Reviews
‘The Nun II’ Review: Say Your Prayers
I can confidently say The Nun II is far and away from its predecessor’s flaws, even if it has a few of its own. When The Nun II has its rough spots, they can drag. But when it pulls off what it’s going for, it is fiery and fun in its execution with its own aggressive voice.
I did not go into The Nun II with high hopes. I only recently rewatched The Nun and was underwhelmed for a second time, primarily with the scares and structure. Valak’s first feature film had some redeeming qualities but didn’t feel like a necessary addition to the Conjuring universe. The demonic entity that had so much influence with so little screentime in the first two Conjuring films never really jumped out at me until the end of The Nun, and by then, it was too late.
A Marked Improvement From the Original
I can confidently say The Nun II is far and away from its predecessor’s flaws, even if it has a few of its own. When The Nun II has its rough spots, they can drag. But when it pulls off what it’s going for, it is fiery and fun in its execution with its own aggressive voice.
The Nun II: Sister Irene vs. Valak’s Deadly Rampage
The Nun II, for the uninitiated (nun-initiated?), follows Sister Irene again as she hunts down her rival Valak. Thought to have been sealed away in the first film, Valak uses the body of Irene’s friend Frenchie to wreak havoc across Europe, with her final stop on the massacre tour being a boarding school in France. As Sister Irene and her apprentice, Sister Debra, try to figure out what Valak wants and where she’s going, bodies pile up around Frenchie and the children, leaving no one safe.
The opening of this film is perfectly executed in its nastiness; if you’ve been craving something as spicy as Evil Dead Rise, The Nun II has you covered, and it’s shocking how high quality it is. The Nun II is a nastier take on Sister Irene’s first journey, with some mean-spirited and enjoyable kills left in Valak’s wake. When people die in this film, they die hard, and it’s just the kind of hateful behavior you’d expect from a demon with a reputation like Valak’s.
Bonnie Aarons Returns as Valak (Pay Her Warner Bros.)
Bonnie Aarons is always a treat, and that’s no different here since she gets a lot of screen time just demolishing her victims’ bodies and minds. The practical effects used in the film are few and far between. Still, many of the digital effects on display are top-notch (barring one very bad, PS3 graphics-looking effect involving a Valak painting).
Though the absence of Damien Bachir hurts (especially their justification for why he isn’t in the film, which felt downright weak), the film’s cast still brings the heat like a packed church on Easter Sunday. Taissa Farmiga is just as enjoyable as she was the first time around playing the soft-spoken but wise Sister Irene. The script here shows you how she’s grown from the experience in the first film and gives us a better glimpse into her life before the convent, which was a welcome surprise. While it takes until the movie’s final sequence for her to really play with the explosive exorcist action the film has been teasing, she gives it her all and has me wondering what other horror franchises she could helm as the lead as I left the theatre.
Standout Performances Amid a Mixed Bag
Storm Reid does well as the young Sister Debra, an American novitiate having a crisis of faith and tagging along searching for a miracle. Regrettably, her character doesn’t have enough room to breathe, as she only gets a pittance of backstory and a borderline nonexistent arc. In terms of her performance, I really can’t complain since she shows her pipes with some great screaming and terrified acting. Jonas Bloquet’s return to the role as the fan favorite Frenchie actually lets him stretch his acting chops beyond comic relief, and if he doesn’t get more roles as an antagonist after this, I would be surprised; this film utilizes him perfectly and doesn’t downplay his grotesque, haunted performance for anything.
Stunning Set Design Elevates The Nun II’s Atmosphere
Speaking of utilizing something perfectly, everyone who sees this movie will agree that the set design is incredible. The Nun liked to bask in dark corridors and open spaces that made shots visually boring rather than spooky. The Nun II, in contrast, has these terrific, rich environments throughout the boarding school that are filled to the brim with set decoration that all falls into the right place; the rooms feel layered and full, and they actually help generate a lot of tension. The whole school becomes a series of interconnected set pieces for the big finale, shot expertly by Michael Chaves, who captures the destruction and transformation of the school with creative shots (and improved lighting from his last venture with Valak).
The score is an improvement from the first, to be sure, ditching the overly droning chorus of chants for a proper soundtrack, but don’t expect anything sonically groundbreaking or particularly new. That being said, the sound design of the rest of the film is crucial to enjoying it. The Nun II is one of those films that feels almost mandatory to watch with great speakers at home or in the theatre. Otherwise, a good chunk of the scares will fall flat, and the destructive finale will lose much of its oomph. This goes doubly for the cheaper jump scares that amount to a loud noise and a snap zoom onto Valak’s face; they’re as effective as getting whipped on your ear with a rosary in the theatre, so imagine that through cheap headphones.
A Lengthy Horror Journey
The Nun II is noticeably hamstrung in its pacing thanks to its hefty hour and fifty-minute runtime, nearly half an hour longer than the first. This is primarily due to the film’s structure, which alternates between our protagonists’ and antagonists’ plots, which go back and forth quite a bit. When the two plots converge, you feel an interesting climax coming. Still, the stories being so separate means that the film’s third act needs to be stretched out and padded to oblivion so these characters can interact. You get a truly incandescent finale when Sister Irene and Valak clash, but I’d be lying if I said I didn’t start getting bored waiting for it to arrive.
