Connect with us

Reviews

‘Slayers: A Buffyverse Story’ is the Comeback We’ve All Been Waiting For

Published

on

Buffy the Vampire Slayer may have ended over 20 years ago, but for fans of the show, it’s still something to be discussed at length. Look at the comments on any post about one of Buffy’s boyfriends, and you’re bound to find some intense discussions. Look at the comments on any post any actor from the show does on social media, and you’ll see plenty of folks bringing up the show. Rarely is there an interview with Sarah Michelle Gellar where the show isn’t mentioned.

So, it’s no surprise fans were so excited to learn there was an audio drama being released that brought back many of the original actors from the series. And, as someone who runs a Buffy podcast called Slayerfest98, I’m “fans”. 

“I talk about slayers so much the kids at school call me slayer but…in like, a mocking way” –Indira Nunnally

Slayers: A Buffyverse Story had no small task of pleasing die-hard fans of the show while still being accessible to casual and new fans alike. But it achieves all of this thanks to the stellar writing of Amber Benson and Christopher Golden. Golden is known for having written numerous Buffy novelizations back in the day, while Benson is known for playing the beloved, doomed witch Tara Maclay in the series. 

After years of rumors about the show returning (it’s not) and comics that are or aren’t canon, we finally have something with the original actors returning that isn’t a Comic Con panel or a reunion photoshoot (all of which are also fun). It doesn’t bring back the titular role. Still, it gets pretty damn close—we get beloved vampire hottie Spike (James Marsters), Sunnydale Queen Bee Cordelia Chase (Charisma Carpenter), surrogate father watcher Rupert Giles (Anthony Stewart Head), everyone’s favorite former vengeance demon Anya (Emma Caulfield-Ford), friendly wrinkly kitten eating demon Clem (James C Leary), unhinged evil vampire Drusilla (Juliet Landau), and lesbian witch Tara Maclay (Amber Benson) all back, alongside some special surprise guests and newcomers, for some top tier vampire slayer antics.

I would be remiss if I mentioned newcomers and didn’t talk about the incredibly charming Laya DeLeon Hayes as newly called slayer, Indira Nunnally.

Advertisement

“Boom, guess what bitches, Indira Nunnally is a slayer now—suck it,” Indira Nunnally

Indira is both the heart of the series and the voice of the fandom. She’s a fangirl at heart—she recognizes Spike pretty quickly, and their relationship is very reminiscent of the surrogate father relationship the blonde vampire had with Buffy’s little sister, Dawn Summers (Michelle Trachtenberg), on the show. She feels exactly like a slayer we would’ve met on Buffy or Angel—Spike even calls her on said slayer-ness numerous times. She feels fun and fresh, a new slayer that could lead her own spin-off. A slayer for 2023.

The series is set in the present-day Buffyverse and an alternate universe during the present-day Buffyverse, where Buffy never existed. However, Anya, Tara, and Cordelia are all still alive (I guess Cordy should’ve stuck with her wish in season 3’s The Wish). Having these beloved characters back feels like a nice warm hug. They have been allowed to age and grow without fully changing who they are—almost all of them being instantly recognizable the moment they speak (oddly, Giles being the one I didn’t recognize right away). The alt-universe versions of our scoobies also are an interesting take—they’re clearly different but still speak like the characters we know and love. And, I mean, freakin’ Cordelia the Vampire Slayer.

“I’m not the Cordelia you knew” – Cordelia Chase

We all know how Cordelia was turned evil, then put into a coma and brought back for 1 episode on Angel, only to die in such a tragic way that I still cry about it. But crying over your favorite character dying on Buffy or Angel 20+ years later is not that uncommon. I mean, hello Anya, Tara, Jenny Calendar, Fred, Darla, et al. But creating an alternate reality where Cordelia is the chosen one is such a brilliant idea. It feels like a love letter to the fans for allowing this to happen and getting Charisma Carpenter back in the role. This is something that’s made with love and care—something Amber Benson is known for.

It’s not the Cordelia we know, but she still makes comments about her hair, fashion, and has no problem giving a casual read.

“Are you like Spike, Spike? Like Summers, Rosenberg, Giles Spike?” Indira Nunnally

I’m someone who loves checking in with beloved characters years later. I love getting a little bit of “Where are they now?”. Linda Hamilton coming back as Sarah Connor in the Terminator franchise 20+ years later? Sign me up! Neve Campbell and Courteney Cox coming back to the Scream franchise after 10 years? Heck yes! Jamie Lee Curtis returning to the Halloween franchise? Absolutely!

Advertisement

So it’s nice to see which of our scoobies got their happy endings and which are still fighting the good fight. Spike is, of course, begrudgingly still in the fight—it makes sense that blondie bear wouldn’t be okay just settling down and working a 9 to 5 (although for a vampire, it’d be more like 5 to 9, I guess). And James Marsters, unsurprisingly, doesn’t miss a beat sliding back into the role. He is the series’ main character and sometimes narrator and has never been better. He allows you to, once again, forget he doesn’t actually have a British accent.

