Connect with us

Reviews

[REVIEW] ‘Calvaire’ (2004) Is An ORDEAL

Calvaire follows Marc Stevens (Laurent Lucas), a traveling singer on the way to his next gig. On a dark and stormy night, his van breaks down. A kind young man, Boris (Jean-Luc Couchard), just so happens to be on this isolated road looking for his dog Bella. Boris leads Marc to Mr. Bartel’s (Jackie Berroyer) Inn for the night. When Marc wakes up, he finds that Mr. Bartel has towed his van to the Inn and plans to help him get it fixed. But all is not as it seems when Mr. Bartel’s intentions go from kindly to creepy. Now, Marc must do everything he can to escape the brazingly brutal Bartel. 

Published

on

I’m someone who likes to research more than watch films. My watchlist is longer than Santa’s naughty or nice list. Throughout my years of research, a film has come up many times, but it has never really stuck on my radar. That’s when the venerable Brooklyn Horror Film Festival decided to put it on their lineup two years ago, practically revitalizing hype for one of the most underseen and underappreciated New French Extremity films of all time. Let me say, I’m upset that it took me this long to watch Calvaire.

Calvaire follows Marc Stevens (Laurent Lucas), a traveling singer on the way to his next gig. On a dark and stormy night, his van breaks down. A kind young man, Boris (Jean-Luc Couchard), just so happens to be on this isolated road looking for his dog Bella. Boris leads Marc to Mr. Bartel’s (Jackie Berroyer) Inn for the night. When Marc wakes up, he finds that Mr. Bartel has towed his van to the Inn and plans to help him get it fixed. But all is not as it seems when Mr. Bartel’s intentions go from kindly to creepy. Now, Marc must do everything he can to escape the brazingly brutal Bartel. 

Calvaire marks the first of two New French Extremity films that are technically Christmas films! And as someone who doesn’t like Christmas, that makes me happy! This film starts off very tame and unsuspecting. Marc first meets Boris, who is generally offputing and weird, but overall a nice guy. And Mr. Bartel comes off as sweet, caring, and generally innocent! This film is writer/director Fabrice Du Welz’s debut feature film, and for a first film, it’s impossible to state just how well it’s conceived. For an extreme film, the writing is stellar, the characters are well-crafted, and the pacing is brilliant. The film’s ramp-up works exceedingly well and creates an overall unassuming nature. It’s not until the cracks start to form and the ugliness starts to show that you feel the true terror of their situation.

One of the most impressive aspects of Calvaire is how reserved, but effective, the violence is. As well as to whom it happens. Horror is wrought with misogynistic violence. For a genre that’s as progressive as it says it is, it sure doesn’t shy away from harming men and torturing women. Just look at Terrifier, one of the genre’s most popular franchises. The fact that Calvaire switches up the victim and puts Marc directly in the killer’s crosshairs is impressive and refreshing. In fact, because people like Damien Leone prefer killing women, it’s stimulating to watch a man be the brunt of the violence. Interestingly, Marc is put in this predicament because Mr. Bartel is generally unwell and thinks Marc is his former wife, Gloria, who left him.

The violence here is not excessive and overly bloody, but it’s painful to watch. Seeing Marc get crucified and forcibly have his hair cut is incredibly difficult to watch. But it never feels too over the top in a way that would feel fake. Bartel’s mental break is difficult to watch, and Jackie Berroyer handles the character with extreme precision. One of the most fascinating moments of Bartel’s character is the moment when his character starts to slip, and you see the facade shattering, but Marc doesn’t. Bartel says he’s going to make a phone call, but you don’t feel like he’s making a phone call. Or when Bartel tells Marc to sing a song, and when Marc stops after a few lines, Bartel responds with, “I didn’t tell you half of my joke.” These small moments reveal how intricately crafted Bartel’s antagonist is and just how much time and effort Fabrice Du Welz put into this terrifying tale.

Advertisement

Calvaire is far from the most extreme and grotesque entry in the New French Extremity movement, but it’s one of the most put together. Each moment slowly builds to the next, rather than a barrage of hate and violence. This isn’t your standard gore film, it’s a well-oiled machine from a filmmaker who knows a thing or two about horror. Knowing that this is Fabrice Du Welz’s debut feature amps up my excitement to watch the rest of his films.

Brendan is an award-winning author and screenwriter rotting away in New Jersey. His hobbies include rain, slugs, and the endless search for The Mothman.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Reviews

‘Frankenstein’ Review: Guillermo Del Toro Is Off to the Races

Published

on

Those expecting Guillermo Del Toro’s Frankenstein to be similar to the book, or to any other adaptation, are in for something else. A longtime enjoyer of the creature’s story, Del Toro instead draws from many places: the novel, James Whale’s culturally defining 1931 film, the Kenneth Branagh version, there are even hints from Terence Fisher’s Curse of Frankenstein, and if the set design and costuming are to be believed, there are trace elements of the National Theatre production too.

