Reviews
WELCOME BACK TO THE FURTHER: A Spoiler-Free Review of ‘Insidious: The Red Door’
To fully contextualize my feelings on Insidious: The Red Door, I kind of have to explain my feelings on all the previous films. You get multiple reviews for the price of one here, reader. Congrats!
Insidious struck just the right balance of enjoyable, atmospheric ghost film with a grounded family drama, and despite some silly editing, you can understand why it did gangbusters at the box office. It became the blueprint for ghost/demon films for a while, and for good reason. Insidious Chapter 2 brought some fresh Blumhouse cash which enhanced the cinematography, mainly in the set design and audio, but it also expanded on the lore of the world and made for an even better film than the first. Insidious 3 was…bad but admittedly redeemed in some respects by the worldbuilding done in Insidious: The Last Key, which is enjoyable and gives us all what we wanted: even more Lin Shaye as Elise Rainier.
So, Insidious: The Red Door being the final mainline installment for the foreseeable future is appropriate, as it reflects the track record of all the films thus far: it’s got its problems, but it’s still undeniably great, and supplements all its shortcomings with a flood of expertly executed scares as you’ve come to expect from the franchise.
Insidious: The Red Door follows the events of Insidious: Chapter 2 directly (well, as direct as a nine-year gap can be). With the Lambert family trying to forget the demons and spirits of the Further, eldest son Dalton (Ty Simpkins) moves away for his first year of college. Despite their best efforts, he and his father, Josh (Patrick Wilson), begin to experience the return of supernatural activity. As the clock runs down, the two must deal with their hypnotically repressed memories and end the madness that has plagued them for almost a decade.
Behind the camera, we get the directorial debut of Patrick Wilson, who in coordination with cinematographer Autumn Eakin makes a very aesthetically pleasing film. The natural and supernatural realms they show us knock it out of the park thanks to this production and some bespoke set design. This is the best the Further has looked in all of the movies, and the return to a very familiar location from previous entries was so perfectly executed that I started smiling in the theatre when I saw it. The return of a fan-favorite villain also gives us a redesign that feels like the truest version of them and makes them the scariest they’ve ever been. There’s an undeniable element of nostalgia in how this film emulates its predecessor’s style. That nostalgia comes from a true understanding of what makes these movies effective.
The greatest strength of the Insidious movies technically has always been its use of shadow and playing with empty space in the frame to build tension. Moving the camera around slowly, and just when you think you’ve pinned down a pattern, it gets a bombastic jumpscare over you while trying to anticipate where it’s coming from. They codified this for all the other horror movies of the 2010s, so of course, the scares are still exceptional in this one. Add onto this Joseph Bisharra’s unmistakable score, which gives you the middle point where dissonant strings meet creaking naturalistic noise, and it scratches your brain just right. These factors work together harmoniously, and you get some all-around grade-A cinematography.
Beyond technical strengths… there’s a little trouble in paradise. I will get all my complaints about the writing out of the way quickly to talk about everything I like in the film’s story. The dialogue is distractingly lackluster early on (see the laughably aggro art professor and the most fratboy fratboy of all time). The film tries its hand at humor quite a bit more than the originals did with Tucker and Specs, to its detriment. While a couple of the jokes hit, the rest fall flat early on, even if they’re delivered by good actors. While the film’s second and third acts are well-done and exceptional, the first act is pretty bad in the face of some of the well-done scares.
The rest of the film I love because it’s none of that. It’s a dramatic and weirdly profound story of a father and son that melds perfectly with the series’ trademark horror. It impacted me even more than the story of the first film. Those who have rewatched the series recently know Josh as a character who never got to develop beyond being the beleaguered skeptic father in the first movie, then being sidelined in the second as he spends the entire runtime possessed by Parker Crane, aka the Woman in Black.
Insidious: The Red Door takes time to explore the implications of those movies and how Josh spent them. Instead of disturbing some wonderful homelife they earned through their previous struggle, this film puts us back in the tumult of a family haunted by their past. The weight of the first two films is felt in a major way, and it’s appreciated that picking back up after two mostly unrelated films in the series and so many years hasn’t hampered that feeling. Time, and absence, have made the story of the Lambert family grow fonder.
Much of the emotional weight this time is carried by Josh, and Wilson plays the character with the same level of depth Rose Byrne afforded Renai in the first and second movies; that is to say, he’s impressive and feels incredibly genuine. The other actor who gets the lion’s share of screen time is Simpkins, playing a now grown-up Dalton (do you feel old yet?). He doesn’t get to interact much with Foster like I had hoped, or his mother Renai, who is back home for most of the film. But, if they did get to interact, it would defeat the purpose of making the audience experience the isolation Dalton’s been through and continues to go through. He does have his roommate Chris, who is played by the very charismatic Sinclair Daniel, and the two have some decent onscreen chemistry. All the movie’s players are enjoyable, but the film absolutely glows in the interactions we get between Josh and Dalton, culminating in a very touching moment between the two and the best climax of the series.
