Connect with us

Reviews

[REVIEW] I Was Left ‘Terrified’ By ‘Aterrados’

Terrified follows a variety of characters throughout a twisting narrative of terror (bear with me). After witnessing the death of Clara (Natalia Señorales) at the hands of the supernatural, Juan (Agustín Rittano) finds himself institutionalized. Walter (Demián Salomón), Clara and Juan’s neighbor, finds himself harassed by a terrifying entity. Across the street, Alicia (Julieta Vallina) grieves at the recent loss of her child, who gets untimely killed (but I won’t tell you how!). Commissioner Funes (Maximiliano Ghione), Alicia’s ex, reaches out to coroner/paranormal investigator Jano (Norberto Gonzalo). Jano meets Dr. Mora Albreck (Elvira Onetto), a paranormal researcher who is in town to examine whatever is going on with Walter. Rosenstock (George L. Lewis) also joins the team as a paranormal researcher.

Published

on

Everyone is so enthusiastic about the prospect of Damien Leone killing a bunch of kids in Terrifier 3. As someone who dislikes these films, I couldn’t care less. Trick ‘r Treat killed off kids in a uniquely terrifying way back in 2007 and since then I didn’t think it had been topped. That was, until When Evil Lurks came around. Writer/director Demián Rugna brought one of the most shocking and unexpected child deaths to horror since Trick ‘r Treat. What separates a filmmaker like Demián Rugna from Damien Leone is intent. No one just wants to see children die (except for some writers at Horror Press), but what makes it work is when the death overtly affects the story progression. Damien Leone tells his story beat by beat, with no real effect on Art’s senseless killings. Demián Rugna uses these moments to create and craft the story. These two are not the same.

Somehow, Rugna’s third feature film escaped my eyes. Even though Aterrado (known as Terrified in the States) made waves when it hit Shudder and was talked about constantly, I never ended up watching it. What a huge mistake that was. Watching Terrified as a 30-year-old gave me the same exact feeling I got when I watched Insidious in theaters as a 15-year-old. I was afraid to turn the lights off before going to bed. Every bump and clank in my apartment made me look over my shoulder. And now I’m even more scared of buses.

Terrified follows a variety of characters throughout a twisting narrative of terror (bear with me). After witnessing the death of Clara (Natalia Señorales) at the hands of the supernatural, Juan (Agustín Rittano) finds himself institutionalized. Walter (Demián Salomón), Clara and Juan’s neighbor, finds himself harassed by a terrifying entity. Across the street, Alicia (Julieta Vallina) grieves at the recent loss of her child, who gets untimely killed (but I won’t tell you how!). Commissioner Funes (Maximiliano Ghione), Alicia’s ex, reaches out to coroner/paranormal investigator Jano (Norberto Gonzalo). Jano meets Dr. Mora Albreck (Elvira Onetto), a paranormal researcher who is in town to examine whatever is going on with Walter. Rosenstock (George L. Lewis) also joins the team as a paranormal researcher.

One day, Alicia’s deceased child’s body shows up. And muddy footprints accompany the corpse. At this point, Jano, Commissioner Funes, Dr. Albreck, and Rosenstock decide on a ghost hunt. Little do they know…this was the worst idea they could ever conceive.

Watching When Evil Lurks first set expectations I wasn’t sure Terrified could fulfill. Granted, filmmakers usually get better over the years, but a bar was set. Surely there was no way a ghost movie could be as bloody and brutal as When Evil Lurks. Boy was I wrong. Terrified starts off with a bloody and frightening kill that sets a tone I was not expecting. With a mixture of physical horror and supernatural horror, Terrified effortlessly switches horror subgenres without ever missing a beat.

Advertisement

The biggest hurdle I have with foreign ensemble films is balancing subtitles with characters. Terrified throws multiple characters at you very quickly. Juggling the dialogue with characters while trying to read the subtitles and correlate them with the actors was a bit difficult to start. Even though I love watching foreign films, it did prove slightly difficult for a short period of time with Terrified. Honestly, that’s the only issue I could find with the film. By about the 15 or 20-minute mark, I was well acquainted with the characters and names, so this didn’t last as an issue.

Demián Rugna crafted a tight and utterly terrifying film with Terrified. There is no question that Rugna is one of the leading names in horror today. Something lurks deep in the recesses of his mind that allows him to continually create films as scary as these. Quite a few times, Rugna previews the scare. He allows you the opportunity to know what is about to happen, and somehow, it’s still absolutely bone-chilling. One scene sticks out where there is obviously a creature of some sort underneath a bed, but they can’t see it from one side of the bed. As they slowly make their way to the opposite side of the bed you know you’re about to be frightened. Even with the notion that a fright is imminent it STILL works. Tell me how many filmmakers can pull that off.

