Reviews
[REVIEW] ‘TERRIFIER 3’ Brings a Bag of Tricks That Shocks and Delights Fans, but Gets Lost in the Gory Sauce
If you came looking for more lore to the Terrifier series, you might be disappointed in the mystery box style Leone indulges in as he drops bits and pieces of interesting demonology to have you looking at the past and toward the future of the series. Or you might be hooked; either way, you’ll be left wanting way more than what you get. Technically there is an explanation you can piece together as to what is going on, but questions of specific details and players lead to a vague reintroduction to the war between light and dark that was first shown in Terrifier 2. Cool visuals are aplenty, but you’ll really just end up asking “So what was that about then?” if you dig too deep in the blood-soaked candy corn bag and pull out a meaty tooth.

Quandt would despise it. Maltin would gag at it. Ebert and Siskel would warn all comers like harbingers of doom on a mountain road, probably with matching walking sticks. Because Terrifier 3 is exactly what you think it’s going to be: a tornado of viscera and bad taste, both nightmarish black humor and childish jokes, engineered by a cinematic mad scientist looking to make people vocally and physically react in their theater seats. It does just that, and it’s here to stay whether you like it or not.
By which I mean, Terrifier 3 is striking out to become the new state fair of horror movies: it will eventually get to the point where we have one every year or two, and people will continuously leave feeling like they were splattered with every manner of bodily fluid under the sun. But they’ll also be satisfied in surviving another house of horrors that will make their seat neighbors regurgitate and run in fear. It’s eating alligator on a stick and chugging down a deep-fried twinkie milkshake—you’re testing your stomach and enjoying every cavity-rotting minute of it. Or, puking behind the Ferris wheel, depends on whether you can hold it down.
Personally, I love the state fair, so if there’s any measure of how much I liked this film, it would be for those overlapping qualities; my appreciation of it is almost purely in how much I appreciate its dedication to diversion.
Terrifier 3 is a film that, while the product of dozens and dozens of incredibly talented people coming together to make pure distilled exploitation, also really screams of a director doing donuts in Screambox and Bloody Disgusting’s studio parking lot. Because we already know as long as there’s a Damien Leone, there’s probably going to be a Terrifier story to make, and there’s going to be more opportunities for him to do whatever he wants, however he wants. And I can appreciate an independent filmmaker who isn’t chained down by producers, even if what he makes can be a bit sloppy at times.
Five years after her fateful clash with Art the Clown, Sienna Shaw has left another stint in a psychiatric hospital in time to come home for the holidays. Spending time with her cousin Gabby as she wrestles with visions of the dead and her otherworldly experiences, Sienna’s strained relationships and dwindling mental health have left her on the ropes. Now, the few tenuous fibers of stability she’s clutching onto will be cut by the return of the demonic harlequin Art, revitalized as he and accomplice Victoria Heyes (victim turned handler/demonically possessed sitcom wife) return for another go around. Nothing good can come of this.
For the victims, I mean. Because in terms of the performances, all the returning cast burst onto the screen with vigor and excitement to be back. David Howard Thornton continues to bring the physical comedy of a rubber hose cartoon to real life as Art the Clown; it’s done in a way only he really can, switching from absolutely reprehensible to undeniably funny with his expressive acting on the turn of a dime.
Lauren LaVera continues to slowly carve more and more details of herself into the solid, gleaming marble of Scream Queen history as one of the most beloved final girls of all time. There are firework flashes of brilliance in her performance here, namely in a dinner scene early in the film and during the all-red-everything climax, where anguish pours out of her like a rushing waterfall of pain. She alone has a Midas touch that will keep plenty of people hooked on the franchise for a good long while.
Elliot Fullam, however, is a sore absence for the majority of the movie. Much like LaVera, what we do get of him is a phenomenal portrayal of his character: now a young college student, Jonathan is trying and failing to move past the hellish world he was introduced to. He’s in a waking nightmare, running down a never-ending hallway to try and return to normalcy, but failing until he reaches his boiling point. It’s an impressive moment in how physical and explosive it was. And for some reason, he’s distant from the plot for the rest of the runtime, much to the film’s detriment.
Fullam’s lacking presence is one in a few instances of footage clearly being left on the cutting room floor, making more space for the two tons of corn syrup and latex needed to make Art’s spree come to life in sacrilegious technicolor blasphemy. Which, could be worth it just from a technical standpoint when you have effects like these. They will make you lift your hands and shut your eyes involuntarily to escape every painful-looking slash, grind, and clobber that Art and Company have to offer with their assortment of torture instruments.
