Connect with us

Reviews

[REVIEW] ‘Bug’ (2006) Is An Interesting and Flawed Take On Conspiracy Films

Bug tells a harrowing tale of the perils of mental health and conspiracy. Agnes (Ashley Judd) finds herself living in a rundown motel and constantly in fear of her incarcerated former partner, Jerry (Harry Connick Jr.). Things start to look up for Agnes when R.C. (Lynn Collins) introduces the mysterious but initially charming Peter Evans (Michael Shannon) into her life. Bug takes a sharp turn when Peter starts to share a theory that some government entity experimented on him during the war, which makes Peter go AWOL. What experiment did the government do to him? They filled him with…bugs!

Published

on

If you’ve listened to a single episode of HPTV, you’re probably aware of my love of Art Bell and [fun] conspiracies. (Once you’re loading up a posse to storm a pizza parlor, you’ve lost me.) Bug is talked about frequently in conspiracy threads all across the interwebs, though in ways that are less fun and more of a get-your-gun-and-storm-a-pizza-parlor way. This marred the film for me, but I thought it would be a great film to cover for our creepy crawlies month. Another red X this film has going for it is something wholly personal and makes me a bit biased. If I had a nickel for every time I’ve watched an edgy theater kid in college (throughout four years of theater classes) do a scene or monologue from this film, I’d have like 20 nickels.

JUST BECAUSE YOU ARE LOUD AND DO ERRATIC MOVEMENTS DOESN’T MEAN YOU’RE ACTING.

Bug tells a harrowing tale of the perils of mental health and conspiracy. Agnes (Ashley Judd) finds herself living in a rundown motel and constantly in fear of her incarcerated former partner, Jerry (Harry Connick Jr.). Things start to look up for Agnes when R.C. (Lynn Collins) introduces the mysterious but initially charming Peter Evans (Michael Shannon) into her life. Bug takes a sharp turn when Peter starts to share a theory that some government entity experimented on him during the war, which makes Peter go AWOL. What experiment did the government do to him? They filled him with…bugs!

Biases aside, Bug is one of the few films where I’m having trouble forming my opinion. To date, there has never been a film I both loved and disliked equally. Bug would mark the first collaboration between director William Friedkin and writer Tracy Letts, based on a play of the same name from writer Tracy Letts. This film walks the line between conspiracy and mental health. It stays fairly ambiguous throughout the entire runtime but eventually gives us a solid answer about one of the ambiguous ideas raised, and it feels incredibly cheap. If you spend considerable time leading the audience one way and then reversing that decision at the last moment with zero evidence to point that way, well, it’s careless. 

Two positive elements of this film work to save it from the depths of a pizza parlor’s sordid basement. Firstly, the film’s descent into madness. Secondly, the performances of Ashley Judd, Michael Shannon, and Lynn Collins (though it’s mainly Judd and Shannon). The characters are written in a way to foil each other perfectly, and the overwhelming majority of this film hinges upon the idea of social isolation so we are stuck with our characters in one location for 98% of the film. Judd and Shannon play off each other masterfully, and by the film’s final act, you cannot take your eyes off the screen. But again, the final act is ruined by Letts and Friedkin giving a solidified answer to questions that have been relatively ambiguous throughout the film. Shannon’s performance is most likely bolstered and fully realized by the fact that he played Peter Evans in the original, and subsequent stage performances of Bug

Advertisement

Finally, the last aspect of this film is something that could go either way for audiences; this mainly worked for me but it’s easy to see how this could be a detractor for some audiences—the dialogue. Friedkin tries hard to make the film feel like a stage play. The dialogue is written and performed as if you were watching a stage play. Conversations overlap in a way that feels very community theater-like. Film typically doesn’t have constant overlapping dialogue, so if that’s something you’re not a fan of, then you’ll have a tough time making it all the way through. 

Bug is a film that I think I’d possibly revisit with some other conspiracy friends, but that’s probably the only time I’d ever watch it again. Judd and Shannon give a masterclass in performing, it’s just ruined by one bad story decision. I’d be interested to see/read the original play to see where the film and the stage play share similarities and differences. 

