Connect with us

Reviews

‘GIVE ME AN A’: A Female Led Anthology for a Post Roe Versus Wade World

Published

on

Give Me An A celebrated its world premiere on October 16 at the seventh annual Brooklyn Horror Film Festival. All 15 segments in this horror anthology were written and directed by women and explore the post-Roe America that is hurtling toward us.

Roe v. Wade was a monumental Supreme Court ruling that the U.S. Constitution conferred the right to have an abortion, and struck down any statutes that criminalized abortion due to a person’s constitutional right to privacy. Its downfall was a watershed moment for women and the LGBTQ+ community. It opened the floodgates for discriminatory laws denying access to safe abortions, gender-affirming care, and other life-saving healthcare.

Give Me An A is an ambitious project that successfully encapsulates the frenzy and terror felt at this moment. At the post-screening Q&A, executive producer and director Natasha Halevi spoke about how the film was conceptualized, written, and filmed at breakneck speed in the weeks after the Supreme Court ruled to overturn Roe v. Wade.

And I am genuinely in awe of the power of women to Make Shit Happen and deliver a polished and nuanced work of art at a time when most of us have only just begun considering what a post-Roe society would look like. Even the first vignette tackles the immediate hopelessness felt during the early hours of June 24, 2022, and makes for an effectively disorienting introduction that I wouldn’t dare spoil for you. The breathlessly written stories in Give Me An A still feel meticulously crafted and are well performed, and you will see familiar faces in Virginia Madsen (Candyman), Alyssa Milano (Charmed), and Gina Torres (Firefly).  The film masterfully uses thriller, sci-fi, and body horror elements to explore the nightmare of a post-Roe reality. Some stories even play out as fantasies where poetic justice finally comes for The Patriarchy.

At its best, Give Me an A feels like a delirious Twilight Zone episode that takes place inside a woman’s mind for the past four months. And what have we been thinking about? Well, we explore the contradictory argument of life beginning at conception, as noted in the segment titled “God’s Plan.” We ask ourselves, “why is this all on us?” — the same question the women asked in “Vasectopia.” We lash out at The Man and men on our personal “Crucible Island.” But we are mostly preoccupied with our mistrust of institutions and each other, like the women in “The Last Store.”

Advertisement

Give Me an A is a smart, engaging, and timely body of work that we so desperately need during this crossroads in American history. My only critique is that the film often stumbled on attempts to explore how a post-Roe society will impact people of multiple marginalized identities, like women of color and trans people. The film also did not include transgender stories and was more concerned with giving cisgender men a comeuppance that neither empowers nor liberates us.

The weakest anthologies were the ones that were centered on cisgender men receiving some kind of 9 to 5 fantastical consequence instead of exploring more diverse stories of the post-Roe hell that awaits us. I was also disappointed in “Abigail” for making Black and Native women a silent chorus serving only to Z-snap and roll their necks in agreement when a fictional Abigail Adams reminds her husband to “remember the ladies.” This Hamilton-esque attempt at diversifying suffragette history glosses over white feminism’s shortcomings and is a painful dismissal of the disproportionate effects that restrictions to reproductive care will have on Black and Brown women.

But this criticism is coming from a place of genuine desire for more stories. Give Me an A is a necessary film and an electrifying call to action. I would welcome several Give Me An A volumes.  This issue touches all of us, and I want stories from more of us. We are only at the tip of the proverbial iceberg of this fight for bodily autonomy and the right to choose whatever life we want. Give Me An A rises to this occasion and can hopefully grow to include more voices in the fight for bodily autonomy.

Jenika McCrayer (she/her) is a writer and horror enthusiast based in Brooklyn, NY. Her adoration for the sociopolitical aspects of the genre inform her writing on gender, politics, and education.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Reviews

[REVIEW] The People Vs. ‘The Exorcism of Emily Rose’

The Exorcism of Emily Rose is a unique take on exorcism films. The film follows Erin Brunner (Laura Linney), a high-profile defense lawyer. Brunner is fresh off a murder case where her client was cleared of all charges–only for that client to turn around and commit another set of murders. In the hopes of becoming a partner at her law firm, Brunner is talked into taking the defense for Father Richard Moore (Tom Wilkinson). Father Moore finds himself in the hot seat after a series of exorcisms resulted in the death of Emma Rose (Jennifer Carpenter). The twist? Erin Brunner is agnostic! OooOOoooOh.

