Reviews
WELCOME BACK TO THE FURTHER: A Spoiler-Free Review of ‘Insidious: The Red Door’
To fully contextualize my feelings on Insidious: The Red Door, I kind of have to explain my feelings on all the previous films. You get multiple reviews for the price of one here, reader. Congrats!
The Blueprint for Modern Horror
Insidious struck just the right balance of enjoyable, atmospheric ghost film with a grounded family drama, and despite some silly editing, you can understand why it did gangbusters at the box office. It became the blueprint for ghost/demon films for a while, and for good reason. Insidious Chapter 2 brought some fresh Blumhouse cash which enhanced the cinematography, mainly in the set design and audio, but it also expanded on the lore of the world and made for an even better film than the first. Insidious 3 was…bad but admittedly redeemed in some respects by the worldbuilding done in Insidious: The Last Key, which is enjoyable and gives us all what we wanted: even more Lin Shaye as Elise Rainier.
Insidious: The Red Door A Worthy Finale?
So, Insidious: The Red Door being the final mainline installment for the foreseeable future is appropriate, as it reflects the track record of all the films thus far: it’s got its problems, but it’s still undeniably great, and supplements all its shortcomings with a flood of expertly executed scares as you’ve come to expect from the franchise.
Insidious: The Red Door follows the events of Insidious: Chapter 2 directly (well, as direct as a nine-year gap can be). With the Lambert family trying to forget the demons and spirits of the Further, eldest son Dalton (Ty Simpkins) moves away for his first year of college. Despite their best efforts, he and his father, Josh (Patrick Wilson), begin to experience the return of supernatural activity. As the clock runs down, the two must deal with their hypnotically repressed memories and end the madness that has plagued them for almost a decade.
Patrick Wilson’s Directorial Debut Shines
Behind the camera, we get the directorial debut of Patrick Wilson, who in coordination with cinematographer Autumn Eakin makes a very aesthetically pleasing film. The natural and supernatural realms they show us knock it out of the park thanks to this production and some bespoke set design. This is the best the Further has looked in all of the movies, and the return to a very familiar location from previous entries was so perfectly executed that I started smiling in the theatre when I saw it. The return of a fan-favorite villain also gives us a redesign that feels like the truest version of them and makes them the scariest they’ve ever been. There’s an undeniable element of nostalgia in how this film emulates its predecessor’s style. That nostalgia comes from a true understanding of what makes these movies effective.
The Horror That Defines Insidious
The greatest strength of the Insidious movies technically has always been its use of shadow and playing with empty space in the frame to build tension. Moving the camera around slowly, and just when you think you’ve pinned down a pattern, it gets a bombastic jumpscare over you while trying to anticipate where it’s coming from. They codified this for all the other horror movies of the 2010s, so of course, the scares are still exceptional in this one. Add onto this Joseph Bisharra’s unmistakable score, which gives you the middle point where dissonant strings meet creaking naturalistic noise, and it scratches your brain just right. These factors work together harmoniously, and you get some all-around grade-A cinematography.
Writing Woes: A Rocky Start
Beyond technical strengths… there’s a little trouble in paradise. I will get all my complaints about the writing out of the way quickly to talk about everything I like in the film’s story. The dialogue is distractingly lackluster early on (see the laughably aggro art professor and the most fratboy fratboy of all time). The film tries its hand at humor quite a bit more than the originals did with Tucker and Specs, to its detriment. While a couple of the jokes hit, the rest fall flat early on, even if they’re delivered by good actors. While the film’s second and third acts are well-done and exceptional, the first act is pretty bad in the face of some of the well-done scares.
A Profound Father-Son Story
The rest of the film I love because it’s none of that. It’s a dramatic and weirdly profound story of a father and son that melds perfectly with the series’ trademark horror. It impacted me even more than the story of the first film. Those who have rewatched the series recently know Josh as a character who never got to develop beyond being the beleaguered skeptic father in the first movie, then being sidelined in the second as he spends the entire runtime possessed by Parker Crane, aka the Woman in Black.
Insidious: The Red Door takes time to explore the implications of those movies and how Josh spent them. Instead of disturbing some wonderful homelife they earned through their previous struggle, this film puts us back in the tumult of a family haunted by their past. The weight of the first two films is felt in a major way, and it’s appreciated that picking back up after two mostly unrelated films in the series and so many years hasn’t hampered that feeling. Time, and absence, have made the story of the Lambert family grow fonder.