If you haven’t seen Terrified, you must rectify that immediately. It’s Insidious on steroids. In this age of endless content, it’s easy to become desensitized to horror. For every twenty Tubi movies, there is one Terrified. Finding films like this, films that truly elicit scares, is like finding a needle in a haystack. Get some friends together, shut the lights off, light some candles, and prepare to be Terrified.

You can stream Terrified on Shudder.

Advertisement

Brendan is an award-winning author and screenwriter rotting away in New Jersey. His hobbies include rain, slugs, and the endless search for The Mothman.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Reviews

[Review] ‘Mother!’ (2017) Is the Greatest Movie of the 21st Century

Published

on

Please give me a few minutes of your time as I take a weird deep dive into my favorite movie of all time. Darren Aronofsky’s Mother! is an incredibly divisive film, and I will never refute that. When I was thinking about what angle I wanted for this review, I was coming up blank. Jennifer Lawrence’s Mother is a compelling and beautifully written character so I knew it would fit this month’s theme. Cut to my 51st viewing of the film a few nights ago, a multi-hour call with a very good friend, and three pots of coffee…that’s when I found my angle.

For those who are unaware, the infinite monkey theorem states that if a monkey is given a typewriter and an unlimited amount of time, it will eventually write the entire works of Shakespeare. Even though NPR tried to disprove that, it still feels possible. If there was truly an unlimited amount of time, how could it not happen? But here’s where I have issues with this idea: who is the monkey, and who is the typewriter? Does Mother have the agency to actually change the outcome of her story? Is Him a passive observer? Does Him’s reactions to Mother’s actions dictate her next steps? And what can the death of first Mother/Foremother (Sarah-Jeanne Labrosse) and the awakening of third Mother/Maiden (Laurence Leboeuf) tell us? Join me as I try to decipher whatever the hell this movie is.

Mother! follows Mother, who awakens post-death from Foremother. Mother wanders around the house before being intercepted by Him. Him is a writer who has been frustrated by a bout of writer’s block. Man (Ed Harris) shows up out of the blue and is soon followed by Woman (Michelle Pfeiffer). After their two kids Youngest Brother (Brian Gleeson) and Oldest Son (Domnhall Gleeson) show up, and a fight ensues, one of them dies. This leads to a wild party to celebrate the deceased’s life in which Him eventually gets Mother pregnant. Him overcomes his writer’s block which leads to the downfall of everything.

When I first saw Mother! I was stunned. What started, on the film’s opening day, as a half-full theater ended with me and my friend sitting in a tearful silence. I went back the next day with another friend (the one I had a multi-hour phone call with for this piece) and watched the movie again. We both sat in stunned silence as the credits rolled. Thanks to being a MoviePass member (when it was still a movie a day), I was able to see Mother! every single day for the next five days. I have never had a theatrical experience like I did with this film. What was equally stunning was that Paramount Pictures had the guts to distribute a film like this.

Aronofsky has been very tightlipped about all of the intricacies of Mother!, and that’s okay. Frustrating, but okay. Here’s what we know. There are three main ideas behind Mother! and that is 1) the story of an artist and their muse 2) the destruction of Mother Earth and the most on-the-nose allegory 3) Him is God and Mother is Mary. While these ideas have been talked about to death, I want to look into how the infinite monkey theorem works here and how Him is experiencing one of the wildest examples of insanity seen in film.

Advertisement

Let’s take note of what we can infer as well as what is directly told to us. In the beginning, we see Foremother burn to death/explode the same way that Mother does. Maiden ends the film by turning over and saying, “Baby” as Mother does. Mother’s recitation of “Baby” is quite different from Maiden’s delivery. When we hear Mother say the line it sounds partially panicky, partially forlorn. Maiden’s almost sounds calm and accepting. To me, Mother’s delivery of the line almost feels like she’s calling out for the recently deceased child while Maiden’s call is toward Him.

The wording of this may sound offensive, but it is simply used in conjunction with the infinite monkey theorem. For the sake of my argument, I believe that Mother is the monkey. When I started writing this piece, I thought that Him might be the monkey until I realized I was wrong. The actual inciting incident of Mother! is when Man and Woman destroy the crystal. (The metaphorical biting of the apple.) Him is not just testing Mother, Him is also testing Man and Woman. When Him, Man, Woman, and Mother are sitting around the table drinking coffee, Mother brings out some snacks. One of the snacks is a bowl of what looks like cookies and two singular slices of fruit that look very similar to apples.

