Reviews
X MARKS THE SPOT: A Review of ‘Saw X’

Before I start my review of Saw X, I feel like I need to tell you now: My favorite Saw film is the original. My second favorite Saw film is Saw 3D. My third is Saw VI.
Something For Every Fan of the Saw Franchise
Now, if that ranking got you in a bit of a tizzy, because who could possibly like Saw 3D that much? It’s terrible (I could, and it is), you should now understand what I find to be one of the fundamental issues of critiquing the Saw films in a way that feels fair or equitable to everybody. Everybody looks for different things in them, so a non-insignificant portion of the audience believes there should be a different metric for reviewing them.
Some people are here for the traps exploding gore all over the place, some for the endearingly convoluted story and all its plot twists, and some for their favorite characters and their development. If you’re here for crazy death traps and some top-tier John Kramer dialogue, you will probably love Saw X despite its flaws and find it a worthy entry in the franchise, just as I did.
John Kramer Returns in Saw X
For those who have been sleeping on the Saw franchise, Saw X is the latest installment in the series and brings back into the fold the legendary John Kramer (Tobin Bell), the first and greatest (not arguing with you on this) Jigsaw killer. Taking place between the first and second films, we see Jigsaw’s tests of the human body and spirit head south to Mexico City for vengeance: a group of five people who wronged John in his time of need are placed in a new game, with some of his most torturous contraptions yet. All the while, newly dubbed apprentice Amanda Young (Shawnee Smith) takes her fledgling steps into the role John has planned for her when he’s gone.
Tobin Bell’s Impact
At the time of their respective releases, the ends of Jigsaw and Spiral seemed to promise an ever-increasing chain of bizarre timeline bends and new players for the franchise’s future, which excited some fans and underwhelmed many others. That promise doesn’t matter anymore because this movie mends the issue by bringing back to center stage the original heart and soul of Saw: Tobin Bell. The later films in the franchise have a big John Kramer-shaped hole in them that is hard to ignore, as Tobin Bell was undeniably instrumental in portraying an unforgettable character and steering the traps and rewriting dialogue on the fly. He was as important to the movies as any director, writer, or editor, and the cast and crew that worked with him have gone on record to say as much.
And that’s really the reason Saw X works. You can feel he’s brought that same essential energy to the role and helped guide the film, with this feeling like less of a straightforward return to form and more of a loving welcome back for Jigsaw and company that plays with the traditional formatting of the franchise. He shows off vulnerability especially here, with what is possibly his best performance to date thanks to the movie’s first act letting us really take the journey with John and see him in a whole new light.
Amanda Young’s Evolution in Saw X
Shawnee Smith also manages to capture a new side of fan favorite Amanda, as a still-green apprentice to John Kramer filling in the gap in her character development between the first two films. We get to see her slowly hardening into the person we meet in Saw II and III; it’s impressive and makes it easy to recognize the film’s place in the ever-muddied timeline almost instantly by visual and dialogue cues alone. Their onscreen chemistry is undeniable, and a solid emotional anchor to hold onto as the film chucks gore at us like an intestine lasso that pulls us along on Jigsaw’s wild ride.
The rest of the cast ranges from alright to pretty bad. Still, all of their characters are designed and written in the vein of one of those mid-to-late-2000s “you’re supposed to hate them completely” character templates. The writing hammers out bodies that are meant only to be mangled, except for one victim who clearly shouldn’t be there. This is the first and only Saw movie where I truly despised the victims in the traps, and the film will bang you over the head with that characterization. You might have found Jeff annoying in Saw III, or Charles unlikable in Saw V, and lord knows many people cheered at William’s death in Saw VI, but here our contestants are the peak of unlikable by design.
Saw X Has Some of the Nastiest Traps On Film Yet
This is a symptom of a script that really leans into the interpretation of Jigsaw as an anti-hero (especially in that hilarious ending shot before the credits roll), so if you find John’s philosophy and that framing of the character not quite your tempo, it might take you out of the movie.
In turn, the film relishes putting them through some of the franchise’s most comically evil traps, which I say with love. And yes, I say it’s comically evil, even in a franchise where they crushed a man’s head to death with two giant swinging ice blocks like Wile E. Coyote. The traps in Saw X stand as a worthy successor in the escalation of John Kramer’s machinations, evisceration engines you couldn’t think up in your wildest nightmares.