Published

on

The second film I wanted to cover, that’s “based on a true story”, is one that utterly fascinates me…and not for the right reasons. After Henry: Portrait of a Serial Killer, I felt let down. I am by no means a Henry Lee Lucas expert, but even with someone having the bare knowledge of the case, I couldn’t believe they dared to refer to it as having anything to do with the Confession Killer. Could The Exorcism of Emily Rose pull me out of this pit of despair? Can it get some basic information right? Ugh.

The Exorcism of Emily Rose is a unique take on exorcism films. The film follows Erin Brunner (Laura Linney), a high-profile defense lawyer. Brunner is fresh off a murder case where her client was cleared of all charges–only for that client to turn around and commit another set of murders. In the hopes of becoming a partner at her law firm, Brunner is talked into taking the defense for Father Richard Moore (Tom Wilkinson). Father Moore finds himself in the hot seat after a series of exorcisms resulted in the death of Emma Rose (Jennifer Carpenter). The twist? Erin Brunner is agnostic! OooOOoooOh.

This film brings us the dramatized events of Emily’s tragic final days through the setting of a courtroom drama. There’s something fun about this idea. It’s surprising this idea hasn’t been reused. Laura Linney and Tom Wilkinson are an excellent duo, they play off each other very well. If only the real-life lawyers were as likable as Erin Brunner (we’ll get there later). The real star of the show is Jennifer Carpenter. Tasked with doing justice to the real Emily Rose (Anneliese Michel), Carpenter handles her performance with class.

The story jumps back and forth between the courtroom and Emily’s experiences. There is great information for the film to base its script on, and it doesn’t do it interestingly. One of the most notorious pieces of evidence in this case is the leaked audio of the 67 exorcisms performed on Michel. The Catholic church did not release this audio until around 2011, but Carpenter does a great job of channeling the pain you can hear in the audio.

An interesting angle of the real Anneliese Michel story is how the lawyers were really trying to put the devil on trial. Unlike the film, Michel’s parents were also put on trial, as well as the two priests who initiated the exorcisms. Rather than the film’s dramatic guilty plea with time served as a sentence, the German justice department thought the parents had suffered enough and that the priests should just get fined. In reality, both the parents and the priests deserved to go to jail. The complete neglect of Anneliese’s ailments was thought nothing more than the dirty hands of the devil. Anneliese’s parents and the priests were the cause of her death. Their extreme beliefs in a bearded man in the sky trumped the reality of what was actually happening with their extremely sick daughter.

Advertisement

The film plays off Brunner as someone who needs to see the light. Brunner is put on this case to help rectify her previous case (the one where she got the murderer off without charges). God put her in Father Moore’s hands. So, by this logic, co-writer/director Scott Derrickson thinks that for one person to receive redemption, another must die. The Exorcism of Emily Rose is nothing more than religious propaganda. “What if god is real,” Erin Brunner asks the jury. Even if god is real, a young woman is dead! God isn’t on the chopping block, Father Moore is. This latter half of this film plays strictly to the Bible Belt.

Also, Erin Brunner is written as someone who can be redeemed and will be redeemed, a tragic character who has accepted greed over truth. Do you want to know who defended the Michels in real life? Lawyers who defended Nazis in the Nurenberg trials. Scott Derrickson can fuck right off.

Everything about this film feels like nothing more than Catholic-funded propaganda. Rather than owning up to their mistakes and accepting the punishment they deserved, the Michels and priests never had to answer for their true crimes. They left a young woman to die a truly horrible death and all got off with a slap on the wrist.

