Connect with us

Reviews

‘Together’ Review: Starts Strong, But Loses Steam by Its Final Act

Published

on

Together is a film that made me resent a relationship I’m not even in. It really is that effective. Director Michael Shanks debut feature is one of the most entertainingly uncomfortable explorations of a failing relationship we’ve gotten in a horror film in years. Together just nearly reaches Possession levels of greatness as far as romantic horror goes– but it falls shy of delivering a soul crushing closer like its spiritual sibling.

Get Ready to Hate Love Again With Together

What Possession dives into is a much more aggressive and cutting dissolution of a relationship. Andrzej Żuławski’s magnum opus, inspired by his own divorce, is a couple going at each other with everything. Cleavers, sharp glass, boxcutters, anything to try and hurt each other quickly. Together is instead the story of two animals who are locked together, teeth gnashing and claws scratching at each other, insisting all the way down that no one is getting hurt. There’s an air of crushing codependency that is certainly more passive aggressive, but still painful to see.

The film follows Milly (Alison Brie) and Tim (Dave Franco), a struggling couple taking the plunge into the next phase of their relationship: moving into a new house together. Milly is a schoolteacher looking for a change of pace, and Tim is a musician trying to make his rockstar dreams come true. Things only get worse after a going-away party highlights the cracks in their relationship. The two move out to the countryside, where a series of strange events end up drawing them closer together. Not just emotionally or mentally— they are physically being dragged closer and closer together by an unseen force.

Nobody Does a Dying Relationship Better Than Alison Brie and Dave Franco

As a real-life married couple and two of the most charming actors in Hollywood, Brie and Franco expectedly have a chemistry here that can only be described as disgustingly good. Despite the cliché setup of their relationship (he’s the fun one, she has to be the responsible one, conflict ensues), the magnetism in their performances is undeniable. They are naturally pithy beyond belief, bouncing back and forth with attitudes of resentment and genuine affection, directed both inward at themselves and outward at each other.

There are moments of conversation between the two in the film that reek of something real. Brie mentioned in Fangoria that you couldn’t make this film with a non-married couple, and I’m hard-pressed to agree; you need actors who understand each other intimately to achieve results like these. You become an unwitting and unsure third wheel to a couple that both love and hate each other. They’re unable to admit it, and the struggle between them doesn’t let up at all.

Advertisement

One moment in particular involving the intrepid couple meeting their new neighbor was so awkward, so convincingly cringe inducing, it evoked a physical response; the best comparison I could make is a crochet hook working its way up inside my body. The tension here between them pulls on muscle and sinew. When Together hits those dramatic beats of the two arguing and saying what they feel, it really, really hits.

Unbelievable Effects and Aesthetics Will Pull You in Close

That drama is of course accentuated by the big body horror the film’s premise pays off on. The invisible force pulling the two closer results in physical stunts that are mind-bogglingly well executed and look exceptionally painful. When they are brought cheek to cheek by the pull, every single touch, every bit of skin-to-skin counts. Contact between the two will invariably leave you wondering if there is any chance for them to pull away.

The movie doesn’t pull many punches when it comes to that contact going horribly wrong. The digital effects on display are surprisingly the highlight of the film, with lots of nightmare fuel thanks to the CGI of the film showing you just how nasty melding meat can be. I would even go as far to say it ends up outshining the films’ practical work that it’s layered on.

The general atmosphere of the film is impeccable as well, with a varied but always effective set design and lighting. Any scene here that takes place in their bedroom stabs at you with an unsafe feeling, setting the tone early on with what I would say is Together’s most effective scare. The same can be said of the cave where the film’s big inciting incident happens; the dark, muddy pit gets under your nails just looking at it too long, and the big scares it offers crash down on you like a hammer to the head.

What Should Be the Best Horror of the Year…Hindered by a Third Act Tonal Shift

Despite the heaps of praise I have to toss onto Together for its beginning and middle, its feet of clay are obvious: it has a little more dark humor than it knows what to do with by its ending, and it ends up spilling it all over an ending that could have been really, truly devastating.

Advertisement

There’s a comparison to be made somewhere in here to Brian Yuzna’s Society, but whatever it is feels lazy. The similarities are, quite literally, skin deep, mostly stemming from the body horror parallels. Society was heavy with its humor, but that’s the rub: Society doesn’t ever get you sucked into the characters. It’s ultimately mostly spectacle and bizarre humor, and doesn’t make you feel like it’s undercut by its jokes.

