Reviews
[REVIEW] Is ‘Fire in the Sky’ (1993) The Greatest Sci-Fi Movie Ever Made?

Nowadays, if you asked a casual fan of High Strangeness if they knew of any high-profile alien/UAP-related stories, they’d probably mention Chris Bledsoe and his book UFO of God. But if you asked that question two or three years ago, they would mention one of two people: Betty/Barney Hill or Travis Walton. I’ve read both Fire in the Sky and The Walton Experience (both are basically the same book) and listened to the times when Art Bell had Travis Walton on his show. The story is fascinating! But…there is information under the surface that makes me question Travis’s experience. Nonetheless, Fire in the Sky was a blindspot on my watchlist, and I figured what better month than “based on a true story” to give it a watch?
It should be noted there are many issues with this story from both Travis Walton and Mike Rogers. While I’m more familiar with everything regarding this story pre-2021, I will discuss the post-2021 issues to the best of my ability.
Fire in the Sky follows a group of six loggers (there were seven in the true story): Travis Walton (D. B. Sweeney), Mike Rogers (Robert Patrick), Allan Dallis (Craig Sheffer), David Whitlock (Peter Berg), Greg Hayes (Henry Thomas), and Bobby Cogdill (Bradley Gregg). This group, led by Travis, is working on clearing brush in the White Mountains in Snowflake, Alaska. Due to a tight deadline, they find themselves working long shifts. At the end of the night, the six men pack into Mike Rogers’s truck and head home through mountain paths. Allan Dallis makes note of a “fire” in the sky, prompting Mike to stop his truck. Travis jumps out and decides to check out the object. Suddenly, he’s consumed by a beam of light and thrown backward. Thinking he’s dead and freaked out by this object, Mike guns it out of there. By the time he gets the guts to go back and check on Travis…he realizes Travis is gone.
Once back in town, Mike calls the cops, and the five of them wait for the police. A search party is called the very next day, to no avail. The town descends into chaos, reporters flood this small town, and a witch hunt ensues. Many of the townsfolk think the other loggers killed Travis and nearly begin to march with pitchforks and torches. Travis eventually reappears five days later…but he is nothing more than the shell of the man he once was.
What’s very clear from the film is that neither writer Tracy Tormé nor director Robert Lieberman believes a single ounce of Travis’s story. Part of me believes that if Tracy and Robert lived in this town when this happened, they’d be a part of the angry mob. It’s frustrating that Lt. Frank Waters (James Garner) is given more credibility than any of the men involved in the incident. Rather than giving proper justice to both sides of the story, the writer and director make their allegiance to their respective sides well-known.
That being said, the film is a joy to watch. Robert Patrick is, and always has been, one hell of an actor. Funnily enough, Robert Patrick learned, not too long before the making of this film, that he is related to Mike Rogers! You can feel Patrick’s passion in every second of screen time. Most notable is the polygraph scene. Tired of being looked down upon and hated by everyone in town, he loses it when asked to come back for a second polygraph test. In the most “I know what I saw!” moment in the film, Mike Rogers has told his truth and is frustrated that it’s not enough.
While the film does a great job at fomenting the hoax angle, there is one scene specifically this film is known for: the testing scene. Coordinated by Industrial Lights & Magic, the scene where Travis explores the spaceship and gets tests run on him is both exhilarating and terrifying. From the gooey space pods to the skin-like wrap and eye needle, this scene hasn’t been topped in Sci-Fi horror. ILM has long been known for pushing the boundaries of visual effects, and this scene is particularly gorgeous. I can’t imagine what it would be like to watch this in theaters in 1993.
All that being said, this film takes way too many liberties for my liking. The scene where Travis wakes up in the spaceship and is tested on is the most notable of exaggerations. In Travis’s story, he was initially knocked out by the beam of light. He then woke up in an almost hospital-like room. Three short, hairless aliens surrounded him. Travis attempted to fight them off and was eventually taken to another room by a human wearing a helmet. The room he was taken to was the last thing he remembers, as three other humans put a plastic sheet over his face. From there, the next thing he remembered was walking down a highway.
I can understand why that might not be too exciting for a feature film, but it’s very different from what we get in Fire in the Sky.
Now, we should get to the evidence that points to this being a possible hoax. The UAP was described as your classic two-pie saucer. I wholeheartedly believe that UAPs are not the classic UFOs we see in 50s sci-fi movies, so that’s a red flag for me. Next, we have the fact that Travis and Duane’s father was a huge fan of Ufology (and there are reports that the brothers believe their father was abducted, but that could be heresy). Also, we have real reports that Travis and his brother Duane wanted to be abducted. When Travis went missing, his brother was definitely worried but didn’t seem as worried as a brother should be. This could possibly be because Travis and Duane [reportedly] had a pact that should one of them be abducted, the one who was taken would try and talk the aliens into coming back and taking the second brother.
