Connect with us

Reviews

[REVIEW] ‘Beetlejuice Beetlejuice’ Is An Enjoyable But Scatterbrained Revival Of The World’s Best Bio-Exorcist

30-some odd years after sending the world’s best bio-exorcist packing, Lydia Deetz struggles to maintain a relationship with her daughter Astrid, juggling a lucrative career as a paranormal investigator/television host with a strained family life. But as a death in the family brings her back to Winter River where it all began, trouble in the afterlife sends her old enemy Beetlejuice racing to reunite with Lydia to save his skin—or rather, his soul.

Published

on

Given that the past decade of his oeuvre hasn’t been as memorable as his work in yesteryear, it’s sometimes easy to forget how Tim Burton remains a household name in film. In a recent roundtable interview with press outlets, Burton even discussed his brief step away from the medium following his displeasure within the industry. He’s felt constrained by it, like many artists have, even the fame and track record can’t insulate you from studio interference it seems. He claims in that interview that what he made with his subsequent Netflix show Wednesday allowed for a “re-cleanse” and a “re-energize” in his art that’s manifested in his newest movie.

So now with the Autumn spirit in the air and Burton back on the screen, we can see he’s certainly told the truth, at least re-energized with his latest high-speed venture Beetlejuice Beetlejuice. Though where and how he directs that energy suggests some trouble with reeling in the Halloween-soaked crazy train he’s constructed.

30-some odd years after sending the world’s best bio-exorcist packing, Lydia Deetz struggles to maintain a relationship with her daughter Astrid, juggling a lucrative career as a paranormal investigator/television host with a strained family life. But as a death in the family brings her back to Winter River where it all began, trouble in the afterlife sends her old enemy Beetlejuice racing to reunite with Lydia to save his skin—or rather, his soul.

Many people will be concerned with how “faithful” or how “good of a sequel” the film is, but Burton wants to riff, no matter how scatterbrained it can turn in the jam sesh. He wants to make something silly and ambitious and cram in all the Beetlejuice ideas and visuals he’s been drafting up throughout the years (even new ones that were thought up on set and on the fly, according to him). It’s fun, fast, and flawed, something I maybe should have predicted given the duo writing the script; you don’t bring in heavyweight hitmakers like Gough and Millar unless you want writers who are crowd-pleasers above all else. People who have the skill to accommodate Burton’s desire to make everything he wants to happen happen. Forget living up to legacy or playing the nostalgia violin; we’re here for the gags and cartoonish visuals. We’re here for the random stop-motion segments and to see ghosts drink drain cleaner for fun. We’re here for the Burton aesthetic.

This time, the cast is certainly funnier to match that ambition, though less compelling than the trio of Ryder, Baldwin, and Davis were in the original. They gave that movie a lot of heart and warmth that is still a delight to watch today, especially juxtaposed against the crude Beetlejuice who spent his share of the runtime spitting in the face of love and general goodness (what a sleazeball, we love that for him). Winona Ryder and Jenna Ortega recapture some of that in their troubled mother-daughter bond, which plays well. Still, everyone in the film is having too much fun with the material to be concerned with emotionally hooking you to the drama of the plot.

Advertisement

Michael Keaton and Catherine O’Hara are the best examples of this since they slip back into their respective roles like a glove and deliver most of the movie’s funniest jokes; solid gold bars of Burton’s comedy are alchemized when either is on screen. Supporting cast like Justin Theroux, but especially Willem Dafoe as “afterlife detective” Wolf Jackson, are a delightful addition that fills out a chorus of irreverent comedic voices that will pull a lot of laughs out of opening weekend audiences.

The whole film, in general, is a showcase of silly horror comedy, replete with some much nastier effects than in the previous film; you get projectile exploding guts, exposed brains, severed limb reassembly montages, and a plethora of walking grotesque sight-gags that push the envelope compared to the original’s afterlife inhabitants. The film’s effects rival those that won the first Beetlejuice accolades at the Oscars, and there are plenty of genuinely amazing practicals here that it would be criminal not to include a “VFX Breakdown” or “Making Of” segment on the home release.

I should mention though, that if you haven’t seen the original Beetlejuice (like fellow Horror Press resident Brennan who only recently tapped into the Burton phenomenon), there are some caveats on how fun it can be. I imagine a lot of the sequel’s charm will be retained for how funny it can get, but it won’t have as much currency in goodwill or nostalgia to buy off its structural problems. The pacing is rushed, most evident by its final act, which leaves no breathing room as it tries to tie up all the loose ends.

The film has a few different plotlines, but instead of feeling weaved together, they end up tangling. Independently, each one is pretty fun: Astrid trying to find love; Lydia herself coping with her weird huckster boyfriend while being haunted; Delia trying to create gauche and goofy art out of her grief; and Beetlejuice trying to dodge a vengeful ex-wife. However, the amount of time allotted to each one causes the movie to jump around and harms the film’s pacing, especially when it rapidly dispatches some of the conflicts and chops up the plots.

