Reviews
Brooklyn Horror Film Festival 2025: ‘New Group’ Review
Unlike the human pyramid at the center of New Group, the foundations of the film are much less stable. Bringing us J-Horror in the vein of Junji Ito, and more accurately the works of Sion Sono, director Yuta Shimotsu’s sophomore endeavor says goodbye to the moody atmosphere cultivated in Best Wishes To All in favor of a bombastic mix of sci-fi with horror underpinnings and comedy all over.
Like Best Wishes, they’re both horror films that explore human nature and the inequities of society, amplifying our worst traits to a supernatural level, with all the discomfort that should entail. But unlike Best Wishes, what New Group’s cinematography builds around that core idea feels like a house of cards rather than a powerful structure.
Ai is a high schooler drifting through life in a dreamlike state. Her home life feels like a parody. Her day in and day out going to school is monotonous. But when a human pyramid forming in the school courtyard begins to spiral out of control, that monotony is shattered and replaced with oddity. As her classmates are commanded by the teachers to join it, an odd display becomes an unrelenting killer force that Ai finds herself unable to escape.
What is New Group About? Trust Me, It Will Let You Know
This is one of the many flashes of brilliance the film has on offer: the idea of people being pulled by an alien force to form a human pyramid, completely entranced and acting bizarre, is a jumping off point that could have gone in any number of directions. The very idea of a cosmic horror coming of age story should have had me hooked from start to finish. But every time the film dazzles you with a genuinely fun concept, or a scene where the students make a newer, stranger formation than the last, you’re subsequently clubbed with the film’s ham-fisted writing.
If you were worried the film would be esoteric in any way, worry no more. From start to finish, the film reminds you in plain terms that it is about the modern structures of society and the state crushing individualism, and our need to fight back. The main characters discuss it, the talking heads on the news discuss it, and even the film’s villains have a truly off-the-wall sequence explaining it to the protagonists (in, what I admit, is the best scene of the film).
But it never goes anywhere with that train of thought, rather running on the same track over and over; our politicians don’t care about us, we’re taught to conform or die, and cruelty is easy in groups. The consolation prize is a movie that is funny and bizarre when it pulls off its dark humor, but not funny and bizarre enough to distract from the feet of clay the script stands on.
Great Performances, Weighed Down by Script and Score
There’s debate to be had on whether this is a comedy first and sci-fi horror second, but if it is, the score and script were not informed of that.
New Group doesn’t suffer from a lack of sincerity; the film gets unusually heavy at points, particularly with one reveal about Ai’s home life and the bullying at the school. The actors are quite good at portraying these moments, specifically our lead Anna Yamada, whose palpable physical reactions to the insanity unfolding around her are very compelling. And while these performances do contribute to the horror, it just ends up clashing with the situation presented; it should be sharp, but the film is a blunt edge, forcing the strange and funny scenario up against the emotional and unsettling facets of the story.
When the actors aren’t weighed down by the script, the film is most prominently undercut by its score and audio mixing. The levels are oppressive, and the composition is overbearing, choking out any organic creepiness that could have been generated. While the soundtrack itself is high quality, it doesn’t mesh with what’s being shown on screen; instead, it tries to lead the audience into a certain feeling. There are multiple scenes where no music would have been preferable, not because it was bad, but because it just didn’t click together.
Hard to Beat Directing From Yuta Shimotsu
The saving grace of this horror film is Shimotsu’s directing. For a film about the existential dread of existing in a society that sees you as a cog rather than a whole machine, the key is contrasting mundanity with insanity, and Shimotsu knows how to shoot scenes to evoke that juxtaposition perfectly.
The camera envelopes Ai and her love interest Yu as the whole world feels like it’s closing in around them, at first figuratively and then literally. The sense of everything being slightly off is captured wonderfully, as Shimotsu uses the blocking and camera angles to communicate the isolation of our characters.
In theory, New Group is a film with a lot to love, but in practice, it loses steam quickly. While both of Shimotsu’s films thus far have proven him an exceptional director, it’s clear that all of his and his actors’ strengths are not enough to push a film through on concept alone. New Group is entertaining, but in the complex gymnastics of filmmaking, one person can’t keep the whole structure standing.
Reviews
‘Frankenstein’ Review: Guillermo Del Toro Is Off to the Races
Those expecting Guillermo Del Toro’s Frankenstein to be similar to the book, or to any other adaptation, are in for something else. A longtime enjoyer of the creature’s story, Del Toro instead draws from many places: the novel, James Whale’s culturally defining 1931 film, the Kenneth Branagh version, there are even hints from Terence Fisher’s Curse of Frankenstein, and if the set design and costuming are to be believed, there are trace elements of the National Theatre production too.
