Connect with us

Reviews

‘Eye for an Eye’ Review: Mr. Sandman Is Coming for You

Eye for an Eye is a unique take on modern-day folk horror. While some of the dialogue was too expository for its good, and I wish there had been less use of digital effects, the final product is substantive and stylistically impressive. Everyone on screen brought their A-game, and nothing seemed to be left on the cutting room floor. Even for its nearly hour and 40-minute runtime, it’s tightly paced and doesn’t drag for a second. You’re going to want to keep your peepers peeled for this one.

Published

on

An eye for an eye is one of my favorite principles. Theoretically, it’s terrible for the natural order; someone steals from you, you break their hands. Something about the tangibility of giving yourself justice is bittersweet. Elisa Victoria took this idea to terrifying heights with their graphic novel Mr. Sandman. Another principle I’m fond of is, “If you want it done right, then do it yourself.” That’s exactly what Elisa Victoria did.

Eye for an Eye follows Anna Reeves (Whitney Peak), a tortured soul implanted directly into Florida’s wetlands from the busy streets of Brooklyn. Anna’s parents recently passed away in a tragic car accident that left Anna in the custody of her blind grandmother, May (S. Epatha Merkerson). Things start strong as Anna makes quick friends with Julie (Laken Giles) and Shawn (Finn Bennett). A grotesque act of violence unwittingly throws Anna and her friends into the sights of a truly terrifying being.

Anna Reeves: A Tortured Soul in Crisis

I haven’t had the opportunity to read Elisa Victoria’s Mr. Sandman, and if it’s anything like the movie, it’s going to be a page-turner. Elisa Victoria and Michael Tully adapted Mr. Sandman into a well-written, finely tuned somatic nightmare. Eye for an Eye tells a tale as old as time: someone was wronged, and their spirit longs for wicked revenge. Each character feels fully fleshed out, with their intentions fitting for their respective actions. Every character has its distinct intricacies, but Anna, understandably, is the most fascinating among the bunch.

Anna, as stated earlier, is a tortured soul. Part of her wants to blame herself for being alive while her parents died in the car crash. She spends her evenings prone on the floor, listening to affirmations and therapeutic videos. These videos are meant to ground Anna and remind her that it’s okay to be alive and that she’s HERE. Once Mr. Sandman is on her tail, she must take herself to a headspace somewhere between being present and dissociated. This beautiful back and forth continually makes Anna question everything about herself.

Mr. Sandman: A Terrifying Creature Design

What steals the show is how director Colin Tilley and cinematographer Robert Leitzell capture Mr. Sandman. The creature design itself (prosthetics by Lone Wolf Effects) is truly haunting. At points, it seems as if we’re haunted by its appearance through the use of a practical, digital puppet creature. Mr. Sandman occasionally has incredibly fluid movements, while at other points, he has herky-jerky, almost J-horror-like movements.

Mr. Sandman, as we’re told in the opening title card, takes his victims’ eyes (his victims are bullies whose names are etched into his tree). This originally had me slightly worried. If the creature has one specific way of dispatching its victims, it could corner the creatives into one singular way of crafting their horror. I was pleasantly surprised by how wrong I was. Mr. Sandman creates specifically crafted nightmares straight out of his victims’ subconscious.

Stellar Performances and Tight Pacing

Eye for an Eye is a unique take on modern-day folk horror. While some of the dialogue was too expository for its good, and I wish there had been less use of digital effects, the final product is substantive and stylistically impressive. Everyone on screen brought their A-game, and nothing seemed to be left on the cutting room floor. Even for its nearly hour and 40-minute runtime, it’s tightly paced and doesn’t drag for a second. You’re going to want to keep your peepers peeled for this one.

Eye for an Eye: Release Date and Where to Watch

Eye for an Eye hits select theaters VOD on June 20th.

