Connect with us

Reviews

THE LOVE OF SHARK MOVIES, TEETH AND ALL: ‘Sharksploitation’ Review

Published

on

Among all the natural horror subgenres (figure that, subgenres for a subgenre!), there’s one so storied and dense that it becomes an academic feat to map the history of. That sect of natural horror all about our toothy maligned friends, the Great Whites, is aptly named “sharksploitation”. For most audiences, sharksploitation films are just an enjoyable outing to see bursts of cloudy crimson blood in pure blue water. We’re all here to watch shark animatronics (or bad CGI models, if you’re nasty) flip out on their victims, and maybe there’s a plot attached to them. There’s no shame in that: what’s simple fun is simple fun, and sometimes simple fun is being mauled by a big angry fish.

But beyond that, when it comes to being more nuanced, to observing the ebb and gory flow of the genre’s trends, it’s impossible to do justice to the history of such a spanning worldwide sensation in a short summary. How can you capture something so large in something so small?

Well, lucky us, our summarizing days are over! Someone made a documentary all about it.

Shudder Brings Us Sharksploitation

Written and directed by Stephen Scarlata, Sharksploitation interviews a veritable who’s-who of film and marine biology experts to discuss the history of the sharksploitation genre, not only its impact on the film industry but on the real world and its ecological consequences. The film starts with the king of cult himself, Roger Corman and 47 Meters Down director Johannes Roberts who dive into the meaning and motivation of thalassophobia; that’s the fear of the deep water for those who don’t regularly get lost looking at photo galleries of people diving in the middle of the inky black ocean.

Advertisement

From here on out, you get to hear from directors like Joe Dante and Rebekah McKendry, and writers like Rob Schrab on the subgenre, the behind-the-scenes of how it came to be, and where it’s going next. You even get an abridged history of the Syfy channel from Thomas P. Vitale and get to see how David Michael Latt and Paul Bales, the men behind the infamous Asylum Productions, came to birth the “mockbuster” genre and the perfect schlock that is the Sharknado series. These interviews capture the history of shark films with fantastic anecdotes from on and off-set; some are morbid, some are fascinating, and some are downright hilarious.

Marine Biology Meets Cinema: The Science Behind Sharks

That’s not even crediting the folks like Vicky Vasquez, Gregory Stone, and David Schiffman, marine biologists who handle all the science behind these not-actually-that-menacing menaces, and how sharks behave when they’re not made of rubber and metal. You get insights from Wendy Benchley, an ocean conservationist and wife of Jaws creator Peter Benchley, who gives a first-hand account of the craze her husband’s film made and its repercussions, for better or worse. Having such a broad spectrum of people talking about the genre lends not only credence to the research done for the film, but it also just gives you a whole lot of great stories that keep you captivated and wanting to hear more.

Given Scarlata produced one of my favorite documentaries of all time, Jodorowsky’s Dune, there was quite a high bar set in terms of quality. Most documentaries composed of sit-down interviews can never really excel in terms of editing and use of footage, and this is much of the same. Still, Sharksploitation tosses interesting graphics, animations, and plenty of glorious shark attack footage to pique your interest. It’ll have you compiling a list of shark films to watch on the Notes app on your phone before you even realize it.

(And I will be adding Ghost Shark to the list post haste, expect a review on that in the future!)

Tracing the Evolution of Shark Horror Films

But where Sharksploitation really excels is in how it creates a chronology for viewers. In the ordering of these stories and info, you find yourself jumping around through time from the early oral traditions of Hawaiian mythology and their depictions of sharks, to the cultural and industry touchstone Jaws, its lesser imitators, leading all the way to the modern-day and the devolved insanity of the Z-grade shark movies that come out every year. It’s a clever way of doing it and avoids trudging along a predictable path as other documentaries on film sometimes tread.

Advertisement

Why Sharksploitation Is a Must-Watch for Horror Fans

The natural horror subgenre is at its best when it’s breaking down the relationship between humans and sharks, and Sharksploitation knows that. It takes the time to chart that relationship and its many branching paths in a way that’s engaging and worthwhile, in a way that plays with that human element and tells a tale that bleeds between the spectacle of cinema and the more outlandish parts of the real world. Even if you aren’t a fan of documentaries, I’d suggest tossing this on once it hits Shudder; if not for the educational value, then for some of the crazy stories of molds being invented and nasty practical effects it has to offer. I’m almost certain it’ll hook you.

Make sure to stream Sharksploitation on Shudder starting July 21st!

