Reviews
[REVIEW] It’s Showtime: A First-Time-Watch ‘Beetlejuice’ (1988)
Young couple Barbara (Geena Davis) and Adam Maitland (Alec Baldwin) have their staycation cut short when their car crashes into the river and they drown. Nothing will ruin your leisure time like dying horribly. Trapped as ghosts in their own home, they hire an untrustworthy “bio-exorcist” named Betelgeuse (Michael Keaton) to rid them of their house’s newest tenants, the rancid yuppie couple Charles (Jeffrey Jones) and Delia Deetz (Catherine O’Hara), who have brought along Charles’ teenage daughter from a previous marriage, the gloriously goth Lydia (Winona Ryder).
I know it’s bananas that I’ve never seen Beetlejuice before sitting down with the iconic 1988 movie to write this review. However, there is no better time to finally erase that huge sandworm-sized hole in my personal horror canon than Gateway Horror Month here at Horror Press!
For those who, like me, were unaware of the full machinations of the plot until now, here’s a quick breakdown. Young couple Barbara (Geena Davis) and Adam Maitland (Alec Baldwin) have their staycation cut short when their car crashes into the river and they drown. Nothing will ruin your leisure time like dying horribly. Trapped as ghosts in their own home, they hire an untrustworthy “bio-exorcist” named Betelgeuse (Michael Keaton) to rid them of their house’s newest tenants, the rancid yuppie couple Charles (Jeffrey Jones) and Delia Deetz (Catherine O’Hara), who have brought along Charles’ teenage daughter from a previous marriage, the gloriously goth Lydia (Winona Ryder).
Does Beetlejuice Hold Up?
Ultimately, there are two major ways that viewing Beetlejuice for the first time in 2024 can damage the experience. The first is the fact that some of the effects bringing the afterlife to, well, life, just don’t gel with the story being told. Frankly, most of the effects don’t hold up, but that doesn’t really matter most of the time. Combining Tim Burton & Co.’s madcap designs with a chintzy theme park haunted house aesthetic provides an exuberant sensibility that does a lot to smooth over many of the flaws in the execution. However, certain moments – particularly any scenes set in the “limbo” zone ruled by giant sandworms – look too tacky and undernourished to survive much scrutiny.
The second issue, unfortunately, is much more insidious and tougher to integrate with the tone the movie wants to evoke: the title character is rape culture personified. There’s hardly a line, gag, or flick of the eyes from Betelgeuse that isn’t intensely uncomfortable on that level, to the point that I wonder how the upcoming sequel, which will probably scrub that element away in the wake of the #MeToo movement, will have anything left with which to characterize him.
There are certainly ways to approach the character in context that mean you don’t have to write off the movie entirely. It’s a product of its time, depiction does not equal endorsement, etc. Unfortunately, despite Michael Keaton’s committed and energetic performance, the onscreen result is still something that I personally find deeply exhausting. The character is broad and schticky, complete with cartoon noises that go off basically every time he moves. It plays like a latter-era Jim Carrey blended with the fourth-best character from one of those Eddie Murphy movies in which he plays every part. Just like horror, comedy is one of the most subjective genres, but for this particular subject, the sheer amount of flop sweat from an ostensibly comic character turns the movie into a grimly unpleasant slog whenever he’s onscreen.
Moments Where It Almost Works
There is one moment in the movie (where Betelgeuse’s head randomly begins to spin 360 degrees and scream, after which point he asks, “Don’t you hate it when that happens?”) where it clicked, and I finally got the sense of the casually ineffable Gene Wilder Willy Wonka-esque figure he was probably meant to be cutting this whole time. However, nothing after that came even close to matching that one perfect moment. Thankfully, the character is only in fewer than 20 minutes of the movie, but his irritating antics cast a pall over the whole experience, at least for this reviewer.
So Is This Good Gateway Horror?
Obviously the Betelgeuse of it all is a huge demerit as far as Beetlejuice being good gateway horror for children to whom you want to deliver important lessons about how to, say, treat women. However, as a horror-comedy in and of itself, the movie delivers solid gateway vibes.
