Reviews
‘I Know What You Did Last Summer’ Review: Nostalgia is Overrated
As a kid who grew up on Kevin Williamson’s 1990s slasher era, I tend to keep my thoughts about the original I Know What You Did Last Summer movies to myself. Like most of my generation, I was a tween with a crush on Freddie Prinze Jr., who spent every Tuesday night watching Sarah Michelle Gellar slay vampires. I wanted to at least like it because it felt like I was obligated to love it. I tried to take the parts that work and gaslight myself into thinking I misremembered how ridiculous it was.
Why the Original Films Fell Short
Upon rewatching it (and the sequel, I Still Know What You Did Last Summer) as an adult proved it still wasn’t my bag. Sure, Helen Shivers’ (Sarah Michelle Gellar) chase scene in the first film is iconic. Obviously, Karla (Brandy Norwood) continued the trend of the sidekick being the true final girl who gets sidelined. The franchise kept trying to make that boring version of Julie James (Jennifer Love Hewitt) “fetch” at all costs.
The new film, unfortunately, has to tread the same premise as the original. However, I Know What You Did Last Summer (2025) gets a few interesting updates. This time, we have five friends who survived high school and have complicated relationships with each other in the car on the night that will haunt them. Danica (Madelyn Cline) and Teddy’s (Tyriq Withers) engagement party is what brings their friends back to town. Ava (Chase Sui Wonders) will be our conscience this outing. However, her ex-boyfriend Milo (Jonah Hauer-King) will not be the poor boyfriend who almost stumbles in a class divide conversation. Instead, the group bumps into their former friend Stevie (Sarah Pidgeon) and uses her for that instead. Stevie is a hardworking townie because her family lost everything, and her friends distanced themselves from her (and the income bracket she fell into) after graduation.
Modernizing the Classic Characters
While there are five characters this time out, it’s hard to not see them as funhouse versions of the 1997 squad at first. As they become more lived in and Danica gets more quotable lines, you can see how these stock characters have been updated for a new generation. Instead of getting their hands dirty and swearing to take the secret to their graves, one of the friends causes the accident and calls his dad to help them cover it up. This is where Sam Lansky and Jennifer Kaytin Robinson’s script attempts to correct some of the wrongs of the first one.
This version of I Know What You Did Last Summer actually dips more than one toe into the water when discussing classicism and capitalism. The cover-up of the events in the original movie, as well as what this new class did last summer, to make the town marketable, is insidious. It harkens back to the mayor in Jaws reopening the beaches while the shark is still snacking on his voters. This refusal to talk about the murders that happened almost 30 years ago gives Ray (Prinze Jr.) a solid reason to be angry and get involved. He and Julie’s marriage caved under all their shared baggage, and he moved back to their hometown of Southport. It feels like we’re finally getting a good use of a legacy character. Although the reasoning for the new generation seeking out the older generation for their situation feels forced.
Reimagining Julie James and Legacy Characters
This installment is a huge step in the right direction because it finally allows Julie James to be a person. Part of the reason the original movies feel flat is that our final girl was never interesting. She was written to be the perfect boring victim and was never going to measure up to other final girls. However, here Julie (and Ray) are weighed down by what they have been through. The trauma has changed them, and they finally feel like real people. They have depth, which gives the actors something to sink their teeth into for a few fleeting scenes. It’s a delight to see both of them get versions of their characters that actually deserve their time and show their range. While we can argue if their arcs made sense forever, it was refreshing to see them evolve. The tenuous connections between them and the new generation are not great, but the movie is okay with that.
Our killer is also a darker and more fragmented version of what we grew up with. While the familiar fisherman stalks the crew and leaves threatening notes as usual, the figure gets multiple scenes to actually be menacing. He even gives us a very welcome higher body count to further set this movie apart from the original. This is another thing working for I Know What You Did Last Summer and is a nice change from its predecessors. While the reveal is predictable, it is not another unforgivable “Ben son” moment. Jennifer Kaytin Robinson’s direction embraces the chaos and absurdity of this world. She elevates it to the kind of campy glory akin to some of our favorite mid-tier slashers. Robinson is having fun with this world. This allows the audience to be in on the jokes, instead of rolling their eyes and wondering why they keep coming back to this IP.
They Know What They’re During With the Nostalgia
I Know What You Did Last Summer knows what it inherited and tries to connect all the dots while fighting to become its own thing. It is not here to reinvent the wheel or give you nightmares. This movie is camp, diva! It is inviting you to brunch but does not really care if you join or not. It understands that this franchise was always rooted in likable lead actors committing to the nonsense while being wrapped in layers of nostalgia. Robinson and the crew are not here to undo that. However, this film adds to that idea while moving the needle to where it should have started decades ago.
Going into the newest installment knowing the franchise is mid, helped me see very clearly that this is an okay film. Which is a sweet win for the series and the subgenre. People are going to pretend it’s worse than it is, as if the first movies were some holy text. Others will oversell it because they are happy to return to their comfort slasher and are biased in a more positive way. Both sides are doing a disservice to the end product, and that is a failure on society’s part.