So, the film prioritizes the ludicrous hyperviolence that audiences have come to expect from the smash success of Terrifier 2, which is fine. Again, you don’t go to the state fair to find out the web of legends and lies surrounding those funnel cake stand employees. But be warned, the longer you think about the film, the more you notice continuity errors and ask why, how, and when things happen/happened.
If you came looking for more lore to the Terrifier series, you might be disappointed in the mystery box style Leone indulges in as he drops bits and pieces of interesting demonology to have you looking at the past and toward the future of the series. Or you might be hooked; either way, you’ll be left wanting way more than what you get. Technically there is an explanation you can piece together as to what is going on, but questions of specific details and players lead to a vague reintroduction to the war between light and dark that was first shown in Terrifier 2. Cool visuals are aplenty, but you’ll really just end up asking “So what was that about then?” if you dig too deep in the blood-soaked candy corn bag and pull out a meaty tooth.
This might be the biggest sign of Damien Leone leaning dangerously back into comfort while making the film; the story really does get dragged under the tidal wave of gore that fans go into these movies now trying to surf. In interviews, he’s mentioned how there’s no turning back from the extremity of Terrifier as a series, and everything in this film from its perfect beats to its mirroring missteps scream of a filmmaker who believes that with their whole chest. It’s no longer enough to push the envelope, the envelope must enter low earth orbit.
For a Halloween horror movie to get your friends gawking (and subsequently talking on the way back through a dark parking lot), or to whittle away a cold October night inside, Terrifier 3 is an easy choice. But as much as I liked it for its blunt smashing mallet of terror and charnel chainsawing that had me recoiling against the theater seat, part of me wishes it wasn’t the easy choice. A part of me wishes it was more challenging than its transgressive special effects and assuredness in a long line of profitable sequels.
Leone is gunning it to try and scare his passengers one max occupancy theater at a time this Halloween, and make no mistake, I’m already buckled in. If it becomes a yearly tradition like Saw, I’ll be seated in theaters day one every time. But there is hope that the series doesn’t get too lost in the comedically evil kills and outlandish body horror that made it famous, so it can also keep innovating in a way that really catches you off guard.
Reviews
[Review] ‘Mother!’ (2017) Is the Greatest Movie of the 21st Century

Please give me a few minutes of your time as I take a weird deep dive into my favorite movie of all time. Darren Aronofsky’s Mother! is an incredibly divisive film, and I will never refute that. When I was thinking about what angle I wanted for this review, I was coming up blank. Jennifer Lawrence’s Mother is a compelling and beautifully written character so I knew it would fit this month’s theme. Cut to my 51st viewing of the film a few nights ago, a multi-hour call with a very good friend, and three pots of coffee…that’s when I found my angle.
For those who are unaware, the infinite monkey theorem states that if a monkey is given a typewriter and an unlimited amount of time, it will eventually write the entire works of Shakespeare. Even though NPR tried to disprove that, it still feels possible. If there was truly an unlimited amount of time, how could it not happen? But here’s where I have issues with this idea: who is the monkey, and who is the typewriter? Does Mother have the agency to actually change the outcome of her story? Is Him a passive observer? Does Him’s reactions to Mother’s actions dictate her next steps? And what can the death of first Mother/Foremother (Sarah-Jeanne Labrosse) and the awakening of third Mother/Maiden (Laurence Leboeuf) tell us? Join me as I try to decipher whatever the hell this movie is.
Mother! follows Mother, who awakens post-death from Foremother. Mother wanders around the house before being intercepted by Him. Him is a writer who has been frustrated by a bout of writer’s block. Man (Ed Harris) shows up out of the blue and is soon followed by Woman (Michelle Pfeiffer). After their two kids Youngest Brother (Brian Gleeson) and Oldest Son (Domnhall Gleeson) show up, and a fight ensues, one of them dies. This leads to a wild party to celebrate the deceased’s life in which Him eventually gets Mother pregnant. Him overcomes his writer’s block which leads to the downfall of everything.
When I first saw Mother! I was stunned. What started, on the film’s opening day, as a half-full theater ended with me and my friend sitting in a tearful silence. I went back the next day with another friend (the one I had a multi-hour phone call with for this piece) and watched the movie again. We both sat in stunned silence as the credits rolled. Thanks to being a MoviePass member (when it was still a movie a day), I was able to see Mother! every single day for the next five days. I have never had a theatrical experience like I did with this film. What was equally stunning was that Paramount Pictures had the guts to distribute a film like this.
