Connect with us

Reviews

The Good, the Bad, and the Chase Scenes of ‘Scream VI’: A Spoiler-y Review

Published

on

A horror movie set in New York City during Halloween might not seem like a new idea, but it is for the Scream franchise – and it’s exactly where and when the latest installment takes place. It feels fresh and new – even if there are too many trees for it to be NYC.

Screaming from the Beginning

I first saw Scream when I rented it on VHS from Blockbuster and watched it in my childhood friend’s bedroom. It was love at first watch. To say these movies are vital to me is an understatement. They are the reason I got into horror and the reason I want to write about it. They are why I’m here, over 25 years later, to review Scream VI.

The sixth installment of Scream has me feeling lots of things. It has some of the franchise’s best chase scenes, but some plot points felt slightly phoned in. So, let’s dig in…

Spoilers ahead!

For a spoiler-free review, click here.

Advertisement

Scream VI Opening Scene

The opening didn’t work for me. I know a lot of people love it, but for me, it wasted Samara Weaving. God, can she scream, though. Plus, it cut all tension once it became Ghostface stalking Ghostface.

So what? Who cares if this new Ghostface gets stabbed and killed by another, different Ghostface? This reveal should’ve happened later in the movie – delivering a twist that multiple Ghostfaces are stalking our beloved Core Four.

This opening undercut the tension almost as much as Scream 4’s did—but that movie, my third favorite of the series, proves I can dislike the opening scene and still love the movie.

Action-Packed Ghostface Chase Scenes

The biggest thing this newest installment has going for it is the pace. The movie never feels dull or slow and earns its more-than two-hour run time. It rarely ever slows down, with chase scene after chase scene.

Fairly quickly after learning Ghostface is back, our new final girls Tara (Jenna Ortega) and Sam (Melissa Barrera) get attacked by Ghostface, who chases them into a bodega, murdering everyone who gets in his way. Ortega’s crying face is unbeatable—she’s so tiny and looks so young, and how she was shivering and crying had me terrified for her.

Advertisement

We also got to see Ghostface brandish a shotgun. While most Ghostfaces wait for their reveal to pull out a gun, this one pulls it out right at the beginning. It’s intense; it’s brutal—a perfect first big chase scene for the sisters.

Another entertaining chase scene took place in the apartment. Having Ghostface in a small (albeit big for NYC) apartment attacking such a large group really worked. The whole scene had me panicked. Everyone should’ve fought back but was too scared to think clearly.

The apartment massacre leads to an incredibly tense moment involving a ladder with a cruel and brutal end.

Once we were shown our characters entering the subway, the scene still felt tense, even though it was nearly fully shown in the trailer. The film got to have fun with everyone in their Halloween costumes, putting a zillion wannabe Ghostfaces on the train; it was all A++.

Does Gale Weathers Die in Scream VI?

Gale’s moment in her colossal apartment rivals Sarah Michelle Gellar’s in I Know What You Did Last Summer —and I genuinely don’t know a better chase scene. Courteney Cox can sell the terror and cunning of a final girl like no other.

Advertisement

Gale’s new boyfriend gets killed, and she doesn’t skip a beat, jumping into action to hit Ghostface with a frying pan and grab her gun. Gale is smart; she isn’t going to pause to grieve her new man’s death, knowing Ghostface could get her at any moment. It is a scene that could be a short, standalone horror film.

The “That’s why I’m gonna shoot you in the fucking head” line from the Scream VI trailer is so iconic, but the absolute best part was what came next. Gale calmly, politely said, “Can you hold, please?” Then, she *69-ed his ass to find out where Ghostface was hiding. It was a moment of pure Scream greatness.

Once Gale got stabbed a second time, I had tears in my eyes, positive she was done for. I’m embarrassed at what the friends beside me witnessed (me acting foolish in my reclining seat).

Thankfully, Gale survives.

How Does Scream VI End?

The final act of every Scream movie is where shit goes down, and this one was no different. Our group is chased around the shrine (more on that later), stabbed, and shot. Our three Ghostfaces stalk the last three standing and “kill” Chad (Mason Gooding). They also shoot and stab returning fan-favorite Kirby (Hayden Panettiere). It was some top-tier action.

