Connect with us

Reviews

[REVIEW] ‘Frogman’ (2023) From Now On Every Cryptid Needs Accessories

As a film, Frogman is enjoyable. It’s hard to do found footage horror well, and harder still to bring something new to the table, but the cast nailed it. The protagonist Dallas is undeniably hubristic, but Tymoshuk plays the role with such earnestness and vulnerability that you can’t help but root for him. In her role as Amy, Grant shines through with a performance that swings from playful to heartfelt, and Barrett, as Scotty, delivers equal doses of comedy and cynicism. 

Published

on

While on a family vacation in 1999, 10-year-old Dallas Kyle captured footage of Frogman, a strange creature said to lurk in the woods of Loveland, Ohio. Although Frogman lore was long established in Loveland—first making a notable splash in 1975 when a local man named George Hale photographed it—Dallas’ video was brushed off as a hoax.

To this day, Dallas is still haunted by the memory of Frogman—and by the experience of not being believed even though he had evidence. Now in his 30s, Dallas’ life is far from where he wants it to be. A struggling filmmaker with only two short films to his name, he’s been crashing at his sister and brother-in-law’s house for two years while harboring an obsession with Frogman.

Dallas decides to break out his Hi-8 camcorder—the camera he was using when he caught that fateful footage—and return to Loveland to film a documentary about Frogman. Roping in his friends Scotty, a videographer, and Amy, an aspiring actor, he sets off on his quest to make the public see the truth: Frogman is real.

In Quaint Ohio, Lies Something Sinister

In Loveland, they check in at the Frogman-themed Bullfrog Bed & Breakfast, interview locals, and venture into Frogman Point—an area of the woods where one might glimpse the enigmatic amphibian. Although they had a promising start, things quickly take a turn. In his determination to find the creature that changed his life, Dallas may have stumbled into something darker than he could have ever imagined. 

Frogman, directed by Anthony Cousins, who co-wrote it with John Karsko, is a found footage creature feature about obsession and trauma. Dallas (played by Nathan Tymoshuk) is unable to lead a normal, productive life because of his obsession with Frogman. He talks about the entity nonstop to the detriment of his personal relationships, and watches videos about the mythology online—even when the narration turns to his footage and paints him as a liar and a hack. His sister believes his Frogman fixation is because their family fell apart after that vacation, but Dallas emphatically denies her theory. He’s adamant that he only wants to bring to light the truth about Frogman, even if it means leading his friends (played by Benny Barrett and Chelsey Grant) into perilous—and illegal—activities. He’s convinced that he’ll be able to get his life on track once he accomplishes this goal. 

Advertisement

Check out our interview with Frogman director Anthony Cousins here!

The film also puts a humanizing spotlight on cryptid-centric tourism. The town of Loveland experienced a boom in tourism after a local released the first photograph of Frogman. Decades later, Loveland still welcomes folklore-loving travelers. There’s a themed B&B, wooden photo props in Frogman’s likeness, and Frogman souvenirs. It’s kitschy, but it’s also a realistic portrayal of tourism based on legends, conspiracy theories, and cryptozoology—think Roswell, New Mexico’s UFO museum, and Point Pleasant, West Virginia’s Mothman festival. Cryptozoology may be a niche interest, but enthusiasts keep it alive, which in turn supports local economies, especially in towns that might not get as many (or any) out-of-towners otherwise.

Is that a Hitachi Magic Wand, Or Are You Just Happy to See Me?

There’s an overarching question in the film in addition to “Is Frogman real?”: Does Frogman fuck? 

It’s a question that’s asked in the interviews with locals (they laughingly answer in the affirmative) and is present throughout the film. While filming, Dallas, Amy, and Scotty are told that Frogman carries a wand (a phallic symbol? A tool for magic? Maybe a Hitachi?), and has been known to have human lovers. When the trio searches the woods, they find slime on trees and on their tent (Frogman ejaculate, perhaps?). At the film’s climax, they discover further evidence of froggy fornication. 