Embrace the Flawed Silver Lining
I Know What You Did Last Summer glows in everything it gets right and relishes in everything it gets wrong. It deserves an audience that will see it for the flawed silver lining that it is in this franchise. It took all of the fan service it was forced to carry in stride and knitted a chunky sweater out of it. The end result is a cozy number that we might not want to wear in public, but we know was made with love.
I Know What You Did Last Summer is not a great movie, and that’s okay because this franchise was never that good. However, at least this newest installment is occasionally fun. It also gives us the dose of nostalgia we seem to crave during these hellish times. That alone keeps it from being the worst thing to happen to this IP. Lansky and Robinson’s script did what it needed to do. It gave predictable and over-the-top moments while attempting to correct a few of the glaring wrongs in the original films. That makes it a fine enough film that will sadly have to endure the social media battle that awaits all legacy sequels.
Reviews
‘Frankenstein’ Review: Guillermo Del Toro Is Off to the Races
Those expecting Guillermo Del Toro’s Frankenstein to be similar to the book, or to any other adaptation, are in for something else. A longtime enjoyer of the creature’s story, Del Toro instead draws from many places: the novel, James Whale’s culturally defining 1931 film, the Kenneth Branagh version, there are even hints from Terence Fisher’s Curse of Frankenstein, and if the set design and costuming are to be believed, there are trace elements of the National Theatre production too.
The formulation to breathe life into this amalgam is a sort of storm cloud of cultural memory and personal desire for Del Toro. This is about crafting his Frankenstein: the one he wanted to see since he was young, the vision he wanted to stitch together. What results is an experience that is more colorful and kinetic and well-loved by its creator than any Frankenstein we’ve had yet, but what it leaves behind is much of its gothic heart. Quiet darkness, looming dread, poetry, and romance are set aside as what has been sold as “the definitive retelling” goes off to the races. It’s a fast-paced ride through a world of mad science, and you’re on it.
Victor Frankenstein’s Ambition and Tragedy
A tale as old as time, with some changes: the morbid talents and untamed hubris of Victor Frankenstein (Oscar Isaac) guide him to challenge death itself. Spurred by a wealthy investor named Henrich Harlander, and a desire for Harlander’s niece Elizabeth (Mia Goth), Victor uses dead flesh and voltaic vigor to bring a creature to life. His attempts to rear it, however, go horribly wrong, setting the two on a bloody collision course as the definitions of man and monster become blurred.
Guillermo Del Toro’s Frankenstein is more Hellboy in its presentation than it is Crimson Peak; it’s honestly more similar to Coppola’s Dracula than either of them. The film is barely done with its opening when it starts with a loud sequence of the monster attacking Walton’s ship on the ice. Flinging crew members about and walking against volleys of gunfire, he is a monstrosity by no other name. The Creature (Jacob Elordi) cries out in guttural screams, part animal and part man, as it calls for its creator to be returned to him. While visually impressive (and it remains visually impressive throughout, believe me), this appropriately bombastic hook foreshadows a problem with tone and tempo.
A Monster That Moves Too Fast
The pace overall is far too fast for its first half, even with its heavy two-and-a-half-hour runtime. It’s also a far cry from the brooding nature the story usually takes. A scene where Victor demonstrates rudimentary reanimation to his peers and a council of judges is rapid, where it should be agonizingly slow. There’s horror and an instability in Victor to be emphasized in that moment, but the grotesque sight is an oddly triumphant one instead. Most do not revile his experiments; in fact he’s taken quite seriously.
Many scenes like this create a tonal problem that makes Victor’s tale lean more toward melodrama than toward philosophical or emotional aspects; he is blatantly wild and free, in a way that is respected rather than pitied. There are opportunities to stop, breathe in the Victorian roses and the smell of death, to get really dour, but it’s neglected until the film’s second half.
Isaac’s and Goth’s performances are overwrought at points, feeling more like pantomimes of Byronic characters. I’m not entirely convinced it has more to do with them than with the script they’re given. Like Victor working with the parts of inmates and dead soldiers, even the best of actors with the best of on-screen chemistry are forced to make do. The dialogue has incredibly high highs (especially in its final moments), but when it has lows, how low they are; a character outright stating that “Victor is the real monster” adage to his face was an ocean floor piece of writing if there ever was one.
Isaac, Goth, and Elordi Bring Life to the Dead
Jacob Elordi’s work here, however, is blameless. Though Elordi’s physical performance as the creature will surely win praise, his time speaking is the true highlight. It’s almost certainly a definitive portrayal of the character; his voice for Victor’s creation is haunted with scorn and solitude, the same way his flesh is haunted by the marks of his creator’s handiwork. It agonizes me to see so little of the books’ most iconic lines used wholesale here, because they would be absolutely perfect coming from Elordi. Still, he has incredible chemistry with both Isaac and Goth, and for as brief as their time together is, he radiates pure force.
