Reviews
[Review] BROOKLYN HORROR FILM FESTIVAL 2023: ‘Cannibal Mukbang’ (2023) We’re Eating Good
From the minute I read the title Cannibal Mukbang among all the other entries on the schedule, I knew it would surely be one of Brooklyn Horror Film Festival’s most anticipated films. That experience wasn’t unique: it sold out online the day after I learned about it. On the day of its premiere, waiting at the top of the stairs of the Nitehawk Cinema, I watched a rush ticket line practically spill out the door as people tried to secure a spot. And from the first few frames to those final credits, there was applause and laughter from nearly every seat in the theatre as we watched a piece of delicious indie horror unfold.
Safe to say, Cannibal Mukbang lives up to the hype.
A YouTube Trend Gone Wonderfully Horror
An anxiety-ridden customer service rep with a shaky sense of self, Mark is lost and lonely. But when the hot mess is hit by a car driven by manic pixie dream girl Ash, the two slowly fall in love at first bite. Ash’s work schedule, however, is a bit different: by day, she films mukbangs, a South Korean genre of video content where people eat ungodly amounts of food for an adoring audience. By night, her cravings for human flesh take precedence as she hunts for her next meal and punishes her victims. As the lovers discover more about each other’s past, Mark and Ash are put on a collision course with destiny—and are served a final course that shocks them both.
So, what makes a film that’s equal parts romantic comedy and horror drama so good? Both are subject to the double-pronged issue of balancing multiple genres, but thanks to an undeniable, once-in-a-blue-moon kind of talent from its cast and crew Cannibal Mukbang pulls it off.
Delectable Casting with Stunning Effects
April Consalo’s Ash is a must-see, being able to portray a multifaceted character effortlessly. She brings a fusion of tactically feigned innocence, disconnected coldness, and genuine cunning that is hard to pin down; it gives life to a character rife for dissection, and it’s backed up by a range in delivery that reaches a fever pitch in the film’s final moments. Even if you disapprove of her hunger-driven choices, Consalo makes Ash so charismatic and convincing that she has a firm shot at winning a “Good For Her” Award from just about anybody who will watch this. What else can I say? She’s beauty, she’s grace, she’ll make charcuterie out of your face.
(Also, a quick shoutout to costume designer Jolene Richardson, whose curation of Ash’s outfits is, no pun intended, a visual chef’s kiss.)
Hand in hand, Nate Wise’s Mark is no joke, matching Consalo’s intensity as the film goes on. Wise teased in the Q&A after the film that he found his own confidence issues as something that helped him nail the part, but the highlight of his performance is undoubtedly portraying the slow change into a more confident person as his relationship with Ash blooms. As his pallor improves and his appearance becomes less messy with every meal, you really feel his metamorphosis, and that makes the film’s resolution all the more impactful.

Photo taken at Brooklyn Horror Film Festival
Director Aimee Kuge Stuns With Her Stylistic Choices
Aimee Kuge’s artistic vision throughout the entire picture’s cinematography feels unfettered, and that’s most evident in the stretch of the film that flashes back to Ash’s origins and shows us how a killer is made. The sequence evokes the exploitation style of the ’70s cannibal boom, signaled by the title and poster with incredible skill. It tells a quiet and chilling story that could be a whole movie on its own. You get 30mm film grain grotesquery that’s expertly done and contrasts nicely with the rest of the film’s clean-cut, bright, and colorful presentation.
I’d also be remiss if I didn’t mention that all throughout the film, you get a veritable buffet of guts, blood, and bones on display as Ash makes a butchery of her targets. The SFX used to show us the gore run a range of textures, captured on film in all their forms: thick, runny, muscular, and gooey alike. It is a cannibal mukbang after all, so rest assured there are pounds and pounds of USDA, Grade A, nasty fake people meat for everyone at the table. Practical effects fans will be eating good with this one.
Humor and Heart in a Gory Package
Even through the sweat, blood, and saliva of the film’s gorier segments, the film’s core is a romantic comedy with breaks of humor that accentuate the messed-up fun of Cannibal Mukbang. Kuge’s script is undeniably funny, and the jokes hit on perfect timing even when they’re more crude than witty. The comedic voice of the film ranges in inspiration from Jennifer’s Body to some of Edgar Wright’s work in the Cornetto Trilogy and Scott Pilgrim, to even the tar-black dark humor of Texas Chainsaw Massacre and American Psycho.
Ultimately, the fact Cannibal Mukbang can emulate these cult classics without feeling like it’s aping them or going through the motions like some homages would is just one of the many measures of expertise on display here, and if it finds the right audiences upon a wider release, feels telling of the popularity it could have.