The formulation to breathe life into this amalgam is a sort of storm cloud of cultural memory and personal desire for Del Toro. This is about crafting his Frankenstein: the one he wanted to see since he was young, the vision he wanted to stitch together. What results is an experience that is more colorful and kinetic and well-loved by its creator than any Frankenstein we’ve had yet, but what it leaves behind is much of its gothic heart. Quiet darkness, looming dread, poetry, and romance are set aside as what has been sold as “the definitive retelling” goes off to the races. It’s a fast-paced ride through a world of mad science, and you’re on it.
Victor Frankenstein’s Ambition and Tragedy
A tale as old as time, with some changes: the morbid talents and untamed hubris of Victor Frankenstein (Oscar Isaac) guide him to challenge death itself. Spurred by a wealthy investor named Henrich Harlander, and a desire for Harlander’s niece Elizabeth (Mia Goth), Victor uses dead flesh and voltaic vigor to bring a creature to life. His attempts to rear it, however, go horribly wrong, setting the two on a bloody collision course as the definitions of man and monster become blurred.
Guillermo Del Toro’s Frankenstein is more Hellboy in its presentation than it is Crimson Peak; it’s honestly more similar to Coppola’s Dracula than either of them. The film is barely done with its opening when it starts with a loud sequence of the monster attacking Walton’s ship on the ice. Flinging crew members about and walking against volleys of gunfire, he is a monstrosity by no other name. The Creature (Jacob Elordi) cries out in guttural screams, part animal and part man, as it calls for its creator to be returned to him. While visually impressive (and it remains visually impressive throughout, believe me), this appropriately bombastic hook foreshadows a problem with tone and tempo.
A Monster That Moves Too Fast
The pace overall is far too fast for its first half, even with its heavy two-and-a-half-hour runtime. It’s also a far cry from the brooding nature the story usually takes. A scene where Victor demonstrates rudimentary reanimation to his peers and a council of judges is rapid, where it should be agonizingly slow. There’s horror and an instability in Victor to be emphasized in that moment, but the grotesque sight is an oddly triumphant one instead. Most do not revile his experiments; in fact he’s taken quite seriously.
Many scenes like this create a tonal problem that makes Victor’s tale lean more toward melodrama than toward philosophical or emotional aspects; he is blatantly wild and free, in a way that is respected rather than pitied. There are opportunities to stop, breathe in the Victorian roses and the smell of death, to get really dour, but it’s neglected until the film’s second half.
Isaac’s and Goth’s performances are overwrought at points, feeling more like pantomimes of Byronic characters. I’m not entirely convinced it has more to do with them than with the script they’re given. Like Victor working with the parts of inmates and dead soldiers, even the best of actors with the best of on-screen chemistry are forced to make do. The dialogue has incredibly high highs (especially in its final moments), but when it has lows, how low they are; a character outright stating that “Victor is the real monster” adage to his face was an ocean floor piece of writing if there ever was one.
Isaac, Goth, and Elordi Bring Life to the Dead
Jacob Elordi’s work here, however, is blameless. Though Elordi’s physical performance as the creature will surely win praise, his time speaking is the true highlight. It’s almost certainly a definitive portrayal of the character; his voice for Victor’s creation is haunted with scorn and solitude, the same way his flesh is haunted by the marks of his creator’s handiwork. It agonizes me to see so little of the books’ most iconic lines used wholesale here, because they would be absolutely perfect coming from Elordi. Still, he has incredible chemistry with both Isaac and Goth, and for as brief as their time together is, he radiates pure force.
Frankenstein Is a Masterclass in Mise-En-Scène
Despite its pacing and tone issues, one can’t help but appreciate the truly masterful craftsmanship Del Toro has managed to pack into the screen. Every millimeter of the sets is carved to specification, filled with personality through to the shadows. Every piece of brick, hint of frost, stain of blood, and curve of the vine is painstakingly and surgically placed to create one of the most wonderful and spellbinding sets you’ve seen—and then it keeps presenting you with new environments like that, over, and over.
