1997 movie. They made up for the clumsy execution with a more impressive effort in I Still Know What You Did Last Summer by Ray traveling to an island to fist fight the father-son duo while Julie unloaded a revolver into Ben Willis.

Advertisement

Both demonstrating they have learned from their first encounter with a murder and not taking second chances. I do not expect them to play the wait-and-see approach in the new movie. 

The Legacy Death

What keeps horror hounds coming back to slasher franchises are the kills. Fans of slasher flicks want to see their beloved Michael Myers or Leatherface hack away at the youths who break horror movie rules. However, the shock and surprise come from meaningful deaths, and this does lead to fan favorites getting the axe (or chainsaw). 

Dewey loses his plot armor in Scream 2022 as Ghostface recognizes, in a meta way, the importance of his death by saying “It’s an honor” as his corpse hits the floor. Sally finally finds her prey, only to receive a chainsaw in the abdomen and to be yeeted into a pile of garbage (I’m still salty about this). In Candyman, while he may not be considered part of the “legacy cast”, Anthony McCoy is still an important returning character. He meets his demise after William Burke saws off his hand, and the Chicago police later slay Anthony in a poignant scene. These deaths make the audience feel the gravity of the situation and fear what is now possible for the new cast. 

I Still Know What You Did Last Summer left us with three possible legacy characters returning: Julie, Ray, and Karla (played by Brandy). Trailers have not revealed a Brandy cameo, but it is not out of the question for her to return as the sacrificial legacy death. I personally believe there is a bigger chance for Ray to meet his end, similar to Dewey. While all filmmakers hope for audiences to fall in love with their new characters, any financial success will likely warrant a sequel that will need to feature Jennifer Love Hewitt to keep the slasher fans excited. Fingers crossed that Julie makes it out of her third run-in with the vengeful fisherman. 

I Know What You Did Last Summer hits theaters July 18, and I’ll eagerly be seated to see what trends this new addition has to offer to the slasher legacy sequel canon. 

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Editorials

Finding Unexpected Empowerment in “Poor Things”

Published

on

Poor Things

A young person, raised by a scientist and seemingly simple minded by design, discovers their inner hedonist. In their quest for pleasure, they leave their home and embark on misadventures involving sex, sugar, an abusive relationship, and various enlightenments, all before returning home to confront their past so that they may move towards their future. This is the streamlined arc for both Poor Things protagonist Bella Baxter and myself. When I saw Poor Things in theaters in January 2024, the only things I knew about the film were that Yorgos Lanthimos directed it and that the cast included Emma Stone, Ramy Youssef, and Willem Dafoe.

You can imagine my surprise when I not only felt the impact of Bella’s arc, but also felt seen and even empowered in a way that I rarely do as a queer disabled man.

Discovering Bella Baxter in Poor Things

Bella, an adult woman who exhibits childlike behavior, is under the care of scientist Godwin Baxter, who has taken on the role of her father figure. Conversations with his student Max reveals that Bella’s body is the resurrected corpse of a woman that Godwin discovered, while her brain had originally belonged to the child the woman had been pregnant with. It’s important to note that Godwin didn’t know the circumstances of the woman’s death before he pulled off this macabre miracle. More on that later.

Bella eventually has her first sexual experience through masturbation, is instantly hooked on the gratification she feels, and tries to achieve constant satisfaction proclaiming “Bella discover happy when she want.”. Those around her, such as Max and Godwin’s maid Prim, are less than elated about Bella’s newfound desires, but Bella shamelessly persists. Godwin, in response, decides to try to arrange a marriage between Bella and Max, with the condition that the pair live with him for the rest of his days. While Max agrees, Bella ultimately decides to leave their home in London to embark on a whirlwind affair with Godwin’s lawyer, Duncan Wedderburn. Duncan, enticed by the contradicting nature of Bella’s innocence and sexual hedonism, pursues and woos her with promises of worldliness and sex.

