Connect with us

Reviews

[REVIEW] Kill Means Kiss In ‘Pontypool’ (2008)

Published

on

Out of all the snow-based horror films I could think of, one kept coming to mind. Tony Burgess’s Pontypool was an exceptional horror film that never got the love it deserved. While it may have received a physical release in 2009, very few people talked about it. A friend introduced me to this film in 2015 and I became obsessed with it. It wouldn’t be until Dead Meat released their Pontypool Kill Count, which currently sits on the verge of two million views, that it would have its much-needed comeuppance. It also helped that it was put on Shudder at some point around then.

Pontypool follows Grant Mazzy (Stephen McHattie), who was recently relocated to the small town of Pontypool after being fired from his long-time radio gig. He finds himself adjusting from his former shock jock life as he tries to build up an audience in this small town. He’s joined in the studio by his tech assistant, Laurel-Ann Drummond (Georgina Reilly), and his producer/station manager, Sydney Briar (Lisa Houle). Not too long into the broadcast, Grant receives a call from Ken Loney (Rick Roberts) in his Sunshine Chopper with troubling news. A horde of people have seemingly rioted into the office of Dr. Mendez (Hrant Alianak). What comes next is one of the most impressive and well-conceived zombie films of all time.

Pontypool is written by Tony Burgess, based on his novel Pontypool Changes Everything. Pontypool Changes Everythingis the second part in a trilogy with the first installment being The Hellmouths of Bewdley and the third being Caesarea; these novels were soon called The Pontypool Trilogy. Much like Mark Z. Danielewski’s House of Leaves, Pontypool Changes Everything seems unfilmable. It’s an incredibly unique and difficult novel that both itches and wrinkles your brain. Pontypool is a very loose adaptation of his own novel, but it gets all the boxes checked. Burgess’s novel is akin to Anthony Burgess’s A Clockwork Orange in overall reading difficulty. This novel is not a casual read. Burgess’s prose could definitely be a turnoff for casual readers. If you want to read Pontypool but don’t want to read Pontypool Changes Everything, there is a transcribed stage play that is incredibly fun and much easier for casual reading.

What makes Pontypool so intriguing is how the information regarding the zombie outbreak is disseminated. With this being a film about a radio show host, the majority of information regarding the zombies is told through calls to Grant from Ken (and a special appearance from another character but I won’t spoil who). Moreover, the infection isn’t spread directly through bites, instead it’s spread through words. The English language is infecting the residents of Pontypool. It should be noted that Pontypool director Bruce McDonald does not refer to the zombies as zombies; instead, they’re conversationalists. We’ll stick with calling them zombies for ease.

Pontypool releasing in 2008, is very important for the zombie subgenre. This is around the time the subgenre was taking over the shelves of Blockbuster and Walmart. I couldn’t go to one of these stores without seeing oversaturated shelves with low-budget, quick-turnout zombie films. Pontypool’s take on the subgenre was, in hindsight, uniquely refreshing. Burgess and McDonald give us a healthy dose of zombie action toward the end of the film, but Burgess edges the audience until there’s no other choice than to give us blood and action.

Advertisement

There’s nothing I can say regarding the spreading of the infection that hasn’t been said by people smarter than I, and that’s okay. If this novel or film was released today there would be heavy implications regarding why the infection is spread through language. Since I was just a wee lad when Burgess released his novel in 1998, I don’t necessarily know all the intricacies of what was happening politically at the time (I know a surface-level amount) but there’s no way you can read this novel or watch this film and not feel heavy undertones of social commentary. It also raises a very important question of just how quickly words can harm someone/a group of people. It’s like…a stand-up comedian being invited on stage by a presidential candidate and then calling a group of people in a certain U.S. Territory garbage.

Pontypool is a novel and film far ahead of its time. It will satiate the zombie lover who wants to see some flesh-ripping carnage and those who want a zombie story with deeper implications. (We don’t need to talk about the Christmas carol scene.) Plus, who doesn’t like seeing Stephen McHattie absolutely chewing the hell out of the scenery while drowning his sorrows deep in a bottle?