The film’s ending feels hurried down the aisle as much as Lydia was during the first film, with a sequence that tows the line between rehashing and reimagining a legendary film scene that you knew they had to reference. It’s a symptom of Burton’s need to make a movie with no strings on him; he will include everything he wants to see, and he will sacrifice that hour and 40-some minute runtime’s balance to do it.

Advertisement

Beetlejuice Beetlejuice is at points sloppy and overuses some of its many needle drops to play on-the-nose music as a gag one too many times. But it hits its mark in too many areas for me not to find it enjoyable. It doesn’t drag, and even has a decent rewatch factor. It’s a fine way to inaugurate the Fall season for horror, and is sure to be a staple Halloween film, flaws and all going forward.

 

Luis Pomales-Diaz is a freelance writer and lover of fantasy, sci-fi, and of course, horror. When he isn't working on a new article or short story, he can usually be found watching schlocky movies and forgotten television shows.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Reviews

[REVIEW] The Skiing Slasher ‘Iced’ (1988) Provides Chills, If Not Thrills

Hell hath frozen over here at Horror Press, and as one of the world’s premiere 1980s slasher obsessives, I thought this might be the perfect time to crack into my unwatched VHS of the 1988 skiing slasher Iced. Here’s the gist. Four years after their friend Jeff (Dan Smith) dies in a skiing accident, a group of friends (Doug Stevenson, Debra De Liso, John C. Cooke, Elizabeth Gorcey, Michael Picardi, Ron Kologie, and the original Wednesday Addams, Lisa Loring) is invited to the swanky Snow Peak skiing community for a vacation. Isolated and surrounded by snow, they begin to be hunted by a killer wearing Jeff’s cracked ski mask, who blames them for the accident. Is it Jeff? Or is it someone else seeking revenge? 

Published

on

Hell hath frozen over here at Horror Press, and as one of the world’s premiere 1980s slasher obsessives, I thought this might be the perfect time to crack into my unwatched VHS of the 1988 skiing slasher Iced. Here’s the gist. Four years after their friend Jeff (Dan Smith) dies in a skiing accident, a group of friends (Doug Stevenson, Debra De Liso, John C. Cooke, Elizabeth Gorcey, Michael Picardi, Ron Kologie, and the original Wednesday Addams, Lisa Loring) is invited to the swanky Snow Peak skiing community for a vacation. Isolated and surrounded by snow, they begin to be hunted by a killer wearing Jeff’s cracked ski mask, who blames them for the accident. Is it Jeff? Or is it someone else seeking revenge? 

Is Iced a Good Slasher Movie?

Unfortunately, like many meat-and-potatoes slasher movies of the late 1980s, Iced does not have much to offer the seasoned horror fan. The acting ranges from competent (hi, Lisa Loring) to absolutely abysmal, averaging out much closer to abysmal than not. The real estate agent Alex Bourne (played by the movie’s screenwriter, Joseph Alan Johnson), in particular, is a disastrously beige nonentity.

The movie’s pacing and structure are also baffling. There are almost no murders beyond the opening kill for a good half of Iced’s runtime, forcing you to spend time watching this group of people have a mediocre ski vacation where they’re constantly sniping at one another and not doing much else. When the kills do come, they zip past you at a too-rapid clip, hardly giving you time to pay proper attention to them, like chocolates on the conveyor belt in I Love Lucy.

There is next to no tension-building in the movie because of this, just a lurching sort of stop-start motion that will make you seasick. By far, the most exciting and visceral moment of the movie is a scene where a character is wandering around in the dark and bangs his shin on a coffee table.

Tragically, the skiing is also not that thrilling to watch. While it’s competently shot, enough to be legible, it seems to be beyond the limits of director Jeff Kwitney to turn it into something propulsive and exciting. Thankfully, the movie pretty much forgets about skiing after the first act, anyway.

Advertisement

What Does Iced Do Well?

Although the sum of its parts is pure blandness, there is plenty that Iced does quite well. For instance, the movie was shot in Utah and thus comes by its iciness naturally (sorry, Jack Frost, California doesn’t quite cut it), crafting a unique setting for a late-period slasher with a frigid, moody atmosphere. I’m also a sucker for themed kills, and the use of a ski pole, an icicle, a snowplow, and a hot tub do a lot to spice up the proceedings.

For the gorehounds in the audience, only one of the kills is particularly bloody, though they are nearly all well-rendered by their own standards (there’s an electrocution that relies on performance rather than effects, for instance, and does stick the landing). And even the offscreen or underwhelming kills end up being useful in the Final Girl sequence, when their frozen bodies provide a gruesome and effectively bleak tableau.