But Together does suffer from that. It makes you want to see the big collision course ending it promises, the thirty-car pileup it dangles over you. But then it delivers an ending that doesn’t ever actually crash into you. The laughs Together renders are pale in comparison to the genuinely agonizing moments of discomfort it sparks. From the sandpaper friction between its characters in the film’s first two acts closes with a finale that is funny and even sweet at points. But in its levity, it left me ever so slightly underwhelmed.

Is Together actually the “perfect date night movie” it marketed itself to be? I believed it at first, but whatever it ends off as is unfortunately weaker than what it began as. Together crafts an incredible cinematic experience, starting with the strongest first two acts in a horror movie this year. It’s worth seeing in theaters just for that. But what it closes on is only a mildly satisfying conclusion, one that betrays the stinging nature of its emotional core.

Advertisement

Luis Pomales-Diaz is a freelance writer and lover of fantasy, sci-fi, and of course, horror. When he isn't working on a new article or short story, he can usually be found watching schlocky movies and forgotten television shows.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Reviews

‘The Innkeepers’ (2011) Review: Ti West’s Horror Gem

Published

on

A little over a year ago, I had the opportunity to catch a new film that reminded me of one of the films that sparked my interest in analyzing films in the first place. Sweet Relief was a fun and well-crafted modern mumblegore film that brought Ti West’s The Innkeepers back into my mind. I first watched The Innkeepers shortly before leaving for college, and I was stunned by how incredibly effective it was. To celebrate Dark Sky Select’s 4K steelbook release of The Innkeepers, I decided to give the film a well-deserved rewatch.

The Innkeepers: A Haunting Ghost Story

The Innkeepers follows Claire (Sara Paxton) and Luke (Pat Healy), the last two employees of The Yankee Pedlar Inn. Claire and Luke find themselves working during the hotel’s last week in operation. They also happen to be amateur ghost hunters. Due to the small number of guests, Claire and Luke have some time to put their ghost hunting tools to good use. As the hunting begins, the terror checks in. Is there more to this ghost story than meets the eye?

Before his flashy slasher trilogy, Ti West’s films had a darker, more personal feel to them. After wowing audiences with his satanic panic masterpiece The House of the Devil, Ti West tackled the true terrors of the supernatural. As much as I adore Ti West, this would be his last film that perfectly balances style and substance. Obviously, the goal of an artist is to grow and transform as a filmmaker, but this feels like West’s last intimate film.

Mumblegore Dialogue: Natural and Grounded

The Innkeepers keeps with the mumblegore-like dialogue West was so great at creating. There’s still that improvisational, but naturalistic, feel to their words. And while the situation becomes extraordinary, the dialogue still feels grounded in reality. Somehow, for a 2011 film, West finds a way to competently direct actors in saying the words “epic” and “failblog”. It’s the exposition of the film that truly sets it apart from others like it. While talking with a child in the lobby, Claire reveals the backstory of Madeline O’Malley and her untimely suicide in the hotel. It’s a small moment that could easily be a throwaway detail to provide the audience with the necessary backstory. But it’s Sara Paxton’s performance that sells the scene.

Speaking of, both Sara Paxton and indie darling Pat Healy absolutely tear it up on screen. Sara Paxton’s performance is reserved and lived in. She carries herself awkwardly, with little self-confidence, but still finds a way to be charming. Indie darling Pat Healy chews up the scenery with his Tintin-like faux hawk and a Red Bull-infused high energy. Not only do they steal their respective scenes alone, but they also play off each other like a fast-paced tennis volley.

Advertisement

Supernatural Horror Done Right

Ti West’s magnum opus handles the supernatural element in a much cleaner, fascinating way than most ghost films. The slow pace highlights the mundanity of working-class life that quickly becomes tense through the creeping terror of Madeline O’Malley and her growing cohorts of terror. There’s a certain unbalanced feel to the film’s three-act structure that lends an air of authenticity to it. Whereas most supernatural films feel the need to do more, The Innkeepers understands that it’s okay to do less. It’s how the scares are delivered that sets this film apart.

If you haven’t seen The Innkeepers, then you’re truly missing out on one of the subgenre’s greatest hits. That being said, I don’t think this film is for everyone. Ti West asks a lot from his audience, and I can understand that some people won’t want to go with him on this ride. It’s talky and demands full attention. But if you’re willing to sit with the film and let it work its magic, you won’t be disappointed.