Brendan is an award-winning author and screenwriter rotting away in New Jersey. His hobbies include rain, slugs, and the endless search for The Mothman.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Reviews

[REVIEW] The People Vs. ‘The Exorcism of Emily Rose’

The Exorcism of Emily Rose is a unique take on exorcism films. The film follows Erin Brunner (Laura Linney), a high-profile defense lawyer. Brunner is fresh off a murder case where her client was cleared of all charges–only for that client to turn around and commit another set of murders. In the hopes of becoming a partner at her law firm, Brunner is talked into taking the defense for Father Richard Moore (Tom Wilkinson). Father Moore finds himself in the hot seat after a series of exorcisms resulted in the death of Emma Rose (Jennifer Carpenter). The twist? Erin Brunner is agnostic! OooOOoooOh.

Published

on

The second film I wanted to cover, that’s “based on a true story”, is one that utterly fascinates me…and not for the right reasons. After Henry: Portrait of a Serial Killer, I felt let down. I am by no means a Henry Lee Lucas expert, but even with someone having the bare knowledge of the case, I couldn’t believe they dared to refer to it as having anything to do with the Confession Killer. Could The Exorcism of Emily Rose pull me out of this pit of despair? Can it get some basic information right? Ugh.

The Exorcism of Emily Rose is a unique take on exorcism films. The film follows Erin Brunner (Laura Linney), a high-profile defense lawyer. Brunner is fresh off a murder case where her client was cleared of all charges–only for that client to turn around and commit another set of murders. In the hopes of becoming a partner at her law firm, Brunner is talked into taking the defense for Father Richard Moore (Tom Wilkinson). Father Moore finds himself in the hot seat after a series of exorcisms resulted in the death of Emma Rose (Jennifer Carpenter). The twist? Erin Brunner is agnostic! OooOOoooOh.

This film brings us the dramatized events of Emily’s tragic final days through the setting of a courtroom drama. There’s something fun about this idea. It’s surprising this idea hasn’t been reused. Laura Linney and Tom Wilkinson are an excellent duo, they play off each other very well. If only the real-life lawyers were as likable as Erin Brunner (we’ll get there later). The real star of the show is Jennifer Carpenter. Tasked with doing justice to the real Emily Rose (Anneliese Michel), Carpenter handles her performance with class.

The story jumps back and forth between the courtroom and Emily’s experiences. There is great information for the film to base its script on, and it doesn’t do it interestingly. One of the most notorious pieces of evidence in this case is the leaked audio of the 67 exorcisms performed on Michel. The Catholic church did not release this audio until around 2011, but Carpenter does a great job of channeling the pain you can hear in the audio.

An interesting angle of the real Anneliese Michel story is how the lawyers were really trying to put the devil on trial. Unlike the film, Michel’s parents were also put on trial, as well as the two priests who initiated the exorcisms. Rather than the film’s dramatic guilty plea with time served as a sentence, the German justice department thought the parents had suffered enough and that the priests should just get fined. In reality, both the parents and the priests deserved to go to jail. The complete neglect of Anneliese’s ailments was thought nothing more than the dirty hands of the devil. Anneliese’s parents and the priests were the cause of her death. Their extreme beliefs in a bearded man in the sky trumped the reality of what was actually happening with their extremely sick daughter.

Advertisement

The film plays off Brunner as someone who needs to see the light. Brunner is put on this case to help rectify her previous case (the one where she got the murderer off without charges). God put her in Father Moore’s hands. So, by this logic, co-writer/director Scott Derrickson thinks that for one person to receive redemption, another must die. The Exorcism of Emily Rose is nothing more than religious propaganda. “What if god is real,” Erin Brunner asks the jury. Even if god is real, a young woman is dead! God isn’t on the chopping block, Father Moore is. This latter half of this film plays strictly to the Bible Belt.

Also, Erin Brunner is written as someone who can be redeemed and will be redeemed, a tragic character who has accepted greed over truth. Do you want to know who defended the Michels in real life? Lawyers who defended Nazis in the Nurenberg trials. Scott Derrickson can fuck right off.

Everything about this film feels like nothing more than Catholic-funded propaganda. Rather than owning up to their mistakes and accepting the punishment they deserved, the Michels and priests never had to answer for their true crimes. They left a young woman to die a truly horrible death and all got off with a slap on the wrist.

