Connect with us

Reviews

[Review] Fantastic Fest 2025: ‘V/H/S/Halloween’ The Most Fun the Franchise Has Had in Years

Published

on

In my review of V/H/S/Beyond out of Fantastic Fest 2024, I described anthology horror as a box of chocolates (okay, Forrest Gump). It seems fitting to expand on that hackneyed metaphor for the latest installment in the long-running found footage franchise, V/H/S/Halloween, which celebrated its world premiere at this year’s festival. If most anthologies are a box of chocolates, V/H/S/Halloween is a trick-or-treat pail stuffed with mystery candy, some from familiar faces, others from creepy neighbors you barely know.
There might be a razor blade hidden in its sugary depths, but damn if that’s going to stop me from plunging my hand back in for another bite.

Aspartame Is the Least of Your Worries with “Diet Phantasma”

V/H/S/Halloween is made up of five segments and the obligatory wraparound story. There are a few entries that harken back to the franchise’s darker beginnings, but the tone this time around is overwhelmingly kooky, befitting of the seasonal theme.
This is established from the first appearance of the frame narrative, “Diet Phantasma.” From Scottish director Bryan M. Ferguson, best known for creating music videos for artists like Boy Harsher, “Diet Phantasma” is presented as internal documentation from a corporation attempting to perfect its new soda in time for a Halloween rollout. Unfortunately for the unsuspecting focus group, drinking the soda causes a few… side effects. Cue heads exploding and tentacles bursting from cans, all while the staff watching from behind the glass glance at the camera like they’re in The Office.
The V/H/S franchise has always struggled with its frame narratives, leading it to largely ditch any attempt to tie its segments together cohesively in later entries. While it does feel like the films have lost part of their identity as a result, “Diet Phantasma” serves as a welcome palate cleanser between the self-contained segments. It’s always a delight to revisit, and Ferguson turns up the dial on the madness every time we cut back, punctuated by the always-amusing punchline of the “For Internal Use Only” memo flashing up on screen. If Shudder doesn’t sell a promotional can around the film’s release, they’re really missing a trick.

There’s No Need to Only Take One from This Candy Bucket

After whetting the audience’s appetite with its frame narrative, V/H/S/Halloween unwraps its first treat-size candy bar: “Coochie Coochie Coo” from Anna Zlokovic, director of Hulu’s Appendage. With shades of Hansel and Gretel if it took place in the universe of Barbarian, the segment introduces us to two teens on the cusp of leaving for college who decide to have one last Halloween hurrah. Dressed as babies, they wreak a little gentle havoc trick-or-treating in their neighborhood before finding themselves drawn to an impossibly alluring house that all the other kids seem to be skipping. Of course, “Coochie Coochie Coo” quickly reveals this to be a house of horrors with something more disturbing (and disgusting) lurking around every corner.
It’s a stellar start, anchored by leads who are unusually likable for a story like this and some great gross-out effects, while also introducing a theme that will crop up repeatedly in the film: if you fuck around with the unofficial rules of Halloween, you’d better be prepared to find out.

Unpacking “Ut Supra Sic Infra”

Zlokovic’s segment is followed by “Ut Supra Sic Infra” from [REC] director Paco Plaza. A bunch of teens died horribly on Halloween night after breaking into the house of an infamous medium, and the police are grilling the only survivor to understand what happened—and why the bodies have no eyes. Plaza cuts back and forth between material recovered from the teens’ phones and present-day police cam footage, breaking the immediacy and immersion of the subgenre more than a little, but the conclusion he’s building to will make you forgive any found footage sins.
Speaking of the conventions of the subgenre, V/H/S/Halloween’s middle segment, “Fun Size,” pokes fun at them right off the bat by having two of its leads dressed as characters in a found footage horror movie, complete with cameras strapped to their faces. They’re out trick-or-treating with another couple, but the specter of an unwanted engagement is dampening the mood. Things take a turn for the weird when they discover a bowl of unusual candy outside a house, but when one of the guys disobeys the order to only “take one,” they discover exactly how the sausage gets made.
From Casper Kelly, co-creator of the hilarious Your Pretty Face Is Going to Hell, “Fun Size” does everything you could possibly want it to do and more, introducing bizarre mascots, a killer conveyor belt, and more, all brought to candy-colored life through some impressively silly practical effects.

