Connect with us

Reviews

[REVIEW] Adam Green’s ‘Frozen’ (2010) Is A Howling Thrill Ride

Frozen follows Dan (Kevin Zegers), his girlfriend Parker (Emma Bell), and his best friend Joe [Lynch] (Shawn Ashmore), who spend the day skiing. The group decides to use a connection with one of the ski lift operators to avoid paying for a lift pass. Even though their friend isn’t there, they end up paying another operator and get to use the ski lift for a small fee. Later in the night, the three friends bully their way into one final trip. Karma bites them in the butt when a storm nears the resort, and they are left alone on the ski lift. Can these three survive on the ski lift until help comes in a few days? Or is being trapped on a ski lift the least of their troubles?

Published

on

Around 2014 I found the podcast from filmmakers Joe Lynch and Adam Green called The Movie Crypt. Even though I was nearing the end of my college tenure, I was using this podcast as a supplementary film school of sorts. Hearing conversations from the indie-est of indie filmmakers to high-profile filmmakers was invaluable. As much as I love Green and Lynch, there was a piece of criticism Green received that stuck with me. I’m paraphrasing, but Green talked about how someone said his films and his excellent show, Holliston, are basically a parading of himself, his friends, and his then-wife, Rileah Vanderbilt. The quote was something like, “Your work is centered around: look how hot my wife is, look how great my life is.” When I rewatched Frozen for this review, I couldn’t get that (somewhat paraphrased) quote out of my head.

(Maybe I’m misremembering where that quote came from and it’s from Digging up the Marrow.)

Frozen follows Dan (Kevin Zegers), his girlfriend Parker (Emma Bell), and his best friend Joe [Lynch] (Shawn Ashmore), who spend the day skiing. The group decides to use a connection with one of the ski lift operators to avoid paying for a lift pass. Even though their friend isn’t there, they end up paying another operator and get to use the ski lift for a small fee. Later in the night, the three friends bully their way into one final trip. Karma bites them in the butt when a storm nears the resort, and they are left alone on the ski lift. Can these three survive on the ski lift until help comes in a few days? Or is being trapped on a ski lift the least of their troubles?

We’ll get back to what I spoke about in the opening in due time, but I do need to give this film the praise it deserves. Writer/director Adam Green crafted an incredibly tight film. Single-location films are hard to do, and it’s even harder when that one location is literally a single location. Green’s pacing feels intricately planned beat-for-beat. You can often feel when a writer has one really good idea for a story and then tries to buff out the script to make that one idea work. Frozen is technically a one-idea film. Three people are trapped on a ski lift. But Green’s script is that of a hungry filmmaker who is keen on carving their genre path to be greater than that of a horror comedy slasher franchise.

Character-wise, Green has likeably unlikeable characters. Dan and Joe are scheemers. They went into this whole trip with the plan of not paying for their ski lift. Even when they get their way, they bitch and moan at the end of the night until they get their way and get one more [fateful] trip. Even though Parker is essentially browbeaten into using her feminine wiles for Dan and Joe to get what they want, she’s likable. Parker just wants to have a good time and she’s thrust into an unfortunate scenario.

Advertisement

At no point does Frozen become visually boring. Over 50% of the film’s runtime does indeed take place on the ski lift andit never ceases to be engaging. This is entirely in part due to Green’s direction as well as his, at this time, third collaboration with cinematographer William Barratt. Barratt finds a happy medium between the static horror of the ski lift to the frantic ground footage when the wolves are introduced. It’s clear why Adam Green loves working with William Barratt, and it’s because that man knows how to work with a camera efficiently and effectively.

Practicals. Frozen is a buffet of practical horror goodness. From the frostbite special effects makeup to the hands frozen to poles and through the wolf attacks, Frozen has enough practical effects for the deepest practical purest. That’s not to say this film has Terrifier-like gore, but Green is brilliant with his use of respectful gore. And the wolves are just too cute. Even with gore and viscera hanging from their mouths, I want to cuddle them.