Subverting Disability Stereotypes

One of the most common stereotypes in media around disabled people is the belief that their disabilities render them either asexual or unable to obtain any type of sexual gratification at all. When one reads Bella as disabled-coded, as I do, she becomes one of the strongest subversions of the “disabled equals asexual” trope seen in recent, mainstream film history. A disabled-coded reading also makes Bella’s hypersexuality much less problematic than it would be if the character was only analyzed at a surface level. The juxtaposition of disability and hypersexuality is an aspect of Bella’s character that I greatly identify with.

Advertisement

In early childhood, I was diagnosed with Autism Spectrum Disorder, and as an adult, I also tend to chase this type of gratification for the sake of leisurely pleasure or even as a way to cope with stress. With Duncan, Bella travels first to Lisbon, Portugal, where the two spend their time together having sex and eating exotic foods and sweets. Bella’s constant craving for more pleasure proves to be too much for Duncan, who grows to resent her as he is unable to keep up.

His resentment is compounded by Bella’s social ineptitude, as she repeatedly embarrasses him with several faux pas during a dinner party at their hotel. For example, after taking an extra moment to understand her female dinner mate’s sex joke, Bella makes a comment about the taste of Duncan’s penis. When Duncan reprimands her and restricts her to a few choice phrases, she describes the death of her dining companion’s relative as “delightful”; she later interrupts the dinner banter because she wants to “punch [a] baby” that’s annoying her.

Poor Things Bella Baxter Emma Stone

Bella’s Misadventures with Duncan Wedderburn

Bella’s unfiltered comments and inappropriate responses are painfully reminiscent of my own past social failings, from remarks about my former partner’s genitals, to intrusive questions about the suicide of a classmate’s uncle, and finally to vocalized violent inclinations towards small, annoying children. Thankfully, like Bella, I was stopped before any harm could come to the younglings.

Despite their growing tensions, Bella and Duncan stay together, even as Bella goes on to binge alcohol and have sexual encounters with other men. Duncan eventually lures her out of Lisbon with a cruise to Athens, Greece. Bella is quite displeased with this change until she befriends two fellow patrons, Martha and Harry, who open her eyes to pursuits beyond her hedonism, and introduce her to philosophy and literature, irking Duncan.

Bella’s Intellectual and Emotional Growth in Poor Things

Bella embraces the intellectual stimulation presented to her, leading to a debate with Harry over humanity’s potential for cruelty in which Bella argues that humankind is not inherently cruel. Harry retaliates when the cruise docks by showing her the conditions that poor people must endure. Bella gives her and Duncan’s money to members of the ship’s crew with the (ultimately ignored) instruction to distribute it to the poor. The rash decision results in Bella and Duncan being left to fend for themselves in Paris. Bella, to Duncan’s outrage, finds work in a local brothel, a job that she views as merely a means to an end. She ends their relationship and gives him money to return to London. Bella continues life as a sex worker, taking on many lovers in the process, including a fellow sex worker named Antoinette. 

Advertisement

The trajectory of Bella and Duncan’s relationship evokes a situationship I had years ago with an older man that would prove to be formative. Like Duncan, he presented himself as a mature man of many sexual interests that he would help me dip my toes into. And, like Duncan, he seemed to be attracted to me only when I was entirely compliant with his whims, and had an issue with me having friends and connections outside of him. I, like Bella, also managed to have a much larger libido than the supposedly adventurous gentleman, which amplified the tension as I was always wanting more.  Finally, after ending this affair, I, like Bella, learned an important lesson or two and threw myself into my personal development and goals.

Returning Home and Facing the Past

Bella’s story eventually sees her return to London. She learns the truth about her origins and reconciles with Godwin, whose health is failing. She also meets Felicity—a “new Bella” that Godwin and Max created. This is a subplot that deeply resonates with me, specifically Godwin and Max’s treatment of Felicity in comparison to their treatment of Bella. Godwin doted on Bella and Max fell for her, whereas the pair grew frustrated with Felicity and essentially abandoned her to be cared for solely by Prim. It’s easy to view Bella and Felicity as higher and lower-functioning disabled people, with Bella as the preferable one because she can mask her symptoms better than Felicity can.

