Connect with us

Reviews

Tokyo Horror Film Festival: ‘Black Spines’ (2024) Review

Published

on

There’s an article I have coming out in August about a film called Jersey Shore Massacre. In said article, I discuss how Scream had an overall negative impact on the slasher subgenre. Also discussed is how there’s nothing wrong with a straightforward slasher film. The Scream Effect™ forced slashers into a corner where they had to be supremely meta and too smart for their own good. A title like Jersey Shore Massacre (and its accompanying cover) had set a low bar of expectation. Once the credits rolled, it reshaped how I look at, and receive, films in the slasher subgenre. Black Spines is the first slasher I have watched since Jersey Shore Massacre. And I could not have been more pleased.

Black Spines: A Gripping Slasher Story

Black Spines follows Cameron (Jan Luis Castellanos), a teen reeling from the recent loss of his father, Andy (Gilbert Owuor). Cameron’s loss is compounded by the excessive bullying he faces from a group of jocks (and his sister Kathryn’s (Tiana Le) boyfriend, Barcley (Cameron Wong). If that weren’t enough, the town of Page Hollow is being stalked by a masked killer named The Pill. “If you act up in this town, he’ll be your medicine.” As the dust settles after each kill, it seems more and more like Cameron is closer to the killer than he may realize. A series of VHS tapes begins to appear, leading Cameron down a dangerous road that he may not survive.

Jordon Foss’ Directorial Debut Shines

Writer/director Jordon Foss steps out of the shadowed alleys of Gotham City with his exceptional feature debut. Black Spines, while accepting certain unavoidable tropes, refuses to rest in the shadows of the slashers of yore. It’s unapologetically its own film. A slasher that doesn’t have overly snappy dialogue, takes its time, and understands its own pace is a breath of fresh air. Slashers that run the festival circuit, understandably, need to find ways to stand out from the crowd. I find a certain level of enjoyment with festival slashers like Founders Day, but it almost feels like they try a bit too hard. Seeing a film like Black Spines makes me feel like slashers are beginning to remember they can be grounded and still be impactful.

Exploring Grief in Black Spines

Foss’ script is beyond impressive with how it handles grief. One of the biggest complaints I’ve seen surrounding “elevated horror” is the frustration people feel with how grief-stricken the genre has become. Black Spines uses grief as a jumping-off point to explore the characters. Cameron and Kathryn live in their grief, and it defines them in different ways. Cameron is sullen and closed off while Kathryn bottles it up until she reaches a tipping point. There are no prolonged scenes of exaggerated keening; there are no Oscar-bait long shots of someone crying with tears streaming down their face. Foss hits the audience with genuine depictions of grief that leave you feeling slightly hollow, but hopeful overall.

A Haunting Score by Alexander Bornstein

Think of a modern slasher film. There’s a good chance a booming, guitar-riffed, drum-pounding score accompanies nearly every kill. Yes, there are some pulse-pounding moments throughout Alexander Bornstein’s score. But Bornstein’s score stands apart from others with how he handles the composition post-kill. Instead of moving on to the next tick on the kill count, we get the opportunity to sit with The Pill’s kill. Bornstein’s score ends each kill with an exclamation point of sorrow. Not only does it make the kill feel more impactful, it transports you to the scene of the crime. It’s a brutal bookend to the incredibly intense kills.

Memorable Kills and Special Effects

Speaking of kills, we all know that a slasher film is only as good as the kills. You can have a terrible story, but as long as the audience likes the kills, they will forgive abhorrent writing. On top of having an A+ story, Black Spines has some impressively effective kills. Seasoned Special Effects Makeup Artist Gary J. Tunnicliffe makes damn sure to awe the audience with his handiwork.

Minor Flaws in Black Spines

That’s not to say there aren’t some issues with Black Spines. My biggest issue with the film is the over-introduction of characters from the jump. Black Spines has a decently slow, albeit methodical, start where a plethora of characters are introduced and then forgotten about until it’s too late. Foss’ debut feels very confident in nearly every facet, but I feel he jumped the gun with the number of characters he wrote into the story. You can easily show quick transgressions here and there as a way to pad out slasher victims, without inundating the viewer with character after character. There are a few instances where a character dies, and then the film decides to go back and tell you who they were. This specific issue wasn’t enough to alter my overall appreciation of what the film does for slashers.
Overall, Black Spines is a well-crafted, silent meditation of grief that exists as a brilliant singular entity. Jordon Foss struck gold and created, what I think, one of the few capital ‘g’ ‘G’reat slashers of the 2020s. Chock full of incredible performances, a stellar script, a straightforward slasher, bloody kills, and a haunting score, Black Spines sets a new bar for modern slashers.
Special thanks to Tokyo Horror Film Festival for letting us remotely cover their film festival!

