Connect with us

Reviews

‘Together’ Review: Starts Strong, But Loses Steam by Its Final Act

Published

on

Together is a film that made me resent a relationship I’m not even in. It really is that effective. Director Michael Shanks debut feature is one of the most entertainingly uncomfortable explorations of a failing relationship we’ve gotten in a horror film in years. Together just nearly reaches Possession levels of greatness as far as romantic horror goes– but it falls shy of delivering a soul crushing closer like its spiritual sibling.

Get Ready to Hate Love Again With Together

What Possession dives into is a much more aggressive and cutting dissolution of a relationship. Andrzej Żuławski’s magnum opus, inspired by his own divorce, is a couple going at each other with everything. Cleavers, sharp glass, boxcutters, anything to try and hurt each other quickly. Together is instead the story of two animals who are locked together, teeth gnashing and claws scratching at each other, insisting all the way down that no one is getting hurt. There’s an air of crushing codependency that is certainly more passive aggressive, but still painful to see.

The film follows Milly (Alison Brie) and Tim (Dave Franco), a struggling couple taking the plunge into the next phase of their relationship: moving into a new house together. Milly is a schoolteacher looking for a change of pace, and Tim is a musician trying to make his rockstar dreams come true. Things only get worse after a going-away party highlights the cracks in their relationship. The two move out to the countryside, where a series of strange events end up drawing them closer together. Not just emotionally or mentally— they are physically being dragged closer and closer together by an unseen force.

Nobody Does a Dying Relationship Better Than Alison Brie and Dave Franco

As a real-life married couple and two of the most charming actors in Hollywood, Brie and Franco expectedly have a chemistry here that can only be described as disgustingly good. Despite the cliché setup of their relationship (he’s the fun one, she has to be the responsible one, conflict ensues), the magnetism in their performances is undeniable. They are naturally pithy beyond belief, bouncing back and forth with attitudes of resentment and genuine affection, directed both inward at themselves and outward at each other.

There are moments of conversation between the two in the film that reek of something real. Brie mentioned in Fangoria that you couldn’t make this film with a non-married couple, and I’m hard-pressed to agree; you need actors who understand each other intimately to achieve results like these. You become an unwitting and unsure third wheel to a couple that both love and hate each other. They’re unable to admit it, and the struggle between them doesn’t let up at all.

Advertisement

One moment in particular involving the intrepid couple meeting their new neighbor was so awkward, so convincingly cringe inducing, it evoked a physical response; the best comparison I could make is a crochet hook working its way up inside my body. The tension here between them pulls on muscle and sinew. When Together hits those dramatic beats of the two arguing and saying what they feel, it really, really hits.

Unbelievable Effects and Aesthetics Will Pull You in Close

That drama is of course accentuated by the big body horror the film’s premise pays off on. The invisible force pulling the two closer results in physical stunts that are mind-bogglingly well executed and look exceptionally painful. When they are brought cheek to cheek by the pull, every single touch, every bit of skin-to-skin counts. Contact between the two will invariably leave you wondering if there is any chance for them to pull away.

The movie doesn’t pull many punches when it comes to that contact going horribly wrong. The digital effects on display are surprisingly the highlight of the film, with lots of nightmare fuel thanks to the CGI of the film showing you just how nasty melding meat can be. I would even go as far to say it ends up outshining the films’ practical work that it’s layered on.

The general atmosphere of the film is impeccable as well, with a varied but always effective set design and lighting. Any scene here that takes place in their bedroom stabs at you with an unsafe feeling, setting the tone early on with what I would say is Together’s most effective scare. The same can be said of the cave where the film’s big inciting incident happens; the dark, muddy pit gets under your nails just looking at it too long, and the big scares it offers crash down on you like a hammer to the head.

What Should Be the Best Horror of the Year…Hindered by a Third Act Tonal Shift

Despite the heaps of praise I have to toss onto Together for its beginning and middle, its feet of clay are obvious: it has a little more dark humor than it knows what to do with by its ending, and it ends up spilling it all over an ending that could have been really, truly devastating.

Advertisement

There’s a comparison to be made somewhere in here to Brian Yuzna’s Society, but whatever it is feels lazy. The similarities are, quite literally, skin deep, mostly stemming from the body horror parallels. Society was heavy with its humor, but that’s the rub: Society doesn’t ever get you sucked into the characters. It’s ultimately mostly spectacle and bizarre humor, and doesn’t make you feel like it’s undercut by its jokes.

But Together does suffer from that. It makes you want to see the big collision course ending it promises, the thirty-car pileup it dangles over you. But then it delivers an ending that doesn’t ever actually crash into you. The laughs Together renders are pale in comparison to the genuinely agonizing moments of discomfort it sparks. From the sandpaper friction between its characters in the film’s first two acts closes with a finale that is funny and even sweet at points. But in its levity, it left me ever so slightly underwhelmed.