So, why did I start this review by bringing up that quote? Two reasons. Firstly, I get it. I get why Adam Green does what he does. Secondly, I get it. I get why that person criticized Green as he did. That’s not to say I agree with the criticism, but it’s hard to get out of my head. Look, I appreciate when filmmakers are referential and use the resources they have. There is no qualm there. When I first watched Frozen in 2011, I wasn’t as knowledgeable about the genre as I am today. Now that I am, I get why that person said what they said.

Let’s look at the constant references throughout the film. Kane Hodder has a cameo, which is fine. In the cameo, he’s wearing a Mount Holliston beanie. Worldbuilding, fine. And that’s when the fun aspect goes from quirky and referential, to flat-out annoying. Dan’s best friend being named Joe Lynch isn’t cute. It’s frustrating and too much of a fourth wall break. There’s a character named Rifkin, an homage to Green’s filmmaking friend Adam Rifkin (Chillerama). I, as well asmany people, find it beyond annoying when characters and locations are named after filmmakers. Romero University, Voorhees Hall, Krueger’s Kindergarten. It’s one of the most frustrating things about horror. Especially when it’s a straight horror story. Horror comedies get a slight pass (for me).

The really frustrating addition is the character of Shannon (Rileah Vanderbilt). Adam Green and Rileah were either dating or engaged at this point in filming. And there’s zero point to her character. All the inclusion of this character does is paint Joe as a “nice guy.” Oh, he helped her up when she fell? AND she’s here with her rude ex-boyfriend? Well, of course she’s going to give Joe her number. None of this is to say Vanderbilt is a bad actor, because she’s not! It just feels like useless flaunting of someone to force unnecessary “character development.” There’s little agency to her character other than acting as an emotional stinger to make you care more about Joe’s survival.

Advertisement

When Shannon gives Joe her number, he clings to remembering the number to help him get through his ordeal. And that’s just not necessary. He’s literally in a life-or-death situation by being trapped on a ski lift as one of the year’s worst storms hits their location. That’s all we need. The film is 93 minutes long. Green could easily have done without this three-minute interlude that breaks the pacing. Joe’s character motivation doesn’t need to be to remember a seven-digit number so he can get laid if he survives. His motivation just needs to be survival!

Adam Green has been upfront with his struggles in the industry and an overall acceptance of the difficulty of “breaking into” it. He’s a perfect example of how to make your own way. He has made his own connections and used them the best way he sees fit, and even with all that said, I can’t help but applaud him for the work he’s done.

That’s enough of that. I don’t dislike Green or this film because of that quote, but I can easily see how people who are big horror fans AND don’t like Green could be frustrated. Frozen is an engaging and entertaining horror film that succeeds on its own merits and ideas, it doesn’t need these referential moments to wink at the audience. Adam Green is one of my favorite filmmakers and Frozen was the film that got me interested in his work. It still holds up all these years later. One thing has always stuck with me since my first viewing of Frozen: I’m never going on a ski lift again!

Advertisement

Brendan is an award-winning author and screenwriter rotting away in New Jersey. His hobbies include rain, slugs, and the endless search for The Mothman.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Reviews

‘Frankenstein’ Review: Guillermo Del Toro Is Off to the Races

Published

on

Those expecting Guillermo Del Toro’s Frankenstein to be similar to the book, or to any other adaptation, are in for something else. A longtime enjoyer of the creature’s story, Del Toro instead draws from many places: the novel, James Whale’s culturally defining 1931 film, the Kenneth Branagh version, there are even hints from Terence Fisher’s Curse of Frankenstein, and if the set design and costuming are to be believed, there are trace elements of the National Theatre production too.

The formulation to breathe life into this amalgam is a sort of storm cloud of cultural memory and personal desire for Del Toro. This is about crafting his Frankenstein: the one he wanted to see since he was young, the vision he wanted to stitch together. What results is an experience that is more colorful and kinetic and well-loved by its creator than any Frankenstein we’ve had yet, but what it leaves behind is much of its gothic heart. Quiet darkness, looming dread, poetry, and romance are set aside as what has been sold as “the definitive retelling” goes off to the races. It’s a fast-paced ride through a world of mad science, and you’re on it.