There’s also the fact that Travis’s company was behind schedule and on the verge of losing their contract to finish the logging job. An abduction would be a great way to prolong that contract! What type of person would cancel a contract when there’s an investigation into a missing person? While the team was working late to finish their job, it was noted by a crew member that on the night of the abduction they stayed longer past dark than they had before.
In 2021, things get messy…kind of. Mike Rogers posts on Facebook denouncing The Walton Experience and stating that he no longer considers himself a witness. A month later, he spoke with a producer making a new documentary about Travis Walton. In this conversation, which the producer recorded, Rogers mentioned that the incident was a staged hoax. Rogers was upset that Walton did not include him in discussions regarding the film’s remake–the two would eventually make amends with each other, and Mike Rogers retracted his statement.
Take that information for what you will.
Fire in the Sky is lighting in a bottle. It was a time when filmmaking was preparing to break into a new spectrum of filmmaking. It’s not just a fascinating look at a supposed real-life story, it’s scary. It’s authentic. It’s emotional. There are parts of Travis’s story I believe, and parts I don’t. While Fire in the Sky may be exaggerated, it’s a beautiful film that tells a beautiful story in a timeless way. If you’re a fan of Ufology, aliens, or High Strangeness in general, you must check this film out. To me, Fire in the Sky is the greatest Sci-non-Fi about alien abductions.
Reviews
‘The Innkeepers’ (2011) Review: Ti West’s Horror Gem

A little over a year ago, I had the opportunity to catch a new film that reminded me of one of the films that sparked my interest in analyzing films in the first place. Sweet Relief was a fun and well-crafted modern mumblegore film that brought Ti West’s The Innkeepers back into my mind. I first watched The Innkeepers shortly before leaving for college, and I was stunned by how incredibly effective it was. To celebrate Dark Sky Select’s 4K steelbook release of The Innkeepers, I decided to give the film a well-deserved rewatch.
The Innkeepers: A Haunting Ghost Story
The Innkeepers follows Claire (Sara Paxton) and Luke (Pat Healy), the last two employees of The Yankee Pedlar Inn. Claire and Luke find themselves working during the hotel’s last week in operation. They also happen to be amateur ghost hunters. Due to the small number of guests, Claire and Luke have some time to put their ghost hunting tools to good use. As the hunting begins, the terror checks in. Is there more to this ghost story than meets the eye?
Before his flashy slasher trilogy, Ti West’s films had a darker, more personal feel to them. After wowing audiences with his satanic panic masterpiece The House of the Devil, Ti West tackled the true terrors of the supernatural. As much as I adore Ti West, this would be his last film that perfectly balances style and substance. Obviously, the goal of an artist is to grow and transform as a filmmaker, but this feels like West’s last intimate film.
Mumblegore Dialogue: Natural and Grounded
The Innkeepers keeps with the mumblegore-like dialogue West was so great at creating. There’s still that improvisational, but naturalistic, feel to their words. And while the situation becomes extraordinary, the dialogue still feels grounded in reality. Somehow, for a 2011 film, West finds a way to competently direct actors in saying the words “epic” and “failblog”. It’s the exposition of the film that truly sets it apart from others like it. While talking with a child in the lobby, Claire reveals the backstory of Madeline O’Malley and her untimely suicide in the hotel. It’s a small moment that could easily be a throwaway detail to provide the audience with the necessary backstory. But it’s Sara Paxton’s performance that sells the scene.
Speaking of, both Sara Paxton and indie darling Pat Healy absolutely tear it up on screen. Sara Paxton’s performance is reserved and lived in. She carries herself awkwardly, with little self-confidence, but still finds a way to be charming. Indie darling Pat Healy chews up the scenery with his Tintin-like faux hawk and a Red Bull-infused high energy. Not only do they steal their respective scenes alone, but they also play off each other like a fast-paced tennis volley.
Supernatural Horror Done Right
Ti West’s magnum opus handles the supernatural element in a much cleaner, fascinating way than most ghost films. The slow pace highlights the mundanity of working-class life that quickly becomes tense through the creeping terror of Madeline O’Malley and her growing cohorts of terror. There’s a certain unbalanced feel to the film’s three-act structure that lends an air of authenticity to it. Whereas most supernatural films feel the need to do more, The Innkeepers understands that it’s okay to do less. It’s how the scares are delivered that sets this film apart.