The formulation to breathe life into this amalgam is a sort of storm cloud of cultural memory and personal desire for Del Toro. This is about crafting his Frankenstein: the one he wanted to see since he was young, the vision he wanted to stitch together. What results is an experience that is more colorful and kinetic and well-loved by its creator than any Frankenstein we’ve had yet, but what it leaves behind is much of its gothic heart. Quiet darkness, looming dread, poetry, and romance are set aside as what has been sold as “the definitive retelling” goes off to the races. It’s a fast-paced ride through a world of mad science, and you’re on it.

Victor Frankenstein’s Ambition and Tragedy

A tale as old as time, with some changes: the morbid talents and untamed hubris of Victor Frankenstein (Oscar Isaac) guide him to challenge death itself. Spurred by a wealthy investor named Henrich Harlander, and a desire for Harlander’s niece Elizabeth (Mia Goth), Victor uses dead flesh and voltaic vigor to bring a creature to life. His attempts to rear it, however, go horribly wrong, setting the two on a bloody collision course as the definitions of man and monster become blurred.

Guillermo Del Toro’s Frankenstein is more Hellboy in its presentation than it is Crimson Peak; it’s honestly more similar to Coppola’s Dracula than either of them. The film is barely done with its opening when it starts with a loud sequence of the monster attacking Walton’s ship on the ice. Flinging crew members about and walking against volleys of gunfire, he is a monstrosity by no other name. The Creature (Jacob Elordi) cries out in guttural screams, part animal and part man, as it calls for its creator to be returned to him. While visually impressive (and it remains visually impressive throughout, believe me), this appropriately bombastic hook foreshadows a problem with tone and tempo.

A Monster That Moves Too Fast

The pace overall is far too fast for its first half, even with its heavy two-and-a-half-hour runtime. It’s also a far cry from the brooding nature the story usually takes. A scene where Victor demonstrates rudimentary reanimation to his peers and a council of judges is rapid, where it should be agonizingly slow. There’s horror and an instability in Victor to be emphasized in that moment, but the grotesque sight is an oddly triumphant one instead. Most do not revile his experiments; in fact he’s taken quite seriously.

Advertisement

Many scenes like this create a tonal problem that makes Victor’s tale lean more toward melodrama than toward philosophical or emotional aspects; he is blatantly wild and free, in a way that is respected rather than pitied. There are opportunities to stop, breathe in the Victorian roses and the smell of death, to get really dour, but it’s neglected until the film’s second half.

Isaac’s and Goth’s performances are overwrought at points, feeling more like pantomimes of Byronic characters. I’m not entirely convinced it has more to do with them than with the script they’re given. Like Victor working with the parts of inmates and dead soldiers, even the best of actors with the best of on-screen chemistry are forced to make do. The dialogue has incredibly high highs (especially in its final moments), but when it has lows, how low they are; a character outright stating that “Victor is the real monster” adage to his face was an ocean floor piece of writing if there ever was one.

Isaac, Goth, and Elordi Bring Life to the Dead

Jacob Elordi’s work here, however, is blameless. Though Elordi’s physical performance as the creature will surely win praise, his time speaking is the true highlight. It’s almost certainly a definitive portrayal of the character; his voice for Victor’s creation is haunted with scorn and solitude, the same way his flesh is haunted by the marks of his creator’s handiwork. It agonizes me to see so little of the books’ most iconic lines used wholesale here, because they would be absolutely perfect coming from Elordi. Still, he has incredible chemistry with both Isaac and Goth, and for as brief as their time together is, he radiates pure force.

Frankenstein Is a Masterclass in Mise-En-Scène

Despite its pacing and tone issues, one can’t help but appreciate the truly masterful craftsmanship Del Toro has managed to pack into the screen. Every millimeter of the sets is carved to specification, filled with personality through to the shadows. Every piece of brick, hint of frost, stain of blood, and curve of the vine is painstakingly and surgically placed to create one of the most wonderful and spellbinding sets you’ve seen—and then it keeps presenting you with new environments like that, over, and over.