Victor Frankenstein’s Ambition and Tragedy

A tale as old as time, with some changes: the morbid talents and untamed hubris of Victor Frankenstein (Oscar Isaac) guide him to challenge death itself. Spurred by a wealthy investor named Henrich Harlander, and a desire for Harlander’s niece Elizabeth (Mia Goth), Victor uses dead flesh and voltaic vigor to bring a creature to life. His attempts to rear it, however, go horribly wrong, setting the two on a bloody collision course as the definitions of man and monster become blurred.

Guillermo Del Toro’s Frankenstein is more Hellboy in its presentation than it is Crimson Peak; it’s honestly more similar to Coppola’s Dracula than either of them. The film is barely done with its opening when it starts with a loud sequence of the monster attacking Walton’s ship on the ice. Flinging crew members about and walking against volleys of gunfire, he is a monstrosity by no other name. The Creature (Jacob Elordi) cries out in guttural screams, part animal and part man, as it calls for its creator to be returned to him. While visually impressive (and it remains visually impressive throughout, believe me), this appropriately bombastic hook foreshadows a problem with tone and tempo.

A Monster That Moves Too Fast

The pace overall is far too fast for its first half, even with its heavy two-and-a-half-hour runtime. It’s also a far cry from the brooding nature the story usually takes. A scene where Victor demonstrates rudimentary reanimation to his peers and a council of judges is rapid, where it should be agonizingly slow. There’s horror and an instability in Victor to be emphasized in that moment, but the grotesque sight is an oddly triumphant one instead. Most do not revile his experiments; in fact he’s taken quite seriously.

Advertisement

Many scenes like this create a tonal problem that makes Victor’s tale lean more toward melodrama than toward philosophical or emotional aspects; he is blatantly wild and free, in a way that is respected rather than pitied. There are opportunities to stop, breathe in the Victorian roses and the smell of death, to get really dour, but it’s neglected until the film’s second half.

Isaac’s and Goth’s performances are overwrought at points, feeling more like pantomimes of Byronic characters. I’m not entirely convinced it has more to do with them than with the script they’re given. Like Victor working with the parts of inmates and dead soldiers, even the best of actors with the best of on-screen chemistry are forced to make do. The dialogue has incredibly high highs (especially in its final moments), but when it has lows, how low they are; a character outright stating that “Victor is the real monster” adage to his face was an ocean floor piece of writing if there ever was one.

Isaac, Goth, and Elordi Bring Life to the Dead

Jacob Elordi’s work here, however, is blameless. Though Elordi’s physical performance as the creature will surely win praise, his time speaking is the true highlight. It’s almost certainly a definitive portrayal of the character; his voice for Victor’s creation is haunted with scorn and solitude, the same way his flesh is haunted by the marks of his creator’s handiwork. It agonizes me to see so little of the books’ most iconic lines used wholesale here, because they would be absolutely perfect coming from Elordi. Still, he has incredible chemistry with both Isaac and Goth, and for as brief as their time together is, he radiates pure force.

Frankenstein Is a Masterclass in Mise-En-Scène

Despite its pacing and tone issues, one can’t help but appreciate the truly masterful craftsmanship Del Toro has managed to pack into the screen. Every millimeter of the sets is carved to specification, filled with personality through to the shadows. Every piece of brick, hint of frost, stain of blood, and curve of the vine is painstakingly and surgically placed to create one of the most wonderful and spellbinding sets you’ve seen—and then it keeps presenting you with new environments like that, over, and over.

At the very least, Del Toro’s Frankenstein is a masterpiece of mise-en-scène down to the minutest of details, and that makes it endlessly rewatchable for aesthetic purposes. This isn’t even getting into the effervescent lighting, or how returning collaborator Kate Hawley has outdone herself again with the costuming. Guillermo Del Toro tackling the king of gothic horror stories, a story written by the mother of all science fiction, inevitably set a high bar for him to clear. And while it’s not a pitch perfect rendering of Mary Shelley’s slow moving and Shakespearean epistolary, it is still one of the best-looking movies you will see all year.

Advertisement

Perhaps for us, it’s at the cost of adapting the straightforward, dark story we know into something more operatic. It sings the tale like a soprano rather than reciting it like humble prose, and it doesn’t always sing well. But for Del Toro, the epic scale and voice of this adaptation is the wage expected for making the movie he’s always dreamed of. Even with its problems, it’s well worth it to see a visionary director at work on a story they love.