But Does V/H/S/Halloween Deliver On the Horror?

In fact, “Fun Size” is so much fun that the penultimate segment, Alex Ross Perry’s “Kidprint,” suffers slightly as a result. Sandwiched between two campy stories and equally unhinged wraparound interludes, “Kidprint” stands out starkly for its unflinching portrayal of true evil. The story concerns a company that makes videos of children in case they go missing. It’s almost Halloween and a lot of parents are understandably concerned about letting their kids go out after a spate of disappearances. Perry draws performances out of his young actors that feel uncomfortably real, giving the segment a gritty, snuff-like quality that we haven’t seen in the franchise for some time. It’s good, dark stuff, but the tonal whiplash will leave the taste of blood in your mouth.
Closing out V/H/S/Halloween is “Home Haunt” from Micheline Pitt-Norman & R.H. Norman. Centering on a dad desperately trying to reignite the passion as his son grows up and loses interest in the elaborate haunted houses they build together every year, “Home Haunt” feels the most classically Halloween of the bunch, filled to the brim with nostalgic imagery. That nostalgia is what gives the segment its heart: how many of us wish we could go back to the simpler Halloweens of days gone by, when it was still magical for our kids, or when we were kids ourselves?
But this is far from a melancholy story, and the fun begins in earnest when a cursed LP brings the haunt to life, slaying everyone in sight, including SFX legend Rick Baker in a pitch-perfect comedic cameo. If this segment is anything to go by, the directors’ upcoming feature, body horror flick Cosmetic, should be on everyone’s radar.

V/H/S/Halloween Is All Treats, with a Few Tricks up Its Sleeve

I’m conscious of how many times I’ve used the word “fun” already in this review, but it’s really the operative word to describe V/H/S/Halloween, a film that will make you wonder why it took the franchise so long to get to this theme—and what other holidays it could and perhaps should tackle next.
There’s truly something for everyone in entry, some sweet, some sour, but all immensely satisfying. It might rot your teeth, but V/H/S/Halloween is proof that this is one annual tradition that deserves to be revisited year after year. V/H/S/Halloween will be available to stream on Shudder starting October 3rd.

Samantha McLaren is a queer Scottish writer, artist, and horror fanatic living in NYC. Her writing has appeared in publications like Fangoria, Scream the Horror Magazine, and Bloody Disgusting, as well as on her own blog, Terror in Tartan. If she's not talking about Bryan Fuller's Hannibal or Peter Cushing, she's probably asleep.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Reviews

‘Frankenstein’ Review: Guillermo Del Toro Is Off to the Races

Published

on

Those expecting Guillermo Del Toro’s Frankenstein to be similar to the book, or to any other adaptation, are in for something else. A longtime enjoyer of the creature’s story, Del Toro instead draws from many places: the novel, James Whale’s culturally defining 1931 film, the Kenneth Branagh version, there are even hints from Terence Fisher’s Curse of Frankenstein, and if the set design and costuming are to be believed, there are trace elements of the National Theatre production too.

The formulation to breathe life into this amalgam is a sort of storm cloud of cultural memory and personal desire for Del Toro. This is about crafting his Frankenstein: the one he wanted to see since he was young, the vision he wanted to stitch together. What results is an experience that is more colorful and kinetic and well-loved by its creator than any Frankenstein we’ve had yet, but what it leaves behind is much of its gothic heart. Quiet darkness, looming dread, poetry, and romance are set aside as what has been sold as “the definitive retelling” goes off to the races. It’s a fast-paced ride through a world of mad science, and you’re on it.

Victor Frankenstein’s Ambition and Tragedy

A tale as old as time, with some changes: the morbid talents and untamed hubris of Victor Frankenstein (Oscar Isaac) guide him to challenge death itself. Spurred by a wealthy investor named Henrich Harlander, and a desire for Harlander’s niece Elizabeth (Mia Goth), Victor uses dead flesh and voltaic vigor to bring a creature to life. His attempts to rear it, however, go horribly wrong, setting the two on a bloody collision course as the definitions of man and monster become blurred.