It doesn’t skimp on a certain amount of intensity. I mean, this is a movie that kills off two of its main characters in the first ten minutes and also depicts the aftermath of a variety of grisly deaths. These deaths are presented in such a Tim Burtonified way that the stylization makes them somehow both gentler and more grotesque, which is perfect for gateway horror. It’s like wandering through the aisles of a Halloween store, in the best way possible.
On top of that, the movie is genuinely funny in many ways that don’t even have anything to do with its ookier elements. For instance, there is a hilariously understated scene that doesn’t call attention to itself whatsoever where, quietly in the background, Charles thumbs through a magazine where a subscription card falls into his lap every time he turns a page. There are also huge comic setpieces here too, like the “Day-O” musical number that frankly mystified me, but certainly aims to delight rather than terrify. And obviously, if you get Catherine O’Hara within two miles of any screenplay, you know you’re going to get a memorable comic line reading or twelve.
Should You Watch (Or Rewatch) Beetlejuice?
So, should you watch Beetlejuice? Especially now that the sequel Beetlejuice Beetlejuice is on the horizon? Honestly, yes. I think my response to the movie represents the worst possible reaction any horror fan could have to it, and I still enjoyed it a great deal. So there is a lot of room for people to like it a hell of a lot more than me.
Plus, even setting aside literally everything about the afterlife and Betelgeuse himself, the movie has got miles and miles of effortless, delectable, exquisite style. Never has the real world felt just as dazzling and eye-popping as the realm of the supernatural. Everything Delia wears on her face, head, and body is worth pausing the movie to pore over in detail. Lydia has nearly the same hit rate, and the movie itself reacts to her with sublime reverence, literally having her carried into the frame in her introduction and at one point supplying her with her own in-universe fog machine for a pivotal moment. The house itself is also a glorious bit of design, evoking a childhood fantasy of a small town home, full of knobby bits shooting off into nowhere and architectural structures that simultaneously make no sense and fit in perfectly.
The filmmaking itself is also dazzling and creative, whether you’re getting a fly-on-the-wall perspective that is then revealed to be a literal fly, or seeing the Maitlands digging through a life-sized model cemetery complete with faux grass and particle board. This is a movie that is immaculately designed to within an inch of its life and beyond. And with Tim Burton at the helm, at the height of his powers, it is a scrumptious sight to behold.
I give Beetlejuice (1988) a 6/10.
Reviews
‘Them That Follow’ Review: A Bleak and Brilliant Thriller
From Blood Shine to now, I’ve really been eating my words with my “don’t like cult horror” attitude. Maybe all I needed was a gigantic break from the hundreds of cult-based horror films that were being churned out. Or, maybe the subgenre just needed some space to find its footing? Anyway, imagine the shock on my face when I was researching snake-based horror films and came across Them That Follow, starring Walton Goggins, Olivia Coleman, Kaitlyn Dever, and *checks notes* Jim Gaffigan!
Lemuel (Walton Goggins) is the pastor of a snake-fearing religious group, tucked away deep in the Appalachian mountains. His daughter, Mara (Alice Englert), is set to marry Garret (Lewis Pullman), a man she seemingly has no interest in. As their young love comes into question, Johnny Law starts breathing down their necks. With her best friend Dilly (Kaitlyn Dever) on her side, Mara questions everything she’s known about her life thus far. Will she go forward and marry a man she may not even love? Or, will her former fling, Auggie (Thomas Mann), win her affection and get her to leave this awful life behind?
A Slow-Burn With Style
Writer/directors Brittany Poulton and Dan Madison Savage bring a wholly unique feature to the table with Them That Follow. At first, the film’s meandering and lackluster pace is grating. WHEN will something happen? WHAT will move this story forward? Slowly but surely, Poulton and Savage’s story serpentines its way into nihilistic horror. If you have zero control over your life, what kind of life is it? Them That Follow is a harrowing, albeit slow, exploration of grief in a way that “elevated horror” typically fails at doing. Rather than forcing audiences into its grief, Poulton and Savage craft an excellent story around it.