All of this went down around the same time as Vatican 2. The Catholics who were against Vatican 2 were hoping that they could find a way to prove that Anneliese was possessed because god wasn’t happy with the Vatican II overhaul. If they could prove god’s anger, they could use that as fuel to ensure Vatican II didn’t happen. Anneliese’s mother gaslit her into refusing the idea that her neurological issues could be the cause of all this. See, Anneliese wanted to be a teacher, but her mother forced her to believe that no one would hire her as a teacher if she had all of these issues. People won’t hire a crazy teacher.

Failed by those around her, Anneliese was posthumously deprived of any justice. If there is a god, I can only hope the Michels and the two priests do not meet him. Instead of breaking down all of these fascinating aspects of the case of Anneliese Michel, Scott Derrickson crafted a shell of a film. His lack of care for the source material is beyond disrespectful to Anneliese’s pain in her short time on earth. Scott Derrickson’s classless and [seemingly] Catholic-funded sophomore feature film is nothing more than a film that has a few solid scares that rely on you taking him at his word. For a film that starts with the title card “based on a true story,” there is not a lick of truth in this nearly two-hour film.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Reviews

[REVIEW] ‘Dreadstone: The Beginning’ Is a Gold Rush of Terror

Published

on

We continue to start our year by looking at short films that either ran their festival circuit in 2024 or will soon be running the festival circuit. Western horror is a subgenre that’s often overlooked, usually because it offensively centers around Native Americans attacking groups of white people who have taken over their land. Bone Tomahawk and The Burrowers are unfortunate examples of painting Natives in a negative light for the plight of the whites. Who knew all it would take for a well-done Western horror is an Italian director at the helm?

Dreadstone: The Beginning follows Jeb (Grid Margraf), a tired and weathered man who is left in charge of his non-verbal autistic daughter Adeline (Alexandra Boulas). Jeb finds himself in possession of a purple-glowing gem that may be more nefarious than meets the eye. The two traverse across harsh lands in search of the source of the gem. But things turn south when they find out what they were looking for may have answers to questions they never intended on asking.

Written by Avery Peck and Riccardo Suriano, and directed by Riccardo Suriano, Dreadstone: The Beginning is a fascinating start to a tale as old as time. Peck’s cinematography beautifully brings their words to life and effortlessly blends cosmic horror with the overwhelming fruitless nature of greed and the human condition. Cosmic and Western horror aren’t typically put together, but they work incredibly well with the ideas behind Dreadstone and its themes. Jeb’s gem is a practical MacGuffin and is a great stand-in for the concept of greed; this opulent-looking rock in a no-tech world. It’s a simple object that’s incredibly effective.

The frontier setting of Dreadstone works to create an isolating setting. This large setting singularly frames these two characters and makes them feel like the only people in the world. It isn’t until the film’s final shot that we realize they are definitely not the only people around. Dreadstone: The Beginning is a drastic change from Suriano’s previous film, Along Came Ruby. Besides the obvious time difference between these two films, Ruby sets itself as a Last of Us-like post-apocalyptic film, whereas Dreadstone: The Beginning sets itself to possibly be a pre-apocalyptic film. These two films also differ in tone, but both films prove that Suriano is confident with his overall voice and vision.

Alexandra Boulas stars in both Along Came Ruby and Dreadstone: The Beginning. Boulas excels in both films but gives a more reserved and confident performance in Dreadstone. With the exception of a few moments, Boulas’ performance is silent…but commanding. Watching Ruby shows that Boulas can easily deliver lines, while Dreadstone proves there’s more to her acting than line delivery. Fingers crossed we see her in more films in the near future, I think she has a promising career ahead of her.

Advertisement

Dreadstone: The Beginning is a unique take on Western horror that forgoes the [racist] Native Americans against white people trope that the subgenre is fraught with. A touch of cosmic horror, a hint of coming-of-age, and a heaping spoonful of good ole greed make Dreadstone: The Beginning a short film that will stick with you long after the credits roll. I’ll tell you what…this made me look forward to Dreadstone: The Aftermath!

Continue Reading

Horror Press Mailing List

Fangoria
Advertisement
Advertisement