Guillermo Del Toro’s Frankenstein is more Hellboy in its presentation than it is Crimson Peak; it’s honestly more similar to Coppola’s Dracula than either of them. The film is barely done with its opening when it starts with a loud sequence of the monster attacking Walton’s ship on the ice. Flinging crew members about and walking against volleys of gunfire, he is a monstrosity by no other name. The Creature (Jacob Elordi) cries out in guttural screams, part animal and part man, as it calls for its creator to be returned to him. While visually impressive (and it remains visually impressive throughout, believe me), this appropriately bombastic hook foreshadows a problem with tone and tempo.

A Monster That Moves Too Fast

The pace overall is far too fast for its first half, even with its heavy two-and-a-half-hour runtime. It’s also a far cry from the brooding nature the story usually takes. A scene where Victor demonstrates rudimentary reanimation to his peers and a council of judges is rapid, where it should be agonizingly slow. There’s horror and an instability in Victor to be emphasized in that moment, but the grotesque sight is an oddly triumphant one instead. Most do not revile his experiments; in fact he’s taken quite seriously.

Advertisement

Many scenes like this create a tonal problem that makes Victor’s tale lean more toward melodrama than toward philosophical or emotional aspects; he is blatantly wild and free, in a way that is respected rather than pitied. There are opportunities to stop, breathe in the Victorian roses and the smell of death, to get really dour, but it’s neglected until the film’s second half.

Isaac’s and Goth’s performances are overwrought at points, feeling more like pantomimes of Byronic characters. I’m not entirely convinced it has more to do with them than with the script they’re given. Like Victor working with the parts of inmates and dead soldiers, even the best of actors with the best of on-screen chemistry are forced to make do. The dialogue has incredibly high highs (especially in its final moments), but when it has lows, how low they are; a character outright stating that “Victor is the real monster” adage to his face was an ocean floor piece of writing if there ever was one.

Isaac, Goth, and Elordi Bring Life to the Dead

Jacob Elordi’s work here, however, is blameless. Though Elordi’s physical performance as the creature will surely win praise, his time speaking is the true highlight. It’s almost certainly a definitive portrayal of the character; his voice for Victor’s creation is haunted with scorn and solitude, the same way his flesh is haunted by the marks of his creator’s handiwork. It agonizes me to see so little of the books’ most iconic lines used wholesale here, because they would be absolutely perfect coming from Elordi. Still, he has incredible chemistry with both Isaac and Goth, and for as brief as their time together is, he radiates pure force.

Frankenstein Is a Masterclass in Mise-En-Scène

Despite its pacing and tone issues, one can’t help but appreciate the truly masterful craftsmanship Del Toro has managed to pack into the screen. Every millimeter of the sets is carved to specification, filled with personality through to the shadows. Every piece of brick, hint of frost, stain of blood, and curve of the vine is painstakingly and surgically placed to create one of the most wonderful and spellbinding sets you’ve seen—and then it keeps presenting you with new environments like that, over, and over.

At the very least, Del Toro’s Frankenstein is a masterpiece of mise-en-scène down to the minutest of details, and that makes it endlessly rewatchable for aesthetic purposes. This isn’t even getting into the effervescent lighting, or how returning collaborator Kate Hawley has outdone herself again with the costuming. Guillermo Del Toro tackling the king of gothic horror stories, a story written by the mother of all science fiction, inevitably set a high bar for him to clear. And while it’s not a pitch perfect rendering of Mary Shelley’s slow moving and Shakespearean epistolary, it is still one of the best-looking movies you will see all year.

Advertisement

Perhaps for us, it’s at the cost of adapting the straightforward, dark story we know into something more operatic. It sings the tale like a soprano rather than reciting it like humble prose, and it doesn’t always sing well. But for Del Toro, the epic scale and voice of this adaptation is the wage expected for making the movie he’s always dreamed of. Even with its problems, it’s well worth it to see a visionary director at work on a story they love.