Them That Follow explores not just grief, but groupthink. In a world where deeply religious political parties storm pizza restaurants with automatic weapons and kill in the name of their god, this film acts as a harsh mirror. YOU may not be aware that groups like this exist…they do. One of my favorite articles is written by someone who embedded himself in a Q-adjacent cult as he chronicled just how broken some of these groups are. (I wish I could remember the title/author, sorry!) Them That Follow does an incredible job at visualizing some of the things I read in that article. Those who believe Lemuel see nothing wrong with letting one of their friends get bitten by a venomous snake and slowly drift into a quiet death in the name of their god.
Outstanding Performances and a Surprising Cast
What really excited me about Them That Follow is how wonderfully miserable the cast is. Never have I seen people portray misery as entertainingly as this cast. Walton Goggins embodies his violent optimism in a way I haven’t seen him do before (though I haven’t seen Justified). Olivia Coleman is brilliant as always. But it’s everyman comedian Jim Gaffigan who really caught my eye. His performance is subtle and refined, something I didn’t think he could pull off. And if you ever thought you would see the day where Jim Gaffigan and Olivia Coleman play husband and wife on screen, you’re lying.
It’s not until the final act that the film goes from stagnant (positively) forwardness to amped up energy. I was concerned Them That Follow wouldn’t nail an interesting stinger, but Poulton and Savage wrapped a bloody brilliant bow on the end of this gift. I did wish they had gone in a different, less realistic angle to the film’s ending; something more grotesque. But I can’t fault them for leaving the film grounded in a reality that is justified and believable. Not all films like this have to end with a supernatural, Lovecraftian twist. And for that, I tip my ten-gallon hat to them.
Why Them That Follow Deserves More Attention
Them That Follow was an incredible surprise, and a wonderful change of pace for what cult-based horror films typically are. With a stacked cast, brilliant writing, and stunning performances, I’m shocked more people haven’t stumbled across this film. It utilizes its snake-based horror well and doesn’t vilify those slithery sneaks in a way many snake-based horror films do. At the very least, watch this film to see what it would be like if Olivia Coleman and Jim Gaffigan were married.
Reviews
‘Five Nights at Freddy’s 2’ Review: Fanservice Wrapped in Mess
I have no illusions that Five Nights at Freddy’s 2 entertained me due in no small part to personal bias. There was genuine enjoyment to be had for how silly and fun it was and enjoy it I did. I, of all people, am not immune to nostalgia. But there’s no mincing words: the second outing at the cinemas for creator Scott Cawthon’s behemoth horror franchise is, in no uncertain terms, a movie of mixed to low quality. It’s kind of bad. And that’s okay.
Its effects are simultaneously better and worse, its dialogue ranges from alright to atrocious, and its performances are all over the place. The premise it runs with, remixing the second game with its shiny new Toy versions of the Fazbear Entertainment gang, is a fun time fueled by fan service and busting at the seams to try and accommodate it all to an under two-hour runtime. But it’s messier than the backrooms of the pizzerias it takes place in.
A Remix of Five Nights at Freddy’s 2 (And Others), Heavy on Fanservice
This time, the primary antagonist puppeteering a cast of aggressive animatronics is literally a puppet; the Marionette, a scorned victim of the previous film’s antagonist William Afton. Slain and bound to the very first restaurant Afton started, a group of ghost hunters unleash its evil when a recording of their show goes horribly wrong. It’s up to Mike (Josh Hutcherson) and Vanessa (Elizabeth Lail) to try and seal it away again, or risk their lives being torn apart by the supernatural once more.
For the game fans this film was crafted for, it will satiate any lore craving they might have. Well, at least until the third film, when Mike will combat oxygen deprivation that causes him to hallucinate phantom animatronics (no, that sentence is not a joke, that actually happens). There are tidbits of foreshadowing for sequels, confirmations of theories, retcons, and somewhat amusing cameos. For everyone else, you’ll get a good laugh and the occasional scare, but you will have a plethora of questions.