The series is a return to form for the Buffyverse and not to be missed. It feels like checking in with an old friend you haven’t seen in years—in the best way possible. The format can be a little jarring if you’ve never listened to an audio drama before (or if you have ADD like me), but it’s so easy to get the hang of it in this pitch-perfect series.

Catch episode-by-episode coverage over on the Slayerfest98 podcast, and be sure to get your copy of Slayers: A Buffyverse Story when it releases on Audible on October 12, 2023!

Ian Carlos Crawford grew up in southern New Jersey and has an MFA in non-fiction writing. His favorite things are Buffy, Scream, X-Men, and pugs. His writing has appeared on sites like BuzzFeed, NewNowNext, Junkee, and other random corners of the internet. He currently hosts a queer Buffy and Marvel focused pop culture podcast called Slayerfest 98 and co-hosts a horror podcast called My Bloody Judy.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Reviews

‘Frankenstein’ Review: Guillermo Del Toro Is Off to the Races

Published

on

Those expecting Guillermo Del Toro’s Frankenstein to be similar to the book, or to any other adaptation, are in for something else. A longtime enjoyer of the creature’s story, Del Toro instead draws from many places: the novel, James Whale’s culturally defining 1931 film, the Kenneth Branagh version, there are even hints from Terence Fisher’s Curse of Frankenstein, and if the set design and costuming are to be believed, there are trace elements of the National Theatre production too.

The formulation to breathe life into this amalgam is a sort of storm cloud of cultural memory and personal desire for Del Toro. This is about crafting his Frankenstein: the one he wanted to see since he was young, the vision he wanted to stitch together. What results is an experience that is more colorful and kinetic and well-loved by its creator than any Frankenstein we’ve had yet, but what it leaves behind is much of its gothic heart. Quiet darkness, looming dread, poetry, and romance are set aside as what has been sold as “the definitive retelling” goes off to the races. It’s a fast-paced ride through a world of mad science, and you’re on it.

Victor Frankenstein’s Ambition and Tragedy

A tale as old as time, with some changes: the morbid talents and untamed hubris of Victor Frankenstein (Oscar Isaac) guide him to challenge death itself. Spurred by a wealthy investor named Henrich Harlander, and a desire for Harlander’s niece Elizabeth (Mia Goth), Victor uses dead flesh and voltaic vigor to bring a creature to life. His attempts to rear it, however, go horribly wrong, setting the two on a bloody collision course as the definitions of man and monster become blurred.

Guillermo Del Toro’s Frankenstein is more Hellboy in its presentation than it is Crimson Peak; it’s honestly more similar to Coppola’s Dracula than either of them. The film is barely done with its opening when it starts with a loud sequence of the monster attacking Walton’s ship on the ice. Flinging crew members about and walking against volleys of gunfire, he is a monstrosity by no other name. The Creature (Jacob Elordi) cries out in guttural screams, part animal and part man, as it calls for its creator to be returned to him. While visually impressive (and it remains visually impressive throughout, believe me), this appropriately bombastic hook foreshadows a problem with tone and tempo.

A Monster That Moves Too Fast

The pace overall is far too fast for its first half, even with its heavy two-and-a-half-hour runtime. It’s also a far cry from the brooding nature the story usually takes. A scene where Victor demonstrates rudimentary reanimation to his peers and a council of judges is rapid, where it should be agonizingly slow. There’s horror and an instability in Victor to be emphasized in that moment, but the grotesque sight is an oddly triumphant one instead. Most do not revile his experiments; in fact he’s taken quite seriously.

Advertisement

Many scenes like this create a tonal problem that makes Victor’s tale lean more toward melodrama than toward philosophical or emotional aspects; he is blatantly wild and free, in a way that is respected rather than pitied. There are opportunities to stop, breathe in the Victorian roses and the smell of death, to get really dour, but it’s neglected until the film’s second half.

Isaac’s and Goth’s performances are overwrought at points, feeling more like pantomimes of Byronic characters. I’m not entirely convinced it has more to do with them than with the script they’re given. Like Victor working with the parts of inmates and dead soldiers, even the best of actors with the best of on-screen chemistry are forced to make do. The dialogue has incredibly high highs (especially in its final moments), but when it has lows, how low they are; a character outright stating that “Victor is the real monster” adage to his face was an ocean floor piece of writing if there ever was one.

Isaac, Goth, and Elordi Bring Life to the Dead

Jacob Elordi’s work here, however, is blameless. Though Elordi’s physical performance as the creature will surely win praise, his time speaking is the true highlight. It’s almost certainly a definitive portrayal of the character; his voice for Victor’s creation is haunted with scorn and solitude, the same way his flesh is haunted by the marks of his creator’s handiwork. It agonizes me to see so little of the books’ most iconic lines used wholesale here, because they would be absolutely perfect coming from Elordi. Still, he has incredible chemistry with both Isaac and Goth, and for as brief as their time together is, he radiates pure force.

Frankenstein Is a Masterclass in Mise-En-Scène

Despite its pacing and tone issues, one can’t help but appreciate the truly masterful craftsmanship Del Toro has managed to pack into the screen. Every millimeter of the sets is carved to specification, filled with personality through to the shadows. Every piece of brick, hint of frost, stain of blood, and curve of the vine is painstakingly and surgically placed to create one of the most wonderful and spellbinding sets you’ve seen—and then it keeps presenting you with new environments like that, over, and over.

