Reviews
[REVIEW] ‘Final Destination: Bloodlines’ Death Makes a Return
In 2011, Final Destination 5 premiered, marking what was seemingly the end to a beloved franchise known for its campy dialogue, boneheaded teenage characters, and gleefully demented kill sequences. Each film starts with a random disaster, narrowly avoided thanks to a young protagonist’s premonition.
The rest usually follows the main character and their friends on the run against a vengeful Grim Reaper, taking revenge on them for cheating death. The series has worked its way into the hearts of horror fans, and in 2000, crafted the first truly innovative and iconic slasher since A Nightmare on Elm Street.
However, after a handful of entries with a fairly mechanical formula with little lore, five seemed like a good place to leave the series, escaping the fate of many other slashers that jumped the shark ten films in.
Why Revisit Final Destination in 2025?
So, after all these years, why turn back to a distinctly 2000s-era horror story, one that had a definitive ending with part 5’s cyclical finale? The answer is Bloodlines.
Easily the funniest, bloodiest, and most surprisingly heartfelt of the series, Final Destination: Bloodlines is a necessary return to the Summer horror blockbuster, revitalizing the genre with new blood while staying true to the series’ roots.
A Fresh Twist on the Franchise’s Premise
This is not your Dad’s Final Destination movie. Okay, well, it kind of is, but simultaneously, it breaks bloody new ground. The movie opens with an elongated, heart-wrenching opening disaster sequence as per tradition, this time set at a collapsing, rotating restaurant in the sixties.
However, instead of just cutting to the character the audience has been following, assuming that what we have seen is a premonition, we cut to present-day college student Stefani Reyes (Kaitlyn Santa Juana). As it turns out, Stefani is having visions of something that almost happened to her family’s estranged matriarch, her grandmother. But why?
A New Layer of Mystery and Family Dynamics
This sudden switch from the standard conventions of a Final Destination movie is reason enough to warrant this sequel. It adds a whole new layer of mystery and rule changes that lead to the film’s most interesting set-up: it is not the near-dead survivors of a crash, but instead the family of the disaster’s survivor.
The family itself is such a great cast, and a welcome change from the usual group of doofy high schoolers. Stefani is a compelling final girl, her family-centric arc adding a deeper, more emotional layer to what could have been a cheap, straight-to-streaming requel.
The characters give this story more important meanings and metaphors of generational trauma, Stefani’s grandmother’s supernatural PTSD from her near-death experience corrupting her daughter (Rya Kihlstedt), son (Alex Zahara), and eventually the rest of the family.
Emotional Depth in a Slasher Flick
The emotional thread allows the film to explore some more complicated character dynamics. It makes it genuinely more painful when some characters get offed, something that these kinds of slashers can often forget.
Additionally, the comedy in this movie is top-notch. Some previous entries can take themselves too seriously, both stylistically and narratively. Still, this film finds a logging truck full of laughs, either in its ludicrous kills or goofy family banter.
Richard Harmon is especially a standout in the film as alternative tattoo designer Erik Campbell, a hilarious side character whose costuming aesthetics totally call back to the 2000s emo vibes and Ian of Final Destination 3.
Tony Todd’s Final Bow as Bludworth
The film also features the return of Tony Todd’s familiar character Bludworth, making it his final film. It is a loving goodbye to an iconic role and a legendary actor. Arguments can definitely be made that the backstory given to his character in this movie could have been a little more…unexpected, to say the least, but his performance more than makes up for it.
The Franchise’s Most Original Death Sequences
It is refreshing to see a Final Destination flick with such an emotional thread, more complicated mystery, and some effective comedy, but let’s be real—we’re all in this for the kills, right? After all, who doesn’t love some of the nastiest movie death scenes, pushing the boundaries of how complicated a way can pulverize a character?
Well, it is a pleasure to say Bloodlines does not disappoint in the slightest. Without giving too much away, this has some of the franchise’s nastiest, most original, and most clever kills. The gore and suspense will have seasoned horror fans gagging on popcorn and squinting. While not necessarily more brutal than other entries, the cleverness of the set-ups are original.
Final Destination: Bloodlines Is Full Of Horror That Will Keep You On The Edge Of Your Seat
Small little details and a plethora of fakeouts, with small props coming back in unexpected ways make this movie the most effective of the entire series in how it handles its Rube Goldberg-esque nature. A more in-depth production design and varied settings, such as a sick tattoo parlor and a creepy isolated cabin, help provide the backdrop for some of the most gleeful deaths.
Overall, Final Destination: Bloodlines seems to mark the beginning of Summer. It is a huge, epic blockbuster of an entry, that demands to be seen with the biggest audience possible, on the biggest screen possible.
