Reviews
‘Five Nights at Freddy’s’ Movie Review: Fun for Fans
At the tail end of September, my Horror 101 article preparing for the Five Nights at Freddy’s film had thrust me into an Olympic swimming pool worth of lore. I was forced to reacquaint myself with a story I hadn’t been following for six games and had a lot of fun doing so. I became immersed in a tangled, nasty web of murder, twisted timelines, magical haunted metal, and surprisingly great voice acting. But it was all for a film I was apprehensive about. Adapting a franchise as mythically dense as FNAF seemed doomed to fail.
Blumhouse makes a fun enough horror comedy for younger fans of the series— but will the mascot suit it’s made fit audiences at large?
Five Nights at Freddy’s is Finally Here
When I sat in the theatre realizing it was actually here, a movie that had only been manifested in fake posters and fan trailers for almost a decade, I was unsurprisingly hit with a wave of nostalgia. For a moment, I was once again an annoying high schooler who had seen all the lets-plays and was arguing in the YouTube comments section about who that security guard was. And I’m not going to lie, it was fun for me. But I will try and divorce that personal bias from the very serious, adult business that is talking about faux-Chuck E. Cheese murder robots.
For those needing a catch-up: Mike (Josh Hutcherson) is a down-on-his-luck man whose nights are filled with the same horrific dream on repeat. In his waking hours, he struggles to hold down a job and support his younger sister Abby. With his Aunt Jane trying to wrestle custody of his sister from him, Mike is forced to take the graveyard shift as the night security of a defunct pizzeria: Freddy Fazbear’s Pizza Place. Shut down years ago due to a rash of missing children cases, his encounter with the uncanny animatronics that live there sets Mike on a path to learn the secret of their deaths– and his past.
A Decent Piece of Gateway Horror for Horror Newbies
I will hit you with the cold water off the bat and say that despite the dire plot of the film, Five Nights is tonally off-key from how it was marketed and will be polarizing because of it. Those looking for a strait-laced horror film will enjoy the first act but might be better off seeking one of those animated fan films on YouTube for some real jolts of fear: Five Nights at Freddy’s ends up being a horror comedy for most of the runtime. It’s gateway horror like most PG-13 ventures, the same way the games were gateway horror for the primarily young fandom.
The fact that it gets more laughs than legitimate scares is understandable because of this, even if it is a tad disappointing to those expecting real frights. Barring one surprisingly violent death (the best shock of the film), we get mostly tempered demises for everyone. It’s more cute than blood-curdling, so don’t get your hopes up if you’re looking for something more on the side of the very corn-syrupy The Banana Splits Movie.
Visuals and Atmosphere: A Dingy, Nostalgic Vibe
Director Emma Tammi’s previous horror venture The Wind was a lot more stylized and a lot more emotionally heavy, so her selection piqued my interest early on, but this odd pick ultimately rendered little more than some good visuals given Five Nights sticks to as conventional of a look as possible in its presentation. Still, the set design and the locations fight against bog-standard camerawork and editing to create a great atmosphere for the film.
I’m always grateful for a movie that avoids those saccharine, neon-splattered depictions of the 90s that have become so popular; Five Nights opts instead for the much more realistic palette of dingy browns and beiges that makes every building interior feel like it is suffering from a special midwestern brand of dry rot. The inside of the pizzeria feels musty and damaged even when the lights are all on, and the arcade machines are glowing brightly. It’s not oversaturated and candy-like, and some choice lighting gives the film a good look.
So What About the Animatronics?
Of course, the star of the show here is those animatronic suits. Freddy, Foxy, Bonnie, and Chica were a riot to see fully realized outside of 3D models and can range from adorable to menacing from scene to scene. Expressive eyes and only the slightest digital touch-ups make every animatronic look freakishly great on screen as the practical elements shine through with smooth movement. The best of these is Foxy, who gets ample time to stalk around and show off the look of these highly advanced endoskeletons (but we don’t get that iconic lunging jump scare, sadly, so a moment of silence for that).