Advertisement

It all leads up to the sisters having an incredibly badass final fight with their three attackers, and it’s very satisfying to watch Sam running out of bullets and not skipping a beat before charging the last Ghostface standing.

The Scream Legacy

Scream VI made me realize we are ready to move on from the original characters and storylines. Without the legacy stuff and characters, it still would’ve worked. The shrine was such an excellent idea and looked fantastic, but it was underwhelming. The way it’s shown in the trailer is about as much as it’s featured in the movie. It’s, unfortunately, just a setting with no fundamental importance.

On the bright side, Kirby was a delight to see again! Her scene with Mindy (Jasmine Savoy-Brown) discussing horror movies was fun. But she was used as more of a red herring than anything else. It was still a joy to see her, though, and while she probably should’ve died from her wounds, I’m glad she lived.

Gale is where I want to scream (get it?). As our final girls leave the precinct post-bodega attack, they encounter my beloved.

The Return of Gale Weathers in Scream VI

Gale has gone through some significant character development since the first movie. In a lesser-written series, she would’ve been killed in the first film, punished for her ambition and sharp wit. But Scream is no lesser horror franchise, so here she is, all these years later.

Advertisement

We learn that the Carpenter sisters hate Gale because she wrote another Ghostface book, contrary to what she said at the end of the last movie. She even called Sam “unstable” in her newest book. She also, for some reason, stopped being a morning show host and now is back to being a reporter chasing stories.

One moment saw Sam going to punch her, and Gale jumping out of the way, referencing the first two films, only for Tara to land her punch. This is a funny bit that leads to a funnier bit later when Tara apologizes, and Gale smiles, telling her she’s not actually sorry.

But why are we backpedaling on Gale’s character development? Gale is dynamic, Gale is brilliant, Gale is witty, and Gale is ambitious—after all, she is the only one trying actively to solve these crimes in the first three films! Sure, Gale can be read as “bitch,” but that’s the lamest, most basic reading on the character.

We needed one or two lines of dialogue explaining that this is because she’s grieving over her loss from the previous movie. (RIP Dewey)

I think it’s time to officially pass the torch and stop putting Sidney (who wasn’t in this one for shitty pay reasons) and Gale in danger. They don’t deserve to keep getting stabbed. I want my favorite final girls to get their happy endings.

Advertisement

Who Dies in Scream VI?

Don’t ask me to pick a favorite kill because I couldn’t possibly – but shouldn’t more people have died? The only character from the core group that died at the hands of Ghostface was Mindy’s wonderful new girlfriend, Anika (Devyn Nekoda).

Gale, Kirby, and Chad all had death scenes. Chad more than anyone—the sisters watched him die, then ran off. The movie was a wild ride, but you realize how few people died once it’s over. Sam’s shitty therapist? Okay, sure. The nice man working in the bodega who tries to save Sam and Tara? Yeah, he died too.

I also am giving them the benefit of the doubt here because I am a big proponent of having random characters survive so their kill can mean more in the next film (hello, Joo-dee), so maybe Scream 7 will be an absolute bloodbath.

Overall

There are no bad Scream movies, and this one is no different. It’s an action-packed, fast-paced thrill ride from start to finish. It may have flaws, but it’s worth the price of admission. I know that the moment it goes up on streaming, I’ll rewatch Gale’s chase scene every night before bed for at least a week.

Are you craving more Scream content? Check out my Ghostface ranking, or find out which character from the Scream universe you are based on your horoscope.

Advertisement

If you have a favorite Ghostface chase scene, let us know in the comments below! See Scream VI in theaters now.

Ian Carlos Crawford grew up in southern New Jersey and has an MFA in non-fiction writing. His favorite things are Buffy, Scream, X-Men, and pugs. His writing has appeared on sites like BuzzFeed, NewNowNext, Junkee, and other random corners of the internet. He currently hosts a queer Buffy and Marvel focused pop culture podcast called Slayerfest 98 and co-hosts a horror podcast called My Bloody Judy.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Reviews

[Review] ‘Mother!’ (2017) Is the Greatest Movie of the 21st Century

Published

on

Please give me a few minutes of your time as I take a weird deep dive into my favorite movie of all time. Darren Aronofsky’s Mother! is an incredibly divisive film, and I will never refute that. When I was thinking about what angle I wanted for this review, I was coming up blank. Jennifer Lawrence’s Mother is a compelling and beautifully written character so I knew it would fit this month’s theme. Cut to my 51st viewing of the film a few nights ago, a multi-hour call with a very good friend, and three pots of coffee…that’s when I found my angle.