“Does Frogman fuck?”, on a surface level, seems to be just a cheeky and deranged question, designed to elicit uncomfortable laughs from the audience. And it may be just that. But it can also lead the way to deeper conversations on topics such as paraphilias, consent, and the subgenre in erotic fiction known as “monster fucking.” The question “Does Frogman fuck?” may indeed make some people uncomfortable…but isn’t that discomfort worth interrogating? What is the purpose of the horror genre if not to provide an outlet to explore and analyze the human psyche and all of its kinks and deviances? The question isn’t just “Does Frogman fuck?”; we must also ask ourselves, “Why do we need to know if Frogman fucks?”

Advertisement

So is Frogman Good?

As a film, Frogman is enjoyable. It’s hard to do found footage horror well, and harder still to bring something new to the table, but the cast nailed it. The protagonist Dallas is undeniably hubristic, but Tymoshuk plays the role with such earnestness and vulnerability that you can’t help but root for him. In her role as Amy, Grant shines through with a performance that swings from playful to heartfelt, and Barrett, as Scotty, delivers equal doses of comedy and cynicism. 

The rest of the cast, including Chari Eckmann as B&B proprietor Gretel, Jack Neveaux as George Hale, Liam Hage, and Shea Mikel, who play the younger versions of Dallas and his sister Lizzie, respectively, round out the film with believable portrayals of people wrapped up in cryptid lore. 

Frogman is available to stream on multiple platforms, including YouTube, Apple TV, and Google Play.

Advertisement

Chloé Harper Gold is a lifelong devotee of all things spooky, macabre, and grotesque. She's written for Nightmarish Conjurings, Dread Central, Horror Film Central, 71 Magazine, Honeysuckle Magazine, Adweek, High Times, and SuperRare. Her fiction has been published in Ghoulish Tales, Reanimated Writers Press' 100-Word Zombie Bites, and Crystal Lake Publishing's Shallow Waters Vol. 4, and her short film "Final Pickup" premiered at Screamfest LA in 2021. She lives in New York with her two cats, Nyx and Hecate, and can be found on Twitter/X, Instagram, and TikTok.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Reviews

[Tribeca Film Festival 2025] ‘Queens of the Dead’: A Fresh—and Fierce—Take on Classic Zombie Films

Published

on

Queens of the Dead starts, as so many wild stories do, with a sketchy app-initiated hookup.

Drag artist Z Queen (played by Julie J) makes a pitstop at her church on the way home from a night out. She drops some cash into the donation box, says a few words of prayer…and gets a notification from the Grindr-esque hookup app Skins saying that someone in the building swiped right on her profile. Intrigued, she goes to look for the mystery suitor, but instead of a casual encounter, she finds a zombie priest who promptly attacks her.

Brooklyn Drag Show Meets Zombie Apocalypse

In a Brooklyn warehouse, DJ and party organizer Dre (Katy O’Brian) is preparing for that night’s Easter-themed drag show, contending with drama between the performers, a backed-up toilet requiring the plumbing expertise of her brother-in-law Barry (Quincy Dunn-Baker)—who is spectacularly ignorant about queer culture—, and her spacey but well-intentioned intern Kelsey (Jack Haven). When one of the headlining drag queens, Yasmine (Dominique Jackson), flakes in order to do a paid appearance at a vodka launch, her former friend Sam (Jaquel Spivey) shows up to resurrect his drag persona, Samoncé. Sam, now a nurse working with Dre’s wife Lizzy (Riki Lindhome) at a local hospital, hasn’t performed in a while; the last time he was supposed to, at a major party that Dre organized, he got cold feet, forcing her to refund everyone’s tickets, amounting to $9,000. Sam is there now, though, ready to help Dre and perform with his drag mother Ginsey (Nina West).