Aronofsky has been very tightlipped about all of the intricacies of Mother!, and that’s okay. Frustrating, but okay. Here’s what we know. There are three main ideas behind Mother! and that is 1) the story of an artist and their muse 2) the destruction of Mother Earth and the most on-the-nose allegory 3) Him is God and Mother is Mary. While these ideas have been talked about to death, I want to look into how the infinite monkey theorem works here and how Him is experiencing one of the wildest examples of insanity seen in film.
Let’s take note of what we can infer as well as what is directly told to us. In the beginning, we see Foremother burn to death/explode the same way that Mother does. Maiden ends the film by turning over and saying, “Baby” as Mother does. Mother’s recitation of “Baby” is quite different from Maiden’s delivery. When we hear Mother say the line it sounds partially panicky, partially forlorn. Maiden’s almost sounds calm and accepting. To me, Mother’s delivery of the line almost feels like she’s calling out for the recently deceased child while Maiden’s call is toward Him.
The wording of this may sound offensive, but it is simply used in conjunction with the infinite monkey theorem. For the sake of my argument, I believe that Mother is the monkey. When I started writing this piece, I thought that Him might be the monkey until I realized I was wrong. The actual inciting incident of Mother! is when Man and Woman destroy the crystal. (The metaphorical biting of the apple.) Him is not just testing Mother, Him is also testing Man and Woman. When Him, Man, Woman, and Mother are sitting around the table drinking coffee, Mother brings out some snacks. One of the snacks is a bowl of what looks like cookies and two singular slices of fruit that look very similar to apples.
One can imply that Him is watching Man and Woman closely because he yearns for the romance he feels between them. I think he’s intently watching to see if they go for the two apples. Him has put Man and Woman in this scenario before and they have failed; here they have passed. It’s not until the breaking of the crystal that all hell [literally] breaks loose.
We see moments of reflection and acknowledgment in some actions. When Mother is asked by Him if Man can stay the night she replies with, “Of…course.” A tinge of sadness echoes through the line and she chokes on her words. When Man sees the crystal he asks if it was a gift from Mother and she replies with a singular, “No.” Again, her voice cracks, she sounds like she wants to cry. It’s almost as if she has been asked this before and something inside of Mother is telling her it was Foremother’s heart she was looking at.
There are countless examples of these moments that crossover between timelines. One can assume that if a monkey will eventually type the entire works of Shakespeare, it will also type a few of the same lines over and over. Multiple moments coexist within these different timelines, and something in Mother is letting her know that.
Him is God. The Great Storyteller. The most egotistical man that can exist. The true definition of good and evil. But is he writing Mother’s story or is she in charge of her own destiny? When Mother wakes up, she wanders around the house. She makes her way to the front door, opens it, and steps outside. Before she can take any further steps, as it can be interpreted as she wanted to continue walking, Him stops her. (This raises another question of whether or not she can exist outside of the confines of this astonishingly octagonal house.) It’s clear that Him remembers everything that happens with previous Mothers, but how far will he go to ensure Mother goes the path he truly wants?
Later in the day, Mother goes to one of the walls in the house to paint it. She puts muted yellow paint on the wall but doesn’t seem content with it. Mother puts her hand on the wall and sees the heart beating inside of it, a small amount of decay starts to grow. This prompts her to sprinkle a yellow substance in the paint for a more vibrant yellow, and she seems happy with the choice. This is one of many examples of the house speaking to Mother, warning her of potential mistakes.
Mother’s body fights back multiple times when she makes the wrong decision. Once Man is in the house, she goes to make tea. A cup is dropped and shattered, which sends a terrible ringing through her ears and a painful tightening of her chest. We know the crystal that reinvents the house is created upon the death of each Mother.
Later, Mother goes to the basement to grab sheets for Man after agreeing he can stay the night. As she grabs the sheets, the furnace kicks in. This seems to imply her decision to agree to Man’s stay is a mistake that Foremother made (which we know led to her demise). That same night, she flicks Man’s lighter off the dresser, which causes another bout of intense ear ringing and reveals a sliver of a charred floor. Once Woman is there, Mother finds Woman and Man making out. This reveals more of the charred floor.
Interestingly, we get a moment of Mother possibly making a choice previous Mothers have not. Mother and Woman go to the basement and Woman makes fun of Mother’s plain underwear. After Woman leaves the basement, Mother sees a pair of Woman’s bright yellow underwear sticking out of the washer. Mother throws the underwear behind the washer (presumably to save it and use at a later date) but there’s no furnace sound. Has she finally made a good decision?
After the brothers arrive and have their tiff, Mother is left alone in the house to clean up. The spot where Younger Brother died has now turned into a goopy hole that reveals the then-blocked-off furnace. She rests her head on the wall while emptying the bloody water bucket, and we see the heart again. It’s decaying more and more.