Brendan is an award-winning author and screenwriter rotting away in New Jersey. His hobbies include rain, slugs, and the endless search for The Mothman.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Reviews

‘The Innkeepers’ (2011) Review: Ti West’s Horror Gem

Published

on

A little over a year ago, I had the opportunity to catch a new film that reminded me of one of the films that sparked my interest in analyzing films in the first place. Sweet Relief was a fun and well-crafted modern mumblegore film that brought Ti West’s The Innkeepers back into my mind. I first watched The Innkeepers shortly before leaving for college, and I was stunned by how incredibly effective it was. To celebrate Dark Sky Select’s 4K steelbook release of The Innkeepers, I decided to give the film a well-deserved rewatch.

The Innkeepers: A Haunting Ghost Story

The Innkeepers follows Claire (Sara Paxton) and Luke (Pat Healy), the last two employees of The Yankee Pedlar Inn. Claire and Luke find themselves working during the hotel’s last week in operation. They also happen to be amateur ghost hunters. Due to the small number of guests, Claire and Luke have some time to put their ghost hunting tools to good use. As the hunting begins, the terror checks in. Is there more to this ghost story than meets the eye?

Before his flashy slasher trilogy, Ti West’s films had a darker, more personal feel to them. After wowing audiences with his satanic panic masterpiece The House of the Devil, Ti West tackled the true terrors of the supernatural. As much as I adore Ti West, this would be his last film that perfectly balances style and substance. Obviously, the goal of an artist is to grow and transform as a filmmaker, but this feels like West’s last intimate film.

Mumblegore Dialogue: Natural and Grounded

The Innkeepers keeps with the mumblegore-like dialogue West was so great at creating. There’s still that improvisational, but naturalistic, feel to their words. And while the situation becomes extraordinary, the dialogue still feels grounded in reality. Somehow, for a 2011 film, West finds a way to competently direct actors in saying the words “epic” and “failblog”. It’s the exposition of the film that truly sets it apart from others like it. While talking with a child in the lobby, Claire reveals the backstory of Madeline O’Malley and her untimely suicide in the hotel. It’s a small moment that could easily be a throwaway detail to provide the audience with the necessary backstory. But it’s Sara Paxton’s performance that sells the scene.

Speaking of, both Sara Paxton and indie darling Pat Healy absolutely tear it up on screen. Sara Paxton’s performance is reserved and lived in. She carries herself awkwardly, with little self-confidence, but still finds a way to be charming. Indie darling Pat Healy chews up the scenery with his Tintin-like faux hawk and a Red Bull-infused high energy. Not only do they steal their respective scenes alone, but they also play off each other like a fast-paced tennis volley.

Advertisement

Supernatural Horror Done Right

Ti West’s magnum opus handles the supernatural element in a much cleaner, fascinating way than most ghost films. The slow pace highlights the mundanity of working-class life that quickly becomes tense through the creeping terror of Madeline O’Malley and her growing cohorts of terror. There’s a certain unbalanced feel to the film’s three-act structure that lends an air of authenticity to it. Whereas most supernatural films feel the need to do more, The Innkeepers understands that it’s okay to do less. It’s how the scares are delivered that sets this film apart.

If you haven’t seen The Innkeepers, then you’re truly missing out on one of the subgenre’s greatest hits. That being said, I don’t think this film is for everyone. Ti West asks a lot from his audience, and I can understand that some people won’t want to go with him on this ride. It’s talky and demands full attention. But if you’re willing to sit with the film and let it work its magic, you won’t be disappointed.

Continue Reading

Reviews

[REVIEW] Fantastic Fest 2025: ‘Primate’ Is the Animal-Attack-Meets-Slasher Movie You Didn’t Know You Needed

Published

on

If that one scene in Nope (you know the one) wasn’t enough to convince you that owning a chimpanzee is a bad idea, Primate is here to remind you that these animals can literally rip you limb from limb. Directed by Johannes Roberts, who also co-wrote the script with Ernest Riera, the film is scheduled to release in January—and if it wasn’t on your radar before, allow me to firmly add it.