Despite being the victim of some clunky integration into the script, its final set piece is an incredibly memorable one that will still stand out among the reverse bear traps and shotgun carousels of the earlier entries as an all-timer just due to how nauseating it is. This film brings the heat with how truly nasty its traps can get, and no expense was spared to make the practical effects here look as spine-tinglingly foul as they do.
A Saw Film Shot in Typical Saw Fashion
If the rest of the cinematography is another step in the evolution of Kevin Greutert’s work, you might consider it devolution depending on how important the series’ iconic screeching-fast editing and sped-up shots are to you. They’re shockingly absent for a return to the mainline series, given he’s the editor who coined them. I would have preferred a more traditional Saw film in this regard. I can’t technically call the way Saw X is shot poor on a technical level; it’s just less unique. The film is not as visually dynamic as any other entries, but it works. And no matter what I have to say about the camerawork and cuts, on an audio level, the soundtrack kills, as always.
The Iconic Zepp’s Theme and Final Thoughts
Who doesn’t get hyped up at Zepp’s Theme, barring people without a pulse?
I have a soft spot for this film, even around its rustier, grimier bits; after all, what is Saw without some grime and rust? Ultimately, this will make a fine addition to the series because of its emotional core and instant classic traps. As a standalone entry, its script and ending can be unsatisfying at points, but if it’s the price we have to pay for more John Kramer, it’s a small fee. Saw X puts on a blood-filled, mean-spirited contest that will keep you guessing, so give it a watch, especially in theatres if you can.
Saw is rated R and has a runtime of 1 hour and 58 minutes.
Reviews
TIFF 2025: ‘Fuck My Son!’ Review

A couple of assumptions can be made when a movie has a title like Fuck My Son! The most obvious one is that the title also serves as the film’s entire premise. The second is that it’s probably going to be a raunchy, tasteless, and chaotic affair. Writer-director Todd Rohal’s (The Catechism Cataclysm, Uncle Kent 2) adaptation of Johnny Ryan’s comic of the same name meets both of those expectations. However, it starts out with an unexpected amount of promise before hitting the slippery slope that leads to an unforgettable but underwhelming experience for the audience.
WTF?!
Fuck My Son! starts off with a scuzzy charm that makes you think it might just surprise you. It gives the audience a cute intro (although it looks like AI was heavily utilized) and explains how to use the Perv-O-Vision and Nude Blok glasses that the audience was given on the way in. This is obviously a ploy to throw some naked people on screen and rip the X-rated band-aid off early. While this bit lasted too long, I appreciated having peen on a big screen. As someone who yells into a podcast microphone a few times a year, “I want to see a pair of testies for every pair of breasties,” I appreciated a filmmaker having the balls to have balls on screen.
We soon meet Sandi (Tipper Newton) and her kid, Bernice (Kynzie Colmery), as they are shopping. They have a run-in with a nameless pervert that feels like Rohal might be going for a John Waters kind of sleaze. While having a heart-to-heart about good people versus bad people, they notice an older woman, Vermina (Robert Longstreet), needing assistance. They do not know that this old lady dressed like Mama from Mama’s Family has set a trap for the woman. This soon leads them to a home where Vermina explains that Sandi will have to fuck her son if she doesn’t want anything bad to happen to her or her daughter. To make this situation more twisted, her son, Fabian (Steve Little), is a mutant with a mutant dick (once it’s finally found).
We Also Feel A Little Trapped
What comes next is a lot of gross-out humor, repetitive jokes, and the fairly predictable escape to only be brought right back to their tormentors. Fuck My Son! loses all of the goodwill (and steam) we had as it stretches this premise well past the breaking point. There are a few more jokes that land as Sandi and Vermina square off, but not enough to stop the movie from overstaying its welcome. That being said, Tipper Newton understood the assignment and had a standout performance worth noting. She is still compelling enough around the forty-minute stretch when it becomes clear this movie didn’t need to be a feature film.
