Film Fests
[REVIEW] Final Girls Berlin Film Festival: ‘Somewhere Quiet’ (2023)
Somewhere Quiet falls into the spectrum of throwing too many ideas at the wall, hoping one of them sticks. Unfortunately, nothing does stick. The bones of this story work well. Meg (Jennifer Kim), who is the lead and doesn’t have top billing, escapes kidnappers and tries to reacclimate back into everyday life. Her husband, Scott (Kentucker Audley), decides for the Christmas season he and Meg will go to his family’s land; a place secluded deep within acres of forest. When Scott’s cousin Madelin (Marin Ireland) pops up, things start to get…strange. Meg’s PTSD from the kidnapping rears its ugly head in full force as she is forced to question Scott’s relationship with his kin.
Ambiguity in horror and film is a favorite of mine. Spoon-feeding the audience is a copout. When a filmmaker lets the audience make their own connections and thoughts about a film, it could mean a few things. Firstly, the filmmaker fully comprehends the story they are telling and trusts that the information provided to the audience is enough to make up their own mind. Secondly, it could mean a filmmaker wasn’t sure which ending they wanted, so they let the audience decide their own ending. Thirdly, it could easily mean the writer had no clue what story they wanted to tell and left it up to the director to put something together. Each example can be fun and can have its merit. Somewhere Quiet can’t make up its mind as to what it wants to be.
Somewhere Quiet: A Confusing Blend of Ideas
Somewhere Quiet falls into the spectrum of throwing too many ideas at the wall, hoping one of them sticks. Unfortunately, nothing does stick. The bones of this story work well. Meg (Jennifer Kim), who is the lead and doesn’t have top billing, escapes kidnappers and tries to reacclimate back into everyday life. Her husband, Scott (Kentucker Audley), decides for the Christmas season he and Meg will go to his family’s land; a place secluded deep within acres of forest. When Scott’s cousin Madelin (Marin Ireland) pops up, things start to get…strange. Meg’s PTSD from the kidnapping rears its ugly head in full force as she is forced to question Scott’s relationship with his kin.
Visually, Somewhere Quiet is a competent film. Writer/director Olivia West Lloyd has no issues there. This is one of those films where the audience is gaslit into questioning what they are seeing. And that’s where the problem lies. Lloyd makes the audience question Meg’s experiences with her kidnappers by trying to retcon the question of whether she is an unreliable narrator. However you choose to decipher the finale is up to you, but going off of the information provided by Lloyd, it feels a bit…off. To boot, the character of Joe (Micheál Neeson) is a complete nothing character-wise. Acting-wise there are no qualms with Neeson’s performance, but his character feels jammed into the story to try and create more thrills that have zero payoff.
A Frustrating Lack of Closure
If anything, Somewhere Quiet is an exercise in patience. By the film’s end, I was left wondering if Meg was projecting. Are these events real? Does it matter? When the credits rolled, not only did I not care anymore, but I felt myself looking at this film in a way where I felt like I was victim blaming. And I felt gross. The film has a supernatural element that goes nowhere and does nothing to progress the story. Ultimately, it seems like Olivia West Lloyd had good intentions with Somewhere Quiet, but the final product is too messy and falls flat.
Film Fests
Fantastic Fest: ‘Ghost in the Cell’ Review
If you’re not watching Indonesian horror, you’re missing out. The region is producing some of the craziest genre movies around right now, thanks in no small part to the efforts of writer-director Joko Anwar. His latest, Ghost in the Cell, which celebrated its North American premiere at Fantastic Fest 2026, combines everything we love about the filmmaker’s work—supernatural scares, inventive kills, and gnarly gore—along with a strong vein of comedy and political satire.
What is Ghost in the Cell About?
Ghost in the Cell centers around Dimas (Endy Arfian), a journalist whose life falls apart after he tries to run a story on corporate corruption and mysterious worker deaths. Wrongfully convicted of the horrific murder of his boss, Dimas finds himself with a one-way ticket to Cell Block C, where he quickly meets a colorful cast of prisoners—the good, the bad, and the seriously nasty. Among the good guys, there’s Anggoro (Abimana Aryasatya), who is constantly getting into trouble for defending fellow inmates, and Six (Yoga Pratama), who claims he can see people’s auras.
As if Dimas’ situation couldn’t get any worse, his arrival seems to trigger a series of brutal killings in the prison. Bodies are showing up mangled beyond recognition and displayed in positions that wouldn’t look out of place in Hannibal. It soon becomes clear that Dimas isn’t behind the murders, which begs the question: what did he bring in with him?
Anwar Embraces Horror-Comedy Whole-Heartedly
Prison is a scary place, and Anwar makes great use of the setting, with the action moving from the dingy showers where predators lurk to the bleak cellblock where inmates are at the mercy of their captors and the cafeteria where rival gangs eye each other up with ill intent.
But for all the human misery contained within the film, Ghost in the Cell is ultimately a horror-comedy, one that isn’t afraid to lean into broad slapstick and quippy dialogue when it wants to raise a chuckle. The tonal shifts can take a little while to adjust to, especially if your previous experience with Anwar comes from his more serious horror outings like Impetigore. This might be a problem if the film wasn’t actually funny, but Ghost in the Cell has enough laugh-out-loud moments to make you forget about any whiplash.