At the very least, Del Toro’s Frankenstein is a masterpiece of mise-en-scène down to the minutest of details, and that makes it endlessly rewatchable for aesthetic purposes. This isn’t even getting into the effervescent lighting, or how returning collaborator Kate Hawley has outdone herself again with the costuming. Guillermo Del Toro tackling the king of gothic horror stories, a story written by the mother of all science fiction, inevitably set a high bar for him to clear. And while it’s not a pitch perfect rendering of Mary Shelley’s slow moving and Shakespearean epistolary, it is still one of the best-looking movies you will see all year.
Perhaps for us, it’s at the cost of adapting the straightforward, dark story we know into something more operatic. It sings the tale like a soprano rather than reciting it like humble prose, and it doesn’t always sing well. But for Del Toro, the epic scale and voice of this adaptation is the wage expected for making the movie he’s always dreamed of. Even with its problems, it’s well worth it to see a visionary director at work on a story they love.
Reviews
‘The Siege of Ape Canyon’ Review: Bigfoot Comes Home
In my home, films like Night of the Demon and Abominable are played on repeat; Stan Gordon is king. One of my favorite stories surrounding Bigfoot and Ufology is the Bigfoot/UFO double flap of 1973, which Stan Gordon has an incredible in-depth book on. The Patterson–Gimlin film couldn’t hold a flame to Stan Gordon’s dive into one of my home state’s most chronicled supernatural time periods. But as much as I love the Bigfoot topic, I’m not ashamed to say I don’t know half of the stories surrounding that big hairy beast. And one topic that I’m not ashamed to say I haven’t heard of is The Siege of Ape Canyon.
The Harrowing Events of Ape Canyon
Washington State, 1924. A group of miners (originally consisting of Marion Smith, Leroy P. Smith, Fred Beck, John Peterson, August Johannson, and Mac Rhodes) was on a quest to claim a potential gold mine. Literally. The miners would eventually set up camp on the east slope of Mount Saint Helens. Little did they know their temporary shelter would be the start of a multi-day barrage of attacks from what they and researchers believed to be Bigfoot. What transpired in those days would turn out to be one of the most highly criticized pieces of American lore, nearly lost to time and history…nearly.
I need to set the record straight on a few things before we get started. One, I don’t typically like watching documentaries. Two, I believe in Bigfoot. Three, this documentary made me cry.

Image courtesy of Justin Cook Public Relations.
Reviving a Forgotten Bigfoot Legend in The Siege of Ape Canyon
Documentarian Eli Watson sets out to tell one of the most prolific Bigfoot stories of all time (for those who are deep in Bigfoot mythology). It’s noted fairly early in the film that this story is told often and is well known in the Washington area. So then, how do people outside of the incident location know so little about it? I’ve read at least 15 books on and about Bigfoot, and I’ve never once heard this story. This isn’t a Stan-Gordon-reported story about someone sitting on the john and seeing a pair of red eyes outside of their bathroom window. The story around Ape Canyon has a deeper spiritual meaning that goes beyond a few sightings here and there.
Watson’s documentary, though, isn’t just about Bigfoot or unearthing the story of Ape Canyon. Ape Canyon nearly became nothing more than a tall tale that elders would share around a campfire to keep the younglings out of the woods at 2 AM. If it weren’t for Mark Myrsell, that’s exactly what would have happened. The Siege of Ape Canyon spends half its time unpacking the story of Fred Beck and his prospecting crew, and the other half tells a truly inspiring tale of unbridled passion, friendship, and love.
Mark Myrsell’s Relentless Pursuit: Friendship, Truth, and Tears
Mark Myrsell’s undying passion for everything outdoors inevitably led to bringing one of Bigfoot’s craziest stories to light. His devotion to the truth vindicated many people who were (probably) labeled kooks and crazies. Throughout Myrsell’s endless search for the truth, he made lifelong friends along the way. What brought me to tears throughout The Siege of Ape Canyon is Watson’s insistence on showing the human side of Myrsell and his friends. They’re not in this to make millions or bag a Bigfoot corpse; they just want to know the truth. And that’s what they find.
The Siege of Ape Canyon is a documentary that will open your eyes to a wildly mystical story you may not have heard of. And it does it pretty damn well. Whereas many documentaries feel the need to talk down to the viewer just to educate them, Watson’s documentary takes you along for the ride. It doesn’t ask you to believe or not believe in Bigfoot. It allows you to make your own decisions and provides the evidence it needs to. If you’ve ever had a passing interest in the topic of Bigfoot, or if you think you’re the next Stan Gordon, I highly recommend watching The Siege of Ape Canyon.
The Siege of Ape Canyon stomps its way onto digital platforms on November 11. Give yourself a little post-Halloween treat and check it out!