Is Together actually the “perfect date night movie” it marketed itself to be? I believed it at first, but whatever it ends off as is unfortunately weaker than what it began as. Together crafts an incredible cinematic experience, starting with the strongest first two acts in a horror movie this year. It’s worth seeing in theaters just for that. But what it closes on is only a mildly satisfying conclusion, one that betrays the stinging nature of its emotional core.

Advertisement

Luis Pomales-Diaz is a freelance writer and lover of fantasy, sci-fi, and of course, horror. When he isn't working on a new article or short story, he can usually be found watching schlocky movies and forgotten television shows.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Reviews

‘Re-Animator’ Review: The Lasting Legacy of a Horror Comedy

Published

on

I can’t remember the first time I saw Re-Animator. While this will probably piss someone off, my first real introduction to a variation of the source material was with Joshua Chaplinsky’s Kanye West – Reanimator. Maybe I had seen the film before that, but I wasn’t certain. I decided to go back and watch (or rewatch) the film to compare it to the satirical book. To my surprise, I loved it! I’m not sure why I didn’t remember watching the film, but I was so enthralled that I wanted to make my second tattoo a Re-Animator tattoo! Five tattoos later, and I still don’t have one.

What is Re-Animator About?

Daniel Cain (Bruce Abbott) is a medical student at Miskatonic University, along with his girlfriend Megan Halsey (Barbara Crampton)… Megan just happens to be the daughter of Dean Halsey (Robert Sampson). Herbert West (Jeffrey Combs), who recently transferred to Miskatonic, finds a posting with a room for rent at Daniel’s. Paying with a fat stack of cash, Herbert quickly moves into Daniel’s and gets down to business. The only problem is, Herbert’s business is reanimating the dead.

As someone who has been adamant about not liking horror comedies, Re-Animator really tickles me in a way most don’t. There’s a supremely dark tone to this film that is brightened by the overly campy performances, deadpan jokes, and brutally funny practical effects. Re-Animator is one of the rare films that could have been singularly played for laughs or fear, but exists in this middle ground where it’s the best of both worlds. While this film isn’t deep enough to glean new meanings or gain profound lessons, each rewatch never ceases to be less enjoyable than the last.

One of the Best Lovecraft Adaptations

Writers Dennis Paoli, William J. Norris, and Stuart Gordon took (racist) H.P. Lovecraft’s Herbert West–Reanimator and unknowingly made one of the best Lovecraft adaptations to date. There’s a peculiar phenomenon in horror where films attempt to be overly Lovecraftian, much like the genre’s tendency to label films as Lynchian. What people don’t get about Lovecraft is that not everything was all tentacles and otherworldly. Obviously, there’s a level of that that plays into what Lovecraft was. I would personally label Re-Animator, along with In the Mouth of Madness and Color out of Space, as the best three Lovecraft adaptations/Lovecraftian films to date.

There’s little to say about a film like Re-Animator that hasn’t been said already, but there is one specific point that needs to be echoed. Well, two. Firstly, Re-Animator was director Stuart Gordon’s directorial debut. His insistence on creating a viscerally nasty, sexy, funny debut film was important to set his name apart from others. Stuart Gordon came out swinging and, throughout his career, didn’t stop swinging.

Advertisement

The second point that needs to be echoed is just how amazing the film’s practical effects are. Whether it’s the played-for-laughs cat puppet or Dr. Carl Hill’s (David Gale) decapitated head, each practical moment is handled with dignity, care, and the utmost beauty. While a handful of shots may not hold up as much now as they did in the 80s, the practical effects that grace Re-Animator rival some of the rare practical effects that are used today.

Why Re-Animator Still Matters in Horror History

If you haven’t seen Re-Animator, what are you doing? It’s full of brilliant, campy performances that could be a masterclass in Horror Acting for Screen 101. Barbara Crampton is a gorgeous badass, Bruce Abbott is a hilariously hapless himbo, and Jeffrey Combs showed how he was cultivating his career to be exactly what he wanted it to be. A film like Re-Animator will live on in horror history for the rest of time. My only question is…how hasn’t there been a (yuck) remake yet?

Continue Reading

Reviews

‘Iron Lung’ Review: Exceptionally Atmospheric Cosmic Horror

Published

on

As Iron Lung begins, the film places you in an overhead shot looking down at a submarine that’s seen better days. Jagged metal teeth of a broken cage sit at its head, illuminated by a light from the ship above that’s about to cut it loose. As you’re about to be dropped into a roiling ocean of blood, you become quickly invested in its story.

A dire paternal voiceover runs you through your place in the world as an observer: someone is being sent into the “waters” of a far-off moon in a dead, dark galaxy. They’re in search of an answer you’re automatically aware will never be enough and a penance they will never attain. It prompts an obvious, cutting question: if Hell is where we’re looking for an answer, how bad must things be among the stars to go searching there for hope?

