Connect with us

Reviews

[REVIEW] Is ‘Fatal Attraction’ (1987) A Horror Film?

Fatal Attraction follows New York attorney Dan Gallagher (Michael Douglas) who meets editor Alex Forrest (Glenn Close) at a book release party. When Dan’s wife Beth (Anne Archer) and young daughter Ellen (Ellen Hamilton Latzen) go out to the country for a weekend with Beth’s parents, Dan has a life-changing affair with Alex. Once Dan makes it clear that he doesn’t wish to continue their affair in secret, Alex attempts to end her life. That’s just the tip of the iceberg. Learning that Alex is pregnant (possibly) with Dan’s child, he fast-tracks his family’s exit from the city to a sprawling, isolated house in the woods. But if he thought moving would solve all his problems…he was dead wrong.

Published

on

Not to be that guy but Merriam-Webster defines horror as, “painful and intense fear, dread, or dismay.” Defining something as horror is more than just checking a few boxes of descriptor words. What it really comes down to is the subjective experience of the viewer. Fatal Attraction is one of those films I’ve heard endlessly mentioned throughout the years, but I had never given it the time of day. So, after finally watching it, I’m left with the question: is it horror?

Yes. But not a good one.

Fatal Attraction follows New York attorney Dan Gallagher (Michael Douglas) who meets editor Alex Forrest (Glenn Close) at a book release party. When Dan’s wife Beth (Anne Archer) and young daughter Ellen (Ellen Hamilton Latzen) go out to the country for a weekend with Beth’s parents, Dan has a life-changing affair with Alex. Once Dan makes it clear that he doesn’t wish to continue their affair in secret, Alex attempts to end her life. That’s just the tip of the iceberg. Learning that Alex is pregnant (possibly) with Dan’s child, he fast-tracks his family’s exit from the city to a sprawling, isolated house in the woods. But if he thought moving would solve all his problems…he was dead wrong.

Where do we start with discussing Fatal Attraction? I’ll start by quelling your, and curator of all things Horror Press James-Michael, minds by saying when I refer to Fatal Attraction as not being a “good one” I don’t mean it’s a bad film. It’s not great by any means but it’s not terrible. Fatal Attraction has the trappings of a great horror film but fails to follow through with elements that would make it an excellent horror film. Part of this has to do with the scrapped ending.

The “good guy” in Fatal Attraction isn’t Dan or Alex, it’s Beth and Ellen. Dan and Alex are inherently both bad people. Where Dan is just morally corrupt, Alex has mental health issues that drive her to commit reprehensible acts. Beth and Ellen (and the rabbit) are the innocents stuck in the crossfire of Dan and Alex. By the time the credits rolled and Dan shook the Luitenant’s hand (Michael Arkin), I didn’t feel anything for him. I felt terrible that Ellen had to be put through this and watch her parents argue (and get kidnapped). I felt bad that Beth was unnecessarily forced to have a car accident and then kill Alex.

Advertisement

Now, if the film’s purpose was to feel bad for Beth and Ellen, I would have a different outlook. But writer James Dearden and director Adrian Lyne (based on Dearden’s short film Diversion ((which was based on Clint Eastwood’s Play Misty for Me))) fail to do anything with their script and direction, respectively, to make you feel for them. Beth and Ellen are constantly relegated to the background and only used when Dan needs to be hurt somehow.

The scrapped ending for this film has Alex slitting her throat and framing Dan for her murder. While this would have been a better all-around ending, it still paints Alex as the crazy woman who solely has it out to hurt men. Which, for a film in the ‘80s, isn’t too much of a stretch. Films like this and 1977’s Death Game (the film that Eli Roth remade Knock Knock from) are quick to point the finger at women. Death Game even ends with Agatha (Sondra Locke) and Donna (Colleen Camp) getting run over by a van–their just desserts. I can only imagine the rounds of applause that moment got in ’70s cinemas. To make a long story short, Dan is not the victim in Fatal Attraction. And it’s completely disingenuous for this film to paint him as such. 

One of the highlights of Fatal Attraction is the acting. While we may not see any of Michael Douglas’ famed cancer-causing-cunnilingus, he does a stellar job as Dan (the way he is written). Glenn Close, brings a level of charisma to her character that could lead to an “alpha” man falling for her. But maybe the biggest plothole of the film is WHO THE HELL WOULD EVER CHEAT ON Anne Archer?!