Brendan is an award-winning author and screenwriter rotting away in New Jersey. His hobbies include rain, slugs, and the endless search for The Mothman.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Reviews

[Review] The Thrills and Kills of ‘Ils’ (2006)

Ils follows school teacher Clémentine (Olivia Bonamy) and her boyfriend Lucas (Michaël Cohen), who recently relocated from France to a remote McMansion in Romania. Clémentine arrives home one night after work to a normal evening. She and Lucas eat dinner, watch TV, flirt a bit, and head to bed. That evening, while they’re asleep, Clémentine hears a noise outside. They go to investigate, which turns out to be the wrong move. The couple soon realizes the noise outside has made its way inside. A cat-and-mouse game ensues, forcing Clémentine and Lucas to do anything they can to survive the night. But it soon comes to light the thing inside might actually be things.

Published

on

Author’s Note: It’s really difficult to talk about this film without spoiling who/what the killers are, so be warned.

As someone who lives alone, home invasion films have started to really get under my skin. Thinking that someone could break into the room in my basement apartment that I don’t use, and is street-facing, killing me, and then escaping, frightens me. Plus, there are no cameras around my building, and the windows don’t even lock properly. Okay, I’m going to shut up about that. But that doesn’t negate the fact that home invasion films get to me now. So, naturally, when researching some New French Extremity films for November, I figured I should finally break the seal and watch Ils, as it’s known in the States, Them.

Ils follows school teacher Clémentine (Olivia Bonamy) and her boyfriend Lucas (Michaël Cohen), who recently relocated from France to a remote McMansion in Romania. Clémentine arrives home one night after work to a normal evening. She and Lucas eat dinner, watch TV, flirt a bit, and head to bed. That evening, while they’re asleep, Clémentine hears a noise outside. They go to investigate, which turns out to be the wrong move. The couple soon realizes the noise outside has made its way inside. A cat-and-mouse game ensues, forcing Clémentine and Lucas to do anything they can to survive the night. But it soon comes to light the thing inside might actually be things.

Supposedly, this film is based on true events. If IMDb Trivia is to be taken at face value, then this film is based on a couple that a group of teenagers brutally murdered. In retrospect, it’s difficult to believe a group of kids pulled this all off. Take the cold open of the film. There is a mother and daughter involved in a single-car crash. The mother goes to check under the hood and disappears. This leads her daughter to lock the doors. In a few seconds, the car’s hood is slammed shut, mud is slung at the car from both sides, and the street light goes out. So, knowing that teenagers are the ones to blame for this, it seems a bit far-fetched. Especially when we eventually see the kids. We’re supposed to believe they’re teenagers, but they look between the ages of eight and ten.

The film works best when it blends the line between natural and supernatural, and when it seems like there is only one antagonist inside. Writer/directors David Moreau and Xavier Palud can’t find their footing with what type of story they want to tell. Ils would have worked much better as a supernatural horror film rather than a home invasion film with teenagers. When Ils makes you question what lurks within the house is when it works best. The big reveal at the end feels a bit forced. Part of me wishes Moreau and Palud had taken the idea on which they based their story and gone the supernatural route.

Advertisement

That being said, the cat-and-mouse aspect of Ils is the most enjoyable. When Lucas is taken out of commission, Clémentine is forced to take matters into her own hands. Clémentine is fascinating to watch and makes, what feels like, choices anyone else would make. Her reactions feel more authentic than the actions people usually take in horror films. But there’s still something that feels off and stale about this movie. At just 74 minutes, Ils feels like it rolls the credits before it really gets going.

Many people consider this film New French Extremity, and I can understand that. Would I consider it NFE? No. This is just a plain home invasion horror film. The violence, setting, and action do nothing to classify that as extreme in any sense. Is it scary? Sure! Is the [limited] violence painful to watch? You bet! But it doesn’t push any boundaries or set out to tell something deeper than it does. Ils isn’t a bad film, but it’s far from being a great film.

Continue Reading

Reviews

[REVIEW] My First Ever New French Extremity Film Was ‘Inside’ (2007)

Inside follows Sarah Scarangella (Alysson Paradis), a pregnant professional photographer who is still mourning the recent loss of her husband. On one unfortunate Christmas Eve, Sarah’s night is interrupted by an unknown woman (Béatrice Dalle). Not knowing who this woman is, Sarah refuses her entry. After taking a photo of this woman, and developing it, Sarah realizes she has a photo of this unknown woman from earlier in the day. Once Sarah thinks the woman is gone, she heads to bed. And that’s when all hell breaks loose. Bodies will drop, blood will flow, and babies will be birthed.

