Editorials
Imagining Aliens through the Lenses of Horror and Reality
Aliens have been the subject of millions of imaginations over the years. Lately, the topic has begun to become a reality as the United States Pentagon released information on a lengthy UFO/UAP investigation, and NASA has recently opted to look into UFOs.
While aerial objects of unknown origin don’t necessarily mean extraterrestrials, a small poll on Twitter found that 43.5% of voters believe aliens to be the leading cause behind UFO sightings. Similarly, a survey conducted by the Pew Research Center in 2021 found that 51% of voters believed that “UFOs reported by people in the military” are more than likely the result of non-human, intelligent beings.
While it’s unclear whether this is the case, what would it mean for humanity if it was? The answer to this question has been traversed through some of the greatest minds in horror, such as Tobe Hooper, John Carpenter, Ryan Murphy, Brad Falchuk, Stephen King, M. Night Shyamalan, Ridley Scott, and more.
While, thankfully, none of their imaginings have yet come to fruition, through the lens of their creations, we can imagine what we’d be up against in the face of an alien threat.
Everything from these masters of horror’s depictions of the arrival, appearance, communication, goals, and weaknesses of aliens is examined and compared to how it all stacks up against what experts, eyewitnesses, and logic tells us.
How did they get here?
When the idea of aliens visiting Earth is mentioned, the thought of UFOs is not far behind.
Whether we picture the flying saucers popularized in films of the 1950s, such as The Day the Earth Stood Still, a large mothership such as the one from Close Encounters of the Third Kind, or something else altogether, the thought of spacecraft and alien invaders go hand in hand.
However, other horror films have strayed from this norm, delivering alien life through crashed meteorites or meteor showers, such as in Creepshow, Invaders from Mars, Color Out of Space, and The Seed.
No matter the method, aliens descending from the skies above is the most common depiction.
What UFO reports say:
The descriptions of different unidentified aerial phenomena have varied greatly over generations. World War II pilots saw different colored orbs of light that moved at impossible speeds and angles, so much so that they nicknamed them Foo Fighters.
Metallic saucers/spheres, pyramid-shaped objects, and irregularly shaped aircraft are all UFOs depicted in recently disseminated UFO footage captured by various forces of the United States military. While the sizes, shapes, and lights vary greatly, one overlying factor is the speed at which they travel and their impossible maneuvers. It’s worth mentioning that this, of course, does not make these objects alien in origin. A UFO is simply that, an unidentified object.
What do aliens look like?
To contend with the varied portrayals of intelligent alien life in horror, this list is broken down into three sections with subsections where necessary. This is by no means a complete list for as varied as life is on Earth; it is triply so in the imaginations of what the universe (or multiverse) could hold.
Creatures
Whether it’s the “run around on all fours” sort presented by Invaders from Mars (1986) and Cloverfield, or the slug-like variety depicted in Dreamcatcher and Slither, there have been a host of alien creatures in scary movies. Slugs are not the only slimeballs of alien depictions as The Blob and the true form of the creature from The Invasion of the Body Snatchers will attest.
But of course, the most notorious alien creature of them all, the Xenomorph from Alien, proves that bipedal monsters make for terrifying adversaries. While these aliens walk on two legs as humans do, they have multiple distinguishing features that make them decidedly different from humanity. The film A Quiet Place also displayed this sort of extraterrestrial as it has no eyes, advanced auditory systems, and long arms and legs that are unsettlingly disproportionate to its body.
Essence
While not as widely used as some of the other depictions on this list, an alien essence is a horrifying concept. Shudder Original Color Our of Space executes this idea in a way that bends reality. The Tommyknockers alsosaw an alien essence, though this one possesses everyone in its proximity.
Humanoid
These aliens look like humans but not quite. Fire in the Sky, Prometheus, and Predator are all examples of this. However, they are not the only representation of humanoid lifeforms.
The Greys
The grey aliens, depicted with large heads, black eyes, and grey skin, are the most prominent of all alien depictions. There’s a good reason for that, which will be explained momentarily. If you cannot picture one, look no further than the films Dark Skies, Dreamcatcher, Signs, or V/H/S/2. Or, as The Fourth Kind would chillingly remind us, picture the face of a white owl.
Clowns
That’s right, “Close Encounters of the Clown Kind” is a real thing. Well, not exactly, but Killer Klowns from Outerspace is, and although it’s a horror-comedy, viewers cannot deny the film’s creepiness. Moreover, the most recognizable horror clown of all time is oft forgotten that he is also a shapeshifting alien. Lest we forget, Pennywise was in Derry, Maine, because he crash-landed there.