The Screenplay Has Been Springlocked
The script for this sequel is riddled with oddities, nothing characters, and genre cliches that are in a quantum state of “good because it’s hilarious” and “bad because it’s genuinely bad” depending on who is delivering them. The story isn’t always predictable just because of the adaptation factor it relishes in, but its dialogue is undeniably silly and hamstrings what could otherwise be good performances with a need to rush along lore and forced character development.
Hutcherson’s go around as Mike this time is phoned in, and it doesn’t help that he wasn’t given anything to work with other than being a stereotypical single father figure to his kid sister. It’s not all bleak; Lail does actually deliver the film’s best bits in a genuinely frightening dream sequence delving into Vanessa’s backstory. She also gets a few fun final girl moments, but hasn’t reached the level of iconic that would garner calling her a scream queen; we’ll see if that changes in 3 given the radical shift in character she goes through here.
Great Villains Hamstrung by an Imperfect Script (And Effects)
Piper Rubio is once again fit to her role as Abby, though the character she’s playing is oddly one note for a child who is psychic friends with the ghosts of dead kids. The brief voice lines for the animatronics by guest stars garner little in the way of memorability, but long-time Freddy voice actor Kellen Goff does manage to make a solid impact with the one or two lines he receives.
While we’re on the topic of those new fiendish animatronics, they are much better than anticipated. Their practical puppetry bases and how they’re composited with the CGI isn’t bad at all, with game designs translating well and moving nicely. The Marionette’s myriad forms, however, do feel exceptionally goofy despite the terrifying concept of a slithering octopoid puppet ghost with no concrete skeleton. They’re the lowlight of the film’s effects, but it’s kind of endearing how silly they look.
The biggest victim of the film, however, is Freddy Carter. He plays the creep factor of his character up to a thousand in a way that absolutely would work with better writing and a darker tone. But he’s shackled by the lore implications of being a character people have been waiting for, in a way that feels more offensive to the story than the constant easter eggs. Every word that leaves his mouth feels comically bad, laden with exposition or just outright limp and cold linework.
We Underused Matthew Lillard Again (And Skeet Ulrich This Time Too)
Which is a shame, because our minor villain does get to have fun. Matthew Lillard’s brief screen chewing time in the sun as William Afton once more is delightful, playing a deranged killer in a yellow bunny costume with all the glee that visual would indicate.
Skeet Ulrich as fan favorite character Henry Emily, however, doesn’t get nearly enough time to shine. Despite being a perfect casting for the role and delivering a convincing turn as a grieving father, he’s relegated to just delivering a plot device that gets 30 seconds of screentime. Here’s to hoping the next film reunites the Scream alums, allowing the long-time rivals of the game to finally cross paths.
Can Five Nights at Freddy’s 2 Be More Than Fan Service?
I suppose the constant reiteration of that last point is important to address: the current train of thought is that hopefully, eventually, the kinks will be worked out as far as the Five Nights at Freddy’s films go. Though I’m not holding my breath.
There are no reservations that this is, first and foremost gateway horror for younger audiences, with a nostalgia barbed fishhook to sink into in older fans as well. My humble prediction is that almost all of these films will remain roughly the same level of quality (middling to poor), the same level of frightening (more than you’d think and much less than you’d hope), and the same level of entertaining for the segments of the population it hits for (a fairly fun time).
And maybe that’s enough. To simply be entertaining gateway horror is fine, I don’t think there’s a screaming necessity for these to be masterpieces. This movie is kind of bad, and that’s okay if all you need is some fleeting entertainment or to see your favorite game adapted to film. But films with this much franchise potential should be treated as all others. They can be strong horror films with great iconography rather than features beholden entirely to that iconography.
Five Nights at Freddy’s 2 fails to wow in any particular department other than being “for the fans” and much of its unintentional humor. Still, there’s a glimmer of hope here in its silvery eyes that this can all be something more down the line.