Mother is still making the wrong decisions.
What does all of this tell us? Mother has a certain amount of agency. But also that previous mother’s soul wants her to succeed. We don’t know how many times Him has gone through this series of events, we only know that it hasn’t worked up to this point. We also don’t know what he wants. When Mother becomes pregnant, Him gets over his writer’s block and writes the New Testament. I believe that he’s completely Id-driven at this point. Him lost sight of what he needed to do and remembers the fame that comes with his writings.
The last thing Him says to Mother before she perishes is, “You were home.” As with nearly everything in this film that can have two meanings. Was that line meant to imply that Mother was in her rightful home? Did he think that she was the one who would end this cataclysmic cycle of pain and torment? Or was he saying that Mother was home? Is this his smooth-talking way of getting her heart to retroactively find solace in his love to turn into the crystal he so desperately needs to make Maiden?
Mother! has an undeniably dense amount of layers that become increasingly apparent with each viewing. As I finish this article I have the film on in the background and I’m noticing more pieces of evidence that make my point more apparent. An argument could possibly be made that Him is the monkey and Mother is the typewriter but that all falls down to perspective and selective examples.
If there’s one thing I can leave you with, it’s that Mother! is one of the most important films of the 21st century. With the recent death of David Lynch, many people feel that art in Hollywood is truly dead. Few filmmakers can make a truly astounding piece of art that transcends time with the conversation it creates. Darren Aronofsky’s Mother! is a film that will be discussed for decades, if not centuries. That is unless we completely destroy Mother Earth and destroy it from the inside out.
Reviews
[REVIEW] SXSW 2025: ‘Drop’ It’s Hard Not to Fall for This One
Drop is a surprisingly cool take on domestic abuse survivors woven into a thrilling narrative of a woman who is forced into a situation where she can trust no one. A single mother who survived an abusive ex-husband goes on her first date in years. She soon discovers that her first-date jitters are the least of her worries when she begins receiving anonymous drops on her phone. As the drops get more terrifying, she soon realizes that her son and sister’s lives hang in the balance as a mysterious tormentor forces her to carry out a chilling plan on her date.
Drop is fun, sophisticated, dangerous, and over the top in all the right ways. It is definitely worth checking out in a theater to see all of the jaw-dropping mayhem unfold.

Many genre fans know Christopher Landon from his wildly popular slashers (like Happy Death Day, Freaky) and his time in the Paranormal Activity universe. Because he’s carved out a name for himself in these two very different horror arenas, most of us leaned in when we heard Drop would be a thriller. I’m happy to report that Landon’s newest film has the energy of Wes Craven’s Red Eye. Elder millennials like myself might also feel a similar vibe to Robert Zemeckis’ What Lies Beneath chaotic conclusion. It is the kind of thriller that’s unafraid to go off the rails and swing big. Luckily, the payoff is huge and a compelling entry to an overstuffed subgenre. Drop breathes new life into the first-date-gone-wrong films and reinvigorates the mystery genre. It feels like a Hitchcockian fever dream filtered through a modern day lens.
A Fresh Take on the Thriller Genre
Violet (Meghann Fahy) wins us over immediately. We have all either been an abused woman, witnessed the abuse, or have seen the end results in the news. So, we instinctively want to root for her as Fahy begins making her a relatable survivor. She’s funny, smart, cool, and grounded and is easily everything more women characters should be. Fahy is also captivating as she drives this film to the out-of-this-world ending while having so much thrown on her plate. She navigates the humor, guilt, fear, and shame spiral as she ascends to her place as a badass. I also appreciate that while Violet’s past is central to the story, she is never a helpless victim. It is giving a final girl who survived her slasher and will carry those lessons with her instead of starting at square one for the sequels.
Her supporting cast is also very fun and filled with red herrings that make you doubt your prime suspect. Is the culprit her hot date, Henry (Brandon Sklenar), who has been very patient and understanding with a woman he is only meeting in person for the first time? Is it the cool bartender Cara (Gabrielle Ryan) who has kept an eye on Violet’s date? Or is it the many other characters she has encountered in this fancy restaurant? Because Drop is a proper mystery, it makes everyone seem like the perfect suspect. Which I enjoy as someone who sees a lot of predictable movies just lazily hand you the culprit in the first five minutes.
Stunning Cinematography Elevates the Mystery
Drop is fun, sophisticated, dangerous, and over the top in all the right ways. It is definitely worth checking out in a theater to see all of the jaw-dropping mayhem unfold.
Drop falls into theaters on April 11.