Reviews
[REVIEW] Demon Knight (1995) Is A Delightful Character Actor and Special Effects Extravaganza
The film follows a transient named Brayker, who after being run down by a mysterious cowboy, ends up at a church-turned-boarding house with seven strangers. It’s soon revealed that Brayker and his pursuer, The Collector, have been in a game of cat and mouse for decades: The Collector is an immortal demon, who wants to take a holy artifact from Brayker for himself. Destiny itself has brought these people together, and if it means killing everyone in the boarding house to get the relic back, The Collector won’t shy from that method.
Despite being a massive horror fan, I have to admit that I don’t really have comfort horror films. I have a catalog a mile long of horror films I admire greatly, films I would consider the best of all time. But the ones I specifically rewatch because they make me feel outright comfortable or lift my spirits are few and far between.
I don’t have many outside of Demon Knight, at least.
It’s got everything I like in a horror movie: wild effects, lots of intricate supernatural lore, a whip-smart pace, and an insane amount of character actors reading off of a very fun script. It feels a lot like a campier version of Legion, but if I really had to sell someone on Demon Knight quickly, I would say that above all else it feels like the Raimi movie Sam Raimi never actually made. It’s gooey, goofy, fun in that distinct style few directors can emulate.
The film follows a transient named Brayker, who after being run down by a mysterious cowboy, ends up at a church-turned-boarding house with seven strangers. It’s soon revealed that Brayker and his pursuer, The Collector, have been in a game of cat and mouse for decades: The Collector is an immortal demon, who wants to take a holy artifact from Brayker for himself. Destiny itself has brought these people together, and if it means killing everyone in the boarding house to get the relic back, The Collector won’t shy from that method.
Demon Knight was the first full-length Tales from the Crypt film, and the first in an intended trilogy that was being planned out by Universal Pictures. After the abysmal sequel Bordello of Blood bombed both critically and financially, Tales from the Crypt has been on the backburner ever since. It might be a bit dramatic to say that Bordello was so bad it killed the franchise, but it certainly didn’t help the legacy of the series. Which is a shame because Demon Knight is a really enjoyable film, and it deserves sequels like it in that irreverent, slightly immature style of horror that Tales from the Crypt is known for. It’s got the energy of Tales from the Crypt’s very origins, the feel of an old-timey horror comic book; this is something the film plays up to and even acknowledges in its most stylized sequence.
The cast, led by William Sadler (playing Brayker) and Jada Pinkett Smith (playing criminally underrated final girl Jeryline) are phenomenal. It’s the aforementioned character actor Olympics here, as everyone is bringing the full force of their “‘isms” to the table. By which I mean, the little acting quirks they’re known for; for instance, the most notable Saddler-ism being William Sadler’s very breathy and dramatic acting breaks out when it’s time to get dire. Pinkett Smith spends the entire runtime giving her signature “Are you serious?” stare, Dick Miller doing his iconic little laugh that makes you feel like you’re talking to your grandpa who just pulled a quarter from behind your ear. And of course, it wouldn’t be CCH Pounder if she wasn’t being a Terminator-level hard-ass on the people around her, even when her whole arm has been ripped off and she shouldn’t be able to talk let alone walk. It’s very endearing to watch if you’re familiar with them from other films, and it’s a little cozy in its familiarity, which I can appreciate. It’s in these little quirks you start to really enjoy their characters and begin rooting for them, as they become unwitting pawns in a chess game between heaven and hell.
The cream of the crop here, though, is Billy Zane, who is genuinely explosively charming and violently funny as The Collector. He’s a human cartoon in his physical performance, with the appeal of Him from Powerpuff Girls wrapped into the physique of a 90’s fashion model. He’s an eldritch abomination you don’t trust at all but can’t help but find charming because of how charismatic he is. He just makes you want to smile a little with each of his quips. The Collector is an all-time villain trapped in a mostly forgotten movie; like the lineage of demons he’s supposed to be spawned from, trapped in darkness, there’s a stupendous character hidden in this film that not many people have seen, and that’s the true crime of Demon Knight’s general obscurity. Free Billy!
Regarding the film’s special effects, Demon Knight spared no expense in creating The Collector’s cohorts of slimy little hellspawn. The film has some impressive work for the reported time and budget constraints they had between sudden rewrites, and it’s mostly thanks to Todd Masters, an SFX maven who’s worked on everything from James Gunn’s Slither to Denis Villenueve’s Dune (he rescued the film’s Pumpkinhead-inspired creatures from being replaced with guys in suits, a version of the demons he jokingly called ‘the Blues Brothers’). Outside of some sparing digital effects and glowy rotoscopes for exploding demon eyes and magical blood, the film is 99% practical, and it’s top-tier stuff. Ernest Dickinson’s directing of not just the actors, but of these effects and the creatures make for an exciting film that reminded me of Raimi’s work heavily in the visual energy it packs.