Wilson and Simpkins Shine
Much of the emotional weight this time is carried by Josh, and Wilson plays the character with the same level of depth Rose Byrne afforded Renai in the first and second movies; that is to say, he’s impressive and feels incredibly genuine. The other actor who gets the lion’s share of screen time is Simpkins, playing a now grown-up Dalton (do you feel old yet?). He doesn’t get to interact much with Foster like I had hoped, or his mother Renai, who is back home for most of the film. But, if they did get to interact, it would defeat the purpose of making the audience experience the isolation Dalton’s been through and continues to go through. He does have his roommate Chris, who is played by the very charismatic Sinclair Daniel, and the two have some decent onscreen chemistry. All the movie’s players are enjoyable, but the film absolutely glows in the interactions we get between Josh and Dalton, culminating in a very touching moment between the two and the best climax of the series.
Tackling Generational Trauma with Horror
While many movies as of late have made it popular to drop a true tangible villain in favor of a horror that hits closer to home, the inscrutable evil of generational trauma, this movie surprised me the most in how well it handled it. Not to say the threats from the Further aren’t still there, and still scary; just that the emotional damage this film shows us is a whole other challenge in and of itself. And if none of that interests you, we’ve also got some gnarly spirits from that astral dimension beyond. One of them gave me a nasty scare that made my jaw drop in the theatre. If you gag easily, wait for this one to be out on VOD. But if you’ve got the guts for it, you should go to the theatre immediately.
Here’s hoping the upcoming spin-off, Thread: An Insidious Tale, lives up to the hype just as well.
Does Insidious: The Red Door Deliver?
After a fat 10-year gap, does Insidious: The Red Door give a satisfying conclusion to the open-door ending of Chapter 2? More than any fan would anticipate. A sloggy first act and some poorly placed humor should not drive you away from what is a lovingly crafted finale for the Lamberts that is shockingly heartfelt despite being able to scare the hell out of you. This is now my second favorite film in the entire series, so believe me when I say you should take one more journey into the Further and watch it this weekend.
Reviews
‘Undertone’ Review: A24’s Scariest Since ‘Hereditary’
A24 never stopped pumping out banger horror movies. Let’s get that out of the way, straight away. Even its commercial and critical flops, like Opus or Y2K, still took a lot of really original swings, even if it hasn’t been a string of masterpieces like in their horror heyday of the late 2010s and early 2020s. Still, they may have made their scariest yet with Undertone, in a return to A24’s original MO of pure indie filmmaking.
A Single Location Horror Film Powered by Sound
Undertone is not a perfect movie, with an occasional off story beat, and the ending just missing the mark of perfection, but it is a tried-and-true testament to the power of storytelling. With essentially one active, on-screen actress and a single location, the film manages to create a sensory hellscape with immersive nightmare-inducing audio that has both story and scares derived entirely from a podcast. It is a sensory overload of pure terror, one that feels deeply sinister in its pitch-black story, one that demands to be seen in the darkest possible movie theater.
A24’s Undertone: A True Crime Podcast Turns Supernatural
The story is pretty straightforward…at least at first. It follows a true crime/horror podcast host (Nina Kiry), who lives by herself as she takes care of her dying, elderly, and borderline vegetative mother. Her co-host (Adam DiMarco, who is never fully seen) is sent a series of ten mysterious audio files from an unknown address, presumably sent for her to listen to on the show. As they begin to record their latest episode with live reactions to the files, reality slips further as she and her co-host fall into supernatural delirium. Strange noises, slipping time, and other haunted house trimmings all come out to play, each elevated by (as mentioned) horrific sound design and an even more horrific backstory.
Nursery Rhyme Origins and Deeply Disturbing Mythology
The story is about 95% airtight. Without getting too deep into spoilers, the origins of these files and their meaning are deeply fascinating, with some elements and angles involving the origins of nursery rhymes that are very, genuinely disturbing. There is one twist in particular that explores what one of the sounds truly means, which is highly upsetting once pieced together.
That being said, Undertone has some familiar tropes, and while the movie mostly touches upon certain unexplored mythology, certain scenes can feel a little too familiar to other recent demon movies like Shelby Oaks. The true meanings are a lot more creative, but it could have played around with its mythos to create a truly original villain.