***
This is usually the part where I would say, “Get out and go to the theatres to catch this film right now”, but this is part of our coverage of Brooklyn Horror Film Festival 2023! This is definitely a movie you want on your radar, so keep your eyes peeled for it!
Reviews
‘Frankenstein’ Review: Guillermo Del Toro Is Off to the Races
Those expecting Guillermo Del Toro’s Frankenstein to be similar to the book, or to any other adaptation, are in for something else. A longtime enjoyer of the creature’s story, Del Toro instead draws from many places: the novel, James Whale’s culturally defining 1931 film, the Kenneth Branagh version, there are even hints from Terence Fisher’s Curse of Frankenstein, and if the set design and costuming are to be believed, there are trace elements of the National Theatre production too.
The formulation to breathe life into this amalgam is a sort of storm cloud of cultural memory and personal desire for Del Toro. This is about crafting his Frankenstein: the one he wanted to see since he was young, the vision he wanted to stitch together. What results is an experience that is more colorful and kinetic and well-loved by its creator than any Frankenstein we’ve had yet, but what it leaves behind is much of its gothic heart. Quiet darkness, looming dread, poetry, and romance are set aside as what has been sold as “the definitive retelling” goes off to the races. It’s a fast-paced ride through a world of mad science, and you’re on it.
Victor Frankenstein’s Ambition and Tragedy
A tale as old as time, with some changes: the morbid talents and untamed hubris of Victor Frankenstein (Oscar Isaac) guide him to challenge death itself. Spurred by a wealthy investor named Henrich Harlander, and a desire for Harlander’s niece Elizabeth (Mia Goth), Victor uses dead flesh and voltaic vigor to bring a creature to life. His attempts to rear it, however, go horribly wrong, setting the two on a bloody collision course as the definitions of man and monster become blurred.
Guillermo Del Toro’s Frankenstein is more Hellboy in its presentation than it is Crimson Peak; it’s honestly more similar to Coppola’s Dracula than either of them. The film is barely done with its opening when it starts with a loud sequence of the monster attacking Walton’s ship on the ice. Flinging crew members about and walking against volleys of gunfire, he is a monstrosity by no other name. The Creature (Jacob Elordi) cries out in guttural screams, part animal and part man, as it calls for its creator to be returned to him. While visually impressive (and it remains visually impressive throughout, believe me), this appropriately bombastic hook foreshadows a problem with tone and tempo.
A Monster That Moves Too Fast
The pace overall is far too fast for its first half, even with its heavy two-and-a-half-hour runtime. It’s also a far cry from the brooding nature the story usually takes. A scene where Victor demonstrates rudimentary reanimation to his peers and a council of judges is rapid, where it should be agonizingly slow. There’s horror and an instability in Victor to be emphasized in that moment, but the grotesque sight is an oddly triumphant one instead. Most do not revile his experiments; in fact he’s taken quite seriously.
Many scenes like this create a tonal problem that makes Victor’s tale lean more toward melodrama than toward philosophical or emotional aspects; he is blatantly wild and free, in a way that is respected rather than pitied. There are opportunities to stop, breathe in the Victorian roses and the smell of death, to get really dour, but it’s neglected until the film’s second half.
Isaac’s and Goth’s performances are overwrought at points, feeling more like pantomimes of Byronic characters. I’m not entirely convinced it has more to do with them than with the script they’re given. Like Victor working with the parts of inmates and dead soldiers, even the best of actors with the best of on-screen chemistry are forced to make do. The dialogue has incredibly high highs (especially in its final moments), but when it has lows, how low they are; a character outright stating that “Victor is the real monster” adage to his face was an ocean floor piece of writing if there ever was one.
Isaac, Goth, and Elordi Bring Life to the Dead
Jacob Elordi’s work here, however, is blameless. Though Elordi’s physical performance as the creature will surely win praise, his time speaking is the true highlight. It’s almost certainly a definitive portrayal of the character; his voice for Victor’s creation is haunted with scorn and solitude, the same way his flesh is haunted by the marks of his creator’s handiwork. It agonizes me to see so little of the books’ most iconic lines used wholesale here, because they would be absolutely perfect coming from Elordi. Still, he has incredible chemistry with both Isaac and Goth, and for as brief as their time together is, he radiates pure force.
Frankenstein Is a Masterclass in Mise-En-Scène
Despite its pacing and tone issues, one can’t help but appreciate the truly masterful craftsmanship Del Toro has managed to pack into the screen. Every millimeter of the sets is carved to specification, filled with personality through to the shadows. Every piece of brick, hint of frost, stain of blood, and curve of the vine is painstakingly and surgically placed to create one of the most wonderful and spellbinding sets you’ve seen—and then it keeps presenting you with new environments like that, over, and over.
