Reviews
‘Calvaire’ (2004) Review: Underrated New French Extremity
Calvaire follows Marc Stevens (Laurent Lucas), a traveling singer on the way to his next gig. On a dark and stormy night, his van breaks down. A kind young man, Boris (Jean-Luc Couchard), just so happens to be on this isolated road looking for his dog Bella. Boris leads Marc to Mr. Bartel’s (Jackie Berroyer) Inn for the night. When Marc wakes up, he finds that Mr. Bartel has towed his van to the Inn and plans to help him get it fixed. But all is not as it seems when Mr. Bartel’s intentions go from kindly to creepy. Now, Marc must do everything he can to escape the brazingly brutal Bartel.
I’m someone who likes to research more than watch films. My watchlist is longer than Santa’s naughty or nice list. Throughout my years of research, a film has come up many times, but it has never really stuck on my radar. That’s when the venerable Brooklyn Horror Film Festival decided to put it on their lineup two years ago, practically revitalizing hype for one of the most underseen and underappreciated New French Extremity films of all time. Let me say, I’m upset that it took me this long to watch Calvaire.
A Nightmarish Roadside Descent
Calvaire follows Marc Stevens (Laurent Lucas), a traveling singer on the way to his next gig. On a dark and stormy night, his van breaks down. A kind young man, Boris (Jean-Luc Couchard), just so happens to be on this isolated road looking for his dog Bella. Boris leads Marc to Mr. Bartel’s (Jackie Berroyer) Inn for the night. When Marc wakes up, he finds that Mr. Bartel has towed his van to the Inn and plans to help him get it fixed. But all is not as it seems when Mr. Bartel’s intentions go from kindly to creepy. Now, Marc must do everything he can to escape the brazingly brutal Bartel.
Calvaire marks the first of two New French Extremity films that are technically Christmas films! And as someone who doesn’t like Christmas, that makes me happy! This film starts off very tame and unsuspecting. Marc first meets Boris, who is generally offputing and weird, but overall a nice guy. And Mr. Bartel comes off as sweet, caring, and generally innocent! This film is writer/director Fabrice Du Welz’s debut feature film, and for a first film, it’s impossible to state just how well it’s conceived. For an extreme film, the writing is stellar, the characters are well-crafted, and the pacing is brilliant. The film’s ramp-up works exceedingly well and creates an overall unassuming nature. It’s not until the cracks start to form and the ugliness starts to show that you feel the true terror of their situation.
Subverting Horror Norms: Violence and Gender in Calvaire
One of the most impressive aspects of Calvaire is how reserved, but effective, the violence is. As well as to whom it happens. Horror is wrought with misogynistic violence. For a genre that’s as progressive as it says it is, it sure doesn’t shy away from harming men and torturing women. Just look at Terrifier, one of the genre’s most popular franchises. The fact that Calvaire switches up the victim and puts Marc directly in the killer’s crosshairs is impressive and refreshing. In fact, because people like Damien Leone prefer killing women, it’s stimulating to watch a man be the brunt of the violence. Interestingly, Marc is put in this predicament because Mr. Bartel is generally unwell and thinks Marc is his former wife, Gloria, who left him.
The violence here is not excessive and overly bloody, but it’s painful to watch. Seeing Marc get crucified and forcibly have his hair cut is incredibly difficult to watch. But it never feels too over the top in a way that would feel fake. Bartel’s mental break is difficult to watch, and Jackie Berroyer handles the character with extreme precision. One of the most fascinating moments of Bartel’s character is the moment when his character starts to slip, and you see the facade shattering, but Marc doesn’t.
Bartel says he’s going to make a phone call, but you don’t feel like he’s making a phone call. Or when Bartel tells Marc to sing a song, and when Marc stops after a few lines, Bartel responds with, “I didn’t tell you half of my joke.” These small moments reveal how intricately crafted Bartel’s antagonist is and just how much time and effort Fabrice Du Welz put into this terrifying tale.
