Connect with us

Reviews

[REVIEW] My First Horror Movie ‘The Evil Dead’ (1981)

The Evil Dead follows five friends who head out to a cabin in the woods for a little trip. We join Ashley Williams (Bruce Campbell), his sister Cheryl (Ellen Sandweiss), girlfriend Linda (Betsy Baker), and friends Shelly (Sarah York/Theresa Tilly) and Scott (Hal Delrich/Richard DeManincor). During dinner on their first night there, a secret basement door swings open and reveals a world beyond their own: a Kandarian dagger, a book bound in flesh and inked in blood, and a tape recording. After the young friends play the tape recording, they find themselves in the thralls of something greater than anyone could have imagined.

Published

on

Whether or not this is a false memory is up in the air, but to my recollection, Sam Raimi’s The Evil Dead was the first horror film I ever watched. What isn’t a false memory is how bone-chillingly scared I was when[ever] I first watched it. The Evil Dead was the film that started it all for Raimi. Spawning two direct(ish) sequels, two reboots, a musical, three seasons of a television show, and multiple video games (one of which was my favorite asymm of 2022). Two brilliant careers flourished from this film, bringing endless love and attention to horror.

The Cabin in the Woods That Changed Horror Forever

The Evil Dead follows five friends who head out to a cabin in the woods for a little trip. We join Ashley Williams (Bruce Campbell), his sister Cheryl (Ellen Sandweiss), girlfriend Linda (Betsy Baker), and friends Shelly (Sarah York/Theresa Tilly) and Scott (Hal Delrich/Richard DeManincor). During dinner on their first night there, a secret basement door swings open and reveals a world beyond their own: a Kandarian dagger, a book bound in flesh and inked in blood, and a tape recording. After the young friends play the tape recording, they find themselves in the thralls of something greater than anyone could have imagined.

One of the biggest debates in horror when discussing this franchise is which is better: The Evil Dead or Evil Dead II? As someone who has always been on the fence with horror comedies, The Evil Dead takes the cake. (I’m not even a huge fan of Army of Darkness, but that’s a horror fan card-revoking discussion for a later time.) The raw, emotional, terrifying, bloody tale Raimi spills with his debut feature film checks all of the boxes for an effective and [nearly] timeless horror flick. Evil Dead II is just too fun and goofy for me. Some of the Three Stooges-ness that bombarded II is sprinkled throughout The Evil Dead, though it doesn’t overtake the horror these five friends are enduring.

Script Issues, Pacing Problems, and One Poorly Aged Scene

Raimi’s script for The Evil Dead does leave something to be desired. I almost wish the film had less dialogue and left the terror up to visual storytelling. Too many times throughout the film poor dialogue takes precedence over proper pacing. That’s really my main issue with this film (other than the poorly aged tree rape scene, which Raimi has since publically regretted). The practical effects and SFX makeup don’t necessarily hold up (visually) nowadays, but that doesn’t necessarily make or break the film’s overall tone.

The makeup work for the Deadites haunted me as a child. I’d see those faces, hear their singsongy taunts, and have chills down my spine. Even if it doesn’t look so great now, the ankle stab with the pencil was the first time I really felt mirror-touch synesthesia. And it’s probably why I have such an aversion to ankle-related violence to date. All of this took place after Raimi’s entrancing POV shot through the bog–a shot that would nearly define his entire career. It’s impossible to see a low-angle POV shot scurrying through the woods and around trees and stumps without thinking about Sam Raimi.

Advertisement

Bruce Campbell, Sam Raimi, and The Evil Dead

Bruce Campbell and Sam Raimi begged and pleaded to get The Evil Dead made, and it shows. There is endless passion behind this film. I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again, some of the best art is created when artists are hungry…and these two best friends were HUNGRY. Little did this small group of filmmakers in their 20s know that this tiny film made for less than half a million dollars over a few weeks from 1979 to 1980 would turn into a monolithic franchise.