Continue Reading

Reviews

[REVIEW] Fantastic Fest 2025: ‘Primate’ Is the Animal-Attack-Meets-Slasher Movie You Didn’t Know You Needed

Published

on

If that one scene in Nope (you know the one) wasn’t enough to convince you that owning a chimpanzee is a bad idea, Primate is here to remind you that these animals can literally rip you limb from limb. Directed by Johannes Roberts, who also co-wrote the script with Ernest Riera, the film is scheduled to release in January—and if it wasn’t on your radar before, allow me to firmly add it.

PSA: Primate Proves That Chimps Are Not Pets (But They Are Great Slasher Killers)

Primate begins with a pre-credits scene introducing us to the danger: a vet has been called to check in on a chimp named Ben that isn’t feeling so hot, only to discover the hard way that the super-strong animal has gone rabid. It’s an evocative opening, though it does create a little timeline confusion when we jump back in time a few days to follow Lucy (Johnny Sequoyah) as she returns home to Hawaii to see her family and their unusual pet.

Her late mother, we learn, worked with Ben for years before her death, and he remains a beloved member of the family, able to communicate most basic needs via the use of sign language and a special tablet. Ben is acting a little off, though, so Lucy’s father (Academy Award-winner Troy Kotsur, in a stand-out role) calls in the vet we’ve already seen die before heading out for the night.

Of course, we know that Ben has rabies, so it’s only a matter of time before he goes bananas. In the meantime, Lucy, her sister, and their friends get to living it up while they have the place to themselves. The family owns a gorgeous secluded mansion complete with a cliffside infinity pool, and if you’ve seen The Strangers: Prey at Night, you’ll know Roberts loves a pool. He quickly finds a reason to drive the young people into it and trap them there—but just because chimps can’t swim, that doesn’t mean they’re safe.

Blending Animal Attack Horror with Slasher Thrills in Primate

One of the biggest things going for Primate is its ability to blend classic animal attack horror with slasher elements. The film draws clear inspiration from Cujo, but where the Trentons were largely safe from the beast’s foaming maw (if not the sun) so long as they stayed inside their vehicle, Lucy and friends aren’t so lucky. As the tagline for Primate warns, Ben is “dangerously close to human,” which means he understands how to use tools and constantly finds creative ways to take a swipe at his prey whenever they and the audience let their guard down. The sicker the chimp gets, the more he seems to radiate a savage, all-too-human glee.

Advertisement

At the same time, Roberts and Riera’s script leverages the communication gap between Ben and the family to devastating effect. Ben is so close to being able to tell them what’s wrong before his rabies progresses to the point of no return, but he doesn’t quite have the language. The fact that Lucy’s father is deaf adds an additional layer to the tragedy: we see how expressive the family is able to be through non-verbal communication, yet Ben is still isolated in his misery.

Toward the climax, however, even this form of communication starts to break down as the girls’ screams go unheard. While it feels like there’s more material that could have been wrung from this theme, it’s notable that Ben goes for the mouth more than once during his rampage, including in the film’s most memorable kill. In the end, maybe all communication is meaningless when nature decides to play a cruel prank.

Miguel Torres Umba’s Incredible Performance as Rabid Chimp Ben

This tragic aspect of the story doesn’t dampen the scares or thrills. Movement specialist Miguel Torres Umba, who portrays Ben, initially imbues the chimp with lovable warmth that makes his feverish, trembling intensity all the more frightening as the sickness takes hold. It’s a remarkable performance, one that lulls the audience into a similar state of wishful thinking to Lucy as she repeatedly reaches out to Ben in the hope that some part of the pet she loved is still in there. Primate rewards that desperate desire with brutal bites, bludgeonings, and beyond.

Primate Is a Lean, Mean, Face-Ripping Machine

Animal attack horror movies have trended hard toward sharks in the last decade (a world Roberts is no stranger to, having helmed 47 Meters Down and its sequel). It’s exciting to see a new addition to this subgenre focusing on a lesser-seen aggressor, especially one that doesn’t frame its killer creature as inherently evil, but rather a victim of both a natural blight and human foolishness. Ben should never have been put in the position he’s in—but now he’s here, it’s pulse-poundingly fun to see the damage that 100+ pounds of pure muscle can do when its brain is on fire.

Primate attacks theaters on January 9.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Horror Press Mailing List

Fangoria
Advertisement
Advertisement