Is The Nun II Worth Watching?
As much as I complain about horror movies being too long, The Nun II ends up being a fun enough romp that I can mostly look past it on the first go around; your mileage may vary. I found it an enjoyable, biting sequel that ups the ante despite its pacing problems. Fans of the original will love it, and those who disliked the original should find a glimmer of hope in how the cinematography comes together for this one. As far as movies to begin the Halloween horror season go, you could do a lot worse, so watch it in theatres if you can.
Hollywood actors and writers are currently on strike against the AMPTP. This movie is not associated with any struck production. However, you can still support those affected most by the strike by donating to the Entertainment Community Fund here!
Reviews
‘Frankenstein’ Review: Guillermo Del Toro Is Off to the Races
Those expecting Guillermo Del Toro’s Frankenstein to be similar to the book, or to any other adaptation, are in for something else. A longtime enjoyer of the creature’s story, Del Toro instead draws from many places: the novel, James Whale’s culturally defining 1931 film, the Kenneth Branagh version, there are even hints from Terence Fisher’s Curse of Frankenstein, and if the set design and costuming are to be believed, there are trace elements of the National Theatre production too.
The formulation to breathe life into this amalgam is a sort of storm cloud of cultural memory and personal desire for Del Toro. This is about crafting his Frankenstein: the one he wanted to see since he was young, the vision he wanted to stitch together. What results is an experience that is more colorful and kinetic and well-loved by its creator than any Frankenstein we’ve had yet, but what it leaves behind is much of its gothic heart. Quiet darkness, looming dread, poetry, and romance are set aside as what has been sold as “the definitive retelling” goes off to the races. It’s a fast-paced ride through a world of mad science, and you’re on it.
Victor Frankenstein’s Ambition and Tragedy
A tale as old as time, with some changes: the morbid talents and untamed hubris of Victor Frankenstein (Oscar Isaac) guide him to challenge death itself. Spurred by a wealthy investor named Henrich Harlander, and a desire for Harlander’s niece Elizabeth (Mia Goth), Victor uses dead flesh and voltaic vigor to bring a creature to life. His attempts to rear it, however, go horribly wrong, setting the two on a bloody collision course as the definitions of man and monster become blurred.
Guillermo Del Toro’s Frankenstein is more Hellboy in its presentation than it is Crimson Peak; it’s honestly more similar to Coppola’s Dracula than either of them. The film is barely done with its opening when it starts with a loud sequence of the monster attacking Walton’s ship on the ice. Flinging crew members about and walking against volleys of gunfire, he is a monstrosity by no other name. The Creature (Jacob Elordi) cries out in guttural screams, part animal and part man, as it calls for its creator to be returned to him. While visually impressive (and it remains visually impressive throughout, believe me), this appropriately bombastic hook foreshadows a problem with tone and tempo.
A Monster That Moves Too Fast
The pace overall is far too fast for its first half, even with its heavy two-and-a-half-hour runtime. It’s also a far cry from the brooding nature the story usually takes. A scene where Victor demonstrates rudimentary reanimation to his peers and a council of judges is rapid, where it should be agonizingly slow. There’s horror and an instability in Victor to be emphasized in that moment, but the grotesque sight is an oddly triumphant one instead. Most do not revile his experiments; in fact he’s taken quite seriously.
Many scenes like this create a tonal problem that makes Victor’s tale lean more toward melodrama than toward philosophical or emotional aspects; he is blatantly wild and free, in a way that is respected rather than pitied. There are opportunities to stop, breathe in the Victorian roses and the smell of death, to get really dour, but it’s neglected until the film’s second half.
Isaac’s and Goth’s performances are overwrought at points, feeling more like pantomimes of Byronic characters. I’m not entirely convinced it has more to do with them than with the script they’re given. Like Victor working with the parts of inmates and dead soldiers, even the best of actors with the best of on-screen chemistry are forced to make do. The dialogue has incredibly high highs (especially in its final moments), but when it has lows, how low they are; a character outright stating that “Victor is the real monster” adage to his face was an ocean floor piece of writing if there ever was one.
Isaac, Goth, and Elordi Bring Life to the Dead
Jacob Elordi’s work here, however, is blameless. Though Elordi’s physical performance as the creature will surely win praise, his time speaking is the true highlight. It’s almost certainly a definitive portrayal of the character; his voice for Victor’s creation is haunted with scorn and solitude, the same way his flesh is haunted by the marks of his creator’s handiwork. It agonizes me to see so little of the books’ most iconic lines used wholesale here, because they would be absolutely perfect coming from Elordi. Still, he has incredible chemistry with both Isaac and Goth, and for as brief as their time together is, he radiates pure force.