The casting for Fatal Attraction works for what this film is, but it’s important to look at what could have been. Almost 100 actresses were looked at for Alex with people including Rosanna Arquette, Jessica Lange, Demi Moore, Sharon Stone, Mia Farrow, Beverly D’Angelo, Julia Louis-Dreyfus, Olivia Newton-John, Heather Locklear, and Isabelle Adjani. ISABELLE ADJANI. Come on! Conversely, some of the men looked at to play Dan were less interesting and attractive like Dan Aykroyd, John Voight, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Rick Moranis, Jim Belushi, Sylvester Stallone, and O.J. Simpson. That would have been hysterical[ly bad].

Fatal Attraction is a competently directed film for the story it’s trying to tell but fails to be anything more than thinly veiled semi-erotic fodder. Some solid performances are bogged down by a one-note story that’s afraid to push itself to the far reaches of human emotion. The first half is fun and exciting but slows down in the back half, which kills the pacing. I wish they would have stuck with the original ending and not curtailed itself to idiotic test audiences. It’s fine for what it is, but it could have been so much more with a better casting director.

Advertisement

Brendan is an award-winning author and screenwriter rotting away in New Jersey. His hobbies include rain, slugs, and the endless search for The Mothman.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Reviews

‘Shutter’ (2004) Review: Is Aughts-ful

Published

on

The aughts were the wild wild west when it came to remakes and reboots. One subgenre that excelled in striking fear into the hearts of North Americans was unquestionably J-horror. It was a craze that gave a 10-ish-year-old me nightmares for too much of my childhood. Out of all of the J-horror remakes that frightened me, the one I never got around to checking out was Shutter. Which is what I was initially going to open this review with. That was until I realized that Shutter wasn’t a J-horror remake! Talk about egg on my face!

A Haunting Tale in Japan

Shutter follows Ben Shaw (Joshua Jackson), a seasoned photographer who moves to Japan with his new wife Jane (Rachael Taylor). Their first night in Japan gets off to an awful start when Jane runs over a mysterious woman at night. Jane starts seeing this mysterious woman throughout her daily life, and Ben’s photos become unusable when a spirit takes them over one by one. Is this spirit coming after Ben and Jane for the accident? Or, is this spirit haunting them for a more sinister reason?

This hastily assembled remake is directed by Masayuki Ochiai and written by Luke Dawson. After Shutter, Dawson’s only other notable script would be the 2015 flop The Lazarus Effect. Which is what I was initially going to write until I learned that The Lazarus Effect brought in nearly $40 million at the box office. It’s difficult to say what the worst part of Shutter is, but the script is definitely at the top of that list. Not only is the script boring and bereft of any real terror, but the characters are beyond flat. Even without having seen Shutter (2004), it was clear what direction this film was taking, and any suspense that could have existed flew right out the window.

Failed Cultural Commentary

Dawson’s script attempts to take a look at white people forcibly inserting themselves into a culture and making it all about themselves. But it’s such a surface-level observation and handled with the care of a five-year-old’s crayon drawing that it’s nearly laughable. At the very least, Shutter does succeed at being a good-for-her film. And for that, I can tip my hat.

Director Masayuki Ochiai and cinematographer Katsumi Yanagijima fail to explore any space in any meaningful way. Japan is a beautiful location, and it’s completely wasted throughout this film. The only really visually interesting moment is the well-choreographed car crash. From there, things quickly go downhill. I’m sure there’s a way to make a film about spirit photography feel interesting and scary, but this is definitely not the right approach.

Advertisement

Shutter is a Forgettable Horror Flop

I’ve covered a lot of films during my tenure at Horror Press that I’ve never seen before. It’s a gamble I’m happy to risk. Whether they hit or miss doesn’t usually matter to me. For some reason, I held Shutter in high regard. I thought people were over the moon for this film. I suppose I can add this to my list of films, such as The Barrens and Warm Bodies, as ones I could easily consider a complete waste of time.

Continue Reading

Reviews

Brooklyn Horror Film Festival 2025: ‘Buffet Infinity’ Review

Published

on

Within the found footage subgenre exists an even more niche and untapped market. Screen life has slowly overtaken found footage; hardcore fans, like myself, ache for something different. One of the more interesting sub-subgenres of found footage is something that I don’t think has a name yet, so let’s name it here and now. How about…TV-gone-rogue! The TV-gone-rogue subgenre is small. Ghostwatch got the ball rolling for these gone rogue-like films, but there was radio silence for quite some time. It would be Chris LaMartina’s WNUF Halloween Special that really brought this idea back into the limelight. Many filmmakers have tried to make TV-gone-rogue interesting, and many have failed. That is until Simon Glassman stepped onto the scene with Buffet Infinity.