Evil Dead (2013) and Evil Dead Rise are two excellent reboots of Raimi’s IP, and both told their stories in unique ways. 2013 was a down-and-dirty reimagining of The Evil Dead (and I think it takes place in the same universe as the original). Rise somehow exists within the franchise universe and has a fun blend of horror and comedy (while keeping the horror at the forefront). The Evil Dead is an all-around horrifying and spectacular film that has been noted as influencing many horror filmmakers working in the industry today–horror would not be what it is without this drive-in classic.

Brendan is an award-winning author and screenwriter rotting away in New Jersey. His hobbies include rain, slugs, and the endless search for The Mothman.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Reviews

‘House of the Dead 2’ Review: Far Better Than The Original

Published

on

Uwe Boll’s House of the Dead is a trash movie classic. For many, it exists as a ‘so bad it’s good’ movie. For me, House of the Dead is so bad it’s bad. Before looking up movies for March, I had no clue there was a House of the Dead sequel! This is the first time this month that I’ve stretched the category limit, as House of the Dead 2 merely premiered on the Sci-Fi Channel. Remember when movies premiered on the Sci-Fi Channel on Fridays and Saturdays? Those were great times. Seeing commercials all through the week, leading up to the big premiere. Ugh. I miss those days.

Zombies Take Over Cuesta Verde University in House of the Dead 2

House of the Dead 2 takes place a few months after the happenings of the first film. When one of Professor Roy Curien’s (Sid Haig) test subjects escapes containment at Cuesta Verde University, AMS is tasked with securing the campus. Led by Alexandra “Nightingale” Morgan (Emmanuelle Vaugier) and Lieutenant Jake Ellis (Ed Quinn), the team descends on the campus with wanton disregard for student safety. Bullets fly and heads explode as AMS gets closer to finding a blood sample…but the ticking clock starts ticking faster when they’re told a series of missiles will level the college campus shortly. Who will live and who will die in House of the Dead 2?

From writer Mark A. Altman and director Michael Hurst, House of the Dead 2 is a slower, more contained, faster-paced entry into the House of the Dead franchise. While the infected lack the scare factor from those in the original, they succeed at creating a frantic environment and an overall more entertaining film than Boll’s abortion of a motion picture. Thankfully, this sequel’s pacing is improved over the original.

Dialogue and Performances: Campy, Cringe, and Self-Aware

One of my main issues with the original is the overly snappy dialogue. Everything is a joke, a setup for a joke, or cringe “macho” lines. While the majority of Altman’s script carries that over, there’s a more refined element to the dialogue. That could also be attributed to better actors like Vaugier, Quinn, Victoria Pratt, Nadine Velazquez, and Sticky Fingaz. Much of the dialogue here does feel a bit cringe in its entirety, but the cast of 2 leans into it so much more. Part of me feels like Boll took a way too serious path with the original, while Hurst leans into the kookiness and over-the-top energy that makes this film work.

But I’m glossing over the main point of what this film is: a zombie film. The topic of slow vs fast zombies is one of the most annoying topics in horror. Just let them be whatever they are! House of the Dead 2 is full of slow zombies, though some do seem to move at a medium-ish pace. As stated, the infected here lack some of the scare factor from the original, but they make up for it in overall tenacity. Plus, they look gnarly. The team from Almost Human made, I can’t believe I’m saying this, some of the best-looking infected prosthetics I’ve seen in a zombie film. Each zombie feels like they have their own story to tell, and the extras who brought the infected to life play that up very well. Whether it’s a one-off zombie or a whole horde, you can feel the characterization behind them.

Advertisement

The Missed Opportunity: Mosquito Zombie Infections

My biggest issue with this film is something they dropped really quickly. At one point, three AMS members are in a dorm room, looking for infected to kill. One of the members is bitten by a mosquito and becomes infected. On top of the throwaway line about how the infected are evolving, the idea of the infection being transmitted by mosquitoes is a great idea, but one that is quickly dropped. Maybe they had plans to go deeper into this idea with the failed third film, but I was hoping that would have been pushed forward in the story.