Published

on

Over 10 years ago I saw my first New French Extremity film in college. I took a trip to the Family Video near my college apartment and scanned the aisles. It was the first time I was in charge of picking a movie for a movie night with some friends. Most of the people attending that evening were horror fans, so that’s the vibe I was going for. After walking around for about five minutes I saw it. The top left corner read DIMENSION EXTREME. The middle of the cover read INSIDE in thick red letter, right below that stated UNRATED. The image was someone grasping their pregnant stomach and a pair of sharp dirty scissors questionably close to her stomach. That’s the movie I picked. And that was the last time I was allowed to pick the movies for our movie nights.

Inside follows Sarah Scarangella (Alysson Paradis), a pregnant professional photographer who is still mourning the recent loss of her husband. On one unfortunate Christmas Eve, Sarah’s night is interrupted by an unknown woman (Béatrice Dalle). Not knowing who this woman is, Sarah refuses her entry. After taking a photo of this woman, and developing it, Sarah realizes she has a photo of this unknown woman from earlier in the day. Once Sarah thinks the woman is gone, she heads to bed. And that’s when all hell breaks loose. Bodies will drop, blood will flow, and babies will be birthed.

Written by Alexandre Bustillo and directed by Julien Maury and Alexandre Bustillo, Inside would kick off an excellent career for these two French filmmakers. Brutal, sad, and one of the bloodiest films of all time, Inside is a film that needs to be seen to be believed. Like Calvaire, what makes Inside work so well, besides the tight script and great direction, is the pacing. Instead of a prolonged leadup to a barrage of violence and gore, Inside doles its violence out like a symphony. Each act perfectly leads into the next with the precision you don’t usually see in a debut feature film. The majority of the extreme violence happens to Sarah, which puts a lot of pressure on Alysson Paradis. Paradis sells her performance like Jordan Belfort selling a pen. Her responses are brutal and heartbreaking, while still being extremely grounded.

The special effects makeup department is too vast to list and will eat up my entire word count, but words cannot describe how visceral the practical effects are. From the most minor cut from a mirror to the stairway scene, you can’t help but feel like you’re watching something you should not be watching.

If you haven’t seen the film then this next part will be a huge spoiler, but we need to talk about it. Bustillo’s script takes an unexpected turn toward the end of the film. We learn the reason La Femme is attacking Sarah is due to a car accident. Sarah caused a car accident that took the life of La Femme’s child, killing her unborn baby. La Femme wants Sarah’s baby as reparations. Towards the end of the film, one of the cops who was presumed dead (he was shot with a riot gun) wakes up. His vision is hindered by the riot gun causing him to accidentally attack Sarah instead of La Femme. This attack breaks Sarah’s water, and La Femme kills the cop. Now, Sarah is on the stairs and her baby isn’t coming out–that’s where the scissors come back into play. La Femme has to perform a C-section on Sarah with the scissors, and it is, simply put, gnarly. The film ends with La Femme looking at Sarah’s dead body as she rocks the baby.

Advertisement

This ending is beyond heartbreaking. La Femme’s character almost has a complete turnaround. It’s hard to tell if she’s crying because she has the baby or because she did end up killing Sarah. My personal belief is that it all became too real once she had to kill the cop. If the cop hadn’t broken her water and forced the birth, would La Femme have gone through with this at this point? It’s up to interpretation, but I believe La Femme had repented her actions by that point. That doesn’t make it any better, though.

Next to Martyrs, Inside has one of the most heartbreaking endings of any New French Extremity film. While it’s a difficult watch, it’s an excellent film to rewatch as a case study on how to write an antagonist. To boot, Sarah was La Femme’s antagonist. Sarah was the one who caused the termination of La Femme’s pregnancy–so in a way, this is a revenge film. Bustillo’s script pulls the rug out from all preconceived notions. We thought we were watching one film when in reality, we were being expertly misled by the person we thought was the narrator. It’s a bold move for a debut.

Bustillo and Maury are still going strong in the genre. Their most recent film, The Soul Eater, recently had its premiere at Fantasia Fest. Like Inside, The Soul Eater was gory and violent, while focusing on an overall story that takes precedent. It’s impressive to see bits and pieces of Inside in The Soul Eater, while also adding all the bits and pieces of lessons they’ve learned over their six previous films. Inside is, to me, the best example of New French Extremity; it’s true stomach-churning, gut-wrenching, bloody as hell terror. 

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Horror Press Mailing List

Fangoria
Advertisement
Advertisement