PSA: Primate Proves That Chimps Are Not Pets (But They Are Great Slasher Killers)

Primate begins with a pre-credits scene introducing us to the danger: a vet has been called to check in on a chimp named Ben that isn’t feeling so hot, only to discover the hard way that the super-strong animal has gone rabid. It’s an evocative opening, though it does create a little timeline confusion when we jump back in time a few days to follow Lucy (Johnny Sequoyah) as she returns home to Hawaii to see her family and their unusual pet.

Her late mother, we learn, worked with Ben for years before her death, and he remains a beloved member of the family, able to communicate most basic needs via the use of sign language and a special tablet. Ben is acting a little off, though, so Lucy’s father (Academy Award-winner Troy Kotsur, in a stand-out role) calls in the vet we’ve already seen die before heading out for the night.

Of course, we know that Ben has rabies, so it’s only a matter of time before he goes bananas. In the meantime, Lucy, her sister, and their friends get to living it up while they have the place to themselves. The family owns a gorgeous secluded mansion complete with a cliffside infinity pool, and if you’ve seen The Strangers: Prey at Night, you’ll know Roberts loves a pool. He quickly finds a reason to drive the young people into it and trap them there—but just because chimps can’t swim, that doesn’t mean they’re safe.

Blending Animal Attack Horror with Slasher Thrills in Primate

One of the biggest things going for Primate is its ability to blend classic animal attack horror with slasher elements. The film draws clear inspiration from Cujo, but where the Trentons were largely safe from the beast’s foaming maw (if not the sun) so long as they stayed inside their vehicle, Lucy and friends aren’t so lucky. As the tagline for Primate warns, Ben is “dangerously close to human,” which means he understands how to use tools and constantly finds creative ways to take a swipe at his prey whenever they and the audience let their guard down. The sicker the chimp gets, the more he seems to radiate a savage, all-too-human glee.

Advertisement

At the same time, Roberts and Riera’s script leverages the communication gap between Ben and the family to devastating effect. Ben is so close to being able to tell them what’s wrong before his rabies progresses to the point of no return, but he doesn’t quite have the language. The fact that Lucy’s father is deaf adds an additional layer to the tragedy: we see how expressive the family is able to be through non-verbal communication, yet Ben is still isolated in his misery.

Toward the climax, however, even this form of communication starts to break down as the girls’ screams go unheard. While it feels like there’s more material that could have been wrung from this theme, it’s notable that Ben goes for the mouth more than once during his rampage, including in the film’s most memorable kill. In the end, maybe all communication is meaningless when nature decides to play a cruel prank.

Miguel Torres Umba’s Incredible Performance as Rabid Chimp Ben

This tragic aspect of the story doesn’t dampen the scares or thrills. Movement specialist Miguel Torres Umba, who portrays Ben, initially imbues the chimp with lovable warmth that makes his feverish, trembling intensity all the more frightening as the sickness takes hold. It’s a remarkable performance, one that lulls the audience into a similar state of wishful thinking to Lucy as she repeatedly reaches out to Ben in the hope that some part of the pet she loved is still in there. Primate rewards that desperate desire with brutal bites, bludgeonings, and beyond.

Primate Is a Lean, Mean, Face-Ripping Machine

Animal attack horror movies have trended hard toward sharks in the last decade (a world Roberts is no stranger to, having helmed 47 Meters Down and its sequel). It’s exciting to see a new addition to this subgenre focusing on a lesser-seen aggressor, especially one that doesn’t frame its killer creature as inherently evil, but rather a victim of both a natural blight and human foolishness. Ben should never have been put in the position he’s in—but now he’s here, it’s pulse-poundingly fun to see the damage that 100+ pounds of pure muscle can do when its brain is on fire.

Primate attacks theaters on January 9.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Horror Press Mailing List

Fangoria
Advertisement
Advertisement