Connect with us

Reviews

‘Knock At The Cabin’ (2023) Review

Published

on

Are you there God? It’s me, Dave Bautista.

A New Movie From Director M. Night Shyamalan

M. Night Shyamalan’s movies make me feel weird. Not weird in the sense that they astound me or are bafflingly strange or terrifically bad, simply that they don’t seem to hit me with their divisiveness.

Since I was a young filmgoer on Al Gore’s internet, I have heard every joke about M. Night Shyamalan’s career. We all know the man has an exaggerated reputation. Once Hollywood’s darling, now its greatest punching bag, I genuinely feel apprehensive about covering his work because of the unnecessary aggression many people have towards him and his filmmaking, both in defense and in attacking his oeuvre. There’s a need among critics at this point to mythologize Shyamalan’s work in a way that is, honestly, just kind of annoying.

The Emotional Disconnect of Shyamalan’s Horror Films

Because I sometimes feel mentally broken looking at them. Especially with his horror films, and especially waiting for my hatred or love of them to sink in. And neither happens. They’re just fine. Even The Happening, reviled as one of the best “so-bad-its-good” horror movies, is sort of just a void to me. I’ve seen it twice, and it doesn’t do much either way.

They’re okay. Devil was fine. The Visit was fine. Split was fine. Everything he does to me, is just fine.

Advertisement

All of this very long preamble is to say my voice as a critic tells me Knock at the Cabin is much of the same, and if you have strong inclinations about Shyamalan’s filmmaking like many do, this film is a pendulum that will swing in your direction.

A Cast of Heavy Hitters Led by Dave Bautista

For the uninformed, Knock at the Cabin is based on the acclaimed Paul Tremblay novel The Cabin at the End of the World. It follows couple Eric (Jonathan Groff) and Andrew (Ben Aldridge) who, while on vacation with adopted daughter Wen (Kristen Cui), find themselves besieged by a doomsday cult that holds them captive. Led by the awkward giant of a man, Leonard (Dave Bautista), and united by visions of the apocalypse that force them to choose which among them will be sacrificed to stop the world’s end.

This cast, rightfully, piqued a good deal of people’s interests. Many have been curious to see Bautista take on more serious roles, and for those excited about that prospect, you will enjoy yourself. He wonderfully inhabits the character of Leonard, a violently neurodivergent doomsayer burdened by a task he believes wholeheartedly. The role is meaty enough for him to work with but not so distracting that he detracts from anyone else in the cast. His companions, played by Nikki Amuka-Bird, Rupert Grint, and Abby Quinn, are also good, barring some awkward line deliveries, but we’ll get back to them soon.

Strong Chemistry, Underutilized Characters

As for Eric and Andrew, Groff and Aldridge have undeniable onscreen chemistry, making a very believable pair; Aldridge is the calloused human rights attorney, while Groff is his much more softhearted husband, and the two balance each other nicely. But for some reason, the two are not particularly compelling in their struggle until their final scene together, which itself is marred by some ham-fisted dialogue despite being ultimately touching. I think it’s because the movie doesn’t give them much to do until the final act, with most of their speaking lines coming from flashbacks to difficult times in Eric and Andrew’s relationship. As a result, much of the onus to entertain and astound is on Bautista’s suicide cult.

Advertisement

The Cult’s Dynamic: A Missed Opportunity

And that’s another hiccup. One of the conceits of how the cult operates hurts what I like the most about the supporting cast; their nervous energy works well off one another, with all the actors’ dread bouncing off electrically as they trade lines. But it doesn’t last that long because…

They begin killing each other to initiate the very real plagues that will destroy everything. Which is an interesting idea, but in practice deprives us of a lot of great character interactions that I’m assuming were in the book and condensed down to a sub-2-hour runtime. While those developments on the ground shaking and the sky falling can be scary, it seems to ignore the human interactions we’re here for.

A Serviceable Script with Thematic Depth

The script is tight, and serviceable for the most part, except for some strange line choices. Thematically the movie isn’t overly ponderous or paper thin, it communicates its thoughts on the thin line that can sometimes appear between faith and delusion quite well, and the weight of the sacrifice is never diminished. The choice to utilize flashback segments wasn’t one I can outright call bad, but they don’t add enough of an emotional punch, or at least don’t add anything that wasn’t already present. The script is fine.

An original score that can ratchet up some of the tension in a film where it’s not always present is an aspect of the film I can appreciate. As far as technical praise goes, the lighting works in tandem with the set design nicely. On the other hand, there’s somewhat obnoxious camerawork that emphasizes a lot of very dire close-ups of characters. The movie opens with one of these, and it’s a few minutes long, shot reverse shot of two faces right next to each other. I understand what they’re trying to communicate, Leonard encroaching on Wen’s space and getting down to her level, but it just feels too literal, and the insistence on pulling in on every character’s face at least once gets tired.