Everyone loves a bleak, moody folk horror, but this film will take excited audiences back to pure 2000s fun and expand into a genuinely meaningful story.
Reviews
‘Frankenstein’ Review: Guillermo Del Toro Is Off to the Races
Those expecting Guillermo Del Toro’s Frankenstein to be similar to the book, or to any other adaptation, are in for something else. A longtime enjoyer of the creature’s story, Del Toro instead draws from many places: the novel, James Whale’s culturally defining 1931 film, the Kenneth Branagh version, there are even hints from Terence Fisher’s Curse of Frankenstein, and if the set design and costuming are to be believed, there are trace elements of the National Theatre production too.
The formulation to breathe life into this amalgam is a sort of storm cloud of cultural memory and personal desire for Del Toro. This is about crafting his Frankenstein: the one he wanted to see since he was young, the vision he wanted to stitch together. What results is an experience that is more colorful and kinetic and well-loved by its creator than any Frankenstein we’ve had yet, but what it leaves behind is much of its gothic heart. Quiet darkness, looming dread, poetry, and romance are set aside as what has been sold as “the definitive retelling” goes off to the races. It’s a fast-paced ride through a world of mad science, and you’re on it.
Victor Frankenstein’s Ambition and Tragedy
A tale as old as time, with some changes: the morbid talents and untamed hubris of Victor Frankenstein (Oscar Isaac) guide him to challenge death itself. Spurred by a wealthy investor named Henrich Harlander, and a desire for Harlander’s niece Elizabeth (Mia Goth), Victor uses dead flesh and voltaic vigor to bring a creature to life. His attempts to rear it, however, go horribly wrong, setting the two on a bloody collision course as the definitions of man and monster become blurred.
Guillermo Del Toro’s Frankenstein is more Hellboy in its presentation than it is Crimson Peak; it’s honestly more similar to Coppola’s Dracula than either of them. The film is barely done with its opening when it starts with a loud sequence of the monster attacking Walton’s ship on the ice. Flinging crew members about and walking against volleys of gunfire, he is a monstrosity by no other name. The Creature (Jacob Elordi) cries out in guttural screams, part animal and part man, as it calls for its creator to be returned to him. While visually impressive (and it remains visually impressive throughout, believe me), this appropriately bombastic hook foreshadows a problem with tone and tempo.
A Monster That Moves Too Fast
The pace overall is far too fast for its first half, even with its heavy two-and-a-half-hour runtime. It’s also a far cry from the brooding nature the story usually takes. A scene where Victor demonstrates rudimentary reanimation to his peers and a council of judges is rapid, where it should be agonizingly slow. There’s horror and an instability in Victor to be emphasized in that moment, but the grotesque sight is an oddly triumphant one instead. Most do not revile his experiments; in fact he’s taken quite seriously.
Many scenes like this create a tonal problem that makes Victor’s tale lean more toward melodrama than toward philosophical or emotional aspects; he is blatantly wild and free, in a way that is respected rather than pitied. There are opportunities to stop, breathe in the Victorian roses and the smell of death, to get really dour, but it’s neglected until the film’s second half.
Isaac’s and Goth’s performances are overwrought at points, feeling more like pantomimes of Byronic characters. I’m not entirely convinced it has more to do with them than with the script they’re given. Like Victor working with the parts of inmates and dead soldiers, even the best of actors with the best of on-screen chemistry are forced to make do. The dialogue has incredibly high highs (especially in its final moments), but when it has lows, how low they are; a character outright stating that “Victor is the real monster” adage to his face was an ocean floor piece of writing if there ever was one.
Isaac, Goth, and Elordi Bring Life to the Dead
Jacob Elordi’s work here, however, is blameless. Though Elordi’s physical performance as the creature will surely win praise, his time speaking is the true highlight. It’s almost certainly a definitive portrayal of the character; his voice for Victor’s creation is haunted with scorn and solitude, the same way his flesh is haunted by the marks of his creator’s handiwork. It agonizes me to see so little of the books’ most iconic lines used wholesale here, because they would be absolutely perfect coming from Elordi. Still, he has incredible chemistry with both Isaac and Goth, and for as brief as their time together is, he radiates pure force.
Frankenstein Is a Masterclass in Mise-En-Scène
Despite its pacing and tone issues, one can’t help but appreciate the truly masterful craftsmanship Del Toro has managed to pack into the screen. Every millimeter of the sets is carved to specification, filled with personality through to the shadows. Every piece of brick, hint of frost, stain of blood, and curve of the vine is painstakingly and surgically placed to create one of the most wonderful and spellbinding sets you’ve seen—and then it keeps presenting you with new environments like that, over, and over.