While many movies as of late have made it popular to drop a true tangible villain in favor of a horror that hits closer to home, the inscrutable evil of generational trauma, this movie surprised me the most in how well it handled it. Not to say the threats from the Further aren’t still there, and still scary; just that the emotional damage this film shows us is a whole other challenge in and of itself. And if none of that interests you, we’ve also got some gnarly spirits from that astral dimension beyond. One of them gave me a nasty scare that made my jaw drop in the theatre. If you gag easily, wait for this one to be out on VOD. But if you’ve got the guts for it, you should go to the theatre immediately.
Here’s hoping the upcoming spin-off, Thread: An Insidious Tale, lives up to the hype just as well.
BOTTOMLINE: After a fat 10-year gap, does Insidious: The Red Door give a satisfying conclusion to the open-door ending of Chapter 2? More than any fan would anticipate. A sloggy first act and some poorly placed humor should not drive you away from what is a lovingly crafted finale for the Lamberts that is shockingly heartfelt despite being able to scare the hell out of you. This is now my second favorite film in the entire series, so believe me when I say you should take one more journey into the Further and watch it this weekend.
Reviews
[Review] The Thrills and Kills of ‘Ils’ (2006)
Ils follows school teacher Clémentine (Olivia Bonamy) and her boyfriend Lucas (Michaël Cohen), who recently relocated from France to a remote McMansion in Romania. Clémentine arrives home one night after work to a normal evening. She and Lucas eat dinner, watch TV, flirt a bit, and head to bed. That evening, while they’re asleep, Clémentine hears a noise outside. They go to investigate, which turns out to be the wrong move. The couple soon realizes the noise outside has made its way inside. A cat-and-mouse game ensues, forcing Clémentine and Lucas to do anything they can to survive the night. But it soon comes to light the thing inside might actually be things.
Author’s Note: It’s really difficult to talk about this film without spoiling who/what the killers are, so be warned.
As someone who lives alone, home invasion films have started to really get under my skin. Thinking that someone could break into the room in my basement apartment that I don’t use, and is street-facing, killing me, and then escaping, frightens me. Plus, there are no cameras around my building, and the windows don’t even lock properly. Okay, I’m going to shut up about that. But that doesn’t negate the fact that home invasion films get to me now. So, naturally, when researching some New French Extremity films for November, I figured I should finally break the seal and watch Ils, as it’s known in the States, Them.
Ils follows school teacher Clémentine (Olivia Bonamy) and her boyfriend Lucas (Michaël Cohen), who recently relocated from France to a remote McMansion in Romania. Clémentine arrives home one night after work to a normal evening. She and Lucas eat dinner, watch TV, flirt a bit, and head to bed. That evening, while they’re asleep, Clémentine hears a noise outside. They go to investigate, which turns out to be the wrong move. The couple soon realizes the noise outside has made its way inside. A cat-and-mouse game ensues, forcing Clémentine and Lucas to do anything they can to survive the night. But it soon comes to light the thing inside might actually be things.
Supposedly, this film is based on true events. If IMDb Trivia is to be taken at face value, then this film is based on a couple that a group of teenagers brutally murdered. In retrospect, it’s difficult to believe a group of kids pulled this all off. Take the cold open of the film. There is a mother and daughter involved in a single-car crash. The mother goes to check under the hood and disappears. This leads her daughter to lock the doors. In a few seconds, the car’s hood is slammed shut, mud is slung at the car from both sides, and the street light goes out. So, knowing that teenagers are the ones to blame for this, it seems a bit far-fetched. Especially when we eventually see the kids. We’re supposed to believe they’re teenagers, but they look between the ages of eight and ten.
The film works best when it blends the line between natural and supernatural, and when it seems like there is only one antagonist inside. Writer/directors David Moreau and Xavier Palud can’t find their footing with what type of story they want to tell. Ils would have worked much better as a supernatural horror film rather than a home invasion film with teenagers. When Ils makes you question what lurks within the house is when it works best. The big reveal at the end feels a bit forced. Part of me wishes Moreau and Palud had taken the idea on which they based their story and gone the supernatural route.
That being said, the cat-and-mouse aspect of Ils is the most enjoyable. When Lucas is taken out of commission, Clémentine is forced to take matters into her own hands. Clémentine is fascinating to watch and makes, what feels like, choices anyone else would make. Her reactions feel more authentic than the actions people usually take in horror films. But there’s still something that feels off and stale about this movie. At just 74 minutes, Ils feels like it rolls the credits before it really gets going.
Many people consider this film New French Extremity, and I can understand that. Would I consider it NFE? No. This is just a plain home invasion horror film. The violence, setting, and action do nothing to classify that as extreme in any sense. Is it scary? Sure! Is the [limited] violence painful to watch? You bet! But it doesn’t push any boundaries or set out to tell something deeper than it does. Ils isn’t a bad film, but it’s far from being a great film.