Cinematography and Editing: Perfectly Fine

The editing is good, while some of the CGI is a bit distracting on a large scale and the small scale (I still don’t get why we’re using CGI blood for simple gunshot wound effects in 2023, but I know that’s just a personal gripe). Can you guess which two words I would ascribe to the cinematography? Right-o, reader: it’s fine.

Advertisement

I’m torn, as usual. In the end, Wen’s promise to her jar of grasshoppers feels like a reflection of my thoughts on Knock At The Cabin: this movie felt like I was here to learn about these people, and learn I did. For some that will be enough; for others, this will be another exercise in disliking Shyamalan’s work. But at the end of the day, I’m not sure if this character study will stick with me, or if it has much rewatch value. It’s a thriller with its fair share of positives and negatives, but it is ultimately no world-rending serpent or rapturous hand of God when it comes to the genre. Still, it’s worth at least one watch, so check it out and see how you feel.

Luis Pomales-Diaz is a freelance writer and lover of fantasy, sci-fi, and of course, horror. When he isn't working on a new article or short story, he can usually be found watching schlocky movies and forgotten television shows.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Reviews

‘Cabin Fever 2: Spring Fever’ Review: A Meth Trip That Never Ends

Published

on

As a horror fan with no life, I watch a TON of horror movies. But, like nearly every horror fan, there are some films whose first viewing leaves deep impressions that will last a lifetime. I can remember where I was when I first watched House of Wax (2005), and The Evil Dead. Just to name a few. One film viewing that stuck with me most from my childhood was Cabin Fever. Probably because I watched it in a cabin in the Poconos during a once-in-a-lifetime snowstorm. While I condone little to nothing of what Eli Roth stands for nowadays, both personally and professionally, I cannot discount the effect his films had on me and my love of horror. Now, if we want to talk about a film I have apparently watched before and have zero recollection of? That would be Cabin Fever 2: Spring Fever.

What Is Cabin Fever 2: Spring Fever About?

John (Noah Segan) and Alex (Rusty Kelley) are two outcasts who find themselves on the short end of abuse from bullies and teachers alike. As prom approaches, the two friends have little hope for dates and are nearly resigned to spending the evening alone. The only chance John has for a date is his childhood crush, Cassie (Alexi Wasser), who is dating John’s biggest bully. After a series of events, catalyzed by Paul (Rider Strong) polluting a local water source, the kids of Springfield High are exposed to Paul’s deadly disease. One by one, the kids start infecting one another, leading to a prom that is bound to be bloodier than Carrie.

With a story from Randy Pearlstein and Ti West, a screenplay by Joshua Malkin, and directed by Alan Smithee (Ti West), Cabin Fever 2: Spring Fever is truly a sight to behold. Many parts of Cabin Fever 2 feel retconned to justify its connection to its predecessor. While other parts of it work deliciously within the Cabin Fever universe. It’s no coincidence that Ti West fought tooth and nail to get his name removed from this project. In fact, this might be the first Alan Smithee film I’ve covered for Horror Press (hell, maybe in general). Copious reshoots from producers turned Ti West’s vision into this slapdash product that feels tonally unsure of what the hell it is–Cabin Fever 2: Spring Fever is a goopy Frankenstein that exists in a better form on a cutting room floor somewhere…potentially lost to time forever.

Cabin Fever 2’s Biggest Problem is the Pacing

Most likely due to producer reshoots, one of the biggest sins of Cabin Fever 2 (and a general sin for film) is its pacing. CF2’s pacing starts like the final few minutes of a meth comedown, before slowly plateauing into meth fiending. Halfway through the film, brought to you by a great Patrick Hernandez “Born to be Alive” needle drop, we get our hands back on some meth. But that meth is stepped on and cut with something because the film goes completely off the rails. In both entertaining and excruciating ways.

After a solid Deputy Winston (Giuseppe Andrews) cold open, we’re given these gorgeous animated opening credits. These credits follow the source of Paul’s spread of the disease into a local water source, all the way through the bottling process, and ending in a bottle of water that’s delivered to Springfield High. And that’s when the film stops being remotely interesting.

Advertisement

Noah Segan Does His Best with a Bad Script

I’ve been a huge fan of Noah Segan for a long time. From Dead Girl and Scare Package, through The Pale Door and Blood Relatives, Noah Segan has always delivered for me. But even early-career Segan has a difficult time working through this awful dialogue that seems written on shoot day. Sure, Segan delivers the goods, but at what cost? His only remotely interesting early scenes exist between him and Cassie, and even those scenes only do so much to keep the viewer’s eyes glued to the screen. As the film goes on, and the action picks up, Segan finds his footing. Only it’s too little too late at that point.

