Connect with us

Reviews

[REVIEW] ‘In a Violent Nature’ Nails A Slasher’s Perspective

Published

on

It feels like a lot of horror movies these past few years have been begging a particular question, and In A Violent Nature might be the one that begs it the most: How many more slashers until we feel like we’re back in a slasher film golden age?

Can In a Violent Nature Birth the Next Horror Icon?

How many more iconic designs do you have to render, how many more insane kills that defy biology and physics and human decency before we feel we have a new crop of killers as iconic as Freddy Krueger, Michael Myers, and (most importantly to this film) Jason Voorhees? Because, outside of Art the Clown, the simple elegance of In A Violent Nature’s killer Johnny, is the closest I’ve felt to seeing an iconic new killer in theatres. He’s got the design, the backstory, the cool weapon, and the mask. And he is, if nothing else, more brutal than brutal. But those aren’t the only reasons why he and this movie work so well.

For those who haven’t been keeping up with the hype train surrounding this film, In A Violent Nature is your typical slasher, but with one big caveat: it is shot almost entirely from the killer’s perspective. This means eschewing non-diegetic sound, and not going too hard on the killer teleporting around in the woods or being too supernaturally skilled. It’s kept grounded, with the camera continuously following Johnny rather than only giving brief glimpses, granting the audience some intimacy in understanding him. Johnny is an ever-present force, and the unique nature of how he’s shown will be enough to hook many people (no pun intended).

The movie achieves its goal in terms of visuals, with naturalistic lighting and great directing to capture Johnny’s domain and the way he moves through it. Writer-Director Chris Nash and DP Pierce Derks are a natural team, and I should have expected the film to be this good-looking since they were carrying experience over from working on one of my favorite horror films of all time: The Void. On the audio side of things, I still wish the foley work had been a little louder and more pronounced given how gruesome the film gets, with some kills feeling weirdly muted and quiet given what he’s doing to these people. Otherwise, the cinematography passes with flying colors.

Can Johnny Take the Place of Jason Voorhees?

Despite the visual distinction and its fun kills, many will be crying out that In A Violent Nature is just another pastiche of Jason Voorhees traipsing through the trees with an axe, as a few of the disgruntled people leaving my theatre audibly felt. And the cast of mostly stock characters that are annoying by design doesn’t help the allegations. But Johnny is an iteration of the archetype that is explicitly sympathetic, and the film goes to lengths to make you like him and even feel bad for him in the same way many Jason fans feel about their favorite villain.

Advertisement

The movie takes something that would be delegated to a brief scene or to subtext in another slasher and makes it the driving force of the movie: the humanity of the monster gleaming through is at center stage here, with a personality underlying his titular behavior. The monster is equal parts unstoppable death machine and complex human, which I know sounds silly, but is a compelling spin when you’re telling an all too familiar tale.  

Visually, this is communicated in some really fun ways. The juxtaposition of a monster man trudging through a field of daisies is a kind of funny if not endearing presentation. All of the nature documentary shots of our killer slipping through the underbrush and tall grass feel like we’re taking a journey with him rather than witnessing something sinister. That journey just happens to be broken up by a lot of scenes of him mutilating the people who get in his way.

Viewers Looking for Over the Top Kills Will Be Satisfied

In terms of his kills, plenty of moviegoers have been and will be talking about the movie’s most over-the-top fatality. It is nasty, unexpectedly brutal, and the effects for it and every other kill in the movie are unrelentingly good. This is most likely thanks to visual effects supervisor Jeff Bruneel, who worked on Jason X, one of the best in the franchise SFX-wise. In the right light, they even render some pretty disturbing shots.  

But I do suspect there is one major issue people will have with the film, and one I’ve been wrestling with since I left the theatre: the ending. Not the ending ending, but the last 5 minutes or so before the ending. Because (LIGHT SPOILERS AHEAD) after a very suspenseful and well-shot sequence, a character hits the brakes on the film and tells a lengthy anecdote that is, as I interpret it, a metaphor for how we as audiences see slasher villains compared to the reality of the villain in universe.   

