Reviews
[REVIEW] Is ‘Dead Alive’ (1992) The Goriest Movie Of All Time?
Is Dead Alive the goriest movie of all time? No. And I wish people would stop acting like it is. Yes, it’s gory, but it’s far from the goriest. Half of the movie contains zero blood. And if you even want to get to the ‘good’ part, you have to get through that bloodless first half! The film’s second half would feel worth it if the first half wasn’t such a slog to get through. First, it’s important to look at the backstory of this film.
The Banned, Cut, and Recut History of Dead Alive
Braindead’s full runtime sits at 104 minutes, and was initially only released in full in the UK and Australia. It would later be banned in multiple countries. Once it hit the United States, a title change would come, Dead Alive, and nearly 20 minutes would be cut from the film. Eventually, we’d get a 97-minute uncut version, but that still means we’re missing almost 10 minutes of footage.
Dead Alive follows Lionel Cosgrove (Timothy Balme), whose mother, Vera Cosgrove (Elizabeth Moody) gets bit by a rat-monkey creature at a zoo. Vera receives said bite after she backs up against a monkey’s cage when stalking Lionel, who’s on a date with Paquita (Diana Peñalver). After a short incubation period, Vera passes away. But don’t you worry, before you shed a tear, you should know she has come back to life! Granted, she’s now hungry for human flesh, but she’s alive! Can Lionel stop his mother’s corpse before it’s too late?
When Slapstick and Gore Collide
Let’s get the negatives out of the way. Slapstick comedy and extreme horror don’t work for me. It just doesn’t work. The slapstick comedy of Hundreds of Beavers works well because it’s easy enough to suspend disbelief and accept the world the characters live in. Dead Alive, on the other hand, has just absolutely awful slapstick humor. It doesn’t even abide by the rule of three. Seeing the same obese guy getting kicked in his balls ten times is fine and all, especially because of who he is, but it’s just not funny. And almost everything in this film is played for laughs. When it comes to movie ratings, I’ve heard violence is rated based on its context–the more violent and mean a kill is, the harder the MPAA would go towards the rating. In Dead Alive, there isn’t a single serious moment, and trying to ‘enjoy’ the kills is incredibly frustrating.
I watched the unrated version and I really wanted to like this movie. Ultimately, it ended up being an extremely frustrating watch. Awful acting and a barebones plot that doesn’t feel fresh even for 1992 just takes what should have been a wonderful first-time experience into 97 minutes of trying not to watch the clock. By the time the action kicks in, I was already turned off. I didn’t care about the outcome at this point because I was unbelievably frustrated.
Overhyped and Underwhelming: A Missed Opportunity
If I learned anything from the endless hours of Lord of the Rings bonus features is that Peter Jackson loves practical effects. The practical effects of Dead Alive still mostly hold up today. The face deglovings, dog throat removals, and zombie headlamps look surprisingly great. If the film’s first half had been 15 to 20 minutes shorter, it would have worked better for me. Being told time and time again that Braindead was one of the goriest films of all time may have overhyped it for me. The film’s lawnmower scene, the bloodiest scene in the film, just didn’t have any impact at this point.
I desperately wanted to love this movie. Part of me was worried that my review would seem too biased because I would enjoy it that much. I can’t think of a time a film has let me down as much as Dead Alive did. Luckily I was able to watch the unrated version because I think I’d be even more frustrated watching a version with less gore. Oh and don’t even get me started on the half-baked dead dad storyline that’s explained in full almost immediately and then dropped for no reason. Overall, Dead Alive is a film I would never revisit and something I would never recommend.
Reviews
‘Undertone’ Review: A24’s Scariest Since ‘Hereditary’
A24 never stopped pumping out banger horror movies. Let’s get that out of the way, straight away. Even its commercial and critical flops, like Opus or Y2K, still took a lot of really original swings, even if it hasn’t been a string of masterpieces like in their horror heyday of the late 2010s and early 2020s. Still, they may have made their scariest yet with Undertone, in a return to A24’s original MO of pure indie filmmaking.
A Single Location Horror Film Powered by Sound
Undertone is not a perfect movie, with an occasional off story beat, and the ending just missing the mark of perfection, but it is a tried-and-true testament to the power of storytelling. With essentially one active, on-screen actress and a single location, the film manages to create a sensory hellscape with immersive nightmare-inducing audio that has both story and scares derived entirely from a podcast. It is a sensory overload of pure terror, one that feels deeply sinister in its pitch-black story, one that demands to be seen in the darkest possible movie theater.
A24’s Undertone: A True Crime Podcast Turns Supernatural
The story is pretty straightforward…at least at first. It follows a true crime/horror podcast host (Nina Kiry), who lives by herself as she takes care of her dying, elderly, and borderline vegetative mother. Her co-host (Adam DiMarco, who is never fully seen) is sent a series of ten mysterious audio files from an unknown address, presumably sent for her to listen to on the show. As they begin to record their latest episode with live reactions to the files, reality slips further as she and her co-host fall into supernatural delirium. Strange noises, slipping time, and other haunted house trimmings all come out to play, each elevated by (as mentioned) horrific sound design and an even more horrific backstory.