But then, another problem arises: the zombie apocalypse hits New York. Now, as a horde of slow-moving but ravenous undead descend upon the warehouse, the group must put aside their personal conflicts and work together to survive.

Tina Romero’s Hilarious Horror-Comedy Debut

In her directorial debut, Tina Romero serves up a delightful zombie horror-comedy that’s hilarious and heartfelt. Her film, co-written by Erin Judge and brought to life by an outstanding ensemble cast (rounded out with Shaunette Renée Wilson, Cheyenne Jackson, Samora la Perdida, and Becca Blackwell), is filled with quippy one-liners, energetic zombie scenes, and well-developed characters with believable relationships with each other. Costumes designed by David Tabbert and hair and makeup led by Mitchell Beck and Christina Grant, respectively, steal the spotlight. And yes, there are a few references to the OG zombie picture helmed by Romero’s father in the forms of an Impala named “Barbara”, a character quoting, “They’re coming for you, Barbara”, and the line, “This is not a George Romero movie.” Tom Savini even has a cameo appearance.

Advertisement

Most notable about Queens of the Dead is that it was clearly made specifically for queer audiences (in the best way!). In addition to the cast being populated by iconic queer and trans actors, there are drag culture references, cishet men getting tripped up by third-person singular pronouns, a butch power dyke wielding a power drill, and some raunchy humor: in one scene, an influencer’s presumably straight (or “straight”) boyfriend unwittingly simulates fellatio on a penis-shaped cake pop; in another, Kelsey—injured by a poorly-aimed axe meant for a zombie—tells her worried fiancée Pops (the aforementioned power dyke, played by Margaret Cho) that she wasn’t bitten, but instead has an “axe wound”, leading to one of the queens telling her not to brag about it. The sound bite of Kelsey saying, “I got an axe wound”, is sampled and remixed into an upbeat, danceable tune that plays during the closing credits.

Queens of the Dead Addresses Real Queer and Trans Issues

Interwoven with the comedy and zombie-fighting scenes are plot points that explore real issues that impact queer and trans communities, such as pervasive drug use in drag scenes and healthcare trauma among trans people. The character Nico (played by Tomas Matos) is a drug dealing (and using) dancer and aspiring drag queen who feels ostracized and disrespected as an artist by Ginsey and Sam. Meanwhile, Lizzy’s patient at the hospital—and companion as they outrun zombies—is a young trans woman named Jane (played by Eve Lindley) who has been getting her HRT from dealers rather than licensed doctors. It’s important to note that Romero and Judge don’t showcase these issues through a moralistic lens; they’re presented in a matter-of-fact and deeply compassionate way.

Why Queens of the Dead Slays

Although there could have been a bit more gore, overall, Queens of the Dead is a thoroughly entertaining zombie flick that also manages to be deeply comforting for queer viewers. The central cast is funny without being relegated to the butt of the joke; the lesbian characters aren’t sexualized for the titillation of straight male audiences; the creativity and DIY prowess for which drag queens are famous is highlighted in the fresh context of zombie-fighting weaponry and armor. The characters are messy, complicated, and bitchy. They’re also smart, resilient, and loving. They, like the film as a whole, slay in every sense of the word.

Continue Reading

Reviews

[REVIEW] ‘The Fly 2’: Less Surrealism, More Slime

Published

on

You’ll never change my mind on this: handing over the reins of a horror movie franchise to a special effects artist is always the right choice. Case in point, The Fly 2.

The Case for Special Effects Artists as Horror Directors

Mastercraft horror needs masters to put it together, and the FX and makeup artists who stitch together the on-screen monstrosities we come to know and love are much more experienced with the directing and photography than their title would suggest.

Lighting the monsters, blocking them, choreographing their motions and how they pass through the sets they’re inhabiting, and even understanding character motivations and emotions and how to portray them. They have skills that transfer over to head-on directing and dealing with actors quite nicely that we often overlook.