For those who are unaware, the infinite monkey theorem states that if a monkey is given a typewriter and an unlimited amount of time, it will eventually write the entire works of Shakespeare. Even though NPR tried to disprove that, it still feels possible. If there was truly an unlimited amount of time, how could it not happen? But here’s where I have issues with this idea: who is the monkey, and who is the typewriter? Does Mother have the agency to actually change the outcome of her story? Is Him a passive observer? Does Him’s reactions to Mother’s actions dictate her next steps? And what can the death of first Mother/Foremother (Sarah-Jeanne Labrosse) and the awakening of third Mother/Maiden (Laurence Leboeuf) tell us? Join me as I try to decipher whatever the hell this movie is.

Mother! follows Mother, who awakens post-death from Foremother. Mother wanders around the house before being intercepted by Him. Him is a writer who has been frustrated by a bout of writer’s block. Man (Ed Harris) shows up out of the blue and is soon followed by Woman (Michelle Pfeiffer). After their two kids Youngest Brother (Brian Gleeson) and Oldest Son (Domnhall Gleeson) show up, and a fight ensues, one of them dies. This leads to a wild party to celebrate the deceased’s life in which Him eventually gets Mother pregnant. Him overcomes his writer’s block which leads to the downfall of everything.

When I first saw Mother! I was stunned. What started, on the film’s opening day, as a half-full theater ended with me and my friend sitting in a tearful silence. I went back the next day with another friend (the one I had a multi-hour phone call with for this piece) and watched the movie again. We both sat in stunned silence as the credits rolled. Thanks to being a MoviePass member (when it was still a movie a day), I was able to see Mother! every single day for the next five days. I have never had a theatrical experience like I did with this film. What was equally stunning was that Paramount Pictures had the guts to distribute a film like this.

Aronofsky has been very tightlipped about all of the intricacies of Mother!, and that’s okay. Frustrating, but okay. Here’s what we know. There are three main ideas behind Mother! and that is 1) the story of an artist and their muse 2) the destruction of Mother Earth and the most on-the-nose allegory 3) Him is God and Mother is Mary. While these ideas have been talked about to death, I want to look into how the infinite monkey theorem works here and how Him is experiencing one of the wildest examples of insanity seen in film.

Advertisement

Let’s take note of what we can infer as well as what is directly told to us. In the beginning, we see Foremother burn to death/explode the same way that Mother does. Maiden ends the film by turning over and saying, “Baby” as Mother does. Mother’s recitation of “Baby” is quite different from Maiden’s delivery. When we hear Mother say the line it sounds partially panicky, partially forlorn. Maiden’s almost sounds calm and accepting. To me, Mother’s delivery of the line almost feels like she’s calling out for the recently deceased child while Maiden’s call is toward Him.

The wording of this may sound offensive, but it is simply used in conjunction with the infinite monkey theorem. For the sake of my argument, I believe that Mother is the monkey. When I started writing this piece, I thought that Him might be the monkey until I realized I was wrong. The actual inciting incident of Mother! is when Man and Woman destroy the crystal. (The metaphorical biting of the apple.) Him is not just testing Mother, Him is also testing Man and Woman. When Him, Man, Woman, and Mother are sitting around the table drinking coffee, Mother brings out some snacks. One of the snacks is a bowl of what looks like cookies and two singular slices of fruit that look very similar to apples.

One can imply that Him is watching Man and Woman closely because he yearns for the romance he feels between them. I think he’s intently watching to see if they go for the two apples. Him has put Man and Woman in this scenario before and they have failed; here they have passed. It’s not until the breaking of the crystal that all hell [literally] breaks loose.