And in terms of the actors, they’re led in quality by Hutcherson, who is enjoyable as Mike. Though he’s stuck dealing with a repetitive plot device for much of the runtime, his acting is compelling enough to make me want to keep seeing him. He’s sympathetic as the beleaguered big brother looking for a way out for his sister and him, so it works. Piper Rubio is fun as precocious kid sister Abby and Elizabeth Lail is serviceably ominous as lady-cop-who-knows-way-too-much Vanessa. They only do poorly when the script puts them in a corner with awkward, ham-fisted exposition, which isn’t that often but is noticeable.
Matthew Lillard’s Missed Opportunity
Finally, there is the big Matthew Lillard-shaped hole here. No, there’s nothing wrong with his performance. Don’t strap me into the Fazbear brand face blender yet. I wish he had more of a presence in the story, especially given the twist of this film stopped being a twist the second you see an actor of his quality playing a supposedly bit part. That is as much as I can say while still staying in the confines of my spoiler-free limits, but you can take a wide, swinging guess as to who he is and still hit your target. He isn’t around nearly enough, and while it’s easy to say they’ll remedy that in the sequel, the film fails to give him enough to do and pulls him into the story way too late.
Needless to say, Stu Macher doesn’t need to eat his heart out just yet, that’s still Lillard’s most iconic performance.
Five Nights at Freddy’s Is a Fun but Flawed Adaptation
In the end, Five Nights at Freddy’s isn’t half bad, but doesn’t soar exceptionally high either. It is the definition of a decent gateway film to spookier ventures, and I had fun with it. It trades near-impenetrable complexity for something much more accessible for general audiences, whose mileage may vary if they go in expecting serious horror. Fans will enjoy seeing recognizable elements of the franchise, but even without that brand recognition carrying it, Five Nights at Freddy’s is a fun haunted house-style excursion for the Halloween season and sets itself to be fondly remembered as an intro to horror for today’s younger audiences.
Reviews
‘Undertone’ Review: A24’s Scariest Since ‘Hereditary’
A24 never stopped pumping out banger horror movies. Let’s get that out of the way, straight away. Even its commercial and critical flops, like Opus or Y2K, still took a lot of really original swings, even if it hasn’t been a string of masterpieces like in their horror heyday of the late 2010s and early 2020s. Still, they may have made their scariest yet with Undertone, in a return to A24’s original MO of pure indie filmmaking.
A Single Location Horror Film Powered by Sound
Undertone is not a perfect movie, with an occasional off story beat, and the ending just missing the mark of perfection, but it is a tried-and-true testament to the power of storytelling. With essentially one active, on-screen actress and a single location, the film manages to create a sensory hellscape with immersive nightmare-inducing audio that has both story and scares derived entirely from a podcast. It is a sensory overload of pure terror, one that feels deeply sinister in its pitch-black story, one that demands to be seen in the darkest possible movie theater.
A24’s Undertone: A True Crime Podcast Turns Supernatural
The story is pretty straightforward…at least at first. It follows a true crime/horror podcast host (Nina Kiry), who lives by herself as she takes care of her dying, elderly, and borderline vegetative mother. Her co-host (Adam DiMarco, who is never fully seen) is sent a series of ten mysterious audio files from an unknown address, presumably sent for her to listen to on the show. As they begin to record their latest episode with live reactions to the files, reality slips further as she and her co-host fall into supernatural delirium. Strange noises, slipping time, and other haunted house trimmings all come out to play, each elevated by (as mentioned) horrific sound design and an even more horrific backstory.
Nursery Rhyme Origins and Deeply Disturbing Mythology
The story is about 95% airtight. Without getting too deep into spoilers, the origins of these files and their meaning are deeply fascinating, with some elements and angles involving the origins of nursery rhymes that are very, genuinely disturbing. There is one twist in particular that explores what one of the sounds truly means, which is highly upsetting once pieced together.
That being said, Undertone has some familiar tropes, and while the movie mostly touches upon certain unexplored mythology, certain scenes can feel a little too familiar to other recent demon movies like Shelby Oaks. The true meanings are a lot more creative, but it could have played around with its mythos to create a truly original villain.
Undertone’s Ambiguous Ending Demands a Rewatch
Similarly, the ending is almost perfect. There is a final twist about something the protagonist might have done that is a little confusing, and reframes the context of the film. It is highly interesting, however, and opens up several cans of worms of what this movie has to say about children, motherhood, and parenthood as a whole, as well as posing questions about the movie’s setting and timeline. It is always better to remain vague in horror, which this movie definitely does, but just a slight retweak of its final act could give the audience just the tiniest more understanding, without it going into full, mainstream territory. The film definitely requires a second watch, and in the best way possible.