Us
Whether it’s by parasitic infection, shapeshifting abilities, or impressive disguises, the scariest presentation of aliens comes in the form of them already existing among us. Many movies have executed this idea in various ways. Still, the most memorable examples of this idea occurred in the films: Invasion of the Body Snatchers, The Thing, Species, and lest we forget those with “formaldehyde face” once you’ve got the glasses on, They Live.
What alleged UFO abductees say
Horror films frequently use the “grey” variety of alien life from the testimony of famous UFO abductees Betty and Barney Hill in 1961. Their widely publicized claims about being abducted by creatures with grey skin and large eyes made a large impact on what society pictures when they imagine an alien.
How do aliens communicate?
Close Encounters of the Third Kind saw aliens communicate with humans through music tones and Signs saw the use of crop circles.
Other media such as Dreamcatcher, American Horror Story: Asylum, and American Horror Story: Death Valleyutilizes a “human ambassador” to serve as a bridge of communication, a human whose aid is typically acquired through telepathy and other forms of mental jiu-jitsu.
On the topic of telepathic connection, horror sees many extraterrestrials that communicate with each other through a hive mind, such as in The Faculty or Slither.
Of all forms of communication featured, though, the most chilling is the lack of it. There was no discussion possible with the aliens presented in Alien, Predator, Signs, or A Quiet Place. Those aliens aren’t interested in communicating with us.
What the experts say:
Since intelligent alien life would likely have very little in common with us Earthlings (would they even have mouths?), there would be a significant communication barrier between them and us. Scientists believe that math is the universal language, and that would be our best chance of sharing ideas.
However, historically we have used imagery to try to convey different ideas to intelligent life, should it exist. One recent example is the proposal NASA published, detailing a plan to send drawings of naked humans to space. Another example is the Voyager Golden Record that was sent to space in 1977, containing images and sounds of Earth.
What do aliens want from us?
Potential Spoilers
The depicted goals of an invading alien race are numerous. Some seek to inhabit the Earth (Invasion of the Body Snatchers), and others strive to make our planet more like their own (Color Out of Space). Then, there was Predator, who only did it for the thrill of the kill. Meanwhile, the aliens in Dark Skies want to come into your house and stack your dishes and canned goods up at impossible angles to mess with you.
Then, others are portrayed as just stopping by to steal people away. In the words of The Fourth Kind: “An encounter in the first kind, that’s when you see a UFO. The second kind is when you see evidence of it: crop circles, radiation. The third kind is when you make contact. But the fourth kind, there’s nothing more frightening than the fourth. You see, that one is when they abduct you.”
Some films look at the extraterrestrial motivation for abduction from the perspective of why humanity would do it: experimentation. While these films can make for the most horrific of alien encounters (here’s looking at you, Fire in the Sky), they are, unfortunately, the truest to life.
Not because alien experimentation is necessarily happening, but because that’s what humans do. We tag sharks, grow ears on mice, and test products on animals in ways akin to torture, all for our benefit. Should we expect aliens to be any different?
Whether it’s world domination, human enslavement, experimentation, destruction, or abduction, many horror films tirelessly try to give reasoning behind what is happening. Though if aliens ever did choose to invade, we may not survive long enough to know the reason why.
What are the aliens’ weaknesses?
Spoiler Alert
One factor that has allowed humans in horror movies to win against an invading alien race is discovering a particular weakness. Signs and A Quiet Place 2 both show the aliens’ aversion to water. A Quiet Place also demonstrated the aliens’ strength to be their weakness as loud sounds disable them. A homemade drug that served as a diuretic was the weapon of choice in The Faculty. Since most extraterrestrial imaginings tend to be mortal beings, the use of any number of commonplace weapons against them has also proven effective.
The reality of the matter is discussed by Dr. Steven Greer in Unacknowledged. He indicates that if intelligent aliens were able to visit Earth, that in itself would prove technological advances far beyond our own. Because of this, if aliens wished to harm us, any weakness an alien might have would be irrelevant because we’d still be no match for them.
One of my favorite pieces of UFO lore serves as a testimony to this idea. While I will not assert that aliens or UFOs piloted by aliens have ever been to Earth, the following story is true and paints a creepy picture of our defenses failing in the face of an aerial threat.
The Battle of Los Angeles
Two months after Pearl Harbor was attacked, on February 25, 1942, at around two a.m., a blackout was ordered in Los Angeles. Something was in the sky, and anti-aircraft weapons began firing hundreds of rounds of artillery at it. At least five people died in the ensuing chaos: three perished in motor vehicle collisions, and two died from heart attacks. Despite 1,440 rounds of ammunition fired, the object was reportedly not brought down. While the official cause of this event remains unknown, the running theory is believed to be a weather balloon combined with post-Pearl Harbor anxieties.