If you haven’t seen The Innkeepers, then you’re truly missing out on one of the subgenre’s greatest hits. That being said, I don’t think this film is for everyone. Ti West asks a lot from his audience, and I can understand that some people won’t want to go with him on this ride. It’s talky and demands full attention. But if you’re willing to sit with the film and let it work its magic, you won’t be disappointed.
Reviews
[REVIEW] Fantastic Fest 2025: ‘Primate’ Is the Animal-Attack-Meets-Slasher Movie You Didn’t Know You Needed

If that one scene in Nope (you know the one) wasn’t enough to convince you that owning a chimpanzee is a bad idea, Primate is here to remind you that these animals can literally rip you limb from limb. Directed by Johannes Roberts, who also co-wrote the script with Ernest Riera, the film is scheduled to release in January—and if it wasn’t on your radar before, allow me to firmly add it.
PSA: Primate Proves That Chimps Are Not Pets (But They Are Great Slasher Killers)
Primate begins with a pre-credits scene introducing us to the danger: a vet has been called to check in on a chimp named Ben that isn’t feeling so hot, only to discover the hard way that the super-strong animal has gone rabid. It’s an evocative opening, though it does create a little timeline confusion when we jump back in time a few days to follow Lucy (Johnny Sequoyah) as she returns home to Hawaii to see her family and their unusual pet.
Her late mother, we learn, worked with Ben for years before her death, and he remains a beloved member of the family, able to communicate most basic needs via the use of sign language and a special tablet. Ben is acting a little off, though, so Lucy’s father (Academy Award-winner Troy Kotsur, in a stand-out role) calls in the vet we’ve already seen die before heading out for the night.
Of course, we know that Ben has rabies, so it’s only a matter of time before he goes bananas. In the meantime, Lucy, her sister, and their friends get to living it up while they have the place to themselves. The family owns a gorgeous secluded mansion complete with a cliffside infinity pool, and if you’ve seen The Strangers: Prey at Night, you’ll know Roberts loves a pool. He quickly finds a reason to drive the young people into it and trap them there—but just because chimps can’t swim, that doesn’t mean they’re safe.
Blending Animal Attack Horror with Slasher Thrills in Primate
One of the biggest things going for Primate is its ability to blend classic animal attack horror with slasher elements. The film draws clear inspiration from Cujo, but where the Trentons were largely safe from the beast’s foaming maw (if not the sun) so long as they stayed inside their vehicle, Lucy and friends aren’t so lucky. As the tagline for Primate warns, Ben is “dangerously close to human,” which means he understands how to use tools and constantly finds creative ways to take a swipe at his prey whenever they and the audience let their guard down. The sicker the chimp gets, the more he seems to radiate a savage, all-too-human glee.
At the same time, Roberts and Riera’s script leverages the communication gap between Ben and the family to devastating effect. Ben is so close to being able to tell them what’s wrong before his rabies progresses to the point of no return, but he doesn’t quite have the language. The fact that Lucy’s father is deaf adds an additional layer to the tragedy: we see how expressive the family is able to be through non-verbal communication, yet Ben is still isolated in his misery.
Toward the climax, however, even this form of communication starts to break down as the girls’ screams go unheard. While it feels like there’s more material that could have been wrung from this theme, it’s notable that Ben goes for the mouth more than once during his rampage, including in the film’s most memorable kill. In the end, maybe all communication is meaningless when nature decides to play a cruel prank.
Miguel Torres Umba’s Incredible Performance as Rabid Chimp Ben
This tragic aspect of the story doesn’t dampen the scares or thrills. Movement specialist Miguel Torres Umba, who portrays Ben, initially imbues the chimp with lovable warmth that makes his feverish, trembling intensity all the more frightening as the sickness takes hold. It’s a remarkable performance, one that lulls the audience into a similar state of wishful thinking to Lucy as she repeatedly reaches out to Ben in the hope that some part of the pet she loved is still in there. Primate rewards that desperate desire with brutal bites, bludgeonings, and beyond.
Primate Is a Lean, Mean, Face-Ripping Machine
Animal attack horror movies have trended hard toward sharks in the last decade (a world Roberts is no stranger to, having helmed 47 Meters Down and its sequel). It’s exciting to see a new addition to this subgenre focusing on a lesser-seen aggressor, especially one that doesn’t frame its killer creature as inherently evil, but rather a victim of both a natural blight and human foolishness. Ben should never have been put in the position he’s in—but now he’s here, it’s pulse-poundingly fun to see the damage that 100+ pounds of pure muscle can do when its brain is on fire.
Primate attacks theaters on January 9.