Several times, I have been in Bella’s position of being a preferable disabled person to interact with compared to others because of my higher functioning and less obvious presentation. I’ve even experienced this dynamic in my childhood with my sister having ADD and ADHD, which was deemed more draining for our parents compared to my own diagnosis. It’s been a journey to overcome the internalized ableism that these experiences created, but it’s one that I’m glad I’ve embarked on. Among other things, it makes Bella rightfully directing the disdain she has for Felicity towards Godwin and Max so much more satisfying, even if she does offer both men forgiveness. 

Uncovering Bella’s Tragic Origins

In London, Bella learns that her body, pre-reanimation, had belonged to a sadistic woman named Victoria Blessington, who, along with her husband Alfie, abused their servants. Alfie informs Bella that Victoria died by suicide, likely due to her hatred of her unborn child, which she referred to as “the monster.” Alfie plots to imprison Bella and subject her to female genital mutilation. Bella ultimately escapes and takes Alfie back to Godwin’s home, where she performs her own surgery—one in which she replaces Alfie’s brain with a goat’s.

Although Godwin dies shortly after Bella’s return, Bella remains ever the optimist and becomes a scientist, following in Godwin’s footsteps. She builds a life with her chosen family, including Max and Antoinette as her partners, Felicity as her surrogate sister, and Prim and Alfie as her servant and pet, respectively. The film’s ending is not the traditional “Good For Her (™)” conclusion we tend to see, but rather a “Good For Bella” ending that empowers her, as a person, uniquely.

Advertisement

Bella Baxter’s Queer and Polyamorous Awakening

The conclusion of Poor Things brings home my feelings of kinship with Bella in two ways. The first being her completed arc from the cruel and hateful Victoria to the joyful and sincere Bella. When I was younger, I was definitely more Victoria than Bella; my younger self was a bully who enjoyed using my sharp tongue to bring others down as hard as I could. It was a lot of work to become a better person, one that I struggle to maintain from time to time. Like Bella, I have found kindness to be more rewarding than cruelty and wish to believe in the inherent joy in humanity.

The other way this conclusion resonates with me is through our—Bella’s and my own— late queer awakenings. For over half of the film, we have no indication that Bella is queer besides the likely unintentional hint of Bella rejecting Godwin and Max’s heteronormative ideals of marriage. We don’t see anything concrete until the montage of her sexual escapades in Paris, concluding with her and Antoinette having sex. It awakens Bella’s queerness in her adulthood to the point where she ends up in a throuple with Antoinette and Max, revealing that Bella is both queer and polyamorous. Similarly, I did not have my queer awakening until I was twenty, and I had my awakening as polyamorous only last year. Bella is a fictional character, but it is comforting to know that it is possible for others to have those awakenings occur later in life.

Embracing My Disabled and Queer Identity

When I look back at Poor Things, I see it as a messy and polarizing film by design. The questions of whether we should be offended, intrigued, or feel something else entirely regarding the plot of a woman being reanimated with her baby’s brain in place of her own and eventually embarking on a quest of hedonism are valid ones that do warrant discourse. I don’t resent those who are outraged by the film and detest the film’s critical success.

However, I can’t find myself outraged, especially when the film’s protagonist’s experiences mirror my own, with Bella becoming a comfort character to me as a result. In the time since my initial viewing of Poor Things, I have found so much more pride in being disabled and queer that I keep surprising myself. I used to be embarrassed to discuss my disability in any detail, because I feared that I would be treated differently or viewed as merely trying to excuse my own faults with my neurodivergence.

On the contrary, those who care about me now understand me better, and I have a film that I can point to for them to have a glimpse into my lived experience. I’ve even become more proud of my queerness to the point of going to my first Pride celebration last summer, as well as having an awakening in regards to my polyamory. I cannot begrudge a film like Poor Things for its messiness when it has empowered me so much in the way that it ultimately empowers its protagonist. 

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Horror Press Mailing List

Fangoria
Advertisement
Advertisement