At the very least, Del Toro’s Frankenstein is a masterpiece of mise-en-scène down to the minutest of details, and that makes it endlessly rewatchable for aesthetic purposes. This isn’t even getting into the effervescent lighting, or how returning collaborator Kate Hawley has outdone herself again with the costuming. Guillermo Del Toro tackling the king of gothic horror stories, a story written by the mother of all science fiction, inevitably set a high bar for him to clear. And while it’s not a pitch perfect rendering of Mary Shelley’s slow moving and Shakespearean epistolary, it is still one of the best-looking movies you will see all year.
Perhaps for us, it’s at the cost of adapting the straightforward, dark story we know into something more operatic. It sings the tale like a soprano rather than reciting it like humble prose, and it doesn’t always sing well. But for Del Toro, the epic scale and voice of this adaptation is the wage expected for making the movie he’s always dreamed of. Even with its problems, it’s well worth it to see a visionary director at work on a story they love.
Reviews
‘The Siege of Ape Canyon’ Review: Bigfoot Comes Home
In my home, films like Night of the Demon and Abominable are played on repeat; Stan Gordon is king. One of my favorite stories surrounding Bigfoot and Ufology is the Bigfoot/UFO double flap of 1973, which Stan Gordon has an incredible in-depth book on. The Patterson–Gimlin film couldn’t hold a flame to Stan Gordon’s dive into one of my home state’s most chronicled supernatural time periods. But as much as I love the Bigfoot topic, I’m not ashamed to say I don’t know half of the stories surrounding that big hairy beast. And one topic that I’m not ashamed to say I haven’t heard of is The Siege of Ape Canyon.
The Harrowing Events of Ape Canyon
Washington State, 1924. A group of miners (originally consisting of Marion Smith, Leroy P. Smith, Fred Beck, John Peterson, August Johannson, and Mac Rhodes) was on a quest to claim a potential gold mine. Literally. The miners would eventually set up camp on the east slope of Mount Saint Helens. Little did they know their temporary shelter would be the start of a multi-day barrage of attacks from what they and researchers believed to be Bigfoot. What transpired in those days would turn out to be one of the most highly criticized pieces of American lore, nearly lost to time and history…nearly.
I need to set the record straight on a few things before we get started. One, I don’t typically like watching documentaries. Two, I believe in Bigfoot. Three, this documentary made me cry.

Image courtesy of Justin Cook Public Relations.
Reviving a Forgotten Bigfoot Legend in The Siege of Ape Canyon
Documentarian Eli Watson sets out to tell one of the most prolific Bigfoot stories of all time (for those who are deep in Bigfoot mythology). It’s noted fairly early in the film that this story is told often and is well known in the Washington area. So then, how do people outside of the incident location know so little about it? I’ve read at least 15 books on and about Bigfoot, and I’ve never once heard this story. This isn’t a Stan-Gordon-reported story about someone sitting on the john and seeing a pair of red eyes outside of their bathroom window. The story around Ape Canyon has a deeper spiritual meaning that goes beyond a few sightings here and there.
Watson’s documentary, though, isn’t just about Bigfoot or unearthing the story of Ape Canyon. Ape Canyon nearly became nothing more than a tall tale that elders would share around a campfire to keep the younglings out of the woods at 2 AM. If it weren’t for Mark Myrsell, that’s exactly what would have happened. The Siege of Ape Canyon spends half its time unpacking the story of Fred Beck and his prospecting crew, and the other half tells a truly inspiring tale of unbridled passion, friendship, and love.
Mark Myrsell’s Relentless Pursuit: Friendship, Truth, and Tears
Mark Myrsell’s undying passion for everything outdoors inevitably led to bringing one of Bigfoot’s craziest stories to light. His devotion to the truth vindicated many people who were (probably) labeled kooks and crazies. Throughout Myrsell’s endless search for the truth, he made lifelong friends along the way. What brought me to tears throughout The Siege of Ape Canyon is Watson’s insistence on showing the human side of Myrsell and his friends. They’re not in this to make millions or bag a Bigfoot corpse; they just want to know the truth. And that’s what they find.
The Siege of Ape Canyon is a documentary that will open your eyes to a wildly mystical story you may not have heard of. And it does it pretty damn well. Whereas many documentaries feel the need to talk down to the viewer just to educate them, Watson’s documentary takes you along for the ride. It doesn’t ask you to believe or not believe in Bigfoot. It allows you to make your own decisions and provides the evidence it needs to. If you’ve ever had a passing interest in the topic of Bigfoot, or if you think you’re the next Stan Gordon, I highly recommend watching The Siege of Ape Canyon.
The Siege of Ape Canyon stomps its way onto digital platforms on November 11. Give yourself a little post-Halloween treat and check it out!