We see moments of reflection and acknowledgment in some actions. When Mother is asked by Him if Man can stay the night she replies with, “Of…course.” A tinge of sadness echoes through the line and she chokes on her words. When Man sees the crystal he asks if it was a gift from Mother and she replies with a singular, “No.” Again, her voice cracks, she sounds like she wants to cry. It’s almost as if she has been asked this before and something inside of Mother is telling her it was Foremother’s heart she was looking at.

There are countless examples of these moments that crossover between timelines. One can assume that if a monkey will eventually type the entire works of Shakespeare, it will also type a few of the same lines over and over. Multiple moments coexist within these different timelines, and something in Mother is letting her know that.

Advertisement

Him is God. The Great Storyteller. The most egotistical man that can exist. The true definition of good and evil. But is he writing Mother’s story or is she in charge of her own destiny? When Mother wakes up, she wanders around the house. She makes her way to the front door, opens it, and steps outside. Before she can take any further steps, as it can be interpreted as she wanted to continue walking, Him stops her. (This raises another question of whether or not she can exist outside of the confines of this astonishingly octagonal house.) It’s clear that Him remembers everything that happens with previous Mothers, but how far will he go to ensure Mother goes the path he truly wants?

Later in the day, Mother goes to one of the walls in the house to paint it. She puts muted yellow paint on the wall but doesn’t seem content with it. Mother puts her hand on the wall and sees the heart beating inside of it, a small amount of decay starts to grow. This prompts her to sprinkle a yellow substance in the paint for a more vibrant yellow, and she seems happy with the choice. This is one of many examples of the house speaking to Mother, warning her of potential mistakes.

Mother’s body fights back multiple times when she makes the wrong decision. Once Man is in the house, she goes to make tea. A cup is dropped and shattered, which sends a terrible ringing through her ears and a painful tightening of her chest. We know the crystal that reinvents the house is created upon the death of each Mother.

Later, Mother goes to the basement to grab sheets for Man after agreeing he can stay the night. As she grabs the sheets, the furnace kicks in. This seems to imply her decision to agree to Man’s stay is a mistake that Foremother made (which we know led to her demise). That same night, she flicks Man’s lighter off the dresser, which causes another bout of intense ear ringing and reveals a sliver of a charred floor. Once Woman is there, Mother finds Woman and Man making out. This reveals more of the charred floor.

Interestingly, we get a moment of Mother possibly making a choice previous Mothers have not. Mother and Woman go to the basement and Woman makes fun of Mother’s plain underwear. After Woman leaves the basement, Mother sees a pair of Woman’s bright yellow underwear sticking out of the washer. Mother throws the underwear behind the washer (presumably to save it and use at a later date) but there’s no furnace sound. Has she finally made a good decision?

Advertisement

After the brothers arrive and have their tiff, Mother is left alone in the house to clean up. The spot where Younger Brother died has now turned into a goopy hole that reveals the then-blocked-off furnace. She rests her head on the wall while emptying the bloody water bucket, and we see the heart again. It’s decaying more and more.

Mother is still making the wrong decisions.

What does all of this tell us? Mother has a certain amount of agency. But also that previous mother’s soul wants her to succeed. We don’t know how many times Him has gone through this series of events, we only know that it hasn’t worked up to this point. We also don’t know what he wants. When Mother becomes pregnant, Him gets over his writer’s block and writes the New Testament. I believe that he’s completely Id-driven at this point. Him lost sight of what he needed to do and remembers the fame that comes with his writings.

The last thing Him says to Mother before she perishes is, “You were home.” As with nearly everything in this film that can have two meanings. Was that line meant to imply that Mother was in her rightful home? Did he think that she was the one who would end this cataclysmic cycle of pain and torment? Or was he saying that Mother was home? Is this his smooth-talking way of getting her heart to retroactively find solace in his love to turn into the crystal he so desperately needs to make Maiden? 

Mother! has an undeniably dense amount of layers that become increasingly apparent with each viewing. As I finish this article I have the film on in the background and I’m noticing more pieces of evidence that make my point more apparent. An argument could possibly be made that Him is the monkey and Mother is the typewriter but that all falls down to perspective and selective examples.

Advertisement

If there’s one thing I can leave you with, it’s that Mother! is one of the most important films of the 21st century. With the recent death of David Lynch, many people feel that art in Hollywood is truly dead. Few filmmakers can make a truly astounding piece of art that transcends time with the conversation it creates. Darren Aronofsky’s Mother! is a film that will be discussed for decades, if not centuries. That is unless we completely destroy Mother Earth and destroy it from the inside out.