For now, in the absence of proof, intelligent alien life interacting with Earth does not exist outside of conjecture and the movies. However, if the films are any indicator, we may very well be better off alone.
For more coverage on space invaders, be sure to check out Shudder’s newly-added Alien Encounters Collection and Jordan Peele’s extraterrestrial horror film Nope, releasing theatrically on July 22nd.
If there are any classic alien-horror movies that you wish I’d included or any fun factoids worthy of a tinfoil hat that you’d like to divulge, feel free to share in the comments below!
As a horror fan, I tend to think about remakes a lot. Not why they are made, necessarily. That answer is pretty clear: money. But something closer to “if they have to be made, how can they be made well?” It’s rare to find a remake that is generally considered to be better than the original. However, there are plenty that have been deemed to be valuable in a different way. You can find these in basically all subgenres. Sci-fi, for instance (The Thing, The Blob). Zombies (Dawn of the Dead, Evil Dead). Even slashers (The Texas Chainsaw Massacre, My Bloody Valentine). However, when it comes to haunted house remakes, only The Woman in Black truly stands out, and it is shockingly underrated. Even more intriguingly, it is demonstrably better than the original movie.
The Original Haunted House Movie Is Almost Always Better
Now please note, I’m specifically talking about movies with haunted houses, rather than ghost movies in general. We wouldn’t want to be bringing The Ring into this conversation. That’s not fair to anyone.
Plenty of haunted house movies are minted classics, and as such, the subgenre has gotten its fair share of remakes. These are, almost unilaterally, some of the most-panned movies in a format that attracts bad reviews like honey attracts flies.
You’ve got 2005’s The Amityville Horror (a CGI-heavy slog briefly buoyed by a shirtless, possessed Ryan Reynolds). That same year’s Dark Water (one of many inert remakes of Asian horror films to come from that era). 1999’s The House on Haunted Hill (a manic, incoherent effort that millennial nostalgia has perhaps been too kind to). That same year there was The Haunting (a manic, incoherent effort that didn’t even earn nostalgia in the first place). And 2015’s Poltergeist (Remember this movie? Don’t you wish you didn’t?). And while I could accept arguments about 2001’s THIR13EN Ghosts, it’s hard to compete with a William Castle classic.
The Problem with Haunted House Remakes
Generally, I think haunted house remakes fail so often because of remakes’ compulsive obsession with updating the material. They throw in state-of-the-art special effects, the hottest stars of the era, and big set piece action sequences. Like, did House on Haunted Hill need to open with that weird roller coaster scene? Of course it didn’t.
However, when it comes to haunted house movies, bigger does not always mean better. They tend to be at their best when they are about ordinary people experiencing heightened versions of normal domestic fears. Bumps in the night, unexplained shadows, and the like. Maybe even some glowing eyes or a floating child. That’s all fine and dandy. But once you have a giant stone lion decapitating Owen Wilson, things have perhaps gone a bit off the rails.
The One Big Exception is The Woman in Black
The one undeniable exception to the haunted house remake rule is 2012’s The Woman in Black. If we want to split hairs, it’s technically the second adaptation of the Susan Hill novel of the same name. But The Haunting was technically a Shirley Jackson re-adaptation, and that still counts as a remake, so this does too.
The novel follows a young solicitor being haunted when handling a client’s estate at the secluded Eel Marsh House. The property was first adapted into a 1989 TV movie starring Adrian Rawlings, and it was ripe for a remake. In spite of having at least one majorly eerie scene, the 1989 movie is in fact too simple and small-scale. It is too invested in the humdrum realities of country life to have much time to be scary. Plus, it boasts a small screen budget and a distinctly “British television” sense of production design. Eel Marsh basically looks like any old English house, with whitewashed walls and a bland exterior.
Therefore, the “bigger is better” mentality of horror remakes took The Woman in Black to the exact level it needed.
The Woman in Black 2012 Makes Some Great Choices
2012’s The Woman in Black deserves an enormous amount of credit for carrying the remake mantle superbly well. By following a more sedate original, it reaches the exact pitch it needs in order to craft a perfect haunted house story. Most appropriately, the design of Eel Marsh House and its environs are gloriously excessive. While they don’t stretch the bounds of reality into sheer impossibility, they completely turn the original movie on its head.