Fuck My Son! Tries to stitch a lot of things together that never really add up. For example, Bernice’s meat friends (the animated meat also gives AI), who visit her in times of distress. The movie also never addresses whether Vermina is being played by a male actor for an actual reason. No one is going to see Fuck My Son! for social commentary, and Longstreet does earn a couple of chuckles. However, it feels like another attempt at what passed for humor decades ago rather than putting drag on the big screen with a purpose. This could also be something that I just overthought once the movie lost its way. Much like I wondered why this old lady would have pads on hand when she is well past the point of having a period.
We Used to Be A Society
Some of these gripes could be partly explained by Fuck My Son! wanting to stay closer to the source material than it should for modern audiences. However, the issue of running a joke into the ground is pervasive throughout the movie. Even before it starts reaching for anything that could be even slightly offensive and makes its way to rape jokes and multiple endings. It makes for an overall frustrating experience because we want filmmakers to do something unique and take chances. Just not like this.
Many of us also have a soft spot for sleazy movies from the 1970s and 1980s. I was one of the last people to discover the charming chaos of Frank Henenlotter’s Basket Case and Frankenhooker. So, I know scuzzy cinema can work, and it can be fun. However, Fuck My Son! is a one-and-done instead of a title that will stand the test of time. It’s a movie you can toss on to laugh at with friends before it becomes background noise. It’s not one that most of us are going to demand a physical release of. Or want to revisit again.
Reviews
TIFF 2025: ‘Dead Lover’ Review
Dead Lover introduces us to a lonely and smelly gravedigger who dreams of being loved. One night, her wish comes true as she saves a man who seems intoxicated by her pungent scent. However, like all gothic romances, theirs is doomed. Her lover dies at sea, leaving the gravedigger upset and alone again, as all that’s left of the man she loved is his finger. This propels her to turn to science to see if she can bring her lover back from the dead using his sole digit. This obviously causes chaos because, as all horror fans know, sometimes things are better left dead.

As a recovering theater kid who supports women’s rights and wrongs, I think Dead Lover is an interesting experiment. It feels like a sketch group has taken over a Black Box theater, and during the Q&A at TIFF, it was confirmed that that was the case. This leads to quite a bit of laughter and a few cheers as you invest in the ridiculousness of this world. Which is great for a movie premiering its Stink-O-Vision at a prestigious festival. However, what stands out the most for me are the themes of longing and basic human desire.
A Smell To Remember
Dead Lover introduces us to a lonely and smelly gravedigger who dreams of being loved. One night, her wish comes true as she saves a man who seems intoxicated by her pungent scent. However, like all gothic romances, theirs is doomed. Her lover dies at sea, leaving the gravedigger upset and alone again, as all that’s left of the man she loved is his finger. This propels her to turn to science to see if she can bring her lover back from the dead using his sole digit. This obviously causes chaos because, as all horror fans know, sometimes things are better left dead.
Director, co-writer, and our leading smelly gravedigger lady, Grace Glowicki, puts forth a world that allows women to be gross. However, unlike most cinema, Dead Lover knows the nauseating and uncouth lead still deserves love. There is no She’s All That makeover or a montage of her learning how to be a lady. This movie gets that people are people, women can be many things, and our dreams should not hinge on how society perceives us. Between the jokes, this film touches on yearning for the life you deserve. While Glowicki’s character yearning leads her to love, the sentiment can be applied to anything. She just happens to think her place in the world is beside the dead love of her short life.
It’s The Ensemble for Me
In addition to Glowicki, Leah Doz, Lowen Morrow, and Ben Petrie (who also co-wrote the script) take turns playing an array of zany characters. This allows the world to feel fuller, even if it’s the same two stages reused with the same four actors. It also guarantees the team a dedicated playground to make an impression. Everyone gets at least one character so bizarre that they feel like the MVP of the film. At least until the next one is introduced.
The small ensemble of four performers tackling all the roles is committed to their bits and having fun. This allows Dead Lover to reach for some silly highs and some ridiculous lows as they move through these characters at a fairly rapid speed. This results in more of a Mel Brooks and Gene Wilder energy (with modern sensibilities). Which isn’t something most of us would expect from a body horror comedy.
If you are in the mood for a likable sketch troupe exploring gothic expressionism, then this is your movie. You might even find yourself charmed by the style choices and improv vibes if you’re a theater person.