Continue Reading

Reviews

[REVIEW] SXSW 2025: ‘Drop’ It’s Hard Not to Fall for This One

Drop is a surprisingly cool take on domestic abuse survivors woven into a thrilling narrative of a woman who is forced into a situation where she can trust no one. A single mother who survived an abusive ex-husband goes on her first date in years. She soon discovers that her first-date jitters are the least of her worries when she begins receiving anonymous drops on her phone. As the drops get more terrifying, she soon realizes that her son and sister’s lives hang in the balance as a mysterious tormentor forces her to carry out a chilling plan on her date.

Drop is fun, sophisticated, dangerous, and over the top in all the right ways. It is definitely worth checking out in a theater to see all of the jaw-dropping mayhem unfold. 

Published

on

Many genre fans know Christopher Landon from his wildly popular slashers (like Happy Death Day, Freaky) and his time in the Paranormal Activity universe. Because he’s carved out a name for himself in these two very different horror arenas, most of us leaned in when we heard Drop would be a thriller. I’m happy to report that Landon’s newest film has the energy of Wes Craven’s Red Eye. Elder millennials like myself might also feel a similar vibe to Robert Zemeckis’ What Lies Beneath chaotic conclusion. It is the kind of thriller that’s unafraid to go off the rails and swing big. Luckily, the payoff is huge and a compelling entry to an overstuffed subgenre. Drop breathes new life into the first-date-gone-wrong films and reinvigorates the mystery genre. It feels like a Hitchcockian fever dream filtered through a modern day lens. 

A Fresh Take on the Thriller Genre

Drop is a surprisingly cool take on domestic abuse survivors woven into a thrilling narrative of a woman who is forced into a situation where she can trust no one. A single mother who survived an abusive ex-husband goes on her first date in years. She soon discovers that her first-date jitters are the least of her worries when she begins receiving anonymous drops on her phone. As the drops get more terrifying, she soon realizes that her son and sister’s lives hang in the balance as a mysterious tormentor forces her to carry out a chilling plan on her date.

Violet (Meghann Fahy) wins us over immediately. We have all either been an abused woman, witnessed the abuse, or have seen the end results in the news. So, we instinctively want to root for her as Fahy begins making her a relatable survivor. She’s funny, smart, cool, and grounded and is easily everything more women characters should be. Fahy is also captivating as she drives this film to the out-of-this-world ending while having so much thrown on her plate. She navigates the humor, guilt, fear, and shame spiral as she ascends to her place as a badass. I also appreciate that while Violet’s past is central to the story, she is never a helpless victim. It is giving a final girl who survived her slasher and will carry those lessons with her instead of starting at square one for the sequels.

Her supporting cast is also very fun and filled with red herrings that make you doubt your prime suspect. Is the culprit her hot date, Henry (Brandon Sklenar), who has been very patient and understanding with a woman he is only meeting in person for the first time? Is it the cool bartender Cara (Gabrielle Ryan) who has kept an eye on Violet’s date? Or is it the many other characters she has encountered in this fancy restaurant? Because Drop is a proper mystery, it makes everyone seem like the perfect suspect. Which I enjoy as someone who sees a lot of predictable movies just lazily hand you the culprit in the first five minutes. 

Stunning Cinematography Elevates the Mystery

Another thing working in Drop’s favor is Marc Spicer’s sexy cinematography. The film is a feast for the eyes as it continually pans the opulent restaurant. The use of reflections captured in windows is stunning. The camera work adds a layer of spectacle that supports the narrative and makes it impossible to look away for a second out of fear you might miss another cool angle or shot. Jillian Jacobs and Christopher Roach have written a tight whodunnit that works on its own. However, the dazzling visuals are the icing on the decadent cake. 

Drop is fun, sophisticated, dangerous, and over the top in all the right ways. It is definitely worth checking out in a theater to see all of the jaw-dropping mayhem unfold. 

Drop falls into theaters on April 11.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Horror Press Mailing List

Fangoria
Advertisement
Advertisement