Undertone’s Ambiguous Ending Demands a Rewatch
Similarly, the ending is almost perfect. There is a final twist about something the protagonist might have done that is a little confusing, and reframes the context of the film. It is highly interesting, however, and opens up several cans of worms of what this movie has to say about children, motherhood, and parenthood as a whole, as well as posing questions about the movie’s setting and timeline. It is always better to remain vague in horror, which this movie definitely does, but just a slight retweak of its final act could give the audience just the tiniest more understanding, without it going into full, mainstream territory. The film definitely requires a second watch, and in the best way possible.
A Groundbreaking Podcast Horror Experience
In a nutshell, the film’s methods of storytelling are groundbreaking. This movie is not a podcast, but all of its scares and stories are delivered to us like it is one. It feels like the birth of a new medium or style of movie, a perfect blend of audio and visual, with emphasis on the audio.
Additionally, with the story being literally told to us as if we’re listening to the characters’ podcast itself, it is a nightmare rabbit hole.
Reviews
‘Silent Warnings’ (2003) Review: An Unknown UFO Gem
Like many people born in the mid-90s, the Sci-Fi Channel was one of my first introductions to horror. Whether it was random films playing or Sci-Fi’s 31 Days of Halloween, this channel was one of the main channels in my household. For the month of March, we’re going to take a look at Sci-Fi Originals (and maybe I cheated a bit and picked films that had their premiere on Sci-Fi). Picking films for this month was no easy task. Did I want to cover one of the plethora of amalgamated mega-animals fighting each other? Or what about shark tornadoes? One of the films I picked, after finding it too difficult to find Children of the Corn (2009) on streaming services, was an odd alien film I had never even heard of. That film is Silent Warnings.
What is Silent Warnings About?
Layne Vossimer (A.J. Buckley), his girlfriend Macy (Callie De Fabry), and a group of their friends head to Layne’s cousin’s house, Joe (Stephen Baldwin), after his mysterious death. Once there, they find the house in disgusting disarray. The friends decide to help Layne clean it up in order to put it on the market. But things quickly go south when they find a series of VHS tapes Joe left behind in the attic. What’s revealed in those tapes shows something that’s out of this world. Can Layne, his friends, and Sheriff Bill Willingham (Billy Zane) fend off these otherworldly invaders before it’s too late?
Conspiracy Theories, Mental Health, and Paranoia in Silent Warnings
As stated, this film was a late pick as I could not find 2009’s Children of the Corn streaming anywhere. Boy, am I glad I picked this. Silent Warnings has its fair share of issues. But it makes up for them in so many ways. This film is a very sober look into conspiracy theories, mental health, and the lengths that people go to when it comes to perceived threats. We get very little Stephen Baldwin, but what we do get is more than enough. He’s a recluse who lives on his 40-ish-acre property that’s been alien-proofed. His best friend (cousin?) is a scarecrow that has an AK-47. And he constantly records incoherent ramblings with his camcorder. Baldwin absolutely kills in his limited screentime. It’s like Stanislavski said, there are no small parts, only small actors.
Small-Town Horror and UFO Lore in Porterville
The quaint town of Porterville acts as the perfect backdrop for a story like this: a sleepy, nowhere town, where most people know each other. A town where the big call of the day for the Sheriff is about a missing dog. It’s the perfect setup for a story like this. It even mirrors many of the towns mentioned in Silent Invasion: The Pennsylvania UFO-Bigfoot Casebook. Much of this film’s atmosphere, the crop circles, acres of corn, and the disintegrating house, create a condensed world that adds so much claustrophobia to the film’s soul.
Acting, Dialogue, and the Problem with Early 2000s CGI Aliens
That being said, there are quite a few issues. Mainly, the acting. Besides Kim Onasch, Michelle Borth, Billy Zane, and A.J. Buckley (mostly), much of this film’s acting feels very Sci-Fi Original. It doesn’t help that the film’s dialogue, from writers Bill Lundy, Christian McIntire, and Kevin Gendreau, is just plain boring. And that’s not even mentioning how awful the CGI aliens look. A 2003 film about aliens, when only two or three are shown on screen, should be fully practical. And the fact that they use digital aliens takes away much of the film’s punch.
Why Silent Warnings Is an Underrated Sci-Fi Original
Silent Warnings doesn’t break much ground when it comes to the topic of aliens/Ufology, but it’s damn entertaining. But that’s the thing. Films don’t necessarily need to break new ground. I appreciate the swings this film takes, whether they hit or miss. There’s a wonderful setup with Stephen Baldwin, and the slow build to an exciting finale makes it all worth the wait. For a Sci-Fi Original, Silent Warnings has worked its way into my heart.