Frankenstein Is a Masterclass in Mise-En-Scène
Despite its pacing and tone issues, one can’t help but appreciate the truly masterful craftsmanship Del Toro has managed to pack into the screen. Every millimeter of the sets is carved to specification, filled with personality through to the shadows. Every piece of brick, hint of frost, stain of blood, and curve of the vine is painstakingly and surgically placed to create one of the most wonderful and spellbinding sets you’ve seen—and then it keeps presenting you with new environments like that, over, and over.
At the very least, Del Toro’s Frankenstein is a masterpiece of mise-en-scène down to the minutest of details, and that makes it endlessly rewatchable for aesthetic purposes. This isn’t even getting into the effervescent lighting, or how returning collaborator Kate Hawley has outdone herself again with the costuming. Guillermo Del Toro tackling the king of gothic horror stories, a story written by the mother of all science fiction, inevitably set a high bar for him to clear. And while it’s not a pitch perfect rendering of Mary Shelley’s slow moving and Shakespearean epistolary, it is still one of the best-looking movies you will see all year.
Perhaps for us, it’s at the cost of adapting the straightforward, dark story we know into something more operatic. It sings the tale like a soprano rather than reciting it like humble prose, and it doesn’t always sing well. But for Del Toro, the epic scale and voice of this adaptation is the wage expected for making the movie he’s always dreamed of. Even with its problems, it’s well worth it to see a visionary director at work on a story they love.
Reviews
‘The Siege of Ape Canyon’ Review: Bigfoot Comes Home
In my home, films like Night of the Demon and Abominable are played on repeat; Stan Gordon is king. One of my favorite stories surrounding Bigfoot and Ufology is the Bigfoot/UFO double flap of 1973, which Stan Gordon has an incredible in-depth book on. The Patterson–Gimlin film couldn’t hold a flame to Stan Gordon’s dive into one of my home state’s most chronicled supernatural time periods. But as much as I love the Bigfoot topic, I’m not ashamed to say I don’t know half of the stories surrounding that big hairy beast. And one topic that I’m not ashamed to say I haven’t heard of is The Siege of Ape Canyon.
The Harrowing Events of Ape Canyon
Washington State, 1924. A group of miners (originally consisting of Marion Smith, Leroy P. Smith, Fred Beck, John Peterson, August Johannson, and Mac Rhodes) was on a quest to claim a potential gold mine. Literally. The miners would eventually set up camp on the east slope of Mount Saint Helens. Little did they know their temporary shelter would be the start of a multi-day barrage of attacks from what they and researchers believed to be Bigfoot. What transpired in those days would turn out to be one of the most highly criticized pieces of American lore, nearly lost to time and history…nearly.
I need to set the record straight on a few things before we get started. One, I don’t typically like watching documentaries. Two, I believe in Bigfoot. Three, this documentary made me cry.

Image courtesy of Justin Cook Public Relations.
Reviving a Forgotten Bigfoot Legend in The Siege of Ape Canyon
Documentarian Eli Watson sets out to tell one of the most prolific Bigfoot stories of all time (for those who are deep in Bigfoot mythology). It’s noted fairly early in the film that this story is told often and is well known in the Washington area. So then, how do people outside of the incident location know so little about it? I’ve read at least 15 books on and about Bigfoot, and I’ve never once heard this story. This isn’t a Stan-Gordon-reported story about someone sitting on the john and seeing a pair of red eyes outside of their bathroom window. The story around Ape Canyon has a deeper spiritual meaning that goes beyond a few sightings here and there.
Watson’s documentary, though, isn’t just about Bigfoot or unearthing the story of Ape Canyon. Ape Canyon nearly became nothing more than a tall tale that elders would share around a campfire to keep the younglings out of the woods at 2 AM. If it weren’t for Mark Myrsell, that’s exactly what would have happened. The Siege of Ape Canyon spends half its time unpacking the story of Fred Beck and his prospecting crew, and the other half tells a truly inspiring tale of unbridled passion, friendship, and love.
Mark Myrsell’s Relentless Pursuit: Friendship, Truth, and Tears
Mark Myrsell’s undying passion for everything outdoors inevitably led to bringing one of Bigfoot’s craziest stories to light. His devotion to the truth vindicated many people who were (probably) labeled kooks and crazies. Throughout Myrsell’s endless search for the truth, he made lifelong friends along the way. What brought me to tears throughout The Siege of Ape Canyon is Watson’s insistence on showing the human side of Myrsell and his friends. They’re not in this to make millions or bag a Bigfoot corpse; they just want to know the truth. And that’s what they find.
The Siege of Ape Canyon is a documentary that will open your eyes to a wildly mystical story you may not have heard of. And it does it pretty damn well. Whereas many documentaries feel the need to talk down to the viewer just to educate them, Watson’s documentary takes you along for the ride. It doesn’t ask you to believe or not believe in Bigfoot. It allows you to make your own decisions and provides the evidence it needs to. If you’ve ever had a passing interest in the topic of Bigfoot, or if you think you’re the next Stan Gordon, I highly recommend watching The Siege of Ape Canyon.
The Siege of Ape Canyon stomps its way onto digital platforms on November 11. Give yourself a little post-Halloween treat and check it out!