Reviews
[REVIEW] My First Ever New French Extremity Film Was ‘Inside’ (2007)
Inside follows Sarah Scarangella (Alysson Paradis), a pregnant professional photographer who is still mourning the recent loss of her husband. On one unfortunate Christmas Eve, Sarah’s night is interrupted by an unknown woman (Béatrice Dalle). Not knowing who this woman is, Sarah refuses her entry. After taking a photo of this woman, and developing it, Sarah realizes she has a photo of this unknown woman from earlier in the day. Once Sarah thinks the woman is gone, she heads to bed. And that’s when all hell breaks loose. Bodies will drop, blood will flow, and babies will be birthed.
Over 10 years ago I saw my first New French Extremity film in college. I took a trip to the Family Video near my college apartment and scanned the aisles. It was the first time I was in charge of picking a movie for a movie night with some friends. Most of the people attending that evening were horror fans, so that’s the vibe I was going for. After walking around for about five minutes I saw it. The top left corner read DIMENSION EXTREME. The middle of the cover read INSIDE in thick red letter, right below that stated UNRATED. The image was someone grasping their pregnant stomach and a pair of sharp dirty scissors questionably close to her stomach. That’s the movie I picked. And that was the last time I was allowed to pick the movies for our movie nights.
Inside follows Sarah Scarangella (Alysson Paradis), a pregnant professional photographer who is still mourning the recent loss of her husband. On one unfortunate Christmas Eve, Sarah’s night is interrupted by an unknown woman (Béatrice Dalle). Not knowing who this woman is, Sarah refuses her entry. After taking a photo of this woman, and developing it, Sarah realizes she has a photo of this unknown woman from earlier in the day. Once Sarah thinks the woman is gone, she heads to bed. And that’s when all hell breaks loose. Bodies will drop, blood will flow, and babies will be birthed.
Written by Alexandre Bustillo and directed by Julien Maury and Alexandre Bustillo, Inside would kick off an excellent career for these two French filmmakers. Brutal, sad, and one of the bloodiest films of all time, Inside is a film that needs to be seen to be believed. Like Calvaire, what makes Inside work so well, besides the tight script and great direction, is the pacing. Instead of a prolonged leadup to a barrage of violence and gore, Inside doles its violence out like a symphony. Each act perfectly leads into the next with the precision you don’t usually see in a debut feature film. The majority of the extreme violence happens to Sarah, which puts a lot of pressure on Alysson Paradis. Paradis sells her performance like Jordan Belfort selling a pen. Her responses are brutal and heartbreaking, while still being extremely grounded.
The special effects makeup department is too vast to list and will eat up my entire word count, but words cannot describe how visceral the practical effects are. From the most minor cut from a mirror to the stairway scene, you can’t help but feel like you’re watching something you should not be watching.
If you haven’t seen the film then this next part will be a huge spoiler, but we need to talk about it. Bustillo’s script takes an unexpected turn toward the end of the film. We learn the reason La Femme is attacking Sarah is due to a car accident. Sarah caused a car accident that took the life of La Femme’s child, killing her unborn baby. La Femme wants Sarah’s baby as reparations. Towards the end of the film, one of the cops who was presumed dead (he was shot with a riot gun) wakes up. His vision is hindered by the riot gun causing him to accidentally attack Sarah instead of La Femme. This attack breaks Sarah’s water, and La Femme kills the cop. Now, Sarah is on the stairs and her baby isn’t coming out–that’s where the scissors come back into play. La Femme has to perform a C-section on Sarah with the scissors, and it is, simply put, gnarly. The film ends with La Femme looking at Sarah’s dead body as she rocks the baby.
This ending is beyond heartbreaking. La Femme’s character almost has a complete turnaround. It’s hard to tell if she’s crying because she has the baby or because she did end up killing Sarah. My personal belief is that it all became too real once she had to kill the cop. If the cop hadn’t broken her water and forced the birth, would La Femme have gone through with this at this point? It’s up to interpretation, but I believe La Femme had repented her actions by that point. That doesn’t make it any better, though.
Next to Martyrs, Inside has one of the most heartbreaking endings of any New French Extremity film. While it’s a difficult watch, it’s an excellent film to rewatch as a case study on how to write an antagonist. To boot, Sarah was La Femme’s antagonist. Sarah was the one who caused the termination of La Femme’s pregnancy–so in a way, this is a revenge film. Bustillo’s script pulls the rug out from all preconceived notions. We thought we were watching one film when in reality, we were being expertly misled by the person we thought was the narrator. It’s a bold move for a debut.
Bustillo and Maury are still going strong in the genre. Their most recent film, The Soul Eater, recently had its premiere at Fantasia Fest. Like Inside, The Soul Eater was gory and violent, while focusing on an overall story that takes precedent. It’s impressive to see bits and pieces of Inside in The Soul Eater, while also adding all the bits and pieces of lessons they’ve learned over their six previous films. Inside is, to me, the best example of New French Extremity; it’s true stomach-churning, gut-wrenching, bloody as hell terror.