Luis Pomales-Diaz is a freelance writer and lover of fantasy, sci-fi, and of course, horror. When he isn't working on a new article or short story, he can usually be found watching schlocky movies and forgotten television shows.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Reviews

‘Frankenstein’ Review: Guillermo Del Toro Is Off to the Races

Published

on

Those expecting Guillermo Del Toro’s Frankenstein to be similar to the book, or to any other adaptation, are in for something else. A longtime enjoyer of the creature’s story, Del Toro instead draws from many places: the novel, James Whale’s culturally defining 1931 film, the Kenneth Branagh version, there are even hints from Terence Fisher’s Curse of Frankenstein, and if the set design and costuming are to be believed, there are trace elements of the National Theatre production too.

The formulation to breathe life into this amalgam is a sort of storm cloud of cultural memory and personal desire for Del Toro. This is about crafting his Frankenstein: the one he wanted to see since he was young, the vision he wanted to stitch together. What results is an experience that is more colorful and kinetic and well-loved by its creator than any Frankenstein we’ve had yet, but what it leaves behind is much of its gothic heart. Quiet darkness, looming dread, poetry, and romance are set aside as what has been sold as “the definitive retelling” goes off to the races. It’s a fast-paced ride through a world of mad science, and you’re on it.

Victor Frankenstein’s Ambition and Tragedy

A tale as old as time, with some changes: the morbid talents and untamed hubris of Victor Frankenstein (Oscar Isaac) guide him to challenge death itself. Spurred by a wealthy investor named Henrich Harlander, and a desire for Harlander’s niece Elizabeth (Mia Goth), Victor uses dead flesh and voltaic vigor to bring a creature to life. His attempts to rear it, however, go horribly wrong, setting the two on a bloody collision course as the definitions of man and monster become blurred.

Guillermo Del Toro’s Frankenstein is more Hellboy in its presentation than it is Crimson Peak; it’s honestly more similar to Coppola’s Dracula than either of them. The film is barely done with its opening when it starts with a loud sequence of the monster attacking Walton’s ship on the ice. Flinging crew members about and walking against volleys of gunfire, he is a monstrosity by no other name. The Creature (Jacob Elordi) cries out in guttural screams, part animal and part man, as it calls for its creator to be returned to him. While visually impressive (and it remains visually impressive throughout, believe me), this appropriately bombastic hook foreshadows a problem with tone and tempo.

A Monster That Moves Too Fast

The pace overall is far too fast for its first half, even with its heavy two-and-a-half-hour runtime. It’s also a far cry from the brooding nature the story usually takes. A scene where Victor demonstrates rudimentary reanimation to his peers and a council of judges is rapid, where it should be agonizingly slow. There’s horror and an instability in Victor to be emphasized in that moment, but the grotesque sight is an oddly triumphant one instead. Most do not revile his experiments; in fact he’s taken quite seriously.

Advertisement

Many scenes like this create a tonal problem that makes Victor’s tale lean more toward melodrama than toward philosophical or emotional aspects; he is blatantly wild and free, in a way that is respected rather than pitied. There are opportunities to stop, breathe in the Victorian roses and the smell of death, to get really dour, but it’s neglected until the film’s second half.

Isaac’s and Goth’s performances are overwrought at points, feeling more like pantomimes of Byronic characters. I’m not entirely convinced it has more to do with them than with the script they’re given. Like Victor working with the parts of inmates and dead soldiers, even the best of actors with the best of on-screen chemistry are forced to make do. The dialogue has incredibly high highs (especially in its final moments), but when it has lows, how low they are; a character outright stating that “Victor is the real monster” adage to his face was an ocean floor piece of writing if there ever was one.

Isaac, Goth, and Elordi Bring Life to the Dead

Jacob Elordi’s work here, however, is blameless. Though Elordi’s physical performance as the creature will surely win praise, his time speaking is the true highlight. It’s almost certainly a definitive portrayal of the character; his voice for Victor’s creation is haunted with scorn and solitude, the same way his flesh is haunted by the marks of his creator’s handiwork. It agonizes me to see so little of the books’ most iconic lines used wholesale here, because they would be absolutely perfect coming from Elordi. Still, he has incredible chemistry with both Isaac and Goth, and for as brief as their time together is, he radiates pure force.

Frankenstein Is a Masterclass in Mise-En-Scène

Despite its pacing and tone issues, one can’t help but appreciate the truly masterful craftsmanship Del Toro has managed to pack into the screen. Every millimeter of the sets is carved to specification, filled with personality through to the shadows. Every piece of brick, hint of frost, stain of blood, and curve of the vine is painstakingly and surgically placed to create one of the most wonderful and spellbinding sets you’ve seen—and then it keeps presenting you with new environments like that, over, and over.