Brendan is an award-winning author and screenwriter rotting away in New Jersey. His hobbies include rain, slugs, and the endless search for The Mothman.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Reviews

‘Frankenstein’ Review: Guillermo Del Toro Is Off to the Races

Published

on

Those expecting Guillermo Del Toro’s Frankenstein to be similar to the book, or to any other adaptation, are in for something else. A longtime enjoyer of the creature’s story, Del Toro instead draws from many places: the novel, James Whale’s culturally defining 1931 film, the Kenneth Branagh version, there are even hints from Terence Fisher’s Curse of Frankenstein, and if the set design and costuming are to be believed, there are trace elements of the National Theatre production too.

The formulation to breathe life into this amalgam is a sort of storm cloud of cultural memory and personal desire for Del Toro. This is about crafting his Frankenstein: the one he wanted to see since he was young, the vision he wanted to stitch together. What results is an experience that is more colorful and kinetic and well-loved by its creator than any Frankenstein we’ve had yet, but what it leaves behind is much of its gothic heart. Quiet darkness, looming dread, poetry, and romance are set aside as what has been sold as “the definitive retelling” goes off to the races. It’s a fast-paced ride through a world of mad science, and you’re on it.

Victor Frankenstein’s Ambition and Tragedy

A tale as old as time, with some changes: the morbid talents and untamed hubris of Victor Frankenstein (Oscar Isaac) guide him to challenge death itself. Spurred by a wealthy investor named Henrich Harlander, and a desire for Harlander’s niece Elizabeth (Mia Goth), Victor uses dead flesh and voltaic vigor to bring a creature to life. His attempts to rear it, however, go horribly wrong, setting the two on a bloody collision course as the definitions of man and monster become blurred.

Guillermo Del Toro’s Frankenstein is more Hellboy in its presentation than it is Crimson Peak; it’s honestly more similar to Coppola’s Dracula than either of them. The film is barely done with its opening when it starts with a loud sequence of the monster attacking Walton’s ship on the ice. Flinging crew members about and walking against volleys of gunfire, he is a monstrosity by no other name. The Creature (Jacob Elordi) cries out in guttural screams, part animal and part man, as it calls for its creator to be returned to him. While visually impressive (and it remains visually impressive throughout, believe me), this appropriately bombastic hook foreshadows a problem with tone and tempo.

A Monster That Moves Too Fast

The pace overall is far too fast for its first half, even with its heavy two-and-a-half-hour runtime. It’s also a far cry from the brooding nature the story usually takes. A scene where Victor demonstrates rudimentary reanimation to his peers and a council of judges is rapid, where it should be agonizingly slow. There’s horror and an instability in Victor to be emphasized in that moment, but the grotesque sight is an oddly triumphant one instead. Most do not revile his experiments; in fact he’s taken quite seriously.

Advertisement

Many scenes like this create a tonal problem that makes Victor’s tale lean more toward melodrama than toward philosophical or emotional aspects; he is blatantly wild and free, in a way that is respected rather than pitied. There are opportunities to stop, breathe in the Victorian roses and the smell of death, to get really dour, but it’s neglected until the film’s second half.

Isaac’s and Goth’s performances are overwrought at points, feeling more like pantomimes of Byronic characters. I’m not entirely convinced it has more to do with them than with the script they’re given. Like Victor working with the parts of inmates and dead soldiers, even the best of actors with the best of on-screen chemistry are forced to make do. The dialogue has incredibly high highs (especially in its final moments), but when it has lows, how low they are; a character outright stating that “Victor is the real monster” adage to his face was an ocean floor piece of writing if there ever was one.

Isaac, Goth, and Elordi Bring Life to the Dead

Jacob Elordi’s work here, however, is blameless. Though Elordi’s physical performance as the creature will surely win praise, his time speaking is the true highlight. It’s almost certainly a definitive portrayal of the character; his voice for Victor’s creation is haunted with scorn and solitude, the same way his flesh is haunted by the marks of his creator’s handiwork. It agonizes me to see so little of the books’ most iconic lines used wholesale here, because they would be absolutely perfect coming from Elordi. Still, he has incredible chemistry with both Isaac and Goth, and for as brief as their time together is, he radiates pure force.

Frankenstein Is a Masterclass in Mise-En-Scène

Despite its pacing and tone issues, one can’t help but appreciate the truly masterful craftsmanship Del Toro has managed to pack into the screen. Every millimeter of the sets is carved to specification, filled with personality through to the shadows. Every piece of brick, hint of frost, stain of blood, and curve of the vine is painstakingly and surgically placed to create one of the most wonderful and spellbinding sets you’ve seen—and then it keeps presenting you with new environments like that, over, and over.