Today we aren’t talking about Screaming Mad George’s foray into gooey sci-fi with The Guyver, or Alec Gillis’s viral crowdfunded Harbinger Down, although I do hope to cover both of those sooner than later.

Spotlight on The Fly 2: An Unconventional Sequel

We’ll be touching on the unsung and unsuspectingly great sequel to David Cronenberg’s classic, The Fly 2. Picking up where the previous film left off, Veronica’s nightmare has come true: her child by Seth Brundle, the genius scientist turned insect abomination by his own ambitions, has come to term.

Bartok Industries, the company Seth worked for, has taken the child Martin Brundle into their stead to study his rapid growth and abnormal intelligence. Suffering from the same symptoms as his father, Martin attempts to get the telepods working again in a desperate ploy to repair his damaged DNA. Things, as expected, go horribly wrong.

Advertisement

While this might seem like a straightforward sequel, its quirks make it anything but normal. The Fly 2 eschews much of its previous film’s more surreal and philosophical qualities, exploring the nature of humanity, and leans into the campy science fiction aspects to match its body horror.

Tonal Shifts and Quirky Energy

That doesn’t make it a less worthy sequel, but it does make it unexpectedly off kilter. Tonally, it’s a screwball, starting with some wildly nasty pregnancy horror as we see Martin’s birth in a larval form. Then, for roughly the first 30 minutes, it bounces between children’s adventure film energy, to a college romance, back to horror occasionally before settling into its sci-fi horror nest.

The sharp contrast between the especially dark moments like Martin interacting with a failed telepod experiment and him dancing with his girlfriend give The Fly 2 a very odd energy that in some aspects I’d describe as off the wall, which at the very least makes it more memorable.

Standout Performances Amid Script Challenges

Issues with the script itself become exacerbated by a lack of strong voices; with no Jeff Goldblum and a regrettably absent Geena Davis, the only really notably great performance is Lee Richardson who plays the mustache-twirlingly devilish Anton Bartok with all the corporate nastiness of Ned Beatty in Network.

Credit is due to a returning John Getz, whose portrayal of a now physically and emotionally scarred Stathis Borans is a fun challenge he embraces.  

Advertisement

While the film does spin its wheels with an honestly completely uncompelling romance for a good chunk of its runtime (think Dan and Megan from Re-Animator with no Herbert to play off of; dreadfully unimportant in the grand scheme of things and not enough humor to derive a good time from), this is alleviated by the rest of the film focusing on the slimy degeneration of our main character, as Martin’s mutations are good and truly off the rails.

Stellar Makeup and Creature Design by Chris Walas

Director Chris Walas and the rest of Amalgamated Dynamics work here is every bit as fantastic as the first film, bringing us plenty of foul fluid and far-gone flesh to make you nauseous. Martin’s slow transformation I would argue is even better than Seth’s, even if the scenes of Martin lamenting and later accepting his change lacks a lot of the dark humor that came with Goldblum’s ambitions to become the first insect politician.

The technical skill on display with this makeup plays best on screen in the film’s climax, featuring the brand-new creature in the Martinfly; it has a greater range of motion than the original Brundlefly, and the sprawling industrial facility the finale takes place in takes advantage of that.

The Climactic Chaos of the Martinfly

Slamming through windows, spewing acid vomit, and swiping with chitinous claws should sell you on the twenty-some minutes of mayhem Martinfly causes.

The Fly 2 isn’t a masterpiece, but this is where my pedantic nature shows; as I said in the opening, it is a masterfully crafted film. It’s a truly admirable attempt at a sequel trying to follow up on one of the greatest horror films of all time, made by one of the most talented special effects artists in American film history. Cronenberg’s fingerprint may not be on it, but it shows a good deal of respect for the original creation it is working off of without turning into a complete retread.

Advertisement

And for that, it deserves much more attention and love than it gets.  

Continue Reading

Horror Press Mailing List

Fangoria
Advertisement
Advertisement