Eel Marsh is now, as it should be, a decaying, rambling pile where every corner might hide deadly secrets. It’d be scary even if there wasn’t a ghost inside it, if only because it might contain copious black mold. Then you add the marshy grounds choked in horror movie fog. And then there’s the winding, muddy road that gets lost in the tide and feels downright purgatorial. Finally, you have a proper damn setting for a haunted house movie that plumbs the wicked secrets of the wealthy.
Why The Woman in Black Remake Is an Underrated Horror Gem
While 2012’s The Woman in Black is certainly underrated as a remake, I think it is even more underrated as a haunted house movie. For one thing, it is one of the best examples of the pre-Conjuring jump-scare horror movie done right. And if you’ve read my work for any amount of time, you know how positively I feel about jump scares. The Woman in Black offers a delectable combo platter of shocks designed to keep you on your toes. For example, there are plenty of patient shots that wait for you to notice the creepy thing in the background. But there are also a number of short sharp shocks that remain tremendously effective.
That is not to say that the movie is perfect. They did slightly overstep with their “bigger is better” move to cast Daniel Radcliffe in the lead role. It was a big swing making his first post-Potter role that of a single father with a four-year-old kid. It’s a bit much to have asked 2012 audiences to swallow, though it reads slightly better so many years later.
However, despite its flaws, The Woman in Black remake is demonstrably better than the original. In nearly every conceivable way. It’s pure Hammer Films confection, as opposed to a television drama without an ounce of oomph.
There are only so many times I can get away with burying the lede with an editorial headline before someone throws a rock at me. It may or may not be justified when they do. This article is not an attempt at ragebaiting Scream fans, I promise. Neither was my Scream 3 article, which I’m still completely right about.
I do firmly believe that Scream 2 is, at the very least, the last Scream film I’d want to watch. But what was initially just me complaining about a film that I disregard as the weakest entry in its series has since developed into trying to address what it does right. You’ve heard of the expression “jack of all trades, master of none”, and to me Scream 2 really was the jack of all trades of the franchise for the longest time.
It technically has everything a Scream movie needs. Its opening is great, but it’s not the best of them by a long shot. Its killers are unexpected, but not particularly interesting, feeling flat and one-dimensional compared to the others. It has kills, but only a few of them are particularly shocking or well executed. It pokes fun at the genre but doesn’t say anything particularly bold in terms of commentary. Having everything a Scream movie needs is the bare minimum to me.
But the question is, what does Scream 2 do best exactly? Finding that answer involves highlighting what each of the other sequels are great at, and trying to pick out what Scream 2 has that the others don’t.
Scream 3 Is the Big Finale That Utilizes Its Setting Perfectly
Scream as a series handily dodges the trap most horror franchises fall into: rehashing and retreading the same territory over and over. That’s because every one of its films are in essence trying to do something a little different and a little bolder.
Scream 3 is especially bold because it was conceived, written, and executed as the final installment in the Scream series. And it does that incredibly well. Taking the action away from a locale similar to Woodsboro, Scream 3 tosses our characters into the frying pan of a Hollywood film production. Despite its notorious number of rewrites and script changes (one of which resulted in our first solo Ghostface), it still manages to be a perfect culmination of Sidney Prescott’s story.
I won’t repeat myself too much (go read my previous article on the subject), but 3 is often maligned for as good a film as it turned out to be. And for all of its clunkier reveals, and its ghost mom antics, it understands how to utilize its setting and send its characters off into the sunset right.
Scream 4’s Meta Commentary Wakes Scream from a Deep Sleep
As Wes Craven’s final film, Scream 4 has a very special place in the franchise. It was and still is largely adored for bringing back the franchise from a deep 11-year sleep. With one of the craziest openings in any horror film, let alone a Scream film, it sets the tone for a bombastic return and pays off in spades with the journey it takes us on.
Its primary Ghostface Jill Roberts is a fan favorite, and for some people, she is the best to ever wear the mask. Its script is the source of many memorable moments, not the least of which is Kirby’s iconic rapid-fire response to the horror remakes question. And most importantly, it makes a bold and surprisingly effective return for our main trio of Sidney, Dewey, and Gale, whose return didn’t feel trite or hammy when they ended up coming back to Woodsboro for more.
Craven’s work on 4 truly understands the power its predecessors had exerted on the horror genre, both irreverent in its metacommentary and celebratory of the Scream series as a whole. The film is less of a love letter to the genre and more of a kicking down of the door to remind people what Scream is about. 4’s story re-established that Scream isn’t going away, no matter how long it takes for another film, and no matter how many franchises try to take its place.