Continue Reading

Reviews

‘The Siege of Ape Canyon’ Review: Bigfoot Comes Home

Published

on

In my home, films like Night of the Demon and Abominable are played on repeat; Stan Gordon is king. One of my favorite stories surrounding Bigfoot and Ufology is the Bigfoot/UFO double flap of 1973, which Stan Gordon has an incredible in-depth book on. The Patterson–Gimlin film couldn’t hold a flame to Stan Gordon’s dive into one of my home state’s most chronicled supernatural time periods. But as much as I love the Bigfoot topic, I’m not ashamed to say I don’t know half of the stories surrounding that big hairy beast. And one topic that I’m not ashamed to say I haven’t heard of is The Siege of Ape Canyon.

The Harrowing Events of Ape Canyon

Washington State, 1924. A group of miners (originally consisting of Marion Smith, Leroy P. Smith, Fred Beck, John Peterson, August Johannson, and Mac Rhodes) was on a quest to claim a potential gold mine. Literally. The miners would eventually set up camp on the east slope of Mount Saint Helens. Little did they know their temporary shelter would be the start of a multi-day barrage of attacks from what they and researchers believed to be Bigfoot. What transpired in those days would turn out to be one of the most highly criticized pieces of American lore, nearly lost to time and history…nearly.

I need to set the record straight on a few things before we get started. One, I don’t typically like watching documentaries. Two, I believe in Bigfoot. Three, this documentary made me cry.

Image courtesy of Justin Cook Public Relations.

Reviving a Forgotten Bigfoot Legend in The Siege of Ape Canyon

Documentarian Eli Watson sets out to tell one of the most prolific Bigfoot stories of all time (for those who are deep in Bigfoot mythology). It’s noted fairly early in the film that this story is told often and is well known in the Washington area. So then, how do people outside of the incident location know so little about it? I’ve read at least 15 books on and about Bigfoot, and I’ve never once heard this story. This isn’t a Stan-Gordon-reported story about someone sitting on the john and seeing a pair of red eyes outside of their bathroom window. The story around Ape Canyon has a deeper spiritual meaning that goes beyond a few sightings here and there.

Watson’s documentary, though, isn’t just about Bigfoot or unearthing the story of Ape Canyon. Ape Canyon nearly became nothing more than a tall tale that elders would share around a campfire to keep the younglings out of the woods at 2 AM. If it weren’t for Mark Myrsell, that’s exactly what would have happened. The Siege of Ape Canyon spends half its time unpacking the story of Fred Beck and his prospecting crew, and the other half tells a truly inspiring tale of unbridled passion, friendship, and love.

Mark Myrsell’s Relentless Pursuit: Friendship, Truth, and Tears

Mark Myrsell’s undying passion for everything outdoors inevitably led to bringing one of Bigfoot’s craziest stories to light. His devotion to the truth vindicated many people who were (probably) labeled kooks and crazies. Throughout Myrsell’s endless search for the truth, he made lifelong friends along the way. What brought me to tears throughout The Siege of Ape Canyon is Watson’s insistence on showing the human side of Myrsell and his friends. They’re not in this to make millions or bag a Bigfoot corpse; they just want to know the truth. And that’s what they find.

Advertisement

The Siege of Ape Canyon is a documentary that will open your eyes to a wildly mystical story you may not have heard of. And it does it pretty damn well. Whereas many documentaries feel the need to talk down to the viewer just to educate them, Watson’s documentary takes you along for the ride. It doesn’t ask you to believe or not believe in Bigfoot. It allows you to make your own decisions and provides the evidence it needs to. If you’ve ever had a passing interest in the topic of Bigfoot, or if you think you’re the next Stan Gordon, I highly recommend watching The Siege of Ape Canyon.

The Siege of Ape Canyon stomps its way onto digital platforms on November 11. Give yourself a little post-Halloween treat and check it out!

Continue Reading

Horror Press Mailing List

Fangoria
Advertisement
Advertisement