At the very least, Del Toro’s Frankenstein is a masterpiece of mise-en-scène down to the minutest of details, and that makes it endlessly rewatchable for aesthetic purposes. This isn’t even getting into the effervescent lighting, or how returning collaborator Kate Hawley has outdone herself again with the costuming. Guillermo Del Toro tackling the king of gothic horror stories, a story written by the mother of all science fiction, inevitably set a high bar for him to clear. And while it’s not a pitch perfect rendering of Mary Shelley’s slow moving and Shakespearean epistolary, it is still one of the best-looking movies you will see all year.

Advertisement

Perhaps for us, it’s at the cost of adapting the straightforward, dark story we know into something more operatic. It sings the tale like a soprano rather than reciting it like humble prose, and it doesn’t always sing well. But for Del Toro, the epic scale and voice of this adaptation is the wage expected for making the movie he’s always dreamed of. Even with its problems, it’s well worth it to see a visionary director at work on a story they love.

Continue Reading

Reviews

‘The Siege of Ape Canyon’ Review: Bigfoot Comes Home

Published

on

In my home, films like Night of the Demon and Abominable are played on repeat; Stan Gordon is king. One of my favorite stories surrounding Bigfoot and Ufology is the Bigfoot/UFO double flap of 1973, which Stan Gordon has an incredible in-depth book on. The Patterson–Gimlin film couldn’t hold a flame to Stan Gordon’s dive into one of my home state’s most chronicled supernatural time periods. But as much as I love the Bigfoot topic, I’m not ashamed to say I don’t know half of the stories surrounding that big hairy beast. And one topic that I’m not ashamed to say I haven’t heard of is The Siege of Ape Canyon.

The Harrowing Events of Ape Canyon

Washington State, 1924. A group of miners (originally consisting of Marion Smith, Leroy P. Smith, Fred Beck, John Peterson, August Johannson, and Mac Rhodes) was on a quest to claim a potential gold mine. Literally. The miners would eventually set up camp on the east slope of Mount Saint Helens. Little did they know their temporary shelter would be the start of a multi-day barrage of attacks from what they and researchers believed to be Bigfoot. What transpired in those days would turn out to be one of the most highly criticized pieces of American lore, nearly lost to time and history…nearly.

I need to set the record straight on a few things before we get started. One, I don’t typically like watching documentaries. Two, I believe in Bigfoot. Three, this documentary made me cry.

Image courtesy of Justin Cook Public Relations.

Reviving a Forgotten Bigfoot Legend in The Siege of Ape Canyon

Documentarian Eli Watson sets out to tell one of the most prolific Bigfoot stories of all time (for those who are deep in Bigfoot mythology). It’s noted fairly early in the film that this story is told often and is well known in the Washington area. So then, how do people outside of the incident location know so little about it? I’ve read at least 15 books on and about Bigfoot, and I’ve never once heard this story. This isn’t a Stan-Gordon-reported story about someone sitting on the john and seeing a pair of red eyes outside of their bathroom window. The story around Ape Canyon has a deeper spiritual meaning that goes beyond a few sightings here and there.

Watson’s documentary, though, isn’t just about Bigfoot or unearthing the story of Ape Canyon. Ape Canyon nearly became nothing more than a tall tale that elders would share around a campfire to keep the younglings out of the woods at 2 AM. If it weren’t for Mark Myrsell, that’s exactly what would have happened. The Siege of Ape Canyon spends half its time unpacking the story of Fred Beck and his prospecting crew, and the other half tells a truly inspiring tale of unbridled passion, friendship, and love.

Mark Myrsell’s Relentless Pursuit: Friendship, Truth, and Tears

Mark Myrsell’s undying passion for everything outdoors inevitably led to bringing one of Bigfoot’s craziest stories to light. His devotion to the truth vindicated many people who were (probably) labeled kooks and crazies. Throughout Myrsell’s endless search for the truth, he made lifelong friends along the way. What brought me to tears throughout The Siege of Ape Canyon is Watson’s insistence on showing the human side of Myrsell and his friends. They’re not in this to make millions or bag a Bigfoot corpse; they just want to know the truth. And that’s what they find.

Advertisement

The Siege of Ape Canyon is a documentary that will open your eyes to a wildly mystical story you may not have heard of. And it does it pretty damn well. Whereas many documentaries feel the need to talk down to the viewer just to educate them, Watson’s documentary takes you along for the ride. It doesn’t ask you to believe or not believe in Bigfoot. It allows you to make your own decisions and provides the evidence it needs to. If you’ve ever had a passing interest in the topic of Bigfoot, or if you think you’re the next Stan Gordon, I highly recommend watching The Siege of Ape Canyon.

The Siege of Ape Canyon stomps its way onto digital platforms on November 11. Give yourself a little post-Halloween treat and check it out!

Continue Reading

Horror Press Mailing List

Fangoria
Advertisement
Advertisement