Ghost in the Cell Is a Genre-Bender to the Max
Comedy isn’t the only new flavor that Anwar has tossed into the mix. In Ghost in the Cell, dance sequences and martial-arts fight choreo sit side-by-side with some of the most extreme gore scenes seen outside a Terrifier movie in recent years. Then there’s the eerie way the spirit presents before it kills (trypophobia sufferers, beware) and the extensive critique of political corruption, power, and inequality. It’s an everything-and-the-kitchen-sink approach that shouldn’t work on paper, but under Anwar’s assured hand, it does.
It helps that for all the slapstick, the film lands a surprisingly earnest message, amplified by its vast ensemble cast. Dimas and Anggoro at times feel like main characters, but everyone in Ghost in the Cell has a big part to play, and that’s the point: in seemingly impossible circumstances, there’s strength in unity.
Ghost in the Cell Is an Endlessly Entertaining Blend of Goofiness, Heart, and Gore
If you’re looking for nonstop scares, you won’t find them in Ghost in the Cell. What you will find is a delightful blend of horror, comedy, and action that is apt to leave you grinning from ear to ear.
The film doesn’t skimp on the gore, throwing flesh and fluids at every surface. But it’s also charmingly goofy, with a cast that doesn’t take itself too seriously and a script that’s all too happy to devolve into a comedic dance scene when it feels like the spirit might strike. In every sense, Anwar is doing the most, and the end result is a film where there’s nary a dull moment in sight.
Film Fests
Fantastic Fest: ‘In a Violent Nature 2’ Review
One of the great pleasures of attending Fantastic Fest is the ability to occasionally see movies that won’t be out for many months. That’s especially true with the Secret Screenings, which this year included a work-in-progress print of In a Violent Nature 2, a film that doesn’t even have a release date yet and made for a wildly entertaining midnight movie surprise.
While a few things may change between now and release, the cut shown at Fantastic Fest felt near-final. Here’s what you can look forward to when this sequel eventually slashes its way onto our screens.
Johnny Returns in In a Violent Nature 2
In a Violent Nature 2 picks up right where the action of its predecessor left off, while also introducing new aspects of the lore that slightly contradict or complicate what has already been established, a nod to the way that slasher sequels throw in new plot elements willy-nilly to suit their needs.
The second film centers on Alex (Lucas Nguyen), a quiet 14-year-old kid who misses the bus home from camp because his bullies have stuffed him in a trunk. Since his older sister works at the camp, he gets to hang out for the night while the counselors celebrate the end of the season. Unfortunately, an old fireman’s whistle has drawn the mute, hulking Johnny (Ry Barrett) to the camp—and before long, their night of revelry has turned into one of unimaginable horror.
Less Walking, More Killing
Chris Nash, who wrote and directed the first film, handles scripting duties this time around, with Nate Wilson—who served as first assistant director on the original—stepping into the director role. It feels as though Nash may have listened to viewers’ complaints about how much walking was in the original, because In a Violent Nature 2 takes a break from following Johnny on his lumbering mission. Instead, the camera largely chases Alex through the woods as he runs, trips, and stumbles away from the carnage.
This change is a mixed bag. Alex may be more a dynamic figure to follow overall, but he also makes some frustratingly poor choices, and his teenage moodiness makes him a little unlikeable. The first film also succeeded, in part, because it consciously played into how audiences consume slasher movies, with their sympathies shifting from cheering on the killer to rooting for the final girl when she triumphantly emerges. In a Violent Nature 2 feels like less of a meta-commentary on the slasher genre, though it still has plenty to offer fans of the genre, especially when it comes to kills.
In a Violent Nature 2 Takes the Gore to a Whole New Level
Mention In a Violent Nature to a horror fan and they’ll probably bring up the yoga kill within 10 seconds. For the sequel, Nash and Wilson attempt to up the ante—no small feat considering just how violent the first film was. It’s hard to top that particular kill, but In a Violent Nature 2 certainly gives it the old college try.
Shifting the focus from a single group of friends to an entire summer camp, even one that’s emptying out, instantly ups the potential body count (and harkens back to the slasher films of yore). Counsellors are slaughtered in droves, in ways more brutal than anything seen in the original film, with a few kills in particular sure to get people talking. It’s a real treat for fans of practical effects, and it’s great to see that even horror films positioning themselves as more “elevated” than the typical fare can have fun and get their hands bloody.
A Possible Set up for Another Sequel?
Minor spoilers ahead.
In a Violent Nature 2 feels like something of a response to the reception of the first film, removing what people didn’t like and piling on more of what they did. The result is a movie that feels a little less focused and meditative than its predecessor, but still incredibly fun. And with a third film heavily teased in the final minutes, it seems like we’ll be seeing more of Johnny in the near future. Based on the trajectory of other slashers, can we expect to see him fighting a psychic child next? Or—dare we dream—is he preparing for a trip to space?
Only time will tell. Better lace up your walking shoes.
When Does In a Violent Nature 2 Come Out?
In a Violent Nature 2 is slated to hit theaters sometime in 2026. Keep an eye on IFC Films and Shudder’s socials for more release information as it becomes available.