Continue Reading

Reviews

‘The Siege of Ape Canyon’ Review: Bigfoot Comes Home

Published

on

In my home, films like Night of the Demon and Abominable are played on repeat; Stan Gordon is king. One of my favorite stories surrounding Bigfoot and Ufology is the Bigfoot/UFO double flap of 1973, which Stan Gordon has an incredible in-depth book on. The Patterson–Gimlin film couldn’t hold a flame to Stan Gordon’s dive into one of my home state’s most chronicled supernatural time periods. But as much as I love the Bigfoot topic, I’m not ashamed to say I don’t know half of the stories surrounding that big hairy beast. And one topic that I’m not ashamed to say I haven’t heard of is The Siege of Ape Canyon.

The Harrowing Events of Ape Canyon

Washington State, 1924. A group of miners (originally consisting of Marion Smith, Leroy P. Smith, Fred Beck, John Peterson, August Johannson, and Mac Rhodes) was on a quest to claim a potential gold mine. Literally. The miners would eventually set up camp on the east slope of Mount Saint Helens. Little did they know their temporary shelter would be the start of a multi-day barrage of attacks from what they and researchers believed to be Bigfoot. What transpired in those days would turn out to be one of the most highly criticized pieces of American lore, nearly lost to time and history…nearly.

I need to set the record straight on a few things before we get started. One, I don’t typically like watching documentaries. Two, I believe in Bigfoot. Three, this documentary made me cry.

Image courtesy of Justin Cook Public Relations.

Reviving a Forgotten Bigfoot Legend in The Siege of Ape Canyon

Documentarian Eli Watson sets out to tell one of the most prolific Bigfoot stories of all time (for those who are deep in Bigfoot mythology). It’s noted fairly early in the film that this story is told often and is well known in the Washington area. So then, how do people outside of the incident location know so little about it? I’ve read at least 15 books on and about Bigfoot, and I’ve never once heard this story. This isn’t a Stan-Gordon-reported story about someone sitting on the john and seeing a pair of red eyes outside of their bathroom window. The story around Ape Canyon has a deeper spiritual meaning that goes beyond a few sightings here and there.

Watson’s documentary, though, isn’t just about Bigfoot or unearthing the story of Ape Canyon. Ape Canyon nearly became nothing more than a tall tale that elders would share around a campfire to keep the younglings out of the woods at 2 AM. If it weren’t for Mark Myrsell, that’s exactly what would have happened. The Siege of Ape Canyon spends half its time unpacking the story of Fred Beck and his prospecting crew, and the other half tells a truly inspiring tale of unbridled passion, friendship, and love.

Mark Myrsell’s Relentless Pursuit: Friendship, Truth, and Tears

Mark Myrsell’s undying passion for everything outdoors inevitably led to bringing one of Bigfoot’s craziest stories to light. His devotion to the truth vindicated many people who were (probably) labeled kooks and crazies. Throughout Myrsell’s endless search for the truth, he made lifelong friends along the way. What brought me to tears throughout The Siege of Ape Canyon is Watson’s insistence on showing the human side of Myrsell and his friends. They’re not in this to make millions or bag a Bigfoot corpse; they just want to know the truth. And that’s what they find.

Advertisement

The Siege of Ape Canyon is a documentary that will open your eyes to a wildly mystical story you may not have heard of. And it does it pretty damn well. Whereas many documentaries feel the need to talk down to the viewer just to educate them, Watson’s documentary takes you along for the ride. It doesn’t ask you to believe or not believe in Bigfoot. It allows you to make your own decisions and provides the evidence it needs to. If you’ve ever had a passing interest in the topic of Bigfoot, or if you think you’re the next Stan Gordon, I highly recommend watching The Siege of Ape Canyon.

The Siege of Ape Canyon stomps its way onto digital platforms on November 11. Give yourself a little post-Halloween treat and check it out!

Continue Reading

Horror Press Mailing List

Fangoria
Advertisement
Advertisement