Buffet Infinity: A Chaotic Tale of Westridge

The town (city?) of Westridge is whisked into chaos when the new Buffet Infinity restaurant rolls into town. Local sandwich shop owner Jennifer Avery (Allison Bench) is the first to take the soon-to-be conglomerate to task with increasingly pointed advertisements. Suddenly, local restaurant owners/workers go missing in droves as Buffet Infinity expands into neighboring businesses. Sinkholes, missing cityfolk, quarantines, and mysterious sounds abound, leaving residents to ask one question…who really has the sauce?

On the Brooklyn Horror Film Festival schedule, the header image for Buffet Infinity shows multiple people T-posing and floating in the sky. I was immediately sold. I had no clue what I was getting into, and I didn’t want to know. The film was introduced as “one of the craziest we have this year.” (Slightly paraphrasing.) What was I about to watch? Little did I know, it was about to be an hour and forty minutes of small-town madness.

Writers Allison Bench and Elisia Snyder, and writer-director Simon Glassman, transport viewers into an upside down world of weaponized local ads; a thriving town invaded by the deep pockets of monopolized capitalism. As someone who grew up in a decently sized town, though probably not large enough to be considered a city, there was a tinge of nostalgia that accompanied Buffet Infinity. Westridge feels cozy and intimate, a town where everyone knows your name. It’s a “baked in a buttery flaky crust” town. Sure, they have their McDonald’s and Burger Kings, but the real townsfolk eat at Jennifer’s sandwich shop–local knitting circles murmur about what they think is in Jennifer’s secret sauce. Simply put, Westridge feels like a home that many people like myself grew up in. And it reminds us of a simpler time that’s long gone.

A Unique Blend of Humor and Eldritch Terror

Buffet Infinity hides its horror well. It slowly guides the viewer into a sense of unease. As easily as the creators have you laughing, they have you squirming. The absurdist joy quickly transforms into Eldritch terrors from beyond. Many filmmakers say they’re inspired by the idea of it’s-not-what-you-see that’s scary, but many times it feels performative. Bench, Glassman, and Snyder have crafted a truly special script that edges you with terror and excitement. They constantly push you to the edge of release, and then back away. It’s the Japanese water torture of exposition. And, for me, it works incredibly well.

Advertisement

One of the most important aspects of Buffet Infinity is the over-capitalization of our lives. While the creators tackle this idea in a tongue-in-cheek manner, their message is highly effective. For the most part. This constant tete-a-tete between Buffet Infinity and the locals is highly amusing, but brings a larger conversation to the forefront. The town I grew up in is a shadow of what it once was. And I know many feel the same about the towns they grew up in. I can already hear the moans of people who dislike this film: “Brandon, it’s not that deep.” And I would highly disagree. Buffet Infinity feels like a reflective protest film–a loud and proud middle finger at what we should have said when the Super Walmart put mom and pops out of business.

Sorry, this review has gone off the rails. Let’s reel it back in a bit.

Why Buffet Infinity Redefines Found Footage

Buffet Infinity is a riotous romp, a hilarious horror that goes from zero to 100 pretty damn fast. Each commercial slowly builds on its last and uniquely tells its story. This film sets a new precedent for the TV-gone-rogue subgenre. Not to directly compare, but a film like WNUF Halloween Special (a film I love) uses its commercials as a coda; it’s a separation of what you saw/heard and prepares you for the next movement. Buffet Infinity uses its commercial to create the story. Instead of watching news pieces, then irrelevant commercials, then back to news pieces, Buffet Infinity breaks the mold. Hell, it creates the mold.

As someone who has been dying to see a Welcome to Nightvale film, Buffet Infinity is the closest thing I could ask for. It is full of killer performances (looking at you, Ahmed Ahmed), is well-crafted, and sets a new precedent on an underutilized side of found footage. Buffet Infinity is a full-course meal. I highly suspect that Buffet Infinity will gather the unwavering support that Hundreds of Beavers gathered and will go on to be considered an instant classic of the 2020s.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Horror Press Mailing List

Fangoria
Advertisement
Advertisement