At the very least, Del Toro’s Frankenstein is a masterpiece of mise-en-scène down to the minutest of details, and that makes it endlessly rewatchable for aesthetic purposes. This isn’t even getting into the effervescent lighting, or how returning collaborator Kate Hawley has outdone herself again with the costuming. Guillermo Del Toro tackling the king of gothic horror stories, a story written by the mother of all science fiction, inevitably set a high bar for him to clear. And while it’s not a pitch perfect rendering of Mary Shelley’s slow moving and Shakespearean epistolary, it is still one of the best-looking movies you will see all year.

Advertisement

Perhaps for us, it’s at the cost of adapting the straightforward, dark story we know into something more operatic. It sings the tale like a soprano rather than reciting it like humble prose, and it doesn’t always sing well. But for Del Toro, the epic scale and voice of this adaptation is the wage expected for making the movie he’s always dreamed of. Even with its problems, it’s well worth it to see a visionary director at work on a story they love.

Continue Reading

Reviews

‘The Siege of Ape Canyon’ Review: Bigfoot Comes Home

Published

on

In my home, films like Night of the Demon and Abominable are played on repeat; Stan Gordon is king. One of my favorite stories surrounding Bigfoot and Ufology is the Bigfoot/UFO double flap of 1973, which Stan Gordon has an incredible in-depth book on. The Patterson–Gimlin film couldn’t hold a flame to Stan Gordon’s dive into one of my home state’s most chronicled supernatural time periods. But as much as I love the Bigfoot topic, I’m not ashamed to say I don’t know half of the stories surrounding that big hairy beast. And one topic that I’m not ashamed to say I haven’t heard of is The Siege of Ape Canyon.

The Harrowing Events of Ape Canyon

Washington State, 1924. A group of miners (originally consisting of Marion Smith, Leroy P. Smith, Fred Beck, John Peterson, August Johannson, and Mac Rhodes) was on a quest to claim a potential gold mine. Literally. The miners would eventually set up camp on the east slope of Mount Saint Helens. Little did they know their temporary shelter would be the start of a multi-day barrage of attacks from what they and researchers believed to be Bigfoot. What transpired in those days would turn out to be one of the most highly criticized pieces of American lore, nearly lost to time and history…nearly.

I need to set the record straight on a few things before we get started. One, I don’t typically like watching documentaries. Two, I believe in Bigfoot. Three, this documentary made me cry.

Image courtesy of Justin Cook Public Relations.

Reviving a Forgotten Bigfoot Legend in The Siege of Ape Canyon

Documentarian Eli Watson sets out to tell one of the most prolific Bigfoot stories of all time (for those who are deep in Bigfoot mythology). It’s noted fairly early in the film that this story is told often and is well known in the Washington area. So then, how do people outside of the incident location know so little about it? I’ve read at least 15 books on and about Bigfoot, and I’ve never once heard this story. This isn’t a Stan-Gordon-reported story about someone sitting on the john and seeing a pair of red eyes outside of their bathroom window. The story around Ape Canyon has a deeper spiritual meaning that goes beyond a few sightings here and there.

Watson’s documentary, though, isn’t just about Bigfoot or unearthing the story of Ape Canyon. Ape Canyon nearly became nothing more than a tall tale that elders would share around a campfire to keep the younglings out of the woods at 2 AM. If it weren’t for Mark Myrsell, that’s exactly what would have happened. The Siege of Ape Canyon spends half its time unpacking the story of Fred Beck and his prospecting crew, and the other half tells a truly inspiring tale of unbridled passion, friendship, and love.

Mark Myrsell’s Relentless Pursuit: Friendship, Truth, and Tears

Mark Myrsell’s undying passion for everything outdoors inevitably led to bringing one of Bigfoot’s craziest stories to light. His devotion to the truth vindicated many people who were (probably) labeled kooks and crazies. Throughout Myrsell’s endless search for the truth, he made lifelong friends along the way. What brought me to tears throughout The Siege of Ape Canyon is Watson’s insistence on showing the human side of Myrsell and his friends. They’re not in this to make millions or bag a Bigfoot corpse; they just want to know the truth. And that’s what they find.

Advertisement

The Siege of Ape Canyon is a documentary that will open your eyes to a wildly mystical story you may not have heard of. And it does it pretty damn well. Whereas many documentaries feel the need to talk down to the viewer just to educate them, Watson’s documentary takes you along for the ride. It doesn’t ask you to believe or not believe in Bigfoot. It allows you to make your own decisions and provides the evidence it needs to. If you’ve ever had a passing interest in the topic of Bigfoot, or if you think you’re the next Stan Gordon, I highly recommend watching The Siege of Ape Canyon.

The Siege of Ape Canyon stomps its way onto digital platforms on November 11. Give yourself a little post-Halloween treat and check it out!

Continue Reading

Horror Press Mailing List

Fangoria
Advertisement
Advertisement