While I like the concept, the way it’s delivered will probably end up distracting you from the great suspense the film was building at that moment. Your body is wracked with tension, waiting for a painful ending, but you’re too focused on the story being told to appreciate that tension. The final moments of the film do manage to restore the anxiety somewhat, but the finale’s ability to gut-punch you with genuine fear falters. This is especially a problem when it’s slow enough to drag the film out beyond its ideal pace, as the film’s final half does feel a bit drawn out compared to the brisk pace it begins with.

Advertisement

Coming in hot before we reach the halfway point of the year, In A Violent Nature is first and foremost, a fantastic slasher with a fun little twist. Its ending will certainly divide audiences, but I suspect many like myself will be able to forgive it and enjoy its simple but effective execution (and executions). It might benefit from watching in a packed theatre thanks to the reactions its grotesque kills can elicit, but its streaming release on Shudder will surely make it a staple for the streaming service. Hopefully, as it builds its audience, Johnny will find a place as a staple horror film icon.

Luis Pomales-Diaz is a freelance writer and lover of fantasy, sci-fi, and of course, horror. When he isn't working on a new article or short story, he can usually be found watching schlocky movies and forgotten television shows.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Reviews

[REVIEW] Fantastic Fest 2024: One Unfortunate Artistic Choice Sours Otherwise Strong Doc ‘The Life and Deaths of Christopher Lee’

The use of a marionette to represent Lee is by far the most compelling choice that the documentary makes, with actor Peter Serafinowicz lending his dulcet tones to bring the puppet to life. The doc imbues the wooden Lee with severity and softness, wit and woe, capturing the many sides of the often conflicted and restless actor. Lee wrote and spoke enough about his life and career that this portrayal doesn’t come across as tasteless in the way that some posthumous reanimations do, such as the CGI rendering of the aforementioned Cushing in 2016’s Rogue One. But it is noticeable that the documentary rarely includes footage of the real Lee talking, when plenty of archival interview footage certainly exists.

Published

on

I’ve made no secret of my love for Sir Christopher Lee over the years. I cried for hours when the actor died in 2015. I’ve got his iconic visage as Dracula tattooed on my leg, something I’m sure he would have hated. So when I saw that writer-director Jon Spira’s new documentary about the man, The Life and Deaths of Christopher Lee, was playing at Fantastic Fest, my finger was poised to snag a ticket the moment they dropped. And while I certainly enjoyed the doc (and cried again… twice), it’s not without its faults — one of which some fans may struggle to overlook.

Lee lived an extraordinary life, and The Life and Deaths of Christopher Lee manages to cover an awful lot of that life in under two hours. From Lee’s still-secretive military service during World War II to his early struggles as a too-tall actor and his bristly attitude toward being labeled the King of Horror, the documentary moves quickly yet comprehensively through Lee’s life in a mostly linear fashion, pausing to flesh out certain details like his long-time friendship with the late Peter Cushing (pass the tissues, please).

If you’ve read Lee’s autobiography, Tall, Dark and Gruesome (later re-released as Lord of Misrule), much of this information won’t be new. Yet The Life and Deaths of Christopher Lee finds ways to keep the material fresh, leveraging a blend of puppetry, animation, and talking head interviews with Lee’s friends, biographers, and peers.

The use of a marionette to represent Lee is by far the most compelling choice that the documentary makes, with actor Peter Serafinowicz lending his dulcet tones to bring the puppet to life. The doc imbues the wooden Lee with severity and softness, wit and woe, capturing the many sides of the often conflicted and restless actor. Lee wrote and spoke enough about his life and career that this portrayal doesn’t come across as tasteless in the way that some posthumous reanimations do, such as the CGI rendering of the aforementioned Cushing in 2016’s Rogue One. But it is noticeable that the documentary rarely includes footage of the real Lee talking, when plenty of archival interview footage certainly exists.

Several other people talk about Lee, however, including Lee’s niece, Harriet Walter, and directors Joe Dante and Peter Jackson, who worked with Lee on Gremlins 2 and The Lord of the Rings Trilogy respectively. Lee’s friend John Landis also appears repeatedly and rather outstays his welcome, telling stories about Lee that largely revolve around himself. Meanwhile, Lee’s biographer, Jonathan Rigby, provides some interesting nuance around the actor’s rocky relationship with the horror genre and his inadvertent habit of pushing fans away.