I struggled quite a bit to find things I don’t like about Demon Knight. It’s hard to critique something in my usual mode when all you have to say is positive. Maybe it’s the comfort film bias, or maybe it’s because it’s actually a real hidden gem. Maybe it’s because it has one of the craziest heavy metal compilation albums for a soundtrack. Regardless of the reason, you should take this rundown of the film’s strengths as a full-throated endorsement of Demon Knight and watch it as soon as possible.
Happy watching horror fans!
Reviews
‘Frankenstein’ Review: Guillermo Del Toro Is Off to the Races
Those expecting Guillermo Del Toro’s Frankenstein to be similar to the book, or to any other adaptation, are in for something else. A longtime enjoyer of the creature’s story, Del Toro instead draws from many places: the novel, James Whale’s culturally defining 1931 film, the Kenneth Branagh version, there are even hints from Terence Fisher’s Curse of Frankenstein, and if the set design and costuming are to be believed, there are trace elements of the National Theatre production too.
The formulation to breathe life into this amalgam is a sort of storm cloud of cultural memory and personal desire for Del Toro. This is about crafting his Frankenstein: the one he wanted to see since he was young, the vision he wanted to stitch together. What results is an experience that is more colorful and kinetic and well-loved by its creator than any Frankenstein we’ve had yet, but what it leaves behind is much of its gothic heart. Quiet darkness, looming dread, poetry, and romance are set aside as what has been sold as “the definitive retelling” goes off to the races. It’s a fast-paced ride through a world of mad science, and you’re on it.
Victor Frankenstein’s Ambition and Tragedy
A tale as old as time, with some changes: the morbid talents and untamed hubris of Victor Frankenstein (Oscar Isaac) guide him to challenge death itself. Spurred by a wealthy investor named Henrich Harlander, and a desire for Harlander’s niece Elizabeth (Mia Goth), Victor uses dead flesh and voltaic vigor to bring a creature to life. His attempts to rear it, however, go horribly wrong, setting the two on a bloody collision course as the definitions of man and monster become blurred.
Guillermo Del Toro’s Frankenstein is more Hellboy in its presentation than it is Crimson Peak; it’s honestly more similar to Coppola’s Dracula than either of them. The film is barely done with its opening when it starts with a loud sequence of the monster attacking Walton’s ship on the ice. Flinging crew members about and walking against volleys of gunfire, he is a monstrosity by no other name. The Creature (Jacob Elordi) cries out in guttural screams, part animal and part man, as it calls for its creator to be returned to him. While visually impressive (and it remains visually impressive throughout, believe me), this appropriately bombastic hook foreshadows a problem with tone and tempo.
A Monster That Moves Too Fast
The pace overall is far too fast for its first half, even with its heavy two-and-a-half-hour runtime. It’s also a far cry from the brooding nature the story usually takes. A scene where Victor demonstrates rudimentary reanimation to his peers and a council of judges is rapid, where it should be agonizingly slow. There’s horror and an instability in Victor to be emphasized in that moment, but the grotesque sight is an oddly triumphant one instead. Most do not revile his experiments; in fact he’s taken quite seriously.
Many scenes like this create a tonal problem that makes Victor’s tale lean more toward melodrama than toward philosophical or emotional aspects; he is blatantly wild and free, in a way that is respected rather than pitied. There are opportunities to stop, breathe in the Victorian roses and the smell of death, to get really dour, but it’s neglected until the film’s second half.
Isaac’s and Goth’s performances are overwrought at points, feeling more like pantomimes of Byronic characters. I’m not entirely convinced it has more to do with them than with the script they’re given. Like Victor working with the parts of inmates and dead soldiers, even the best of actors with the best of on-screen chemistry are forced to make do. The dialogue has incredibly high highs (especially in its final moments), but when it has lows, how low they are; a character outright stating that “Victor is the real monster” adage to his face was an ocean floor piece of writing if there ever was one.
Isaac, Goth, and Elordi Bring Life to the Dead
Jacob Elordi’s work here, however, is blameless. Though Elordi’s physical performance as the creature will surely win praise, his time speaking is the true highlight. It’s almost certainly a definitive portrayal of the character; his voice for Victor’s creation is haunted with scorn and solitude, the same way his flesh is haunted by the marks of his creator’s handiwork. It agonizes me to see so little of the books’ most iconic lines used wholesale here, because they would be absolutely perfect coming from Elordi. Still, he has incredible chemistry with both Isaac and Goth, and for as brief as their time together is, he radiates pure force.
Frankenstein Is a Masterclass in Mise-En-Scène
Despite its pacing and tone issues, one can’t help but appreciate the truly masterful craftsmanship Del Toro has managed to pack into the screen. Every millimeter of the sets is carved to specification, filled with personality through to the shadows. Every piece of brick, hint of frost, stain of blood, and curve of the vine is painstakingly and surgically placed to create one of the most wonderful and spellbinding sets you’ve seen—and then it keeps presenting you with new environments like that, over, and over.