Why Calvaire Is One of New French Extremity’s Strongest Films
Calvaire is far from the most extreme and grotesque entry in the New French Extremity movement, but it’s one of the most put together. Each moment slowly builds to the next, rather than a barrage of hate and violence. This isn’t your standard gore film, it’s a well-oiled machine from a filmmaker who knows a thing or two about horror. Knowing that this is Fabrice Du Welz’s debut feature amps up my excitement to watch the rest of his films.
Reviews
Madame Morbid Trolley Tour Review: Is It Worth It?
Most people find that stretching their dollar still barely gets them by in today’s economy. I am very particular about what I spend my spare money on regarding extracurriculars. And no one likes to feel like their money is wasted. Madame Morbid Trolley Tours wasn’t an experience I had been familiar with. Maybe that’s because I’m chronically offline for most of my life. So this leads to the perfect question: in today’s turbulent economy, is Madame Morbid Trolley Tours worth the price? The short answer is unquestionably, yes. But it’s more than just a simple yes.
My wife and I arrived at the designated meeting point 15 minutes before the scheduled departure time. A handful of minutes later, a gorgeous, e-candle-lit trolley pulled up to the side of the road. We were greeted by impeccably on-brand Allison Chase, our tour guide, and trolley driver ‘Mad’ Matt Zaller. The wonderfully cheery duo invited us on the trolley, and the tour was set to begin.
400 Years of Death, Destruction, and Infrastructure
After a welcoming video intro from someone who knows a thing or two about busting ghosts, we set off on the inaugural Madame Morbid Trolley Tour in its ninth year of operation. From the Brooklyn Naval Yard all the way to Dumbo, and more, this tour magnificently chronicles 400 years of history, the good and the bad, expertly. No matter how much you think you may know about Brooklyn history, I can bet there will be something new learned within the first 15 minutes of the tour. From the first-ever plane crash to one of the worst theater fires in history, this tour covers tragedies that the greatest horror writers couldn’t conceive.
The Deadly [Charming] Docent
Allison Chase led the fascinating tour in character from the moment we stepped on the trolley until our departure. But Allison’s character was not forced or fake; you could feel Allison’s passion for not just morbid history, but the accuracy of it. Some of the stories we heard were steeped in historical context, and it was not boring for a single second. The Madame Morbid Trolley Tour is not your standard full-talking tour. It’s a mixed-media adventure of some of Brooklyn’s darkest moments.
During “downtime” (the times between locations), we were edutained by mini documentaries (that were quite funny). Some of the “downtime” was filled with traffic trivia (I won a needle pen!). And other times were show-and-tell-like, with objects passed around for us to examine. But there was never a moment of silence that wasn’t purposeful. All in all, Allison’s knowledge and passion shone like the luminosity of a full moon.
Is Madame Morbid Trolley Tours Worth It?
The Madame Morbid Trolley Tour was not just a fun night out for my wife and me, but it was a delightfully dark night of edutainment. It should also be noted that ‘Mad’ Matt’s driving skills were fantastic. There was a time when I had become enamored with how Matt handled the narrow streets of Brooklyn before realizing that I needed to refocus my attention on Allison. The Madame Morbid Trolley Tour is an exceptionally fun evening of horror and history that will make you think twice next time you walk down the streets of Brooklyn. It is worth the money, and then some. There’s no better activity for a cold, dark October night than the Madame Morbid Trolley Tour.
For more information on Madame Morbid Trolley Tours, and to get your tickets, click here!
Reviews
‘Cujo’ (1983): A First-Time-Watch Review
I don’t know what’s wrong with me. I should have watched the Stephen King adaptation Cujo a million years ago. First of all, I was a voracious King reader in middle school. The other thing I was obsessed with during those years was Friends. You know, the show that hinges a major episode’s subplot on Rachel (Jennifer Aniston) watching Cujo for the first time. Whatever the reason was, I never got around to it, but I’m rectifying that oversight now.
