Reviews
‘Saw the Musical’ and Putting the Queerness of ‘Saw’ Into Words (and Songs)
Saw the Musical’s very existence makes me happy. It’s nice to see a horror movie that was initially dismissed as mindless “torture porn” by many critics be reimagined as something silly and joyous and, most importantly, unabashedly, unquestioningly queer. It’s the thing many queer people already knew Saw to be, even if we didn’t quite have the words to articulate it. Saw the Musical: The Unauthorized Parody of Saw is playing in Los Angeles through April 7 and New York City through June 23, with a national tour kicking off in April. For tickets and tour dates, visit the website.
I was guesting on an episode of my friends’ podcast, It Came from the Midwest, recently when one of the hosts, Aryn, asked me to talk about the queerness of the Saw franchise. I’m not going to lie: I fudged it. My mind went blank. Despite writing for a living, I momentarily lost the ability to translate a deeply held belief into words. If it had been Jigsaw asking me the question against the clock, I would have lost my test. Game over, bitch.
Aryn, thankfully, is more benevolent than Jigsaw. After listening to me waffle for several minutes, she stepped in to voice what I was struggling to communicate.
“I don’t even think you have to say it necessarily, because I feel it,” she said. “It’s there. You can sense it. You just know it’s different.”
Saw is a Queer Franchise, IYKYK
Aryn is right: the Saw franchise is different, as are the most memorable characters from its world. Take the angry, apathetic loner Adam Faulkner-Stanheight (Leigh Whannell in Saw), an artsy boy on the outskirts of society who puts his trust in all the wrong men and gets attacked by a monster in the closet. Or what about that monster herself, Amanda Young (Shawnee Smith in Saw 1–3 and Saw X), who steps into her full lesbian power (and haircuts) after having a major reawakening? And how can anyone watch Dr. Lawrence Gordon (Cary Elwes) putting his hand on Adam’s cheek during the climax of Saw — Adam sobbing uncontrollably, their faces inches apart, lips quivering, Dr. Gordon making a solemn promise to come back for him — and not see it as the tragic conclusion of an enemies-to-lovers arc? (Cue Elle Woods throwing chocolates at the screen with a cry of “Liar!” How could you, Larry?)
There’s just something about the Saw franchise that speaks to the queer community, and the franchise has taken notice. When Jigsaw hit theaters in 2017, the team promoting the tie-in blood drive — a tradition dating back to the very first film — ran an ad campaign called “All Types Welcome” to protest the Food and Drug Administration’s discriminatory abstinence rule for LBGTQ+ blood donors (a rule that wouldn’t be revised for another six years). By the time Saw X rolled around last year, the iconic Billy puppet was announcing “yes I stun” from Saw’s official Twitter profile. Over on TikTok, meanwhile, fans were speculating why the Lionsgate account would post a video featuring Jigsaw killer John Kramer (Tobin Bell) framed in the colors of the Bisexual Pride flag.
Of course, we don’t need the marketing team to tell us that Saw is queer, because as Aryn so sagely articulated, we just know. The fic writers know it. The fan artists know it. And the creators of Saw the Musical: The Unauthorized Parody of Saw most definitely know it, too.
Saw the Musical : A Play Where the Subtext Can Become Text
Created and produced by Cooper Jordan, from a book by Zoe Ann Jordan and with music and lyrics by Anthony De Angelis and Patrick Spencer, Saw the Musical wastes no time letting us know that Adam and Dr. Gordon would be in one another’s pants immediately if only those darn chains weren’t keeping them apart. Adam is recast as a slutty himbo twink with a pocket full of condoms and a head full of cotton wool and dirty thoughts. As for Dr. Gordon, he’s no longer just a distant father with a penchant for stepping out on his marriage. Now, he’s a horny closeted bisexual who cares more about his furniture than his family and who won’t pass up an opportunity to bend over a resident, portrayed by a blow-up sex doll.
Chain these versions of Adam and Dr. Gordon together in a bathroom and the sexual tension doesn’t so much build as explode. It’s camp, it’s raunchy, and it can only end in — spoilers, but duh — a surprisingly sweet on-stage kiss. Perhaps if the bathroom set didn’t look like hepatitis waiting to happen, it might have gone even further. Then again, Dr. Gordon is bleeding out at the time. It is based on Saw, after all.
I was front and center for Saw the Musical off-Broadway in New York City around Halloween 2023. My editor asked me if I wanted to write something about it not long after and I agreed, but whenever I opened my laptop to do so, the words just wouldn’t come.
It was the podcast all over again. Sometimes something is just so obvious that you can’t find the queer forest for all the gay trees.
I think that what I most wanted to say but didn’t know how was that Saw the Musical’s very existence makes me happy. It’s nice to see a horror movie that was initially dismissed as mindless “torture porn” by many critics be reimagined as something silly and joyous and, most importantly, unabashedly, unquestioningly queer. It’s the thing many queer people already knew Saw to be, even if we didn’t quite have the words to articulate it.