Frankenstein Is a Masterclass in Mise-En-Scène
Despite its pacing and tone issues, one can’t help but appreciate the truly masterful craftsmanship Del Toro has managed to pack into the screen. Every millimeter of the sets is carved to specification, filled with personality through to the shadows. Every piece of brick, hint of frost, stain of blood, and curve of the vine is painstakingly and surgically placed to create one of the most wonderful and spellbinding sets you’ve seen—and then it keeps presenting you with new environments like that, over, and over.
At the very least, Del Toro’s Frankenstein is a masterpiece of mise-en-scène down to the minutest of details, and that makes it endlessly rewatchable for aesthetic purposes. This isn’t even getting into the effervescent lighting, or how returning collaborator Kate Hawley has outdone herself again with the costuming. Guillermo Del Toro tackling the king of gothic horror stories, a story written by the mother of all science fiction, inevitably set a high bar for him to clear. And while it’s not a pitch perfect rendering of Mary Shelley’s slow moving and Shakespearean epistolary, it is still one of the best-looking movies you will see all year.
Perhaps for us, it’s at the cost of adapting the straightforward, dark story we know into something more operatic. It sings the tale like a soprano rather than reciting it like humble prose, and it doesn’t always sing well. But for Del Toro, the epic scale and voice of this adaptation is the wage expected for making the movie he’s always dreamed of. Even with its problems, it’s well worth it to see a visionary director at work on a story they love.
Reviews
‘The Siege of Ape Canyon’ Review: Bigfoot Comes Home
In my home, films like Night of the Demon and Abominable are played on repeat; Stan Gordon is king. One of my favorite stories surrounding Bigfoot and Ufology is the Bigfoot/UFO double flap of 1973, which Stan Gordon has an incredible in-depth book on. The Patterson–Gimlin film couldn’t hold a flame to Stan Gordon’s dive into one of my home state’s most chronicled supernatural time periods. But as much as I love the Bigfoot topic, I’m not ashamed to say I don’t know half of the stories surrounding that big hairy beast. And one topic that I’m not ashamed to say I haven’t heard of is The Siege of Ape Canyon.
The Harrowing Events of Ape Canyon
Washington State, 1924. A group of miners (originally consisting of Marion Smith, Leroy P. Smith, Fred Beck, John Peterson, August Johannson, and Mac Rhodes) was on a quest to claim a potential gold mine. Literally. The miners would eventually set up camp on the east slope of Mount Saint Helens. Little did they know their temporary shelter would be the start of a multi-day barrage of attacks from what they and researchers believed to be Bigfoot. What transpired in those days would turn out to be one of the most highly criticized pieces of American lore, nearly lost to time and history…nearly.
I need to set the record straight on a few things before we get started. One, I don’t typically like watching documentaries. Two, I believe in Bigfoot. Three, this documentary made me cry.

Image courtesy of Justin Cook Public Relations.
Reviving a Forgotten Bigfoot Legend in The Siege of Ape Canyon
Documentarian Eli Watson sets out to tell one of the most prolific Bigfoot stories of all time (for those who are deep in Bigfoot mythology). It’s noted fairly early in the film that this story is told often and is well known in the Washington area. So then, how do people outside of the incident location know so little about it? I’ve read at least 15 books on and about Bigfoot, and I’ve never once heard this story. This isn’t a Stan-Gordon-reported story about someone sitting on the john and seeing a pair of red eyes outside of their bathroom window. The story around Ape Canyon has a deeper spiritual meaning that goes beyond a few sightings here and there.
Watson’s documentary, though, isn’t just about Bigfoot or unearthing the story of Ape Canyon. Ape Canyon nearly became nothing more than a tall tale that elders would share around a campfire to keep the younglings out of the woods at 2 AM. If it weren’t for Mark Myrsell, that’s exactly what would have happened. The Siege of Ape Canyon spends half its time unpacking the story of Fred Beck and his prospecting crew, and the other half tells a truly inspiring tale of unbridled passion, friendship, and love.
Mark Myrsell’s Relentless Pursuit: Friendship, Truth, and Tears
Mark Myrsell’s undying passion for everything outdoors inevitably led to bringing one of Bigfoot’s craziest stories to light. His devotion to the truth vindicated many people who were (probably) labeled kooks and crazies. Throughout Myrsell’s endless search for the truth, he made lifelong friends along the way. What brought me to tears throughout The Siege of Ape Canyon is Watson’s insistence on showing the human side of Myrsell and his friends. They’re not in this to make millions or bag a Bigfoot corpse; they just want to know the truth. And that’s what they find.
The Siege of Ape Canyon is a documentary that will open your eyes to a wildly mystical story you may not have heard of. And it does it pretty damn well. Whereas many documentaries feel the need to talk down to the viewer just to educate them, Watson’s documentary takes you along for the ride. It doesn’t ask you to believe or not believe in Bigfoot. It allows you to make your own decisions and provides the evidence it needs to. If you’ve ever had a passing interest in the topic of Bigfoot, or if you think you’re the next Stan Gordon, I highly recommend watching The Siege of Ape Canyon.
The Siege of Ape Canyon stomps its way onto digital platforms on November 11. Give yourself a little post-Halloween treat and check it out!