At the very least, Del Toro’s Frankenstein is a masterpiece of mise-en-scène down to the minutest of details, and that makes it endlessly rewatchable for aesthetic purposes. This isn’t even getting into the effervescent lighting, or how returning collaborator Kate Hawley has outdone herself again with the costuming. Guillermo Del Toro tackling the king of gothic horror stories, a story written by the mother of all science fiction, inevitably set a high bar for him to clear. And while it’s not a pitch perfect rendering of Mary Shelley’s slow moving and Shakespearean epistolary, it is still one of the best-looking movies you will see all year.

Advertisement

Perhaps for us, it’s at the cost of adapting the straightforward, dark story we know into something more operatic. It sings the tale like a soprano rather than reciting it like humble prose, and it doesn’t always sing well. But for Del Toro, the epic scale and voice of this adaptation is the wage expected for making the movie he’s always dreamed of. Even with its problems, it’s well worth it to see a visionary director at work on a story they love.

Continue Reading

Reviews

‘The Siege of Ape Canyon’ Review: Bigfoot Comes Home

Published

on

In my home, films like Night of the Demon and Abominable are played on repeat; Stan Gordon is king. One of my favorite stories surrounding Bigfoot and Ufology is the Bigfoot/UFO double flap of 1973, which Stan Gordon has an incredible in-depth book on. The Patterson–Gimlin film couldn’t hold a flame to Stan Gordon’s dive into one of my home state’s most chronicled supernatural time periods. But as much as I love the Bigfoot topic, I’m not ashamed to say I don’t know half of the stories surrounding that big hairy beast. And one topic that I’m not ashamed to say I haven’t heard of is The Siege of Ape Canyon.

The Harrowing Events of Ape Canyon

Washington State, 1924. A group of miners (originally consisting of Marion Smith, Leroy P. Smith, Fred Beck, John Peterson, August Johannson, and Mac Rhodes) was on a quest to claim a potential gold mine. Literally. The miners would eventually set up camp on the east slope of Mount Saint Helens. Little did they know their temporary shelter would be the start of a multi-day barrage of attacks from what they and researchers believed to be Bigfoot. What transpired in those days would turn out to be one of the most highly criticized pieces of American lore, nearly lost to time and history…nearly.

I need to set the record straight on a few things before we get started. One, I don’t typically like watching documentaries. Two, I believe in Bigfoot. Three, this documentary made me cry.

Image courtesy of Justin Cook Public Relations.

Reviving a Forgotten Bigfoot Legend in The Siege of Ape Canyon

Documentarian Eli Watson sets out to tell one of the most prolific Bigfoot stories of all time (for those who are deep in Bigfoot mythology). It’s noted fairly early in the film that this story is told often and is well known in the Washington area. So then, how do people outside of the incident location know so little about it? I’ve read at least 15 books on and about Bigfoot, and I’ve never once heard this story. This isn’t a Stan-Gordon-reported story about someone sitting on the john and seeing a pair of red eyes outside of their bathroom window. The story around Ape Canyon has a deeper spiritual meaning that goes beyond a few sightings here and there.

Watson’s documentary, though, isn’t just about Bigfoot or unearthing the story of Ape Canyon. Ape Canyon nearly became nothing more than a tall tale that elders would share around a campfire to keep the younglings out of the woods at 2 AM. If it weren’t for Mark Myrsell, that’s exactly what would have happened. The Siege of Ape Canyon spends half its time unpacking the story of Fred Beck and his prospecting crew, and the other half tells a truly inspiring tale of unbridled passion, friendship, and love.

Mark Myrsell’s Relentless Pursuit: Friendship, Truth, and Tears

Mark Myrsell’s undying passion for everything outdoors inevitably led to bringing one of Bigfoot’s craziest stories to light. His devotion to the truth vindicated many people who were (probably) labeled kooks and crazies. Throughout Myrsell’s endless search for the truth, he made lifelong friends along the way. What brought me to tears throughout The Siege of Ape Canyon is Watson’s insistence on showing the human side of Myrsell and his friends. They’re not in this to make millions or bag a Bigfoot corpse; they just want to know the truth. And that’s what they find.

Advertisement

The Siege of Ape Canyon is a documentary that will open your eyes to a wildly mystical story you may not have heard of. And it does it pretty damn well. Whereas many documentaries feel the need to talk down to the viewer just to educate them, Watson’s documentary takes you along for the ride. It doesn’t ask you to believe or not believe in Bigfoot. It allows you to make your own decisions and provides the evidence it needs to. If you’ve ever had a passing interest in the topic of Bigfoot, or if you think you’re the next Stan Gordon, I highly recommend watching The Siege of Ape Canyon.

The Siege of Ape Canyon stomps its way onto digital platforms on November 11. Give yourself a little post-Halloween treat and check it out!

Continue Reading

Horror Press Mailing List

Fangoria
Advertisement
Advertisement