At the very least, Del Toro’s Frankenstein is a masterpiece of mise-en-scène down to the minutest of details, and that makes it endlessly rewatchable for aesthetic purposes. This isn’t even getting into the effervescent lighting, or how returning collaborator Kate Hawley has outdone herself again with the costuming. Guillermo Del Toro tackling the king of gothic horror stories, a story written by the mother of all science fiction, inevitably set a high bar for him to clear. And while it’s not a pitch perfect rendering of Mary Shelley’s slow moving and Shakespearean epistolary, it is still one of the best-looking movies you will see all year.
Perhaps for us, it’s at the cost of adapting the straightforward, dark story we know into something more operatic. It sings the tale like a soprano rather than reciting it like humble prose, and it doesn’t always sing well. But for Del Toro, the epic scale and voice of this adaptation is the wage expected for making the movie he’s always dreamed of. Even with its problems, it’s well worth it to see a visionary director at work on a story they love.
Reviews
‘The Siege of Ape Canyon’ Review: Bigfoot Comes Home
In my home, films like Night of the Demon and Abominable are played on repeat; Stan Gordon is king. One of my favorite stories surrounding Bigfoot and Ufology is the Bigfoot/UFO double flap of 1973, which Stan Gordon has an incredible in-depth book on. The Patterson–Gimlin film couldn’t hold a flame to Stan Gordon’s dive into one of my home state’s most chronicled supernatural time periods. But as much as I love the Bigfoot topic, I’m not ashamed to say I don’t know half of the stories surrounding that big hairy beast. And one topic that I’m not ashamed to say I haven’t heard of is The Siege of Ape Canyon.
The Harrowing Events of Ape Canyon
Washington State, 1924. A group of miners (originally consisting of Marion Smith, Leroy P. Smith, Fred Beck, John Peterson, August Johannson, and Mac Rhodes) was on a quest to claim a potential gold mine. Literally. The miners would eventually set up camp on the east slope of Mount Saint Helens. Little did they know their temporary shelter would be the start of a multi-day barrage of attacks from what they and researchers believed to be Bigfoot. What transpired in those days would turn out to be one of the most highly criticized pieces of American lore, nearly lost to time and history…nearly.
I need to set the record straight on a few things before we get started. One, I don’t typically like watching documentaries. Two, I believe in Bigfoot. Three, this documentary made me cry.

Image courtesy of Justin Cook Public Relations.
Reviving a Forgotten Bigfoot Legend in The Siege of Ape Canyon
Documentarian Eli Watson sets out to tell one of the most prolific Bigfoot stories of all time (for those who are deep in Bigfoot mythology). It’s noted fairly early in the film that this story is told often and is well known in the Washington area. So then, how do people outside of the incident location know so little about it? I’ve read at least 15 books on and about Bigfoot, and I’ve never once heard this story. This isn’t a Stan-Gordon-reported story about someone sitting on the john and seeing a pair of red eyes outside of their bathroom window. The story around Ape Canyon has a deeper spiritual meaning that goes beyond a few sightings here and there.
Watson’s documentary, though, isn’t just about Bigfoot or unearthing the story of Ape Canyon. Ape Canyon nearly became nothing more than a tall tale that elders would share around a campfire to keep the younglings out of the woods at 2 AM. If it weren’t for Mark Myrsell, that’s exactly what would have happened. The Siege of Ape Canyon spends half its time unpacking the story of Fred Beck and his prospecting crew, and the other half tells a truly inspiring tale of unbridled passion, friendship, and love.
Mark Myrsell’s Relentless Pursuit: Friendship, Truth, and Tears
Mark Myrsell’s undying passion for everything outdoors inevitably led to bringing one of Bigfoot’s craziest stories to light. His devotion to the truth vindicated many people who were (probably) labeled kooks and crazies. Throughout Myrsell’s endless search for the truth, he made lifelong friends along the way. What brought me to tears throughout The Siege of Ape Canyon is Watson’s insistence on showing the human side of Myrsell and his friends. They’re not in this to make millions or bag a Bigfoot corpse; they just want to know the truth. And that’s what they find.
The Siege of Ape Canyon is a documentary that will open your eyes to a wildly mystical story you may not have heard of. And it does it pretty damn well. Whereas many documentaries feel the need to talk down to the viewer just to educate them, Watson’s documentary takes you along for the ride. It doesn’t ask you to believe or not believe in Bigfoot. It allows you to make your own decisions and provides the evidence it needs to. If you’ve ever had a passing interest in the topic of Bigfoot, or if you think you’re the next Stan Gordon, I highly recommend watching The Siege of Ape Canyon.
The Siege of Ape Canyon stomps its way onto digital platforms on November 11. Give yourself a little post-Halloween treat and check it out!