Scream 5 & 6 Is Radio Silence’s Brutal and Bloody Attitude Era
Put simply, Scream 5 and 6’s strong suit was not its characters. It was not its clever writing. The Radio Silence duology in the Scream series excelled in one thing: beating the hell out of its characters.
Wrestling fans (of which there is an unsurprising amount of crossover with horror fans) will know why I call it the Attitude Era. Just like WWE’s most infamous stretch of history, Radio Silence brought something especially aggressive to their entries. And it’s because these films were just brutal. Handing the reins to the series, Bettinelli-Olpin and Gillet gifted a special kineticism to the classic Scream chase sequences, insane finales, and especially its ruthless killers.
All five of the Ghostfaces present in 5 and 6 are the definition of nasty. They’re unrelenting, and in my humble opinion, the freakiest since the original duo of Stu Macher and Billy Loomis. Getting to hear all the air get sucked out of the room as Dewey is gutted like a fish in 5 was still an incredible moment to experience in theatres, and it’s something I don’t think would have happened if the films were any less mean and any less explosively violent.
So, What Does Scream 2 Do Best Exactly?
So now, after looking at all these entries and all of their greatest qualities, what does Scream 2 have that none of the others do? What must I concede to Scream 2?
Really great character development.
Film is a medium of spectacle most of the time, and this is reflected in how we critique and compliment them. It affects how we look back on them, sometimes treating them more harshly than they deserve because they don’t have that visual flash. But for every ounce of spectacle Scream 2 lacks, I have to admit, it does an incredible job of developing Sidney Prescott as a character.
On a rare rewatch, it’s clear Neve Campbell is carrying the entirety of Scream 2 on her back just because of how compelling she makes Sidney. Watching her slowly fight against a tide of paranoia, fear, and distrust of the people around her once more, watching her be plunged back into the nightmare, is undeniably effective.
It’s also where Dewey and Gale are really cemented as a couple, and where the seeds of them always returning to each other are planted. Going from a mutual simmering disrespect to an affectionate couple to inseparable but awkward and in love is just classic; two people who complete each other in how different they are, but are inevitably pulled back and forth by those differences, their bond is one of the major highlights throughout the series.
Maybe All the Scream Films Are Just Good?
These three characters are the heart of the series, long after they’ve been written out. I talk a big game about how Scream 3 is the perfect ending for the franchise, but I like to gloss over the fact that Scream 2 does a lot of the legwork when it comes to developing the characters of Dewey, Gale, and especially Sidney.
Without 2, 3 just isn’t that effective when it comes to giving Sidney her long deserved peace. Without 2, the way we see Sidney’s return in 4 & 5 doesn’t hit as hard. All of the Scream movies owe something to Scream 2 in the same way they owe something to the original Scream. I think I’ve come to a new point of view when it comes to the Scream franchise: maybe there is no bad entry. Maybe none of them have to be the worst. Each one interlinks with the others in their own unique way.
And even though I doubt I will ever really love Scream 2, it has an undeniable strength in its character writing that permeates throughout the whole franchise. And that at the very least keeps it from being the worst Scream film.
Brooklyn Horror Film Festival 2025: The Creep Tapes Season 2
The Horror Press Podcast Ep 51: Frankenstein & Stranger Things
‘Frankenstein’ Review: Guillermo Del Toro Is Off to the Races
‘The Siege of Ape Canyon’ Review: Bigfoot Comes Home
The Best Horror You Can Stream on Shudder in November 2025
‘The Addams Family’ (1991) First-Time Watch Review
Brooklyn Horror Film Festival 2025: ‘Slayed’ LGBTQ+ Shorts Block
Brooklyn Horror Film Fest 2025: ‘CAMP’ Review
Brooklyn Horror Film Fest 2025: ‘The Serpent’s Skin’ Review
The Best Horror You Can Stream on Netflix in November 2025
‘The People Under the Stairs’ Review: A Brilliantly Bizarre Undercover Horror Classic
Slappy Was the Blueprint: How the Dummy from Goosebumps Became A Horror Icon
Glen and Glenda: Don Mancini’s Reverence for Queerness in ‘Seed of Chucky’ (2004)
‘Five Nights at Freddy’s’ and The Story of William Afton Explained
‘Truth or Dare’: Who Did it Best?
The 11 Most Disturbing Horror Movies Ever, According to an Actual Horror Fan
V/H/S Franchise Ranked, Best to Worst
Everything You Need to Know About Jason Voorhees
[REVIEW] ‘Cherry Falls’ (1999) Brittany Murphy Shines in This Cult Classic Slasher