Advertisement

These interviews and puppet interludes are spliced with footage from some of Lee’s films (though they’re rarely labeled), still photographs, and a variety of animated segments, and it’s the latter that will likely leave a sour taste in the mouth. Because, for all its use of practical puppetry, The Life and Deaths of Christopher Lee can’t help but dip into AI’s bag of tricks to fill some screen time. And where other films have at least edited the work that AI produced (looking at you, Late Night with the Devil), Spira seems content to leave it obviously unfinished and, frankly, ugly.

There’s a moment in The Life and Deaths of Christopher Lee when one of the talking heads comments flippantly that Hammer Film Productions — where Lee shot to fame — was not in the business of creating art. Hammer was certainly thrifty and business minded, always quick to churn out a sequel or flash a bare breast to make a quick buck, but it also had an immensely talented and hardworking crew behind the scenes who frequently spun gold out of straw. That’s why Hammer and Lee’s legacy with the company have lived on long after the horror genre at large left their brand of cozy Gothic terror behind. You can feel all the fingerprints on film, and they’re beautiful.

It’s hard to imagine something that leans so heavily on AI having as much staying power.

The Life and Deaths of Christopher Lee had its North American premiere at Fantastic Fest 2024.

Advertisement

 

Continue Reading

Reviews

[REVIEW] Fantastic Fest 2024: ‘Dead Talents Society’ Leans Into Horror Tropes to Create Something Wholly Unique and Surprisingly Wholesome

Gingle Wang stars as The Rookie, who is on the fast track to oblivion after her family inadvertently throws away a key artifact from her life. In order to be seen by the living and earn her keep in the afterlife, she has to audition for a “haunter’s license” — an audition that she bombs spectacularly. You see, The Rookie didn’t die in a way that would lend itself easily to urban legend, and she’s so shy and hesitant that life passed her by even when she was alive. Luckily, she’s taken on as an assistant to fading diva Catharine (Sandrine Pinna), once an icon of the industry, now wilting in the shadow of her more famous protege, Jessica (Eleven Yao).

Published

on

Supernatural horror films tend to share one core element in common: what’s buried won’t stay buried. Taiwanese horror-comedy Dead Talents Society takes this in an absurd — and absurdly brilliant — new direction, presenting us with a world where the dead compete to become (and stay) urban legends to avoid disappearing.

Gingle Wang stars as The Rookie, who is on the fast track to oblivion after her family inadvertently throws away a key artifact from her life. In order to be seen by the living and earn her keep in the afterlife, she has to audition for a “haunter’s license” — an audition that she bombs spectacularly. You see, The Rookie didn’t die in a way that would lend itself easily to urban legend, and she’s so shy and hesitant that life passed her by even when she was alive. Luckily, she’s taken on as an assistant to fading diva Catharine (Sandrine Pinna), once an icon of the industry, now wilting in the shadow of her more famous protege, Jessica (Eleven Yao).

This apprenticeship gives director John Hsu, who co-wrote the script with Kun-Lin Tsai, the opportunity to pay loving homage to all the great horror that East Asian cinema has produced over the past few decades. References to The Ring, The Grudge, and even Perfect Blue are woven throughout the various urban legends, always with a cheeky wink to the audience. There are shades of Beetlejuice here too, though never to a point that feels derivative. Where Burton presented the afterlife as one of boredom and drudgery, albeit through a cartoonish filter, Hsu’s version of the eternal waiting room is glossy and frenetic, with the dead as obsessed with the allure of celebrity as we are.

A lesser film might take the easy path of simply critiquing celebrity culture, but Dead Talents Society merely uses this critique as a springboard for a deeper commentary about the crushing weight of expectations. This is something that every one of us can relate to on some level, and Hsu ensures that The Rookie’s deep-felt hurt over being overlooked and her consequent feelings of worthlessness remain the beating heart of the film, even amidst all the zany ghost antics.

And Dead Talents Society is certainly zany, juxtaposing slapstick shocks like The Rookie’s fumbling attempts to become an urban legend with more traditional scare scenes like Catharine’s award-winning hotel haunt. The script knows when to go full tilt and when to pause for breath, and while it favors the former to great effect, it’s those quieter character moments that will haunt you long after the final fright is through.

Advertisement

Dead Talents Society made its U.S. premiere at Fantastic Fest 2024, where it won Best Director and the Audience Award.

Continue Reading

Horror Press Mailing List

Fangoria
Advertisement
Advertisement