One can imply that Him is watching Man and Woman closely because he yearns for the romance he feels between them. I think he’s intently watching to see if they go for the two apples. Him has put Man and Woman in this scenario before and they have failed; here they have passed. It’s not until the breaking of the crystal that all hell [literally] breaks loose.

We see moments of reflection and acknowledgment in some actions. When Mother is asked by Him if Man can stay the night she replies with, “Of…course.” A tinge of sadness echoes through the line and she chokes on her words. When Man sees the crystal he asks if it was a gift from Mother and she replies with a singular, “No.” Again, her voice cracks, she sounds like she wants to cry. It’s almost as if she has been asked this before and something inside of Mother is telling her it was Foremother’s heart she was looking at.

There are countless examples of these moments that crossover between timelines. One can assume that if a monkey will eventually type the entire works of Shakespeare, it will also type a few of the same lines over and over. Multiple moments coexist within these different timelines, and something in Mother is letting her know that.

Advertisement

Him is God. The Great Storyteller. The most egotistical man that can exist. The true definition of good and evil. But is he writing Mother’s story or is she in charge of her own destiny? When Mother wakes up, she wanders around the house. She makes her way to the front door, opens it, and steps outside. Before she can take any further steps, as it can be interpreted as she wanted to continue walking, Him stops her. (This raises another question of whether or not she can exist outside of the confines of this astonishingly octagonal house.) It’s clear that Him remembers everything that happens with previous Mothers, but how far will he go to ensure Mother goes the path he truly wants?

Later in the day, Mother goes to one of the walls in the house to paint it. She puts muted yellow paint on the wall but doesn’t seem content with it. Mother puts her hand on the wall and sees the heart beating inside of it, a small amount of decay starts to grow. This prompts her to sprinkle a yellow substance in the paint for a more vibrant yellow, and she seems happy with the choice. This is one of many examples of the house speaking to Mother, warning her of potential mistakes.

Mother’s body fights back multiple times when she makes the wrong decision. Once Man is in the house, she goes to make tea. A cup is dropped and shattered, which sends a terrible ringing through her ears and a painful tightening of her chest. We know the crystal that reinvents the house is created upon the death of each Mother.

Later, Mother goes to the basement to grab sheets for Man after agreeing he can stay the night. As she grabs the sheets, the furnace kicks in. This seems to imply her decision to agree to Man’s stay is a mistake that Foremother made (which we know led to her demise). That same night, she flicks Man’s lighter off the dresser, which causes another bout of intense ear ringing and reveals a sliver of a charred floor. Once Woman is there, Mother finds Woman and Man making out. This reveals more of the charred floor.

Interestingly, we get a moment of Mother possibly making a choice previous Mothers have not. Mother and Woman go to the basement and Woman makes fun of Mother’s plain underwear. After Woman leaves the basement, Mother sees a pair of Woman’s bright yellow underwear sticking out of the washer. Mother throws the underwear behind the washer (presumably to save it and use at a later date) but there’s no furnace sound. Has she finally made a good decision?

Advertisement

After the brothers arrive and have their tiff, Mother is left alone in the house to clean up. The spot where Younger Brother died has now turned into a goopy hole that reveals the then-blocked-off furnace. She rests her head on the wall while emptying the bloody water bucket, and we see the heart again. It’s decaying more and more.

Mother is still making the wrong decisions.

What does all of this tell us? Mother has a certain amount of agency. But also that previous mother’s soul wants her to succeed. We don’t know how many times Him has gone through this series of events, we only know that it hasn’t worked up to this point. We also don’t know what he wants. When Mother becomes pregnant, Him gets over his writer’s block and writes the New Testament. I believe that he’s completely Id-driven at this point. Him lost sight of what he needed to do and remembers the fame that comes with his writings.

The last thing Him says to Mother before she perishes is, “You were home.” As with nearly everything in this film that can have two meanings. Was that line meant to imply that Mother was in her rightful home? Did he think that she was the one who would end this cataclysmic cycle of pain and torment? Or was he saying that Mother was home? Is this his smooth-talking way of getting her heart to retroactively find solace in his love to turn into the crystal he so desperately needs to make Maiden? 

Mother! has an undeniably dense amount of layers that become increasingly apparent with each viewing. As I finish this article I have the film on in the background and I’m noticing more pieces of evidence that make my point more apparent. An argument could possibly be made that Him is the monkey and Mother is the typewriter but that all falls down to perspective and selective examples.