All of this went down around the same time as Vatican 2. The Catholics who were against Vatican 2 were hoping that they could find a way to prove that Anneliese was possessed because god wasn’t happy with the Vatican II overhaul. If they could prove god’s anger, they could use that as fuel to ensure Vatican II didn’t happen. Anneliese’s mother gaslit her into refusing the idea that her neurological issues could be the cause of all this. See, Anneliese wanted to be a teacher, but her mother forced her to believe that no one would hire her as a teacher if she had all of these issues. People won’t hire a crazy teacher.

Failed by those around her, Anneliese was posthumously deprived of any justice. If there is a god, I can only hope the Michels and the two priests do not meet him. Instead of breaking down all of these fascinating aspects of the case of Anneliese Michel, Scott Derrickson crafted a shell of a film. His lack of care for the source material is beyond disrespectful to Anneliese’s pain in her short time on earth. Scott Derrickson’s classless and [seemingly] Catholic-funded sophomore feature film is nothing more than a film that has a few solid scares that rely on you taking him at his word. For a film that starts with the title card “based on a true story,” there is not a lick of truth in this nearly two-hour film.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Reviews

[REVIEW] ‘Dreadstone: The Beginning’ Is a Gold Rush of Terror

Published

on

We continue to start our year by looking at short films that either ran their festival circuit in 2024 or will soon be running the festival circuit. Western horror is a subgenre that’s often overlooked, usually because it offensively centers around Native Americans attacking groups of white people who have taken over their land. Bone Tomahawk and The Burrowers are unfortunate examples of painting Natives in a negative light for the plight of the whites. Who knew all it would take for a well-done Western horror is an Italian director at the helm?

Dreadstone: The Beginning follows Jeb (Grid Margraf), a tired and weathered man who is left in charge of his non-verbal autistic daughter Adeline (Alexandra Boulas). Jeb finds himself in possession of a purple-glowing gem that may be more nefarious than meets the eye. The two traverse across harsh lands in search of the source of the gem. But things turn south when they find out what they were looking for may have answers to questions they never intended on asking.

Written by Avery Peck and Riccardo Suriano, and directed by Riccardo Suriano, Dreadstone: The Beginning is a fascinating start to a tale as old as time. Peck’s cinematography beautifully brings their words to life and effortlessly blends cosmic horror with the overwhelming fruitless nature of greed and the human condition. Cosmic and Western horror aren’t typically put together, but they work incredibly well with the ideas behind Dreadstone and its themes. Jeb’s gem is a practical MacGuffin and is a great stand-in for the concept of greed; this opulent-looking rock in a no-tech world. It’s a simple object that’s incredibly effective.

The frontier setting of Dreadstone works to create an isolating setting. This large setting singularly frames these two characters and makes them feel like the only people in the world. It isn’t until the film’s final shot that we realize they are definitely not the only people around. Dreadstone: The Beginning is a drastic change from Suriano’s previous film, Along Came Ruby. Besides the obvious time difference between these two films, Ruby sets itself as a Last of Us-like post-apocalyptic film, whereas Dreadstone: The Beginning sets itself to possibly be a pre-apocalyptic film. These two films also differ in tone, but both films prove that Suriano is confident with his overall voice and vision.

Alexandra Boulas stars in both Along Came Ruby and Dreadstone: The Beginning. Boulas excels in both films but gives a more reserved and confident performance in Dreadstone. With the exception of a few moments, Boulas’ performance is silent…but commanding. Watching Ruby shows that Boulas can easily deliver lines, while Dreadstone proves there’s more to her acting than line delivery. Fingers crossed we see her in more films in the near future, I think she has a promising career ahead of her.

Advertisement

Dreadstone: The Beginning is a unique take on Western horror that forgoes the [racist] Native Americans against white people trope that the subgenre is fraught with. A touch of cosmic horror, a hint of coming-of-age, and a heaping spoonful of good ole greed make Dreadstone: The Beginning a short film that will stick with you long after the credits roll. I’ll tell you what…this made me look forward to Dreadstone: The Aftermath!

Continue Reading

Horror Press Mailing List

Fangoria
Advertisement
Advertisement