At the very least, Del Toro’s Frankenstein is a masterpiece of mise-en-scène down to the minutest of details, and that makes it endlessly rewatchable for aesthetic purposes. This isn’t even getting into the effervescent lighting, or how returning collaborator Kate Hawley has outdone herself again with the costuming. Guillermo Del Toro tackling the king of gothic horror stories, a story written by the mother of all science fiction, inevitably set a high bar for him to clear. And while it’s not a pitch perfect rendering of Mary Shelley’s slow moving and Shakespearean epistolary, it is still one of the best-looking movies you will see all year.

Advertisement

Perhaps for us, it’s at the cost of adapting the straightforward, dark story we know into something more operatic. It sings the tale like a soprano rather than reciting it like humble prose, and it doesn’t always sing well. But for Del Toro, the epic scale and voice of this adaptation is the wage expected for making the movie he’s always dreamed of. Even with its problems, it’s well worth it to see a visionary director at work on a story they love.

Continue Reading

Reviews

‘The Siege of Ape Canyon’ Review: Bigfoot Comes Home

Published

on

In my home, films like Night of the Demon and Abominable are played on repeat; Stan Gordon is king. One of my favorite stories surrounding Bigfoot and Ufology is the Bigfoot/UFO double flap of 1973, which Stan Gordon has an incredible in-depth book on. The Patterson–Gimlin film couldn’t hold a flame to Stan Gordon’s dive into one of my home state’s most chronicled supernatural time periods. But as much as I love the Bigfoot topic, I’m not ashamed to say I don’t know half of the stories surrounding that big hairy beast. And one topic that I’m not ashamed to say I haven’t heard of is The Siege of Ape Canyon.

The Harrowing Events of Ape Canyon

Washington State, 1924. A group of miners (originally consisting of Marion Smith, Leroy P. Smith, Fred Beck, John Peterson, August Johannson, and Mac Rhodes) was on a quest to claim a potential gold mine. Literally. The miners would eventually set up camp on the east slope of Mount Saint Helens. Little did they know their temporary shelter would be the start of a multi-day barrage of attacks from what they and researchers believed to be Bigfoot. What transpired in those days would turn out to be one of the most highly criticized pieces of American lore, nearly lost to time and history…nearly.

I need to set the record straight on a few things before we get started. One, I don’t typically like watching documentaries. Two, I believe in Bigfoot. Three, this documentary made me cry.

Image courtesy of Justin Cook Public Relations.

Reviving a Forgotten Bigfoot Legend in The Siege of Ape Canyon

Documentarian Eli Watson sets out to tell one of the most prolific Bigfoot stories of all time (for those who are deep in Bigfoot mythology). It’s noted fairly early in the film that this story is told often and is well known in the Washington area. So then, how do people outside of the incident location know so little about it? I’ve read at least 15 books on and about Bigfoot, and I’ve never once heard this story. This isn’t a Stan-Gordon-reported story about someone sitting on the john and seeing a pair of red eyes outside of their bathroom window. The story around Ape Canyon has a deeper spiritual meaning that goes beyond a few sightings here and there.

Watson’s documentary, though, isn’t just about Bigfoot or unearthing the story of Ape Canyon. Ape Canyon nearly became nothing more than a tall tale that elders would share around a campfire to keep the younglings out of the woods at 2 AM. If it weren’t for Mark Myrsell, that’s exactly what would have happened. The Siege of Ape Canyon spends half its time unpacking the story of Fred Beck and his prospecting crew, and the other half tells a truly inspiring tale of unbridled passion, friendship, and love.

Mark Myrsell’s Relentless Pursuit: Friendship, Truth, and Tears

Mark Myrsell’s undying passion for everything outdoors inevitably led to bringing one of Bigfoot’s craziest stories to light. His devotion to the truth vindicated many people who were (probably) labeled kooks and crazies. Throughout Myrsell’s endless search for the truth, he made lifelong friends along the way. What brought me to tears throughout The Siege of Ape Canyon is Watson’s insistence on showing the human side of Myrsell and his friends. They’re not in this to make millions or bag a Bigfoot corpse; they just want to know the truth. And that’s what they find.

Advertisement

The Siege of Ape Canyon is a documentary that will open your eyes to a wildly mystical story you may not have heard of. And it does it pretty damn well. Whereas many documentaries feel the need to talk down to the viewer just to educate them, Watson’s documentary takes you along for the ride. It doesn’t ask you to believe or not believe in Bigfoot. It allows you to make your own decisions and provides the evidence it needs to. If you’ve ever had a passing interest in the topic of Bigfoot, or if you think you’re the next Stan Gordon, I highly recommend watching The Siege of Ape Canyon.

The Siege of Ape Canyon stomps its way onto digital platforms on November 11. Give yourself a little post-Halloween treat and check it out!

Continue Reading

Horror Press Mailing List

Fangoria
Advertisement
Advertisement