Advertisement

If there’s one thing I can leave you with, it’s that Mother! is one of the most important films of the 21st century. With the recent death of David Lynch, many people feel that art in Hollywood is truly dead. Few filmmakers can make a truly astounding piece of art that transcends time with the conversation it creates. Darren Aronofsky’s Mother! is a film that will be discussed for decades, if not centuries. That is unless we completely destroy Mother Earth and destroy it from the inside out.

Continue Reading

Reviews

[REVIEW] SXSW 2025: ‘Drop’ It’s Hard Not to Fall for This One

Drop is a surprisingly cool take on domestic abuse survivors woven into a thrilling narrative of a woman who is forced into a situation where she can trust no one. A single mother who survived an abusive ex-husband goes on her first date in years. She soon discovers that her first-date jitters are the least of her worries when she begins receiving anonymous drops on her phone. As the drops get more terrifying, she soon realizes that her son and sister’s lives hang in the balance as a mysterious tormentor forces her to carry out a chilling plan on her date.

Drop is fun, sophisticated, dangerous, and over the top in all the right ways. It is definitely worth checking out in a theater to see all of the jaw-dropping mayhem unfold. 

Published

on

Many genre fans know Christopher Landon from his wildly popular slashers (like Happy Death Day, Freaky) and his time in the Paranormal Activity universe. Because he’s carved out a name for himself in these two very different horror arenas, most of us leaned in when we heard Drop would be a thriller. I’m happy to report that Landon’s newest film has the energy of Wes Craven’s Red Eye. Elder millennials like myself might also feel a similar vibe to Robert Zemeckis’ What Lies Beneath chaotic conclusion. It is the kind of thriller that’s unafraid to go off the rails and swing big. Luckily, the payoff is huge and a compelling entry to an overstuffed subgenre. Drop breathes new life into the first-date-gone-wrong films and reinvigorates the mystery genre. It feels like a Hitchcockian fever dream filtered through a modern day lens. 

A Fresh Take on the Thriller Genre

Drop is a surprisingly cool take on domestic abuse survivors woven into a thrilling narrative of a woman who is forced into a situation where she can trust no one. A single mother who survived an abusive ex-husband goes on her first date in years. She soon discovers that her first-date jitters are the least of her worries when she begins receiving anonymous drops on her phone. As the drops get more terrifying, she soon realizes that her son and sister’s lives hang in the balance as a mysterious tormentor forces her to carry out a chilling plan on her date.

Violet (Meghann Fahy) wins us over immediately. We have all either been an abused woman, witnessed the abuse, or have seen the end results in the news. So, we instinctively want to root for her as Fahy begins making her a relatable survivor. She’s funny, smart, cool, and grounded and is easily everything more women characters should be. Fahy is also captivating as she drives this film to the out-of-this-world ending while having so much thrown on her plate. She navigates the humor, guilt, fear, and shame spiral as she ascends to her place as a badass. I also appreciate that while Violet’s past is central to the story, she is never a helpless victim. It is giving a final girl who survived her slasher and will carry those lessons with her instead of starting at square one for the sequels.

Her supporting cast is also very fun and filled with red herrings that make you doubt your prime suspect. Is the culprit her hot date, Henry (Brandon Sklenar), who has been very patient and understanding with a woman he is only meeting in person for the first time? Is it the cool bartender Cara (Gabrielle Ryan) who has kept an eye on Violet’s date? Or is it the many other characters she has encountered in this fancy restaurant? Because Drop is a proper mystery, it makes everyone seem like the perfect suspect. Which I enjoy as someone who sees a lot of predictable movies just lazily hand you the culprit in the first five minutes. 

Stunning Cinematography Elevates the Mystery

Another thing working in Drop’s favor is Marc Spicer’s sexy cinematography. The film is a feast for the eyes as it continually pans the opulent restaurant. The use of reflections captured in windows is stunning. The camera work adds a layer of spectacle that supports the narrative and makes it impossible to look away for a second out of fear you might miss another cool angle or shot. Jillian Jacobs and Christopher Roach have written a tight whodunnit that works on its own. However, the dazzling visuals are the icing on the decadent cake. 

Drop is fun, sophisticated, dangerous, and over the top in all the right ways. It is definitely worth checking out in a theater to see all of the jaw-dropping mayhem unfold. 

Drop falls into theaters on April 11.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Horror Press Mailing List

Fangoria
Advertisement
Advertisement