What is Cujo About?
Cujo tells a relatively simple story. Donna Trenton’s (Dee Wallace) a housewife who’s cheating on her husband Vic (Daniel Hugh-Kelly) with local handyman Steve (Christopher Stone). There’s no accounting for taste, because Vic is 10 times hotter and Steve doesn’t own a bed frame. Look, Donna. I know Vic has that awful David Hasselhoff hair, but I promise the 1980s will end sooner or later. It’ll be OK.
Donna’s attempted termination of this affair ultimately leads to its discovery. Amid this drama, her car breaks down at a mechanic’s isolated farmhouse, trapping her and her son, Tad (Danny Pintauro). You see, the mechanic’s dog, Cujo, freshly christened with rabies, is patrolling the area and attacking everything in sight.
Dee Wallace Is Cujo’s Not-So-Secret Weapon
It would be impossible to start a worthwhile review of Cujo without praising Dee Wallace. The woman is a genre icon, naturally. Think about this: She had only appeared in seven theatrical movies before starring in Cujo. Four of those movies are The Stepford Wives, The Hills Have Eyes, E.T., and The Howling. But this woman didn’t become an icon simply by accidentally stumbling into some iconic titles. She is simply terrific as Donna, using her darting eyes and taut expression to deliver oodles of subtext. You instantly get the sense of how trapped she feels by marriage and motherhood without her uttering a single word.
A good performance is vital, here. Because there’s a hell of a lot of drama to get through before she’s trapped in that damn car. But Wallace instantly shoves you into Donna’s perspective, whether you like it or not. This makes it all the more potent when she is menaced by Cujo. Her desperate attempts for survival, also impeccably performed, have true weight because she seems like a real person. She is also given an incredible scene partner in Danny Pintauro. The future Who’s the Boss? star, who was only six when shooting Cujo, has a perfect everychild quality. His innocence heightens the peril. But so does that fact that he is just as irritating as every six-year-old you’ve ever met.
This movie truly captures how annoying it must be to be stuck in a life-and-death situation with a child. This is a compliment, I swear! Donna is worn down by every aspect of the situation, including her own son’s inability to cope with it. And this ratchets up the tension even further, to an almost unbearable degree.
Cujo Is a Mixed Bag, But Worthwhile Overall
The movie doesn’t work if Cujo himself doesn’t work, and at first I was real worried that he wouldn’t. In the first half, the St. Bernards that play Cujo onscreen are often shown to be wagging their tails in delight. Which kind of undercuts the reality of the situation, I’d say. But the editing and the special effects step in to fix what animal training couldn’t. The attack scenes in the second half are constructed with quick cuts that never let you get too much purchase. It’s a good approach for keeping viewers off-kilter.
Also, Cujo becomes less and less recognizable as a cuddly canine the further the movie gets. It’s a simple trick, really. He ends up getting coated with more and more slime. Saliva, pus, blood, and what have you. This is good for making him feel like a true movie monster. Plus, it’s a good mirror for the sliminess inside the car as it gets covered in sweat, blood, and grime.
The second half of the movie ultimately works like gangbusters. It’s a shame that Cujo is too cowardly to get Donna and Tad in the car before the halfway point. This decision is somewhat faithful to the book’s structure as I remember it. However, it diminishes the weight of the long days that they spend in the car. We really need to feel that crushing stretch of time, and we don’t. When Tad is suffering from dehydration, it’s not a gut punch. Honestly, I just found myself asking, “Already?” It’s good that they gave the movie a happier ending, because the classic grimdark Stephen King finale wouldn’t have landed.
Is Cujo Worth Watching in 2026?
At the end of the day, Cujo is a solid movie and I’m glad I finally watched it. However, it’s not such a stone-cold classic that I’m not at least a little intrigued by that upcoming Netflix remake…