A Surprising Outing for Writer and Director Mark Fischbach

The debut feature film of writer and director Mark Fischbach, better known to the internet at large as Markiplier, is as surprising as it is atmospheric. And no, not surprising because Fischbach is an internet personality crossing over into film. And no, not surprising because this is a video game adaptation that is actually quite good.

The surprise here is mainly from the way Fischbach dodges a number of first-time filmmaker torpedoes that would otherwise sink the film straight to the sea floor. It’s in the very clear coordination and trust he has with his cast and crew. In a way, the film itself is a mirror of the submersible his character is forced to pilot: flawed, surely, but strong enough to complete its mission and deliver an exceptional experience.

What Is Iron Lung About Exactly?

The story goes as follows: in the wake of an event called the Quiet Rapture, the stars themselves have been snuffed out. Most of the galaxy has been plunged into sudden darkness, and a mass dying off has consumed countless worlds (think the worst possible aftermath to The Nine Billion Names of God).

Advertisement

Convicted for a reprehensible crime, the convict Simon (played by Markiplier himself) has been given a rare opportunity to return to life among the survivors. The mission is to pilot a death trap of a one-man submarine into the blood oceans of an alien moon, looking for a scientific sample useful enough to earn his freedom. That is, assuming he doesn’t lose his mind or his life in the process.

Bespoke Set Design That Matches the Premise Perfectly

Iron Lung should be commended first and foremost for being a bottle film with the perfect set design to match. Not overly ambitious, but not too simplistic either. Contained in a marvel of a small space, the submarine here is a tactile nightmare of rusty metal and antiquated technology you never get sick of seeing more of.

While Fischbach and director of photography Philip Roy have the camera linger in close ups almost too often, I don’t blame them for wanting to capture the finer details and leer at them. It’s clear every inch of this condensation covered machine was engineered by the art team and production design to emphasize its prison cell qualities as a barely functional vessel.

The ship’s external camera fires off like a flash bulb on its interior, barely illuminating the cabin with its next horrific image of the sea floor before plunging us back into darkness. The oxygen gauge and its cold robotic voice are a countdown to the painful annihilation that awaits its pilot. Its proximity sensors give only the barest indications of what’s going on outside, ticking a dull noise warning us: you are not alone. It’s a punishment to operate, and the set design as well as the very solid sound design that accompany it make that violently clear and effectively spinetingling.

Translation From Game to Film Isn’t So Perfect Though

This perfect setting isn’t always used perfectly though. The translation of the game’s mechanics and gameplay to the screen are both a weakness and a strength. They make the pacing of the first third run to a slow start, especially when Fischbach’s screenplay grinds against the strong suit of the film’s cinematography: the panic of it all.

Advertisement

Like its video game source material, David Szymanski’s Iron Lung, the film is really at its best when it’s instilling a sense of active and imminent panic. A tone that matches the borrowed time the submarine is glued together with. Putting out fires, both literal and metaphorical, ratcheting up its claustrophobia as you’re placed cheek to cheek with Simon in steamy, metallic darkness. This is where Iron Lung shines.

Markiplier’s Performance in Iron Lung is Hit or Miss, But Mostly Hits

It’s outside of these moments of panic where the weakest parts of the script and Fischbach’s performance are highlighted. Some weak line deliveries and beats of dead air kill the real tight headlock the film could have you gripped in from start to finish. And while Fischbach is phenomenal at playing terrified or pleading or even simple exhaustion in the face of the impossible, he really requires someone to bounce off of as his solo work just isn’t as compelling. Even the clunkiest bits of dialogue between him and his jailer (Caroline Kaplan) are better than the best of his moments where he talks to himself or tries to inject some humor into the bleak story.

This is a shame too, because the minimalist storytelling and background we get for his character is genuinely very intriguing. It’s thematically rich for what the film is trying to say about the power and terror of belief, and it’s doubly satisfying that the film has enough confidence to not lay everything out in a longwinded speech explaining the motives and lore that landed him here.

All that being said, his performance is hit or miss, but he mostly hits. The dialogue becomes more urgent as we approach the climax, and all of the cast delivers on that impending doom nicely. It reaches its peak in the final act, and Fischbach is on fire as he struggles to hold himself together in the face of absolute madness leaching its way into the pressurized cabin.

Iron Lung: A Redemptive Finale With Pure Liquid Body Horror

What a fantastic final act it is, one that makes up for its imperfection in the first two parts with a homerun of pure liquid body horror. It’s just phenomenal how the film’s digital and practical effects present the true horrors of Iron Lung. There’s a near perfect mesh between the two, and they highlight the best influences of similar genre films that came before.

Advertisement

Soaked with all the gore, madness, and mystery of the likes of Event Horizon and Pandorum, Iron Lung is a worthy successor in the cosmic horror genre as it rises above its own problems. It’s a moody, environmentally precise stunner of a horror film that sets a benchmark as the movie to beat for forthcoming releases this year.

Continue Reading

Horror Press Mailing List

Fangoria
Advertisement
Advertisement