As director and choreographer Stephanie Rosenberg told NPR, the musical is “a love story that… people have wanted for 20 years.” We felt it. We could sense it. Saw the Musical just turns our intuition (and the film’s subtext) into text. Sometimes in the form of funny songs.
Saw the Musical: The Unauthorized Parody of Saw is playing in New York City through June 23. The national tour kicked off in April. For tickets and tour dates, visit their website.
Film Fests
Overlook Film Festival: ‘Hokum’ Review
No way it’s the horror of 2026, but Hokum could be this year’s most solid “welcome to the big leagues, kid” horror. It’s a pill that’s got the potential to draw in new horror fans, but has enough flavor to satisfy a veteran for 101 minutes. Damian McCarthy definitely learned to polish up his idea of a nightmare from Caveat (2020), to Oddity (2024), to his best feature yet. Literally, sort of. With a single watch of each under my belt… Hokum has the same theme and tone as the previous two, just waxed and remixed. I’m not mad at it, though.
Hokum That Bridges Indie and Mainstream Appeal
Even the freaks like us who live in the underground horror tunnels can understand the public’s genre fatigue. I agree- it can seem like all these remakes and re-hashes are seriously weighing down blockbuster horror these days. The good indie stuff gets looked over, but McCarthy’s most recent film is a decent little in-between. It won’t bother you with a high cinema monologue, but it knows how to make you cringe, and will lock you in a dusty room with it.
It’s vague in exposition, not that a simple idea like this really needs to be super fleshed out. It stars Severance’s Adam Scott as Ohm Bauman, a famous Yankee novelist, a guy who grieves, and a big jerk. He arrives at a boutique Irish inn to scatter the ashes of his parents, and finish the last book in his trilogy. The challenge of writing an asshole lead that still has to convince the audience to root for them is damn refreshing. Scott’s performance holds it up too. He’s got a great jerk-face even without dialogue. He’s easy to pity, though- somewhere between Paul Sheldon from Misery, and a real life Stephen King, who shares the suspiciously balanced atmosphere that drove Jack Torrence nuts in The Shining.
Familiar Horror Influences with a Refined Execution
McCarthy borrows a lot from those two, and probably a catalog of blockbuster peek-a-boo scary movies. The reason Hokum is a good challenge for the horror gateway, is that it doesn’t try too hard to “elevate” (it does, though only a little) the genre. It listens and learns from its elders to complete the haunted hotel play-by-play. Not a repeat, but a re-do of the things that work for paranormal and folk horror. The aspect that Hokum brings home is the solid polycule made of production design, sound mixing, and cinematography. A happy, creepy home of cobwebs and jump scares.
The only hotel staff spared from Ohm’s terrible attitude is Fiona. When he learns she’s gone missing after a Halloween party he was famously blackout drunk for, he feels a responsibility to return the kindness and effort she had shown him. The last person to speak to Fiona was local kooky guy, Jerry (David Wilmot). His local status is confirmed by Ohm after Jerry claims Fiona is most likely dead in the honeymoon suite… because her ghost approached him and told him so. Jerry might be crazy, but Ohm has nothing to live for, apparently. Ohm agrees to investigate the suite that the hotel staff keep locked and out of service. It’s haunted by a witch, they say. Obviously.
Production Design and Sound Craft a Claustrophobic Nightmare
The suite, and the source of Hokum’s nightmares, is stunning work in the macabre department. Despite my distaste for them, it really is a playground for jump scares. Lighting and sound design do some real respectable heavy lifting that the viewer is forced (complimentary) to sit through. My personal playground, though, would be the dumbwaiter. The last time I had that much fun with one of those was when lowering Danny into the den of lizard aliens in Zathura (2005). Hokum’s dumbwaiter plays as much of a role as Adam Scott does in his.
Besides the horrors that persist in it, the honeymoon suite really comes alive with the one or two Resident Evil-esque puzzles in order to reach the meat of the mystery. A super engaging focus from cinematographer Colm Hogan to use frame ratio, and other visual camera tricks to induce the claustrophobia of the epicenter of scares. Bring back the dumbwaiter please.
Where Hokum Falls Short
What doesn’t work is excusable. The thin background information on Ohm’s trauma presents itself too often through a jump scare/flashback cocktail. Did this movie need to be 101 minutes, or could it have been 90? Did the viewer need to understand the weight of Ohm’s undesirable childhood? Not to this degree. I think these moments also risk confusion as to what supernatural thing we’re dealing with at the moment: the witch of the honeymoon suite, Fiona’s ghost, or the lasting haunt of Ohm’s mother’s tragic death? The film takes the “less is more” rule at about 70%- not awesome, but a passing grade, no doubt.
Reviews
‘2001 Maniacs’ Is Spring Break…For Racists?!