A Groundbreaking Podcast Horror Experience
In a nutshell, the film’s methods of storytelling are groundbreaking. This movie is not a podcast, but all of its scares and stories are delivered to us like it is one. It feels like the birth of a new medium or style of movie, a perfect blend of audio and visual, with emphasis on the audio.
Additionally, with the story being literally told to us as if we’re listening to the characters’ podcast itself, it is a nightmare rabbit hole.
Reviews
‘Silent Warnings’ (2003) Review: An Unknown UFO Gem
Like many people born in the mid-90s, the Sci-Fi Channel was one of my first introductions to horror. Whether it was random films playing or Sci-Fi’s 31 Days of Halloween, this channel was one of the main channels in my household. For the month of March, we’re going to take a look at Sci-Fi Originals (and maybe I cheated a bit and picked films that had their premiere on Sci-Fi). Picking films for this month was no easy task. Did I want to cover one of the plethora of amalgamated mega-animals fighting each other? Or what about shark tornadoes? One of the films I picked, after finding it too difficult to find Children of the Corn (2009) on streaming services, was an odd alien film I had never even heard of. That film is Silent Warnings.
What is Silent Warnings About?
Layne Vossimer (A.J. Buckley), his girlfriend Macy (Callie De Fabry), and a group of their friends head to Layne’s cousin’s house, Joe (Stephen Baldwin), after his mysterious death. Once there, they find the house in disgusting disarray. The friends decide to help Layne clean it up in order to put it on the market. But things quickly go south when they find a series of VHS tapes Joe left behind in the attic. What’s revealed in those tapes shows something that’s out of this world. Can Layne, his friends, and Sheriff Bill Willingham (Billy Zane) fend off these otherworldly invaders before it’s too late?
Conspiracy Theories, Mental Health, and Paranoia in Silent Warnings
As stated, this film was a late pick as I could not find 2009’s Children of the Corn streaming anywhere. Boy, am I glad I picked this. Silent Warnings has its fair share of issues. But it makes up for them in so many ways. This film is a very sober look into conspiracy theories, mental health, and the lengths that people go to when it comes to perceived threats. We get very little Stephen Baldwin, but what we do get is more than enough. He’s a recluse who lives on his 40-ish-acre property that’s been alien-proofed. His best friend (cousin?) is a scarecrow that has an AK-47. And he constantly records incoherent ramblings with his camcorder. Baldwin absolutely kills in his limited screentime. It’s like Stanislavski said, there are no small parts, only small actors.
Small-Town Horror and UFO Lore in Porterville
The quaint town of Porterville acts as the perfect backdrop for a story like this: a sleepy, nowhere town, where most people know each other. A town where the big call of the day for the Sheriff is about a missing dog. It’s the perfect setup for a story like this. It even mirrors many of the towns mentioned in Silent Invasion: The Pennsylvania UFO-Bigfoot Casebook. Much of this film’s atmosphere, the crop circles, acres of corn, and the disintegrating house, create a condensed world that adds so much claustrophobia to the film’s soul.
Acting, Dialogue, and the Problem with Early 2000s CGI Aliens
That being said, there are quite a few issues. Mainly, the acting. Besides Kim Onasch, Michelle Borth, Billy Zane, and A.J. Buckley (mostly), much of this film’s acting feels very Sci-Fi Original. It doesn’t help that the film’s dialogue, from writers Bill Lundy, Christian McIntire, and Kevin Gendreau, is just plain boring. And that’s not even mentioning how awful the CGI aliens look. A 2003 film about aliens, when only two or three are shown on screen, should be fully practical. And the fact that they use digital aliens takes away much of the film’s punch.
Why Silent Warnings Is an Underrated Sci-Fi Original
Silent Warnings doesn’t break much ground when it comes to the topic of aliens/Ufology, but it’s damn entertaining. But that’s the thing. Films don’t necessarily need to break new ground. I appreciate the swings this film takes, whether they hit or miss. There’s a wonderful setup with Stephen Baldwin, and the slow build to an exciting finale makes it all worth the wait. For a Sci-Fi Original, Silent Warnings has worked its way into my heart.