But what’s a Cabin Fever film without skin-rippingly grotesque gore? The original film succeeded with crafting interesting (enough) characters that kept you enthralled until the crap finally hits the fan. Joshua Malkin’s script decides to throw all of that out of the window for whatever reason. Most of the character motivation from the first film is, indeed, sex. And there’s nothing wrong with having sex be a character’s motivating factor. But if those characters fail to be interesting in any way, shape, or form, then that’s where you have a product that will fall more flat than the skin of a degloved arm.

Ti West’s Visual Fingerprints and Where They Break Down

It’s somewhat hard to tell what was created by Ti West and what was crafted by producers, even if there is a slight tell. Many of the scenes have a distinct aspect ratio that feels very West-y. And that visual feel is kept through the entirety of the film, but with one distinct difference. Ti West has a very distinct shooting style that has carried through his entire career (except for you, MaXXXine). You can feel when the style is substantive and purposeful versus when a producer came in and was pigeonholed into shooting like that to keep visual continuity. The film’s visual tone becomes an overall detractor because, again, while it all looks the same, you can feel when it’s intended and when it’s done because they had to.

Is Cabin Fever 2: Spring Fever Worth Watching?

Overall, Cabin Fever 2: Spring Fever is a mess of a film. There are a handful of really great scenes of gore and violence, though it’s far from enough to make this product worthwhile. And screw the producers for not letting Ti West remove his name from this film. Even though my idol Larry Fessenden is in this film, I don’t think it’s worth a rewatch ever again. If you haven’t seen it, I don’t think I can even recommend it unless you’re a Ti West completionist. At least it’s better than Cabin Fever Patient Zero.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Film Fests

Overlook Film Festival: ‘Exit 8’ Review

Published

on

If you’re at the intersection of video games and horror, then you know not all video game film adaptations are created equally. For every Silent Hill (2006), Werewolves Within, or Detention (2019), there is a lot of heartbreak and titles we’re still trying to forget. Which is why, when Kotake Create’s beloved Exit 8 video game was tapped to become a film, we held our collective breath. How would this quick psychological nightmare transfer to a feature-length film? Would the filmmaker chosen understand the assignment? Luckily, the movie works overall, and horror and game nerds have another title in the win column. 

In Case You Missed It

Exit 8 puts gamers into the shoes of an unseen protagonist who is stuck in a subway station. Players soon realize that this location is not what it seems. They are also tasked with spotting anomalies in hopes of making it to the eighth level and (hopefully) back to the real world. Some of the anomalies are subtle, some are anxiety-inducing, and some leave you wanting to scream WTF? However, the game is a pretty quick introduction to liminal spaces and self-gaslighting. 

The film, written by Kentaro Hirase and Genki Kawamura, understands what made the game effective. They even keep and elevate some of the anomalies that were my personal favorites. The duo also builds three very distinct characters to keep us from sitting for 95 minutes of vibes.

Walking Man (Yamato Kochi) is not just the creepy guy making circles in this hallway with us in the film. He gets a full arc in his chapter that informs us he was a human who panicked and made the wrong choice. He is now doomed to spend eternity here as part of others’ nightmarish quests. While all of the performances are great, Kochi brings a humanity and sadness to the role that was unexpected. He finds ways of using his character’s repetitive nature as a way to add subtle layers. This makes the shift into his chapter feel more alive, frantic, and heartbreaking. We know this journey isn’t going to end well for him, but it’s hard not to fully invest and feel that heartbreak anyway. 

It’s Not All Great at Exit 8

Exit 8 plays with us in the beginning before shifting from first-person perspective to reveal our protagonist will be Lost Man (Kazunari Ninomiya). He and his girlfriend are having a moment when he ends up in this subway station on a loop. Their phone conversation reveals she’s pregnant, so Lost Man is having a bad day before getting stuck in liminal limbo. This, on its own, is fine. However, after a lot of laps, he meets The Boy (Naru Asanuma) and discovers he is not an anomaly.

Advertisement

The Boy ties Lost Man and Walking Man’s stories together. He tries to assist both of them on their journeys while being too afraid to speak for most of his screentime. Again, all of the performances are great, but a kid killing it with a mostly silent role is highly impressive. His relationship with these two broken and frightened men is believable and palpable. He and Lost Man specifically bond and form a lovely duo that, unfortunately, underscores the pregnant girlfriend to lead to a very pro-life message.

Exit 8’s Politics Derail the Horror

Kawamura directed the hell out of Exit 8, and it’s a good time. However, it’s hard to wash away the very heavy swerve into pro-life territory in 2026. Especially as a person with ovaries who lives in a country that doesn’t want me to have autonomy. Horror is political, and this game has so many things that could have been expanded on. The insertion of an anti-choice layer into a film centered on three male characters (at three very different stages of life) is wild. I personally hated it because, aside from that, it does capture the vibes of the game. It feels like watching someone piss in the lemonade on a hot summer day.

Continue Reading

Horror Press Mailing List

Fangoria
Advertisement
Advertisement