Nursery Rhyme Origins and Deeply Disturbing Mythology
The story is about 95% airtight. Without getting too deep into spoilers, the origins of these files and their meaning are deeply fascinating, with some elements and angles involving the origins of nursery rhymes that are very, genuinely disturbing. There is one twist in particular that explores what one of the sounds truly means, which is highly upsetting once pieced together.
That being said, Undertone has some familiar tropes, and while the movie mostly touches upon certain unexplored mythology, certain scenes can feel a little too familiar to other recent demon movies like Shelby Oaks. The true meanings are a lot more creative, but it could have played around with its mythos to create a truly original villain.
Undertone’s Ambiguous Ending Demands a Rewatch
Similarly, the ending is almost perfect. There is a final twist about something the protagonist might have done that is a little confusing, and reframes the context of the film. It is highly interesting, however, and opens up several cans of worms of what this movie has to say about children, motherhood, and parenthood as a whole, as well as posing questions about the movie’s setting and timeline. It is always better to remain vague in horror, which this movie definitely does, but just a slight retweak of its final act could give the audience just the tiniest more understanding, without it going into full, mainstream territory. The film definitely requires a second watch, and in the best way possible.
A Groundbreaking Podcast Horror Experience
In a nutshell, the film’s methods of storytelling are groundbreaking. This movie is not a podcast, but all of its scares and stories are delivered to us like it is one. It feels like the birth of a new medium or style of movie, a perfect blend of audio and visual, with emphasis on the audio.
Additionally, with the story being literally told to us as if we’re listening to the characters’ podcast itself, it is a nightmare rabbit hole.
Reviews
‘Silent Warnings’ (2003) Review: An Unknown UFO Gem
Like many people born in the mid-90s, the Sci-Fi Channel was one of my first introductions to horror. Whether it was random films playing or Sci-Fi’s 31 Days of Halloween, this channel was one of the main channels in my household. For the month of March, we’re going to take a look at Sci-Fi Originals (and maybe I cheated a bit and picked films that had their premiere on Sci-Fi). Picking films for this month was no easy task. Did I want to cover one of the plethora of amalgamated mega-animals fighting each other? Or what about shark tornadoes? One of the films I picked, after finding it too difficult to find Children of the Corn (2009) on streaming services, was an odd alien film I had never even heard of. That film is Silent Warnings.
What is Silent Warnings About?
Layne Vossimer (A.J. Buckley), his girlfriend Macy (Callie De Fabry), and a group of their friends head to Layne’s cousin’s house, Joe (Stephen Baldwin), after his mysterious death. Once there, they find the house in disgusting disarray. The friends decide to help Layne clean it up in order to put it on the market. But things quickly go south when they find a series of VHS tapes Joe left behind in the attic. What’s revealed in those tapes shows something that’s out of this world. Can Layne, his friends, and Sheriff Bill Willingham (Billy Zane) fend off these otherworldly invaders before it’s too late?
Conspiracy Theories, Mental Health, and Paranoia in Silent Warnings
As stated, this film was a late pick as I could not find 2009’s Children of the Corn streaming anywhere. Boy, am I glad I picked this. Silent Warnings has its fair share of issues. But it makes up for them in so many ways. This film is a very sober look into conspiracy theories, mental health, and the lengths that people go to when it comes to perceived threats. We get very little Stephen Baldwin, but what we do get is more than enough. He’s a recluse who lives on his 40-ish-acre property that’s been alien-proofed. His best friend (cousin?) is a scarecrow that has an AK-47. And he constantly records incoherent ramblings with his camcorder. Baldwin absolutely kills in his limited screentime. It’s like Stanislavski said, there are no small parts, only small actors.
Small-Town Horror and UFO Lore in Porterville
The quaint town of Porterville acts as the perfect backdrop for a story like this: a sleepy, nowhere town, where most people know each other. A town where the big call of the day for the Sheriff is about a missing dog. It’s the perfect setup for a story like this. It even mirrors many of the towns mentioned in Silent Invasion: The Pennsylvania UFO-Bigfoot Casebook. Much of this film’s atmosphere, the crop circles, acres of corn, and the disintegrating house, create a condensed world that adds so much claustrophobia to the film’s soul.
Acting, Dialogue, and the Problem with Early 2000s CGI Aliens
That being said, there are quite a few issues. Mainly, the acting. Besides Kim Onasch, Michelle Borth, Billy Zane, and A.J. Buckley (mostly), much of this film’s acting feels very Sci-Fi Original. It doesn’t help that the film’s dialogue, from writers Bill Lundy, Christian McIntire, and Kevin Gendreau, is just plain boring. And that’s not even mentioning how awful the CGI aliens look. A 2003 film about aliens, when only two or three are shown on screen, should be fully practical. And the fact that they use digital aliens takes away much of the film’s punch.
Why Silent Warnings Is an Underrated Sci-Fi Original
Silent Warnings doesn’t break much ground when it comes to the topic of aliens/Ufology, but it’s damn entertaining. But that’s the thing. Films don’t necessarily need to break new ground. I appreciate the swings this film takes, whether they hit or miss. There’s a wonderful setup with Stephen Baldwin, and the slow build to an exciting finale makes it all worth the wait. For a Sci-Fi Original, Silent Warnings has worked its way into my heart.