At the very least, Del Toro’s Frankenstein is a masterpiece of mise-en-scène down to the minutest of details, and that makes it endlessly rewatchable for aesthetic purposes. This isn’t even getting into the effervescent lighting, or how returning collaborator Kate Hawley has outdone herself again with the costuming. Guillermo Del Toro tackling the king of gothic horror stories, a story written by the mother of all science fiction, inevitably set a high bar for him to clear. And while it’s not a pitch perfect rendering of Mary Shelley’s slow moving and Shakespearean epistolary, it is still one of the best-looking movies you will see all year.
Perhaps for us, it’s at the cost of adapting the straightforward, dark story we know into something more operatic. It sings the tale like a soprano rather than reciting it like humble prose, and it doesn’t always sing well. But for Del Toro, the epic scale and voice of this adaptation is the wage expected for making the movie he’s always dreamed of. Even with its problems, it’s well worth it to see a visionary director at work on a story they love.
Reviews
‘The Siege of Ape Canyon’ Review: Bigfoot Comes Home
In my home, films like Night of the Demon and Abominable are played on repeat; Stan Gordon is king. One of my favorite stories surrounding Bigfoot and Ufology is the Bigfoot/UFO double flap of 1973, which Stan Gordon has an incredible in-depth book on. The Patterson–Gimlin film couldn’t hold a flame to Stan Gordon’s dive into one of my home state’s most chronicled supernatural time periods. But as much as I love the Bigfoot topic, I’m not ashamed to say I don’t know half of the stories surrounding that big hairy beast. And one topic that I’m not ashamed to say I haven’t heard of is The Siege of Ape Canyon.
The Harrowing Events of Ape Canyon
Washington State, 1924. A group of miners (originally consisting of Marion Smith, Leroy P. Smith, Fred Beck, John Peterson, August Johannson, and Mac Rhodes) was on a quest to claim a potential gold mine. Literally. The miners would eventually set up camp on the east slope of Mount Saint Helens. Little did they know their temporary shelter would be the start of a multi-day barrage of attacks from what they and researchers believed to be Bigfoot. What transpired in those days would turn out to be one of the most highly criticized pieces of American lore, nearly lost to time and history…nearly.
I need to set the record straight on a few things before we get started. One, I don’t typically like watching documentaries. Two, I believe in Bigfoot. Three, this documentary made me cry.

Image courtesy of Justin Cook Public Relations.
Reviving a Forgotten Bigfoot Legend in The Siege of Ape Canyon
Documentarian Eli Watson sets out to tell one of the most prolific Bigfoot stories of all time (for those who are deep in Bigfoot mythology). It’s noted fairly early in the film that this story is told often and is well known in the Washington area. So then, how do people outside of the incident location know so little about it? I’ve read at least 15 books on and about Bigfoot, and I’ve never once heard this story. This isn’t a Stan-Gordon-reported story about someone sitting on the john and seeing a pair of red eyes outside of their bathroom window. The story around Ape Canyon has a deeper spiritual meaning that goes beyond a few sightings here and there.
Watson’s documentary, though, isn’t just about Bigfoot or unearthing the story of Ape Canyon. Ape Canyon nearly became nothing more than a tall tale that elders would share around a campfire to keep the younglings out of the woods at 2 AM. If it weren’t for Mark Myrsell, that’s exactly what would have happened. The Siege of Ape Canyon spends half its time unpacking the story of Fred Beck and his prospecting crew, and the other half tells a truly inspiring tale of unbridled passion, friendship, and love.
Mark Myrsell’s Relentless Pursuit: Friendship, Truth, and Tears
Mark Myrsell’s undying passion for everything outdoors inevitably led to bringing one of Bigfoot’s craziest stories to light. His devotion to the truth vindicated many people who were (probably) labeled kooks and crazies. Throughout Myrsell’s endless search for the truth, he made lifelong friends along the way. What brought me to tears throughout The Siege of Ape Canyon is Watson’s insistence on showing the human side of Myrsell and his friends. They’re not in this to make millions or bag a Bigfoot corpse; they just want to know the truth. And that’s what they find.
The Siege of Ape Canyon is a documentary that will open your eyes to a wildly mystical story you may not have heard of. And it does it pretty damn well. Whereas many documentaries feel the need to talk down to the viewer just to educate them, Watson’s documentary takes you along for the ride. It doesn’t ask you to believe or not believe in Bigfoot. It allows you to make your own decisions and provides the evidence it needs to. If you’ve ever had a passing interest in the topic of Bigfoot, or if you think you’re the next Stan Gordon, I highly recommend watching The Siege of Ape Canyon.
The Siege of Ape Canyon stomps its way onto digital platforms on November 11. Give yourself a little post-Halloween treat and check it out!