One of the most entertaining aspects of horror is its subgenres. Zombie films have an ever-branching group of sub-subgenres, as do slashers and paranormal films. It’s honestly exhausting to try to classify some of these films. Hell, my favorite bigfoot film, Night of the Demon, is a cryptid slasher film! Who knew that the slasher subgenre would ever have a cryptid branch to it?! But the straight-to-DVD times of the mid-aughts brought a series of weird slasher-ish films to the shelves of Walmart and FYE’s across the United States. One of those films that caught my eye (at too young an age) was a genuinely weird, trailer park, splatterpunk remake called 2001 Maniacs. (Would this technically fall under the Hellbilly slasher subgenre?)
What Is 2001 Maniacs About?
Anderson Lee (Jay Gillespie), Corey Jones (Matthew Carey), and Nelson Elliot (Dylan Edrington) are three college kids on their way to Daytona for Spring Break. As their college graduation looms, or lack of graduation, they want to go out with a bang. Literally. A detour leads the three and two other groups into the overly cheery town of Pleasant Valley. But this stuck-in-their-ways town has danger lurking beneath it. The town’s mayor, George W. Buckman (Robert Englund), who dons a Confederate flag eye patch, welcomes the eight travelers in with open arms. And just like that, the Guts n’ Glory festival is set to begin! Though who will make it out alive, and who will get turned into tonight’s pot roast?
A Movie that Shares Some Odd Company
I’ll be completely honest. I haven’t watched this movie in over a decade. There was a time in my life when I was hellbent on finding the most messed-up movies I could. As my watchlist grew, so did my desensitization. Movies like this, Freakshow (which proudly boasted it was banned in 47 countries), August Underground, and The Girl Next Door filled out my formative film-viewing years. While I can understand why some of these disgusting movies were made, some completely befuddled me as to why they were even made. Out of all of these films, 2001 Maniacs stuck in my head as the most perplexing of the bunch.
Writers Tim Sullivan and Chris Kobin, with direction from Tim Sullivan, are very competent voices in horror. They co-wrote Driftwood together, which, while not amazing, is better than the reviews suggest. Their work on Snoop Dogg’s Hood of Horror resulted in a great anthology film that gets overlooked in most conversations about anthologies. And Tim Sullivan wrote/directed the second-best segment in Chillerama, “I was a Teenage Werebear”. So, why this movie? Why remake Herschell Gordon Lewis’s just as perplexing Two Thousand Maniacs!?
2001 Maniacs’ Surprising Connection to Cabin Fever
Quick aside, since we’re also covering Cabin Fever 2: Spring Fever this month. What’s interesting is that this film stars Giuseppe Andrews as Harper Alexander (who reprises his role of Deputy Winston in Cabin Fever 2). And towards the beginning of this film, Eli Roth reprises his role of Justin from Cabin Fever. So, Eli Roth exists in this world as his character from Cabin Fever, but Giuseppe Andrews exists as a completely different entity. That’s neither here nor there. Just an interesting observation that implies the flesh-eating disease also exists within this world. What are the odds? As much as I despise Eli Roth, it would have been fascinating to see this group of characters battle Confederate ghosts AND a flesh-eating disease.
Okay, where were we?
The Incredibly Shaky Acting in 2001 Maniacs
Nothing about this film works, except for a handful of practical effects. You can all hate me for what I’m about to say…and that’s okay. Robert Englund and Lin Shaye are not good actors. I will concede that Englud is great as Freddy, and he has worked his way into his legendary status. Beyond that? Not so much. Lin Shaye just…she’s a nepo sister who got in while the getting was good. Her high-pitched, high-energy line readings get old after more than 30 seconds of screentime. It’s easy to see why she has so many fans, and I’m happy that they have thousands of films to watch her in. I just think she took the spot of a potentially better actor. Though you should not mistake what I said as me saying the other actors in this movie are great. Because that is simply untrue. Nearly every scene feels as if the actors are reading their lines from a teleprompter slightly off-screen.
Do the Kills Make it Worth Sitting Through?
“But the point of this movie is the gory kills!” Okay, and? A few of the kills in 2001 Maniacs are fun and inventive, but you have to sit through endless filler until you get there. It gets to a point where this movie’s horniness becomes so over the top that even a hypersexual Joe Bob Briggs fan would become annoyed. You can say that it’s because this movie is a horror comedy, or that it’s supposed to be tongue-in-cheek. And I can come right back and say that there is not a single bit of ‘comedy’ in this movie that works. Vampires Suck is funnier than this. Hell, Disaster Movie is funnier than this.
2001 Maniacs is a Big Skip
2001 Maniacs is the closest I’ve come to a DNF when covering a film for Horror Press. The movie’s blatant racism-played-for-jokes becomes old before it even gets started. Decent practical effects are ruined by mid-aughts digital effects that would make the SciFi Channel cringe. God, how many times can you scream, “The South’s gonna rise again,” before it stops becoming satire and becomes weird? Calling this movie satire would be unfair because there is not a single moment of awareness throughout. Yes, they make Southerners look like pig-screwing dimwits, but it feels like it’s only done to cover their asses.
Do not watch 2001 Maniacs. It is a truly terrible movie. And that’s coming from someone who has watched nearly every SciFi Original, Mongolian Deathworm, and has sat through Verotika eight times.