As far as exploitation movies go, Iced also has quite a bit to offer on that front. Nearly every member of the cast takes off all their clothes at one point or another, chilliness be damned, and there is a reasonably equitable division of male and female characters wandering around bare-chested, which always feels shockingly progressive when you’re watching a 1980s slasher. Plus, the sequence that is the most undignified (a topless corpse is seen with snow piled on her breasts) actually works for the tone, as the indignity makes her death feel that much more tragic, while the piled snow emphasizes how impossibly long the character has been exposed to the elements.

What else is good? Well… The killer’s POV is depicted by showing a view through the cracks in Jeff’s visor, which provides a neat new image for a type of shot that is otherwise pretty standard for a slasher movie.

However, Iced ultimately exists in this nether space between interesting and boring where it never particularly feels like a slog, but is oh-so withholding when it comes to meting out exciting moments. I’ve seen dozens of slashers that are much, much worse, so it’s hard to get angry about what this 1988 entry is bringing to the table. That said, this one is only for die-hard fans of the subgenre, or for people who desperately need a snowy horror fix and have already seen everything else from The Shining to Wind Chill.

Advertisement

Score: 4/10

Continue Reading

Reviews

[Review] The Thrills and Kills of ‘Ils’ (2006)

Ils follows school teacher Clémentine (Olivia Bonamy) and her boyfriend Lucas (Michaël Cohen), who recently relocated from France to a remote McMansion in Romania. Clémentine arrives home one night after work to a normal evening. She and Lucas eat dinner, watch TV, flirt a bit, and head to bed. That evening, while they’re asleep, Clémentine hears a noise outside. They go to investigate, which turns out to be the wrong move. The couple soon realizes the noise outside has made its way inside. A cat-and-mouse game ensues, forcing Clémentine and Lucas to do anything they can to survive the night. But it soon comes to light the thing inside might actually be things.

Published

on

Author’s Note: It’s really difficult to talk about this film without spoiling who/what the killers are, so be warned.

As someone who lives alone, home invasion films have started to really get under my skin. Thinking that someone could break into the room in my basement apartment that I don’t use, and is street-facing, killing me, and then escaping, frightens me. Plus, there are no cameras around my building, and the windows don’t even lock properly. Okay, I’m going to shut up about that. But that doesn’t negate the fact that home invasion films get to me now. So, naturally, when researching some New French Extremity films for November, I figured I should finally break the seal and watch Ils, as it’s known in the States, Them.

Ils follows school teacher Clémentine (Olivia Bonamy) and her boyfriend Lucas (Michaël Cohen), who recently relocated from France to a remote McMansion in Romania. Clémentine arrives home one night after work to a normal evening. She and Lucas eat dinner, watch TV, flirt a bit, and head to bed. That evening, while they’re asleep, Clémentine hears a noise outside. They go to investigate, which turns out to be the wrong move. The couple soon realizes the noise outside has made its way inside. A cat-and-mouse game ensues, forcing Clémentine and Lucas to do anything they can to survive the night. But it soon comes to light the thing inside might actually be things.

Supposedly, this film is based on true events. If IMDb Trivia is to be taken at face value, then this film is based on a couple that a group of teenagers brutally murdered. In retrospect, it’s difficult to believe a group of kids pulled this all off. Take the cold open of the film. There is a mother and daughter involved in a single-car crash. The mother goes to check under the hood and disappears. This leads her daughter to lock the doors. In a few seconds, the car’s hood is slammed shut, mud is slung at the car from both sides, and the street light goes out. So, knowing that teenagers are the ones to blame for this, it seems a bit far-fetched. Especially when we eventually see the kids. We’re supposed to believe they’re teenagers, but they look between the ages of eight and ten.

The film works best when it blends the line between natural and supernatural, and when it seems like there is only one antagonist inside. Writer/directors David Moreau and Xavier Palud can’t find their footing with what type of story they want to tell. Ils would have worked much better as a supernatural horror film rather than a home invasion film with teenagers. When Ils makes you question what lurks within the house is when it works best. The big reveal at the end feels a bit forced. Part of me wishes Moreau and Palud had taken the idea on which they based their story and gone the supernatural route.

Advertisement

That being said, the cat-and-mouse aspect of Ils is the most enjoyable. When Lucas is taken out of commission, Clémentine is forced to take matters into her own hands. Clémentine is fascinating to watch and makes, what feels like, choices anyone else would make. Her reactions feel more authentic than the actions people usually take in horror films. But there’s still something that feels off and stale about this movie. At just 74 minutes, Ils feels like it rolls the credits before it really gets going.

Many people consider this film New French Extremity, and I can understand that. Would I consider it NFE? No. This is just a plain home invasion horror film. The violence, setting, and action do nothing to classify that as extreme in any sense. Is it scary? Sure! Is the [limited] violence painful to watch? You bet! But it doesn’t push any boundaries or set out to tell something deeper than it does. Ils isn’t a bad film, but it’s far from being a great film.

Continue Reading

Horror Press Mailing List

Fangoria
Advertisement
Advertisement