A Better (and More Self-Aware) Zombie Sequel

House of the Dead 2 is a fairly typical zombie movie. It’s an ensemble film that introduces way too many characters with the promise of picking them off one by one. But it’s less on the nose than the original and plays into the more darkly humorous side that Uwe Boll couldn’t touch with a ten-foot pole. With an attractive cast that knows what they’re in for, a cast that chews up the scenery as much as the undead, House of the Dead 2 brought life into a dead franchise. I’m just glad we didn’t get that reported third film with…Dean Cain (yuck!).

Continue Reading

Reviews

‘Bring It On: Cheer or Die’ Review: A Blood Free Slasher That Fumbles the Franchise

Published

on

Growing up in the mid-90s, I bore witness to some very out-there films. One of the films that defined cinema for many of the women I grew up with was Bring It On. I have never gotten around to seeing the film; being a teen boy in a red town, I was more of a Fired Up! guy. I have long known of a horror installment in the Bring It On series, but had zero interest in ever checking it out. Knowing that Bring It On: Cheer or Die premiered on the SyFy Channel gave me the perfect excuse to finally watch it. Yikes.

What is Bring It On: Cheer or Die About?

Abby (Kerri Medders) is the head cheerleader for The Diablos. Abby and her team are barred from doing any interesting choreography due to an incident from 20 years ago, by Principal Simmons (Missi Pyle). The team decides to go behind Simmons’s back and do a 24-hour rehearsal-thon at the building that their high school used to be in. Once at the abandoned building, someone donning their high school mascot’s costume starts picking off the cheer squad one by one. Will anyone in the cheer squad make it to regionals (Glee joke!), or will this be their last pyramid?

It is at this point in my review, yes, even after watching the movie, that I’m realizing who one of the writers is. Cheer or Die is co-written by Rebekah McKendry and Dana Schwartz, which comes as a complete surprise. I respect the hell out of Dr. McKendry. Her knowledge of the genre, its tropes and cliches, extends beyond what nearly anyone else knows. And I absolutely loved All The Creatures Were Stirring. So the fact that this is a film written by her floors me.

Comparing Cheer or Die to Modern Teen Slashers

While I’m not expecting Hereditary or Don’t Look Now-like storytelling from the seventh film in the Bring It On franchise, I was hoping for a little more than what it ended up as. I’ve discussed time and time again how much I enjoyed Fear Street: Prom Queen. Its general straightforwardness is refreshing in a subgenre that was forced to become too smart for its own good. Cheer or Die is just as straightforward, but nowhere near as good. Prom Queen is a very competent film; it looks great and is entertaining. Cheer or Die is not. It is vapid and pointless, an extreme waste of 91 minutes.

A slasher film should have at least one memorable kill. Right? There is not a single memorable kill, let alone a memorable moment, in Cheer or Die. On top of that, how do you have a blood-free slasher flick? I think there is one singular blood spray that is on camera for less than two seconds. I understand that you have to toe the line between appealing to Bring It On fans and genre fans, but it gets to a point where that line is pointless when you make a nothing film like this.

Advertisement

Karen Lam’s Direction and Technical Missteps

Was this film used as a tax scheme? Karen Lam apparently directed this film, but I didn’t see a single bit of direction the entire time. The cast recited their lines directly from the script with not a single bit of care in the world. I spent the near entirety of the film’s runtime just staring at the screen, wondering how this film got greenlit in the first place. If this were Lam’s feature directorial debut, I would cut it a bit of slack. But this was award-winning Karen Lam’s fourth film. Which is crazy considering the film refuses to adhere to any implication of the 180-degree rule. Wherever they wanted to set the camera, they set it. Few films feel like first-take films, but Bring It On: Cheer or Die feels like a film that utilized every single first take that they got.

Avoid Bring It On: Cheer or Die 

My goal isn’t to take a film that someone put love and energy into and shit down its throat. But Cheer or Die barely deserves to be called a film. From its first bloodless death to its painfully obvious motive reveal, Cheer or Die fails at every single aspect. Hell, the killer(s) even say, “Story time,” when they tell the remaining cheer squad their motive. I expected more from the incredibly talented Dr. McKendry. All I can honestly say at this point is to avoid this film with every part of your being.

Continue Reading

Horror Press Mailing List

Fangoria
Advertisement
Advertisement